- -

The Spheres & Shield Maze Task: A virtual reality serious game for the assessment of risk taking in decision making

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

The Spheres & Shield Maze Task: A virtual reality serious game for the assessment of risk taking in decision making

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Juan-Ripoll, Carla De es_ES
dc.contributor.author Soler-Domínguez, José L. es_ES
dc.contributor.author CHICCHI-GIGLIOLI, IRENE ALICE es_ES
dc.contributor.author Contero, Manuel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Alcañiz Raya, Mariano Luis es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-04-24T03:31:06Z
dc.date.available 2021-04-24T03:31:06Z
dc.date.issued 2020-11-01 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 2152-2715 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/165558
dc.description.abstract [EN] Risk taking (RT) is an essential component in decision-making process that depicts the propensity to make risky decisions. RT assessment has traditionally focused on self-report questionnaires. These classical tools have shown clear distance from real-life responses. Behavioral tasks assess human behavior with more fidelity, but still show some limitations related to transferability. A way to overcome these constraints is to take advantage from virtual reality (VR), to recreate real-simulated situations that might arise from performance-based assessments, supporting RT research. This article presents results of a pilot study in which 41 individuals explored a gamified VR environment: the Spheres & Shield Maze Task (SSMT). By eliciting implicit behavioral measures, we found relationships between scores obtained in the SSMT and self-reported risk-related constructs, as engagement in risky behaviors and marijuana consumption. We conclude that decontextualized Virtual Reality Serious Games are appropriate to assess RT, since they could be used as a cross-disciplinary tool to assess individuals' capabilities under the stealth assessment paradigm. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This work was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness funded projects "Advanced Therapeutic Tools for Mental Health'' (DPI2016-77396-R), and "Assessment and Training on Decision Making in Risk Environments'' (RTC-2017-6523-6) (MINECO/AEI/FEDER,UE) and by the Generalitat Valenciana funded project "Rebrand'' (PROMETEU/2019/105). es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Mary Ann Liebert es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial (by-nc) es_ES
dc.subject Risk taking es_ES
dc.subject Serious games es_ES
dc.subject Virtual reality es_ES
dc.subject Evaluation methodologies es_ES
dc.subject Implicit measures es_ES
dc.subject.classification EXPRESION GRAFICA EN LA INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title The Spheres & Shield Maze Task: A virtual reality serious game for the assessment of risk taking in decision making es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1089/cyber.2019.0761 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//DPI2016-77396-R/ES/HERRAMIENTAS TERAPEUTICAS AVANZADAS PARA SALUD MENTAL/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI//RTC-2017-6523-6/ES/ATEMIN - Evaluación y entrenamiento en toma de decisiones en entornos de riesgo./ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//PROMETEO%2F2019%2F105/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Interuniversitario de Investigación en Bioingeniería y Tecnología Orientada al Ser Humano - Institut Interuniversitari d'Investigació en Bioenginyeria i Tecnologia Orientada a l'Ésser Humà es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Gráfica - Departament d'Enginyeria Gràfica es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Juan-Ripoll, CD.; Soler-Domínguez, JL.; Chicchi-Giglioli, IA.; Contero, M.; Alcañiz Raya, ML. (2020). The Spheres & Shield Maze Task: A virtual reality serious game for the assessment of risk taking in decision making. Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking. 23(11):773-781. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0761 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0761 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 773 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 781 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 23 es_ES
dc.description.issue 11 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 32845725 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmcid PMC7698844 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\417826 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Generalitat Valenciana es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Agencia Estatal de Investigación es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Regional Development Fund es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES
dc.description.references Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The Iowa Gambling Task and the somatic marker hypothesis: some questions and answers. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(4), 159-162. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.02.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Krain, A. L., Wilson, A. M., Arbuckle, R., Castellanos, F. X., & Milham, M. P. (2006). Distinct neural mechanisms of risk and ambiguity: A meta-analysis of decision-making. NeuroImage, 32(1), 477-484. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.047 es_ES
dc.description.references Einhorn, H. J. (1970). The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 73(3), 221-230. doi:10.1037/h0028695 es_ES
dc.description.references Figner, B., & Weber, E. U. (2011). Who Takes Risks When and Why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(4), 211-216. doi:10.1177/0963721411415790 es_ES
dc.description.references Endsley, M. R., & Garland, D. J. (Eds.). (2000). Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement. doi:10.1201/b12461 es_ES
dc.description.references Lauriola, M., & Levin, I. P. (2001). Personality traits and risky decision-making in a controlled experimental task: an exploratory study. Personality and Individual Differences, 31(2), 215-226. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00130-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Rundmo, T. (1996). Associations between risk perception and safety. Safety Science, 24(3), 197-209. doi:10.1016/s0925-7535(97)00038-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Zuckerman, M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (2000). Personality and Risk‐Taking: Common Bisocial Factors. Journal of Personality, 68(6), 999-1029. doi:10.1111/1467-6494.00124 es_ES
dc.description.references Dahlen, E. R., Martin, R. C., Ragan, K., & Kuhlman, M. M. (2005). Driving anger, sensation seeking, impulsiveness, and boredom proneness in the prediction of unsafe driving. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 37(2), 341-348. doi:10.1016/j.aap.2004.10.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Donohew, L., Zimmerman, R., Cupp, P. S., Novak, S., Colon, S., & Abell, R. (2000). Sensation seeking, impulsive decision-making, and risky sex: implications for risk-taking and design of interventions. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(6), 1079-1091. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(99)00158-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Moreno, M., Estevez, A. F., Zaldivar, F., Montes, J. M. G., Gutiérrez-Ferre, V. E., Esteban, L., … Flores, P. (2012). Impulsivity differences in recreational cannabis users and binge drinkers in a university population. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 124(3), 355-362. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2012.02.011 es_ES
dc.description.references Dvorak, R. D., & Day, A. M. (2014). Marijuana and self-regulation: Examining likelihood and intensity of use and problems. Addictive Behaviors, 39(3), 709-712. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.11.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Trocki, K. F., Drabble, L. A., & Midanik, L. T. (2009). Tobacco, marijuana, and sensation seeking: Comparisons across gay, lesbian, bisexual, and heterosexual groups. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 23(4), 620-631. doi:10.1037/a0017334 es_ES
dc.description.references Ames, S. L., Zogg, J. B., & Stacy, A. W. (2002). Implicit cognition, sensation seeking, marijuana use and driving behavior among drug offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 33(7), 1055-1072. doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00212-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Highhouse, S., Nye, C. D., Zhang, D. C., & Rada, T. B. (2016). Structure of the Dospert: Is There Evidence for a General Risk Factor? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 30(2), 400-406. doi:10.1002/bdm.1953 es_ES
dc.description.references Jackson, D. N., Hourany, L., & Vidmar, N. J. (1972). A four-dimensional interpretation of risk taking1. Journal of Personality, 40(3), 483-501. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1972.tb00075.x es_ES
dc.description.references Skeel, R. L., Neudecker, J., Pilarski, C., & Pytlak, K. (2007). The utility of personality variables and behaviorally-based measures in the prediction of risk-taking behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(1), 203-214. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.025 es_ES
dc.description.references Horvath, P., & Zuckerman, M. (1993). Sensation seeking, risk appraisal, and risky behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 14(1), 41-52. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(93)90173-z es_ES
dc.description.references Lejuez, C. W., Aklin, W. M., Zvolensky, M. J., & Pedulla, C. M. (2003). Evaluation of the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART) as a predictor of adolescent real-world risk-taking behaviours. Journal of Adolescence, 26(4), 475-479. doi:10.1016/s0140-1971(03)00036-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Verhulst, N., De Keyser, A., Gustafsson, A., Shams, P., & Van Vaerenbergh, Y. (2019). Neuroscience in service research: an overview and discussion of its possibilities. Journal of Service Management, 30(5), 621-649. doi:10.1108/josm-05-2019-0135 es_ES
dc.description.references de-Juan-Ripoll, C., Soler-Domínguez, J. L., Guixeres, J., Contero, M., Álvarez Gutiérrez, N., & Alcañiz, M. (2018). Virtual Reality as a New Approach for Risk Taking Assessment. Frontiers in Psychology, 9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02532 es_ES
dc.description.references Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50(1-3), 7-15. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Bottari, C., Dassa, C., Rainville, C., & Dutil, É. (2009). The factorial validity and internal consistency of the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Profile in individuals with a traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 19(2), 177-207. doi:10.1080/09602010802188435 es_ES
dc.description.references Verschoor, A., D’Exelle, B., & Perez-Viana, B. (2016). Lab and life: Does risky choice behaviour observed in experiments reflect that in the real world? Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 128, 134-148. doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2016.05.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Tarr, M. J., & Warren, W. H. (2002). Virtual reality in behavioral neuroscience and beyond. Nature Neuroscience, 5(S11), 1089-1092. doi:10.1038/nn948 es_ES
dc.description.references Alcañiz, M., Rey, B., Tembl, J., & Parkhutik, V. (2009). A Neuroscience Approach to Virtual Reality Experience Using Transcranial Doppler Monitoring. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 18(2), 97-111. doi:10.1162/pres.18.2.97 es_ES
dc.description.references Chittaro, L., & Ranon, R. (2009). Serious Games for Training Occupants of a Building in Personal Fire Safety Skills. 2009 Conference in Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications. doi:10.1109/vs-games.2009.8 es_ES
dc.description.references Lovreglio, R., Gonzalez, V., Amor, R., Spearpoint, M., Thomas, J., Trotter, M., & Sacks, R. (2017). The Need for Enhancing Earthquake Evacuee Safety by Using Virtual Reality Serious Games. Lean and Computing in Construction Congress - Volume 1: Proceedings of the Joint Conference on Computing in Construction. doi:10.24928/jc3-2017/0058 es_ES
dc.description.references Rizzo, A. A., Bowerly, T., Buckwalter, J. G., Klimchuk, D., Mitura, R., & Parsons, T. D. (2009). A Virtual Reality Scenario for All Seasons:The Virtual Classroom. CNS Spectrums, 11(1), 35-44. doi:10.1017/s1092852900024196 es_ES
dc.description.references Chicchi Giglioli, I. A., de Juan Ripoll, C., Parra, E., & Alcañiz Raya, M. (2019). Are 3D virtual environments better than 2D interfaces in serious games performance? An explorative study for the assessment of executive functions. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 28(2), 148-157. doi:10.1080/23279095.2019.1607735 es_ES
dc.description.references Huang, H.-M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S.-S. (2010). Investigating learners’ attitudes toward virtual reality learning environments: Based on a constructivist approach. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1171-1182. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Dalgarno, B., & Lee, M. J. W. (2009). What are the learning affordances of 3-D virtual environments? British Journal of Educational Technology, 41(1), 10-32. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01038.x es_ES
dc.description.references Fowler, C. (2014). Virtual reality and learning: Where is the pedagogy? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 412-422. doi:10.1111/bjet.12135 es_ES
dc.description.references Zuckerman, M., Kolin, E. A., Price, L., & Zoob, I. (1964). Development of a sensation-seeking scale. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 28(6), 477-482. doi:10.1037/h0040995 es_ES
dc.description.references Patton, J. H., Stanford, M. S., & Barratt, E. S. (1995). Factor structure of the barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 51(6), 768-774. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(199511)51:6<768::aid-jclp2270510607>3.0.co;2-1 es_ES
dc.description.references So, R. H. Y., Lo, W. T., & Ho, A. T. K. (2001). Effects of Navigation Speed on Motion Sickness Caused by an Immersive Virtual Environment. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 43(3), 452-461. doi:10.1518/001872001775898223 es_ES
dc.description.references Zuckerman, M. (2008). Sensation Seeking. The International Encyclopedia of Communication. doi:10.1002/9781405186407.wbiecs029 es_ES
dc.description.references Orlebeke, J. F., Van Der Molen, M. W., Dolan, C., & Stoffels, E. J. (1990). The additive factor logic applied to the personality trait disinhibition. Personality and Individual Differences, 11(6), 553-558. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(90)90037-r es_ES
dc.description.references Popham, L. E., Kennison, S. M., & Bradley, K. I. (2011). Ageism, Sensation-Seeking, and Risk-Taking Behavior in Young Adults. Current Psychology, 30(2), 184-193. doi:10.1007/s12144-011-9107-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Roberti, J. W. (2004). A review of behavioral and biological correlates of sensation seeking. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(3), 256-279. doi:10.1016/s0092-6566(03)00067-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Zuckerman, M., Eysenck, S. B., & Eysenck, H. J. (1978). Sensation seeking in England and America: Cross-cultural, age, and sex comparisons. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46(1), 139-149. doi:10.1037/0022-006x.46.1.139 es_ES
dc.description.references Television campaigns and adolescent marijuana use: tests of sensation seeking targeting. (2001). American Journal of Public Health, 91(2), 292-296. doi:10.2105/ajph.91.2.292 es_ES
dc.description.references Barry, D., & Petry, N. M. (2008). Predictors of decision-making on the Iowa Gambling Task: Independent effects of lifetime history of substance use disorders and performance on the Trail Making Test. Brain and Cognition, 66(3), 243-252. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2007.09.001 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem