- -

Operating Conditions Optimization via the Taguchi Method to Remove Colloidal Substances from Recycled Paper and Cardboard Production Wastewater

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Operating Conditions Optimization via the Taguchi Method to Remove Colloidal Substances from Recycled Paper and Cardboard Production Wastewater

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Sousa, Mayko Rannany S. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Lora-García, Jaime es_ES
dc.contributor.author López Pérez, Maria Fernanda es_ES
dc.contributor.author Santafé Moros, María Asunción es_ES
dc.contributor.author Gozálvez-Zafrilla, José M. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-05-28T03:32:02Z
dc.date.available 2021-05-28T03:32:02Z
dc.date.issued 2020-08 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/166894
dc.description.abstract [EN] Optimization of the ultrafiltration (UF) process to remove colloidal substances from a paper mill's treated effluent was investigated in this study. The effects of four operating parameters in a UF system (transmembrane pressure (TMP), cross-flow velocity (CFV), temperature and molecular weight cut-off (MWCO)) on the average permeate flux (J(v)), organic matter chemical oxygen demand (COD) rejection rate and the cumulative flux decline (SFD), was investigated by robust experimental design using the Taguchi method. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for an L(9)orthogonal array were used to determine the significance of the individual factors, that is to say, to determine which factor has more and which less influence over the UF response variables. Analysis of the percentage contribution (P%) indicated that the TMP and MWCO have the greatest contribution to the average permeate flux and SFD. In the case of the COD rejection rate, the results showed that MWCO has the highest contribution followed by CFV. The Taguchi method and the utility concept were employed to optimize the multiple response variables. The optimal conditions were found to be 2.0 bar of transmembrane pressure, 1.041 m/s of the cross-flow velocity, 15 degrees C of the temperature, and 100 kDa MWCO. The validation experiments under the optimal conditions achievedJ(v), COD rejection rate and SFD results of 81.15 L center dot m(-2)center dot h(-1), 43.90% and 6.01, respectively. Additionally, SST and turbidity decreased by about 99% and 99.5%, respectively, and reduction in particle size from around 458-1281 nm to 12.71-24.36 nm was achieved. The field-emission scanning electron microscopy images under optimal conditions showed that membrane fouling takes place at the highest rate in the first 30 min of UF. The results demonstrate the validity of the approach of using the Taguchi method and utility concept to obtain the optimal membrane conditions for the wastewater treatment using a reduced number of experiments. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI AG es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Membranes es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Paper mill treated effluent es_ES
dc.subject Ultrafiltration es_ES
dc.subject Optimization es_ES
dc.subject Fouling es_ES
dc.subject DoE es_ES
dc.subject Taguchi method es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA QUIMICA es_ES
dc.title Operating Conditions Optimization via the Taguchi Method to Remove Colloidal Substances from Recycled Paper and Cardboard Production Wastewater es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/membranes10080170 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Química y Nuclear - Departament d'Enginyeria Química i Nuclear es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Sousa, MRS.; Lora-García, J.; López Pérez, MF.; Santafé Moros, MA.; Gozálvez-Zafrilla, JM. (2020). Operating Conditions Optimization via the Taguchi Method to Remove Colloidal Substances from Recycled Paper and Cardboard Production Wastewater. Membranes. 10(8):1-22. https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10080170 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.3390/membranes10080170 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 22 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 10 es_ES
dc.description.issue 8 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2077-0375 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 32751266 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmcid PMC7465071 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\416962 es_ES
dc.description.references Sevimli, M. F. (2005). Post-Treatment of Pulp and Paper Industry Wastewater by Advanced Oxidation Processes. Ozone: Science & Engineering, 27(1), 37-43. doi:10.1080/01919510590908968 es_ES
dc.description.references Key Statistics Report 2017|CEPI-CONFEDERATION OF EUROPEAN PAPER INDUSTRIEShttp://www.cepi.org/keystatistics2017 es_ES
dc.description.references Rajkumar, K. (2016). An Evaluation of Biological Approach for the Effluent Treatment of Paper Boards Industry - An Economic Perspective. Journal of Bioremediation & Biodegradation, 7(5). doi:10.4172/2155-6199.1000366 es_ES
dc.description.references AHMAD, A., WONG, S., TENG, T., & ZUHAIRI, A. (2008). Improvement of alum and PACl coagulation by polyacrylamides (PAMs) for the treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater. Chemical Engineering Journal, 137(3), 510-517. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2007.03.088 es_ES
dc.description.references Temmink, H., & Grolle, K. (2005). Tertiary activated carbon treatment of paper and board industry wastewater. Bioresource Technology, 96(15), 1683-1689. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2004.12.035 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhang, Q., & Chuang, K. T. (2001). Adsorption of organic pollutants from effluents of a Kraft pulp mill on activated carbon and polymer resin. Advances in Environmental Research, 5(3), 251-258. doi:10.1016/s1093-0191(00)00059-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Catalkaya, E. C., & Kargi, F. (2008). Advanced oxidation treatment of pulp mill effluent for TOC and toxicity removals. Journal of Environmental Management, 87(3), 396-404. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.016 es_ES
dc.description.references Pérez, M., Torrades, F., Garcı́a-Hortal, J. A., Domènech, X., & Peral, J. (2002). Removal of organic contaminants in paper pulp treatment effluents under Fenton and photo-Fenton conditions. Applied Catalysis B: Environmental, 36(1), 63-74. doi:10.1016/s0926-3373(01)00281-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Gönder, Z. B., Arayici, S., & Barlas, H. (2012). Treatment of Pulp and Paper Mill Wastewater Using Utrafiltration Process: Optimization of the Fouling and Rejections. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 51(17), 6184-6195. doi:10.1021/ie2024504 es_ES
dc.description.references Liu, G., Liu, Y., Ni, J., Shi, H., & Qian, Y. (2004). Treatability of kraft spent liquor by microfiltration and andultrafiltration. Desalination, 160(2), 131-141. doi:10.1016/s0011-9164(04)90003-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Nuortila-Jokinen, J., Mänttäri, M., Huuhilo, T., Kallioinen, M., & Nyström, M. (2004). Water circuit closure with membrane technology in the pulp and paper industry. Water Science and Technology, 50(3), 217-227. doi:10.2166/wst.2004.0199 es_ES
dc.description.references Zaidi, A., Buisson, H., Sourirajan, S., & Wood, H. (1992). Ultra- and Nano-Filtration in Advanced Effluent Treatment Schemes for Pollution Control in the Pulp and Paper Industry. Water Science and Technology, 25(10), 263-276. doi:10.2166/wst.1992.0254 es_ES
dc.description.references Toczyłowska-Mamińska, R. (2017). Limits and perspectives of pulp and paper industry wastewater treatment – A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 764-772. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.021 es_ES
dc.description.references Kamali, M., & Khodaparast, Z. (2015). Review on recent developments on pulp and paper mill wastewater treatment. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 114, 326-342. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.05.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Beril Gönder, Z., Arayici, S., & Barlas, H. (2011). Advanced treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater by nanofiltration process: Effects of operating conditions on membrane fouling. Separation and Purification Technology, 76(3), 292-302. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2010.10.018 es_ES
dc.description.references Shukla, S. K., Kumar, V., Van Doan, T., Yoo, K., Kim, Y., & Park, J. (2014). Combining activated sludge process with membrane separation to obtain recyclable quality water from paper mill effluent. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(3), 781-788. doi:10.1007/s10098-014-0836-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Chen, C., Mao, S., Wang, J., Bao, J., Xu, H., Su, W., & Dai, H. (2015). Application of Ultrafiltration in a Paper Mill: Process Water Reuse and Membrane Fouling Analysis. BioResources, 10(2). doi:10.15376/biores.10.2.2376-2391 es_ES
dc.description.references Krawczyk, H., Oinonen, P., & Jönsson, A.-S. (2013). Combined membrane filtration and enzymatic treatment for recovery of high molecular mass hemicelluloses from chemithermomechanical pulp process water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 225, 292-299. doi:10.1016/j.cej.2013.03.089 es_ES
dc.description.references Sousa, M. R. S., Lora-Garcia, J., & López-Pérez, M.-F. (2018). Modelling approach to an ultrafiltration process for the removal of dissolved and colloidal substances from treated wastewater for reuse in recycled paper manufacturing. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 21, 96-106. doi:10.1016/j.jwpe.2017.11.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Karthik, M., Dhodapkar, R., Manekar, P., Aswale, P., & Nandy, T. (2011). Closing water loop in a paper mill section for water conservation and reuse. Desalination, 281, 172-178. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.07.055 es_ES
dc.description.references Mänttäri, M., Nuortila-Jokinen, J., & Nyström, M. (1997). Evaluation of nanofiltration membranes for filtration of paper mill total effluent. Filtration & Separation, 34(3), 275-280. doi:10.1016/s0015-1882(97)84794-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Cassano, A., Conidi, C., & Drioli, E. (2011). Comparison of the performance of UF membranes in olive mill wastewaters treatment. Water Research, 45(10), 3197-3204. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2011.03.041 es_ES
dc.description.references Puro, L., Tanninen, J., & Nyström, M. (2002). Analyses of organic foulants in membranes fouled by pulp and paper mill effluent using solid-liquid extraction. Desalination, 143(1), 1-9. doi:10.1016/s0011-9164(02)00215-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Puro, L., Kallioinen, M., Mänttäri, M., & Nyström, M. (2011). Evaluation of behavior and fouling potential of wood extractives in ultrafiltration of pulp and paper mill process water. Journal of Membrane Science, 368(1-2), 150-158. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2010.11.032 es_ES
dc.description.references Hesampour, M., Krzyzaniak, A., & Nyström, M. (2008). The influence of different factors on the stability and ultrafiltration of emulsified oil in water. Journal of Membrane Science, 325(1), 199-208. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2008.07.048 es_ES
dc.description.references Pourjafar, S., Jahanshahi, M., & Rahimpour, A. (2013). Optimization of TiO2 modified poly(vinyl alcohol) thin film composite nanofiltration membranes using Taguchi method. Desalination, 315, 107-114. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2012.08.029 es_ES
dc.description.references Reyhani, A., Sepehrinia, K., Seyed Shahabadi, S. M., Rekabdar, F., & Gheshlaghi, A. (2014). Optimization of operating conditions in ultrafiltration process for produced water treatment via Taguchi methodology. Desalination and Water Treatment, 54(10), 2669-2680. doi:10.1080/19443994.2014.904821 es_ES
dc.description.references Rezvanpour, A., Roostaazad, R., Hesampour, M., Nyström, M., & Ghotbi, C. (2009). Effective factors in the treatment of kerosene–water emulsion by using UF membranes. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161(2-3), 1216-1224. doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04.074 es_ES
dc.description.references Salahi, A., Abbasi, M., & Mohammadi, T. (2010). Permeate flux decline during UF of oily wastewater: Experimental and modeling. Desalination, 251(1-3), 153-160. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2009.08.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Salahi, A., & Mohammadi, T. (2011). Oily wastewater treatment by ultrafiltration using Taguchi experimental design. Water Science and Technology, 63(7), 1476-1484. doi:10.2166/wst.2011.383 es_ES
dc.description.references Ezzati, A., Gorouhi, E., & Mohammadi, T. (2005). Separation of water in oil emulsions using microfiltration. Desalination, 185(1-3), 371-382. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2005.03.086 es_ES
dc.description.references Kaladhar, M., Subbaiah, K. V., Rao, C. S., … Rao, K. N. (2011). Application of Taguchi approach and Utility Concept in solving the Multi-objective Problem when turning AISI 202 Austenitic Stainless Steel. Journal of Engineering Science and Technology Review, 4(1), 55-61. doi:10.25103/jestr.041.08 es_ES
dc.description.references Mohammadi, T., & Safavi, M. A. (2009). Application of Taguchi method in optimization of desalination by vacuum membrane distillation. Desalination, 249(1), 83-89. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2009.01.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Khan, M. M. T., Takizawa, S., Lewandowski, Z., Jones, W. L., Camper, A. K., Katayama, H., … Ohgaki, S. (2011). Membrane fouling due to dynamic particle size changes in the aerated hybrid PAC–MF system. Journal of Membrane Science, 371(1-2), 99-107. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.01.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Rezaei, H., Ashtiani, F. Z., & Fouladitajar, A. (2014). Fouling behavior and performance of microfiltration membranes for whey treatment in steady and unsteady-state conditions. Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering, 31(2), 503-518. doi:10.1590/0104-6632.20140312s00002521 es_ES
dc.description.references Cojocaru, C., & Zakrzewska-Trznadel, G. (2007). Response surface modeling and optimization of copper removal from aqua solutions using polymer assisted ultrafiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 298(1-2), 56-70. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2007.04.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Idris, A. (2002). Optimization of cellulose acetate hollow fiber reverse osmosis membrane production using Taguchi method. Journal of Membrane Science, 205(1-2), 223-237. doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(02)00116-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Kumar, Y., & Singh, H. (2014). Multi-response Optimization in Dry Turning Process Using Taguchi’s Approach and Utility Concept. Procedia Materials Science, 5, 2142-2151. doi:10.1016/j.mspro.2014.07.417 es_ES
dc.description.references Song, L. (1998). Flux decline in crossflow microfiltration and ultrafiltration: mechanisms and modeling of membrane fouling. Journal of Membrane Science, 139(2), 183-200. doi:10.1016/s0376-7388(97)00263-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Xu, J., Chang, C.-Y., & Gao, C. (2010). Performance of a ceramic ultrafiltration membrane system in pretreatment to seawater desalination. Separation and Purification Technology, 75(2), 165-173. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2010.07.020 es_ES
dc.description.references Seyed Shahabadi, S. M., & Reyhani, A. (2014). Optimization of operating conditions in ultrafiltration process for produced water treatment via the full factorial design methodology. Separation and Purification Technology, 132, 50-61. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2014.04.051 es_ES
dc.description.references Ennil Köse, T. (2008). Agricultural residue anion exchanger for removal of dyestuff from wastewater using full factorial design. Desalination, 222(1-3), 323-330. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.156 es_ES
dc.description.references Gönder, Z. B., Kaya, Y., Vergili, I., & Barlas, H. (2010). Optimization of filtration conditions for CIP wastewater treatment by nanofiltration process using Taguchi approach. Separation and Purification Technology, 70(3), 265-273. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2009.10.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Reyhani, A., & Hemmati, M. (2013). Wastewater treatment by ultrafiltration system, considering the effects of operating conditions: experimental and modeling. Desalination and Water Treatment, 52(34-36), 6282-6294. doi:10.1080/19443994.2013.815587 es_ES
dc.subject.ods 12.- Garantizar las pautas de consumo y de producción sostenibles es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem