- -

Physiological changes of pepper accessions in response to salinity and water stress

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Physiological changes of pepper accessions in response to salinity and water stress

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Lopez-Serrano;Pen ...
Tamaño: 827.4Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Lopez-Serrano, Lidia es_ES
dc.contributor.author Penella, Consuelo es_ES
dc.contributor.author San Bautista Primo, Alberto es_ES
dc.contributor.author López Galarza, Salvador Vicente es_ES
dc.contributor.author Calatayud, Angeles es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-10-28T04:33:24Z
dc.date.available 2020-10-28T04:33:24Z
dc.date.issued 2017-09 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1695-971X es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/153379
dc.description.abstract [EN] New sources of water stress and salinity tolerances are needed for crops grown in marginal lands. Pepper is considered one of the most important crops in the world. Many varieties belong to the genus Capsicum spp., and display wide variability in tolerance/sensitivity terms in response to drought and salinity stress. The objective was to screen seven salt/drought-tolerant pepper accessions to breed new cultivars that could overcome abiotic stresses, or be used as new crops in land with water and salinity stress. Fast and effective physiological traits were measured to achieve the objective. The present study showed wide variability of the seven pepper accessions in response to both stresses. Photosynthesis, stomatal conductance and transpiration reduced mainly under salinity due to stomatal and non-stomatal (Na+ accumulation) constraints and, to a lesser extent, in the accessions grown under water stress. A positive relationship between CO2 fixation and fresh weight generation was observed for both stresses. Decreases in Ys and YW and increased proline were observed only when accessions were grown under salinity. However, these factors were not enough to alleviate salt effects and an inverse relation was noted between plant salt tolerance and proline accumulation. Under water stress, A31 was the least affected and A34 showed the best tolerance to salinity in terms of photosynthesis and biomass. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship INIA, Spain (Project RTA2013-00022-C02-01 and doctoral fellowship FPI-INIA to LLS); European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Instituto Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria y Alimentaria es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Osmotic potential es_ES
dc.subject Photosynthesis es_ES
dc.subject Proline es_ES
dc.subject Salinity ions es_ES
dc.subject Water potential es_ES
dc.subject.classification PRODUCCION VEGETAL es_ES
dc.title Physiological changes of pepper accessions in response to salinity and water stress es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.5424/sjar/2017153-11147 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//RTA2013-00022-C02-00/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Producción Vegetal - Departament de Producció Vegetal es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Lopez-Serrano, L.; Penella, C.; San Bautista Primo, A.; López Galarza, SV.; Calatayud, A. (2017). Physiological changes of pepper accessions in response to salinity and water stress. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 15(3):1-10. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017153-11147 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017153-11147 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 10 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 15 es_ES
dc.description.issue 3 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\351802 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Regional Development Fund es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES
dc.description.references Abbad, H., El Jaafari, S., Bort, J., & Araus, J. L. (2004). Comparison of flag leaf and ear photosynthesis with biomass and grain yield of durum wheat under various water conditions and genotypes. Agronomie, 24(1), 19-28. doi:10.1051/agro:2003056 es_ES
dc.description.references Abideen, Z., Koyro, H.-W., Huchzermeyer, B., Ahmed, M. Z., Gul, B., & Khan, M. A. (2014). Moderate salinity stimulates growth and photosynthesis of Phragmites karka by water relations and tissue specific ion regulation. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 105, 70-76. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.04.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Aktas, H., Abak, K., & Cakmak, I. (2006). Genotypic variation in the response of pepper to salinity. Scientia Horticulturae, 110(3), 260-266. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2006.07.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Allen RG, Pereira RS, Raes D, Smith M, 1998. Crop evapotranspiration. In: Guidelines for computing crop water requirements - FAO Irrig Drain paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. es_ES
dc.description.references Alvino, A., Centritto, M., & Lorenzi, F. (1994). Photosynthesis Response of Sunlit and Shade Pepper (Capsicum annuum) Leaves at Different Positions in the Canopy Under Two Water Regimes. Functional Plant Biology, 21(3), 377. doi:10.1071/pp9940377 es_ES
dc.description.references Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., & Teare, I. D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39(1), 205-207. doi:10.1007/bf00018060 es_ES
dc.description.references Bojórquez-Quintal E, Velarde-Buendía A, Ku-González Á, Carillo-Pech M, Ortega-Camacho D, Echevaría-Machado I, Pottosin I, Martínez-Estévez M, 2014. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in habanero pepper plants (Capsicum chinense Jacq.): Proline accumulation, ions dynamics and sodium root-shoot partition and compartmentation. Front Plant Sci 5: 1-14. es_ES
dc.description.references Bray EA, Bailey-Serres J, Weretilnyk E, 2000. Response to abiotic stress. In: Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants; Gruissem W, Buchannan B, Jones R (eds.). pp: 1158-1249. Am Soc Plant Physiol, Rockville, MD, USA. es_ES
dc.description.references Callister, A. N., Arndt, S. K., & Adams, M. A. (2006). Comparison of four methods for measuring osmotic potential of tree leaves. Physiologia Plantarum, 127(3), 383-392. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3054.2006.00652.x es_ES
dc.description.references Chartzoulakis, K., & Klapaki, G. (2000). Response of two greenhouse pepper hybrids to NaCl salinity during different growth stages. Scientia Horticulturae, 86(3), 247-260. doi:10.1016/s0304-4238(00)00151-5 es_ES
dc.description.references CHAVES, M. M. (2002). How Plants Cope with Water Stress in the Field? Photosynthesis and Growth. Annals of Botany, 89(7), 907-916. doi:10.1093/aob/mcf105 es_ES
dc.description.references Chaves, M. M., Maroco, J. P., & Pereira, J. S. (2003). Understanding plant responses to drought — from genes to the whole plant. Functional Plant Biology, 30(3), 239. doi:10.1071/fp02076 es_ES
dc.description.references Chaves, M. M., Flexas, J., & Pinheiro, C. (2008). Photosynthesis under drought and salt stress: regulation mechanisms from whole plant to cell. Annals of Botany, 103(4), 551-560. doi:10.1093/aob/mcn125 es_ES
dc.description.references Chen, Z., Cuin, T. A., Zhou, M., Twomey, A., Naidu, B. P., & Shabala, S. (2007). Compatible solute accumulation and stress-mitigating effects in barley genotypes contrasting in their salt tolerance. Journal of Experimental Botany, 58(15-16), 4245-4255. doi:10.1093/jxb/erm284 es_ES
dc.description.references Colmer, T. D., Munns, R., & Flowers, T. J. (2005). Improving salt tolerance of wheat and barley: future prospects. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture, 45(11), 1425. doi:10.1071/ea04162 es_ES
dc.description.references Cowan IR, Farquhar, G, 1977. Stomatal functioning in relation to leaf metabolism and environment. In: Integration of activity in the higher plants; Jennings DH (ed.). pp: 470-505. University Press, Cambrigde. es_ES
dc.description.references Silva, E. N. da, Ribeiro, R. V., Ferreira-Silva, S. L., Viégas, R. A., & Silveira, J. A. G. (2011). Salt stress induced damages on the photosynthesis of physic nut young plants. Scientia Agricola, 68(1), 62-68. doi:10.1590/s0103-90162011000100010 es_ES
dc.description.references De Oliveira, A. B., Mendes Alencar, N. L., & Gomes-Filho, E. (2013). Comparison Between the Water and Salt Stress Effects on Plant Growth and Development. Responses of Organisms to Water Stress. doi:10.5772/54223 es_ES
dc.description.references De Pascale S, Ruggiero C, Barbieri G, 2003. Physiological responses of pepper to salinity and drought. J Am Sociol Hortic Sci 128: 48-54. es_ES
dc.description.references Del Amor, F. M., Cuadra-Crespo, P., Walker, D. J., Cámara, J. M., & Madrid, R. (2010). Effect of foliar application of antitranspirant on photosynthesis and water relations of pepper plants under different levels of CO2 and water stress. Journal of Plant Physiology, 167(15), 1232-1238. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2010.04.010 es_ES
dc.description.references Delfine, S., Tognetti, R., Loreto, F., & Alvino, A. (2002). Physiological and growth responses to water stress in Field-grown bell pepper (Capsicum annuumL.). The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology, 77(6), 697-704. doi:10.1080/14620316.2002.11511559 es_ES
dc.description.references Filippou, P., Bouchagier, P., Skotti, E., & Fotopoulos, V. (2014). Proline and reactive oxygen/nitrogen species metabolism is involved in the tolerant response of the invasive plant species Ailanthus altissima to drought and salinity. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 97, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2013.09.010 es_ES
dc.description.references Fischer KS, Wood G, 1981. Breeding and selection for drought tolerance in tropical maize. Proc. Symp. on principles and methods in crop improvement for drought resistance with emphasis on rice, IRRI, Philippines. es_ES
dc.description.references Flexas, J., Bota, J., Loreto, F., Cornic, G., & Sharkey, T. D. (2004). Diffusive and Metabolic Limitations to Photosynthesis under Drought and Salinity in C 3 Plants. Plant Biology, 6(3), 269-279. doi:10.1055/s-2004-820867 es_ES
dc.description.references Gill, S. S., & Tuteja, N. (2010). Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 48(12), 909-930. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 es_ES
dc.description.references Hasanuzzaman, M., Nahar, K., & Fujita, M. (2012). Plant Response to Salt Stress and Role of Exogenous Protectants to Mitigate Salt-Induced Damages. Ecophysiology and Responses of Plants under Salt Stress, 25-87. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-4747-4_2 es_ES
dc.description.references Hassine, A. B., Ghanem, M. E., Bouzid, S., & Lutts, S. (2008). An inland and a coastal population of the Mediterranean xero-halophyte species Atriplex halimus L. differ in their ability to accumulate proline and glycinebetaine in response to salinity and water stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 59(6), 1315-1326. doi:10.1093/jxb/ern040 es_ES
dc.description.references Huang, Y., Bie, Z., He, S., Hua, B., Zhen, A., & Liu, Z. (2010). Improving cucumber tolerance to major nutrients induced salinity by grafting onto Cucurbita ficifolia. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 69(1), 32-38. doi:10.1016/j.envexpbot.2010.02.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Lutts, S., & Guerrier, G. (1995). Peroxidase activities of two rice cultivars differing in salinity tolerance as affected by proline and NaCl. Biologia plantarum, 37(4). doi:10.1007/bf02908842 es_ES
dc.description.references Maynard DN, Hochmuth GJ, 2007. Knott's handbook for vegetable growers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, NY. es_ES
dc.description.references Morgan, J. (1992). Osmotic Components and Properties Associated With Genotypic Differences in Osmoregulation in Wheat. Functional Plant Biology, 19(1), 67. doi:10.1071/pp9920067 es_ES
dc.description.references Munns, R. (2002). Comparative physiology of salt and water stress. Plant, Cell & Environment, 25(2), 239-250. doi:10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00808.x es_ES
dc.description.references Munns, R., & James, R. A. (2003). Screening methods for salinity tolerance: a case study with tetraploid wheat. Plant and Soil, 253(1), 201-218. doi:10.1023/a:1024553303144 es_ES
dc.description.references Munns, R., Brady, C., & Barlow, E. (1979). Solute Accumulation in the Apex and Leaves of Wheat During Water Stress. Functional Plant Biology, 6(3), 379. doi:10.1071/pp9790379 es_ES
dc.description.references Munns, R., & Tester, M. (2008). Mechanisms of Salinity Tolerance. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 59(1), 651-681. doi:10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911 es_ES
dc.description.references Navarro, J. M., Garrido, C., Martínez, V., & Carvajal, M. (2003). Water relations and xylem transport of nutrients in pepper plants grown under two different salts stress regimes. Plant Growth Regulation, 41(3), 237-245. doi:10.1023/b:grow.0000007515.72795.c5 es_ES
dc.description.references Nio, S. A., Cawthray, G. R., Wade, L. J., & Colmer, T. D. (2011). Pattern of solutes accumulated during leaf osmotic adjustment as related to duration of water deficit for wheat at the reproductive stage. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 49(10), 1126-1137. doi:10.1016/j.plaphy.2011.05.011 es_ES
dc.description.references Noreen Z, Ashraf M, Akram NA, 2010. Salt-induced regulation of some key antioxidant enzymes and physio-biochemical phenomena in five diverse cultivars of turnip (Brassica rapa L.). J Agron Crop Sci 196: 273-285. es_ES
dc.description.references Patade, V. Y., Bhargava, S., & Suprasanna, P. (2012). Halopriming mediated salt and iso-osmotic PEG stress tolerance and, gene expression profiling in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Molecular Biology Reports, 39(10), 9563-9572. doi:10.1007/s11033-012-1821-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Patakas, A., Nikolaou, N., Zioziou, E., Radoglou, K., & Noitsakis, B. (2002). The role of organic solute and ion accumulation in osmotic adjustment in drought-stressed grapevines. Plant Science, 163(2), 361-367. doi:10.1016/s0168-9452(02)00140-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Penella C, Nebauer SG, Lopéz-Galarza S, San Bautista A, Gorbe E, Calatayud A, 2013. Evaluation for salt stress tolerance of pepper genotypes to be used as rootstocks. J Food Agric Environ 11: 1101-1107. es_ES
dc.description.references Penella, C., Nebauer, S. G., Bautista, A. S., López-Galarza, S., & Calatayud, Á. (2014). Rootstock alleviates PEG-induced water stress in grafted pepper seedlings: Physiological responses. Journal of Plant Physiology, 171(10), 842-851. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2014.01.013 es_ES
dc.description.references Penella C, Nebauer SG, López-Galarza S, Bautista AS, Rodriguez-Burruezo A, Calatayud A, 2014b. Evaluation of some pepper genotypes as rootstocks in water stress conditions. Hort Sci 41: 192-200. es_ES
dc.description.references Penella, C., Nebauer, S. G., Quiñones, A., San Bautista, A., López-Galarza, S., & Calatayud, A. (2015). Some rootstocks improve pepper tolerance to mild salinity through ionic regulation. Plant Science, 230, 12-22. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.10.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Penella, C., Landi, M., Guidi, L., Nebauer, S. G., Pellegrini, E., Bautista, A. S., … Calatayud, A. (2016). Salt-tolerant rootstock increases yield of pepper under salinity through maintenance of photosynthetic performance and sinks strength. Journal of Plant Physiology, 193, 1-11. doi:10.1016/j.jplph.2016.02.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Praxedes, S. C., De Lacerda, C. F., DaMatta, F. M., Prisco, J. T., & Gomes-Filho, E. (2009). Salt Tolerance is Associated with Differences in Ion Accumulation, Biomass Allocation and Photosynthesis in Cowpea Cultivars. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 196(3), 193-204. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2009.00412.x es_ES
dc.description.references Rouphael, Y., Cardarelli, M., Rea, E., & Colla, G. (2012). Improving melon and cucumber photosynthetic activity, mineral composition, and growth performance under salinity stress by grafting onto Cucurbita hybrid rootstocks. Photosynthetica, 50(2), 180-188. doi:10.1007/s11099-012-0002-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Saleem, A., Ashraf, M., & Akram, N. A. (2011). Salt (NaCl)-Induced Modulation in some Key Physio-Biochemical Attributes in Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 197(3), 202-213. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037x.2010.00453.x es_ES
dc.description.references Smirnoff, N., & Cumbes, Q. J. (1989). Hydroxyl radical scavenging activity of compatible solutes. Phytochemistry, 28(4), 1057-1060. doi:10.1016/0031-9422(89)80182-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Szabados, L., & Savouré, A. (2010). Proline: a multifunctional amino acid. Trends in Plant Science, 15(2), 89-97. doi:10.1016/j.tplants.2009.11.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Tanjii KK, Kielen NC, 2002. Agricultural drainage water management in arid and semi-arid areas. FAO, Roma. es_ES
dc.description.references Yadollahi, A., Arzani, K., Ebadi, A., Wirthensohn, M., & Karimi, S. (2011). The response of different almond genotypes to moderate and severe water stress in order to screen for drought tolerance. Scientia Horticulturae, 129(3), 403-413. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2011.04.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Yoshiba, Y., Kiyosue, T., Nakashima, K., Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K., & Shinozaki, K. (1997). Regulation of Levels of Proline as an Osmolyte in Plants under Water Stress. Plant and Cell Physiology, 38(10), 1095-1102. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029093 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem