Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Marco, Onofre | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Ródenas, Juan José | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Fuenmayor Fernández, Francisco-Javier | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Tur Valiente, Manuel | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-12-19T21:01:57Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-12-19T21:01:57Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.issn | 0178-7675 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/133375 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Gradient-based shape optimization processes of mechanical components require the gradients (sensitivity) of the magnitudes of interest to be calculated with sufficient accuracy. The aim of this study was to develop algorithms for the calculation of shape sensitivities considering geometric representation by parametric surfaces (i.e. NURBS or T-splines) using 3D Cartesian h-adapted meshes independent of geometry. A formulation of shape sensitivities was developed for an environment based on Cartesian meshes independent of geometry, which implies, for instance, the need to take into account the special treatment of boundary conditions imposed in non body-fitted meshes. The immersed boundary framework required to implement new methods of velocity field generation, which have a primary role in the integration of both the theoretical concepts and the discretization tools in shape design optimization. Examples of elastic problems with three-dimensional components are given to demonstrate the efficiency of the algorithms. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | The authors wish to thank the Spanish Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad for the financial support received through the project DPI2013-46317-R and the FPI program (BES-2011-044080), and the Generalitat Valenciana through the Project PROMETEO/2016/007. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Springer-Verlag | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Computational Mechanics | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | Cartesian grid-FEM | es_ES |
dc.subject | Sensitivity analysis | es_ES |
dc.subject | Velocity field | es_ES |
dc.subject | NURB | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | INGENIERIA MECANICA | es_ES |
dc.title | An extension of shape sensitivity analysis to an immersed boundary method based on Cartesian grids | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s00466-017-1522-0 | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//DPI2013-46317-R/ES/PERSONALIZACION DE IMPLANTES MEDIANTE MODELOS DE ELEMENTOS FINITOS A PARTIR DE IMAGENES MEDICAS 3D/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//BES-2011-044080/ES/BES-2011-044080/ | es_ES |
dc.relation.projectID | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//PROMETEO%2F2016%2F007/ES/Modelado numérico avanzado en ingeniería mecánica/ | es_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.date.embargoEndDate | 2019-10-31 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Mecánica y de Materiales - Departament d'Enginyeria Mecànica i de Materials | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Marco, O.; Ródenas, JJ.; Fuenmayor Fernández, F.; Tur Valiente, M. (2018). An extension of shape sensitivity analysis to an immersed boundary method based on Cartesian grids. Computational Mechanics. 62(4):701-723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1522-0 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.1007/s00466-017-1522-0 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 701 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 723 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 62 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 4 | es_ES |
dc.relation.pasarela | S\359276 | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Generalitat Valenciana | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad | es_ES |
dc.contributor.funder | Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Abel JF, Shephard MS (1979) An algorithm for multipoint constraints in finite element analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 14(3):464–467 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Akgün MA, Garcelon GH, Haftka RT (2001) Fast exact linear and nonlinear structural reanalysis and the sherman-morrison-woodbury formulas. Int J Numer Methods Eng 50(7):1587–1606 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Arora JS (1993) An exposition of the material derivative approach for structural shape sensitivity analysis. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 105(1):41–62 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Arora JS, Lee TH, Cardoso JB (1992) Structural shape sensitivity analysis: relationship between material derivative and control volume approaches. AIAA J 30(6):1638–1648 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Belegundu D, Zhang S, Manicka Y, Salagame R (1991) The natural approach for shape optimization with mesh distortion control. Technical report. Penn State University, State College | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bennett JA, Botkin ME (1985) Structural shape optimization with geometric problem description and adaptive mesh refinement. AIAA J 23(3):459–464 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bischof C, Carle A, Khademi P, Mauer A (1996) The adifor 2.0 system for the automatic differentiation of fortran 77 programs. IEEE Comput Sci Eng 3(3):18–32 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Braibant V, Fleury C (1984) Shape optimal design using b-splines. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 44(3):247–267 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bugeda G, Oliver J (1993) A general methodology for structural shape optimization problems using automatic adaptive remeshing. Int J Numer Methods Eng 36(18):3161–3185 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Cho S, Ha SH (2009) Isogeometric shape design optimization: exact geometry and enhanced sensitivity. Struct Multidiscip Optim 38(1):53–70 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Choi K, Kim N (2005) Structural sensitivity analysis and optimization, mechanical engineering series, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Choi KK, Chang KH (1994) A study of design velocity field computation for shape optimal design. Finite Elem Anal Des 15(4):317–341 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Choi KK, Duan W (2000) Design sensitivity analysis and shape optimization of structural components with hyperelastic material. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 187(1–2):219–243 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Choi KK, Twu SL (1989) Equivalence of continuum and discrete methods of shape design sensitivity analysis. AIAA J 27(10):1419–1424 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Choi MJ, Cho S (2014) Isogeometric shape design sensitivity analysis of stress intensity factors for curved crack problems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 279:469–496 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Chowdhury MS, Song C, Gao W (2014) Shape sensitivity analysis of stress intensity factors by the scaled boundary finite element method. Eng Fract Mech 116:13–30 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Doctor LJ, Torborg JG (1981) Display techniques for octree-encoded objects. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 1(3):29–38 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | El-Sayed MEM, Zumwalt KW (1991) Efficient design sensitivity derivatives for multi-load case structures as an integrated part of finite element analysis. Comput Struct 40(6):1461–1467 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Escobar JM, Montenegro R, Rodríguez E, Cascón JM (2014) The meccano method for isogeometric solid modeling and applications. Eng Comput 30(3):331–343 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Farhat C, Lacour C, Rixen D (1998) Incorporation of linear multipoint constraints in substructure based iterative solvers. Part 1: a numerically scalable algorithm. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43(6):997–1016 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fuenmayor FJ, Domínguez J, Giner E, Oliver JL (1997) Calculation of the stress intensity factor and estimation of its error by a shape sensitivity analysis. Fatigue Fract Eng Mater Struct 20(5):813–828 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Fuenmayor FJ, Oliver JL, Ródenas JJ (1997) Extension of the Zienkiewicz-Zhu error estimator to shape sensitivity analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 40(8):1413–1433 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gil AJ, Arranz-Carreño A, Bonet J, Hassan O (2010) The immersed structural potential method for haemodynamic applications. J Comput Phys 229(22):8613–8641 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Giner E, Fuenmayor FJ, Besa AJ, Tur M (2002) An implementation of the stiffness derivative method as a discrete analytical sensitivity analysis and its application to mixed mode in LEFM. Eng Fract Mech 69(18):2051–2071 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Griewank A, Juedes D, Utke J (1996) ADOL-C, a package for the automatic differentiation of algorithms written in C/C++. ACM Trans Math Softw (TOMS) 22(2):131–167 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ha SH, Choi K, Cho S (2010) Numerical method for shape optimization using T-spline based isogeometric method. Struct Multidiscip Optim 42(3):417–428 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Haftka RT (1993) Semi-analytical static nonlinear structural sensitivity analysis. AIAA J 31(7):1307–1312 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Haftka RT, Adelman H (1989) Recent developments in structural sensitivity analysis. Struct Optim 1(3):137–151 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Haftka RT, Barthelemy B (1989) Discretization methods and structural optimization—procedures and applications. In: Proceedings of a GAMM-Seminar October 5–7, 1988, Siegen, FRG, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, chap On the Accuracy of shape sensitivity derivatives, pp 136–144 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Haslinger J, Jedelsky D (1996) Genetic algorithms and fictitious domain based approaches in shape optimization. Struc Optim 12:257–264 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hughes TJR, Cottrell JA, Bazilevs Y (2005) Isogeometric analysis: CAD, finite elements, NURBS, exact geometry, and mesh refinement. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194:4135–4195 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Iman MH (1982) Three-dimensional shape optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 18(5):661–673 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Jackins CL, Tanimoto SL (1980) Oct-tree and their use in representing three-dimensional objects. Comput Graph Image Process 14(3):249–270 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kanninen MF, Popelar CH (1985) Advanced fracture mechanics. Oxford Engineering Science Series. Oxford University Press, Oxford | es_ES |
dc.description.references | van Keulen F, Haftka R, Kim N (2005) Review of options for structural design sensitivity analysis. Part I: linear systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(30–33):3213–3243 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kibsgaard S (1992) Sensitivity analysis-the basis for optimization. Int J Numer Methods Eng 34(3):901–932 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kiendl J, Schmidt R, Wüchner R, Bletzinger KU (2014) Isogeometric shape optimization of shells using semi-analytical sensitivity analysis and sensitivity weighting. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 274:148–167 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kirsch U (2002) Design-oriented analysis: a unified approach. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kunisch K, Peichl G (1996) Numerical gradients for shape optimization based on embedding domain techniques. Comput Optim 18:95–114 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lee BY (1996) Consideration of body forces in axisymmetric design sensitivity analysis using the bem. Comput Struct 61(4):587–596 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lee BY (1997) Direct differentiation formulation for boundary element shape sensitivity analysis of axisymmetric elastic solids. Int J Solids Struct 34(1):99–112 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Li FZ, Shih CF, Needleman A (1985) A comparison of methods for calculating energy release rates. Eng Fract Mech 21(2):405–421 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Li K, Qian X (2011) Isogeometric analysis and shape optimization via boundary integral. Comput Aided Des 43(11):1427–1437 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lian H, Bordas SPA, Sevilla R, Simpson RN (2012) Recent developments in the integration of computer aided design and analysis. Comput Technol Rev 6:1–36 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lian H, Kerfriden P, Bordas SPA (2016) Implementation of regularized isogeometric boundary element methods for gradient-based shape optimization in two-dimensional linear elasticity. Int J Numer Methods Eng 106(12):972–1017 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Liu L, Zhang Y, Hughes TJR, Scott MA, Sederberg TW (2014) Volumetric T-spline construction using boolean operations. Eng Comput 30(4):425–439 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Liu WK, Tang S (2007) Mathematical foundations of the immersed finite element method. Comput Mech 39(3):211–222 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Liu WK, Liu Y, Darell D, Zhang L, Wang XS, Fukui Y, Patankar N, Zhang Y, Bajaj C, Lee J, Hong J, Chen X, Hsu H (2006) Immersed finite element method and its applications to biological systems. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 195(13):1722–1749 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Marco O, Sevilla R, Zhang Y, Ródenas JJ, Tur M (2015) Exact 3D boundary representation in finite element analysis based on Cartesian grids independent of the geometry. Int J Numer Methods Eng 103:445–468 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Marco O, Ródenas JJ, Navarro-Jiménez JM, Tur M (2017) Robust h-adaptive meshing strategy considering exact arbitrary CAD geometries in a Cartesian grid framework. Comput Struct 193:87–109 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Meagher D (1980) Octree encoding: a new technique for the representation, manipulation and display of arbitrary 3-D objects by computer. Tech. Rep. IPL-TR-80-11 I, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Moita JS, Infanta J, Mota CM (2000) Sensitivity analysis and optimal design of geometrically non-linear laminated plates and shells. Comput Struct 76(1–3):407–420 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Nadal E (2014) Cartesian grid FEM (cgFEM): high performance h-adaptive FE analysis with efficient error control. Application to structural shape optimization. Ph.D. Thesis. Universitat Politècnica de València | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Nadal E, Ródenas JJ, Albelda J, Tur M, Tarancón JE, Fuenmayor FJ (2013) Efficient finite element methodology based on cartesian grids: application to structural shape optimization. Abstract and Applied Analysis 2013 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Navarrina F, López-Fontán S, Colominas I, Bendito E, Casteleiro M (2000) High order shape design sensitivities: a unified approach. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 188(4):681–696 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Neittaanmäki P, Salmenjoki K (1989) Comparison of various techniques for shape design sensitivity analysis. In: Computer aided optimum design of structures: recent advances. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 367–377 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Nguyen VP, Anitescu C, Bordas SPA, Rabczuk T (2015) Isogeometric analysis: an overview and computer implementation aspects. Math Comput Simul 117:89–116 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ozaki I, Kimura F, Berz M (1995) Higher-order sensitivity analysis of finite element method by automatic differentiation. Comput Mech 16(4):223–234 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pandey PC, Bakshi P (1999) Analytical response sensitivity computation using hybrid finite elements. Comput Struct 71(5):525–534 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Peskin CS (1977) Numerical analysis of blood flow in the heart. J Comput Phys 25:220–252 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Phelan DG, Haber RB (1989) Sensitivity analysis of linear elastic systems using domain parametrization and a mixed mutual energy principle. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 77(1–2):31–59 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Piegl L, Tiller W (1995) The NURBS book. Springer, New York | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Poldneff MJ, Rai IS, Arora JS (1993) Implementation of design sensitivity analysis for nonlinear structures. AIAA J 31(11):2137–2142 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Qian X (2010) Full analytical sensitivities in NURBS based isogeometric shape optimization. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 199(29–32):2059–2071 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rice JR (1968) A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks. J Appl Mech 35(2):379–386 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ródenas JJ (2001) Error de Discretización en el Cálculo de Sensibilidades mediante el Método de los Elementos Finitos. Ph.D. Thesis | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ródenas JJ, Fuenmayor FJ, Tarancón JE (2003) A numerical methodology to assess the quality of the design velocity field computation methods in shape sensitivity analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 59(13):1725–1747 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rodenas JJ, Tur M, Fuenmayor FJ, Vercher A (2007) Improvement of the superconvergent patch recovery technique by the use of constraint equations: the SPR-C technique. Int J Numer Methods Eng 70(6):705–727 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ródenas JJ, Bugeda G, Albelda J, Oñate E (2011) On the need for the use of error-controlled finite element analyses in structural shape optimization processes. Int J Numer Methods Eng 87(11):1105–1126 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rogers DF (2001) An introduction to NURBS: with historical perspective. Elsevier, London | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Schramm U, Pilkey WW (1993) The coupling of geometric descriptions and finite elements using NURBs a study in shape optimization. Finite Elem Anal Des 15(1):11–34 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sevilla R, Fernández-Méndez S, Huerta A (2011) 3D-NURBS-enhanced finite element method (NEFEM). Int J Numer Methods Eng 88(2):103–125 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sevilla R, Fernández-Méndez S, Huerta A (2011) NURBS-enhanced finite element method (NEFEM): a seamless bridge between CAD and FEM. Arch Comput Methods Eng 18(4):441–484 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Shiriaev D, Griewank A (1996) ADOL-F: automatic differentiation of fortran codes. Comput Differ Tech Appl Tools (SIAM) 1:375–384 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Shivakumar KN, Raju IS (1992) An equivalent domain integral method for three-dimensional mixed-mode fracture problems. Eng Fract Mech 42(6):935–959 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Silva CAC, Bittencourt ML (2007) Velocity fields using NURBS with distortion control for structural shape optimization. Struct Multidiscip Optim 33(2):147–159 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tur M, Albelda J, Nadal E, Ródenas JJ (2014) Imposing dirichlet boundary conditions in hierarchical cartesian meshes by means of stabilized lagrange multipliers. Int J Numer Methods Eng 98(6):399–417 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tur M, Albelda J, Marco O, Ródenas JJ (2015) Stabilized method to impose dirichlet boundary conditions using a smooth stress field. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 296:352–375 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wujek BA, Renaud JE (1998) Automatic differentiation for more efficient system analysis and optimization. Eng Optim 31(1):101–139 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Yang RJ, Fiedler MJ (1987) Design modelling for large-scale three-dimensional shape optimization problems. ASME Comput Eng 15:177–182 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Yoon BG, Belegundu AD (1988) Iterative methods for design sensitivity analysis. AIAA J 26(11):1413–1415 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zhang L, Gerstenberger A, Wang X, Liu WK (2004) Immersed finite element method. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 293(21):2051–2067 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zhang W, Beckers P (1989) Comparison of different sensitivity analysis approaches for structural shape optimization. In: Computer aided optimum design of structures: recent advances. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 347–356 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zhang Y, Wang W, Hughes TJR (2013) Conformal solid T-spline construction from boundary T-spline representations. Comput Mech 6(51):1051–1059 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zienkiewicz OC, Zhu JZ (1987) A simple error estimator and adaptive procedure for practical engineering analysis. Int J Numer Methods Eng 24(2):337–357 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zienkiewicz OC, Taylor RL, Zhu J (2013) The finite element method: its basis and fundamentals, 7th edn. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford | es_ES |