Review of Recent Studies on the Absolute and Relative Growth of Atlantic Bluefin Tuna: Similarities with the Pacific Bluefin Tuna

Abstract

[EN] This study aims to clarify some aspects of the growth of Atlantic bluefin tuna, Thunnus thynnus (L.), (ABFT) mainly regarding parameters of the growth equation and of relative growth, in this case length-weight relationships. There is a great volume of literature on these matters and there is a danger that the resulting confusion may give rise to mistaken decisions. In spite of the publication of 55 articles on absolute growth (FL > 50 cm), which contain a total of 43 growth equations, no consensus has yet been reached within the ABFT assessment group (AG) of the SCRS on parameters such as L-max and L-infinity. The results of the present study indicate that the L-infinity = 314.9 cm of the growth equation used for the western stock by the AG from 2010 (Lt = 314.9 [1 - e(-0.089 (t) (+ 1.13))]), which was discarded in 2016, lies within the confidence limits of the maximum Ls presented in this study (L-max= 321.4 +/- 8.7 cm), confirming that this equation fit the biology of the ABFT growth. With regard to the length-weight relationships, 38 articles (FL > 50 cm) have been consulted containing a total of 71 equations, but in spite of this the models adopted by the AG in 2014 underestimate the weight of spawners (>2 m) in high fattening phase by up to 23%. The coincidence of the length-weight model for the ABFT western stock, discarded by the AG in 2014, with that of Pacific bluefin tuna, Thunnus orientalis (T & S), (PBFT) indicates that both species must have the same growth, something that is not surprising since both were the same species until 2003. Other coincidences, such as the trend of condition factor K in adults and the growth in the first months of life, could ratify it. In the Pacific Ocean, where far fewer growth studies have been made on PBFT than on ABFT in the Atlantic and Mediterranean, the management of growth models for the purposes of stock assessment in the International Scientific Committee (ISC) makes more sense than that carried out by the SCRS on this matter.