- -

Using UAV-Based Systems to Monitor Air Pollution in Areas with Poor Accessibility

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Using UAV-Based Systems to Monitor Air Pollution in Areas with Poor Accessibility

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Alvear-Alvear, Óscar es_ES
dc.contributor.author Zema, Nicola Roberto es_ES
dc.contributor.author Natalizio, Enrico es_ES
dc.contributor.author Tavares De Araujo Cesariny Calafate, Carlos Miguel es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-17T03:32:07Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-17T03:32:07Z
dc.date.issued 2017-08-07 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0197-6729 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/152261
dc.description.abstract [EN] Air pollution monitoring has recently become an issue of utmost importance in our society. Despite the fact that crowdsensing approaches could be an adequate solution for urban areas, they cannot be implemented in rural environments. Instead, deploying a fleet of UAVs could be considered an acceptable alternative. Embracing this approach, this paper proposes the use of UAVs equipped with off-the-shelf sensors to perform air pollution monitoring tasks. These UAVs are guided by our proposed Pollution-driven UAV Control (PdUC) algorithm, which is based on a chemotaxis metaheuristic and a local particle swarm optimization strategy. Together, they allow automatically performing the monitoring of a specified area using UAVs. Experimental results show that, when using PdUC, an implicit priority guides the construction of pollution maps by focusing on areas where the pollutants' concentration is higher. This way, accurate maps can be constructed in a faster manner when compared to other strategies. The PdUC scheme is compared against various standard mobility models through simulation, showing that it achieves better performance. In particular, it is able to find the most polluted areas with more accuracy and provides a higher coverage within the time bounds defined by the UAV flight time. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This work has been partially carried out in the framework of the DIVINA Challenge Team, which is funded under the Labex MS2T program. Labex MS2T is supported by the French Government, through the program "Investments for the Future" managed by the National Agency for Research (Reference: ANR-11-IDEX-0004-02). This work was also supported by the "Programa Estatal de Investigacion, Desarrollo e Innovacion Orientada a Retos de la Sociedad, Proyecto I+D+I TEC2014-52690-R," the "Programa de Becas SENESCYT de la Republica del Ecuador," and the Research Direction of University of Cuenca. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher John Wiley & Sons es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Advanced Transportation es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Unmanned Aerial Vehicles es_ES
dc.subject.classification ARQUITECTURA Y TECNOLOGIA DE COMPUTADORES es_ES
dc.title Using UAV-Based Systems to Monitor Air Pollution in Areas with Poor Accessibility es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1155/2017/8204353 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/ANR//ANR-11-IDEX-0004/FR/Sorbonne Universités à Paris pour l'Enseignement et la Recherche/SUPER/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//TEC2014-52690-R/ES/INTEGRACION DEL SMARTPHONE Y EL VEHICULO PARA CONECTAR CONDUCTORES, SENSORES Y ENTORNO A TRAVES DE UNA ARQUITECTURA DE SERVICIOS FUNCIONALES/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Informática de Sistemas y Computadores - Departament d'Informàtica de Sistemes i Computadors es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Alvear-Alvear, Ó.; Zema, NR.; Natalizio, E.; Tavares De Araujo Cesariny Calafate, CM. (2017). Using UAV-Based Systems to Monitor Air Pollution in Areas with Poor Accessibility. Journal of Advanced Transportation. 2017:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8204353 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/8204353 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 14 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 2017 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\343174 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Universidad de Cuenca, Ecuador es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Agence Nationale de la Recherche, Francia es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Secretaría de Educación Superior, Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación, Ecuador es_ES
dc.description.references Seaton, A., Godden, D., MacNee, W., & Donaldson, K. (1995). Particulate air pollution and acute health effects. The Lancet, 345(8943), 176-178. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90173-6 es_ES
dc.description.references McFrederick, Q. S., Kathilankal, J. C., & Fuentes, J. D. (2008). Air pollution modifies floral scent trails. Atmospheric Environment, 42(10), 2336-2348. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2007.12.033 es_ES
dc.description.references Mage, D., Ozolins, G., Peterson, P., Webster, A., Orthofer, R., Vandeweerd, V., & Gwynne, M. (1996). Urban air pollution in megacities of the world. Atmospheric Environment, 30(5), 681-686. doi:10.1016/1352-2310(95)00219-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Mayer, H. (1999). Air pollution in cities. Atmospheric Environment, 33(24-25), 4029-4037. doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00144-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Kanaroglou, P. S., Jerrett, M., Morrison, J., Beckerman, B., Arain, M. A., Gilbert, N. L., & Brook, J. R. (2005). Establishing an air pollution monitoring network for intra-urban population exposure assessment: A location-allocation approach. Atmospheric Environment, 39(13), 2399-2409. doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.06.049 es_ES
dc.description.references Alvear, O., Zamora, W., Calafate, C., Cano, J.-C., & Manzoni, P. (2016). An Architecture Offering Mobile Pollution Sensing with High Spatial Resolution. Journal of Sensors, 2016, 1-13. doi:10.1155/2016/1458147 es_ES
dc.description.references Adam-Poupart, A., Brand, A., Fournier, M., Jerrett, M., & Smargiassi, A. (2014). Spatiotemporal Modeling of Ozone Levels in Quebec (Canada): A Comparison of Kriging, Land-Use Regression (LUR), and Combined Bayesian Maximum Entropy–LUR Approaches. Environmental Health Perspectives, 122(9), 970-976. doi:10.1289/ehp.1306566 es_ES
dc.description.references Pujadas, M., Plaza, J., Terés, J., Artı́ñano, B., & Millán, M. (2000). Passive remote sensing of nitrogen dioxide as a tool for tracking air pollution in urban areas: the Madrid urban plume, a case of study. Atmospheric Environment, 34(19), 3041-3056. doi:10.1016/s1352-2310(99)00509-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Eisenman, S. B., Miluzzo, E., Lane, N. D., Peterson, R. A., Ahn, G.-S., & Campbell, A. T. (2009). BikeNet. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks, 6(1), 1-39. doi:10.1145/1653760.1653766 es_ES
dc.description.references André, M. (2004). The ARTEMIS European driving cycles for measuring car pollutant emissions. Science of The Total Environment, 334-335, 73-84. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2004.04.070 es_ES
dc.description.references Hu, S.-C., Wang, Y.-C., Huang, C.-Y., & Tseng, Y.-C. (2011). Measuring air quality in city areas by vehicular wireless sensor networks. Journal of Systems and Software, 84(11), 2005-2012. doi:10.1016/j.jss.2011.06.043 es_ES
dc.description.references Dunbabin, M., & Marques, L. (2012). Robots for Environmental Monitoring: Significant Advancements and Applications. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 19(1), 24-39. doi:10.1109/mra.2011.2181683 es_ES
dc.description.references Hugenholtz, C. H., Moorman, B. J., Riddell, K., & Whitehead, K. (2012). Small unmanned aircraft systems for remote sensing and Earth science research. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 93(25), 236-236. doi:10.1029/2012eo250005 es_ES
dc.description.references Pajares, G. (2015). Overview and Current Status of Remote Sensing Applications Based on Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs). Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 81(4), 281-330. doi:10.14358/pers.81.4.281 es_ES
dc.description.references Colomina, I., & Molina, P. (2014). Unmanned aerial systems for photogrammetry and remote sensing: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 92, 79-97. doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2014.02.013 es_ES
dc.description.references Anderson, K., & Gaston, K. J. (2013). Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(3), 138-146. doi:10.1890/120150 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhang, C., & Kovacs, J. M. (2012). The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review. Precision Agriculture, 13(6), 693-712. doi:10.1007/s11119-012-9274-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Bellvert, J., Zarco-Tejada, P. J., Girona, J., & Fereres, E. (2013). Mapping crop water stress index in a ‘Pinot-noir’ vineyard: comparing ground measurements with thermal remote sensing imagery from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Precision Agriculture, 15(4), 361-376. doi:10.1007/s11119-013-9334-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Erman, A., Hoesel, L., Havinga, P., & Wu, J. (2008). Enabling mobility in heterogeneous wireless sensor networks cooperating with UAVs for mission-critical management. IEEE Wireless Communications, 15(6), 38-46. doi:10.1109/mwc.2008.4749746 es_ES
dc.description.references Khan, A., Schaefer, D., Tao, L., Miller, D. J., Sun, K., Zondlo, M. A., … Lary, D. J. (2012). Low Power Greenhouse Gas Sensors for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles. Remote Sensing, 4(5), 1355-1368. doi:10.3390/rs4051355 es_ES
dc.description.references Illingworth, S., Allen, G., Percival, C., Hollingsworth, P., Gallagher, M., Ricketts, H., … Roberts, G. (2014). Measurement of boundary layer ozone concentrations on-board a Skywalker unmanned aerial vehicle. Atmospheric Science Letters, n/a-n/a. doi:10.1002/asl2.496 es_ES
dc.description.references Wang, W., Guan, X., Wang, B., & Wang, Y. (2010). A novel mobility model based on semi-random circular movement in mobile ad hoc networks. Information Sciences, 180(3), 399-413. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2009.10.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Wan, Y., Namuduri, K., Zhou, Y., & Fu, S. (2013). A Smooth-Turn Mobility Model for Airborne Networks. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 62(7), 3359-3370. doi:10.1109/tvt.2013.2251686 es_ES
dc.description.references Briante, O., Loscri, V., Pace, P., Ruggeri, G., & Zema, N. R. (2015). COMVIVOR: An Evolutionary Communication Framework Based on Survivors’ Devices Reuse. Wireless Personal Communications, 85(4), 2021-2040. doi:10.1007/s11277-015-2888-y es_ES
dc.description.references Meier, L., Tanskanen, P., Heng, L., Lee, G. H., Fraundorfer, F., & Pollefeys, M. (2012). PIXHAWK: A micro aerial vehicle design for autonomous flight using onboard computer vision. Autonomous Robots, 33(1-2), 21-39. doi:10.1007/s10514-012-9281-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Boussaïd, I., Lepagnot, J., & Siarry, P. (2013). A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Information Sciences, 237, 82-117. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2013.02.041 es_ES
dc.description.references Stein, M. L. (1999). Interpolation of Spatial Data. Springer Series in Statistics. doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-1494-6 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem