- -

Differences in Architects and Nonarchitects' Perception of Urban Design: An Application of Kansei Engineering Techniques

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Differences in Architects and Nonarchitects' Perception of Urban Design: An Application of Kansei Engineering Techniques

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Linares; Montañana; ...
Tamaño: 2.557Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Llinares Millán, María del Carmen es_ES
dc.contributor.author Montañana i Aviñó, Antoni es_ES
dc.contributor.author Navarro Astor, Elena es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2014-03-28T14:28:55Z
dc.date.available 2014-03-28T14:28:55Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.issn 2090-4185
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/36722
dc.description.abstract We analyse architects and nonarchitects' emotional assessments of different districts in their own city (Valencia, Spain) by applying Kansei engineering techniques. A field study was carried out on a sample of 140 subjects (70 architects and 70 nonarchitects) who were asked to express their opinions on different areas in the city. The set of emotional impressions used by architects and non-architects to describe their sensations was obtained using differential semantics. The semantic space was described by 9 independent axis which explained 62% of the variability. Then, for each collective the set of impressions which influence the final residential or investment area decision was analysed. This relationship was obtained applying linear regression models. The results showed no significant differences between both groups so that the emotional attributes determining the choice of area were very similar for architects and non-architects. Greater discrepancies were found when the purpose of the choice was investment and not residential. Finally a neighbourhood was semantically profiled to represent and compare both collectives' perceptions. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Urban Studies Research es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Differential semantics es_ES
dc.subject Differences in perception es_ES
dc.subject Kansei engineering es_ES
dc.subject Urban design es_ES
dc.subject.classification ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS es_ES
dc.title Differences in Architects and Nonarchitects' Perception of Urban Design: An Application of Kansei Engineering Techniques es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1155/2011/736307
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Llinares Millán, MDC.; Montañana I Aviñó, A.; Navarro Astor, E. (2011). Differences in Architects and Nonarchitects' Perception of Urban Design: An Application of Kansei Engineering Techniques. Urban Studies Research. 2011:1-13. doi:10.1155/2011/736307 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2011/736307 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 13 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 2011 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 212132
dc.description.references Groat, L. (1982). Meaning in post-modern architecture: An examination using the multiple sorting task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 2(1), 3-22. doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(82)80002-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Duffy, M., Bailey, S., Beck, B., & Barker, D. G. (1986). Preferences in Nursing Home Design. Environment and Behavior, 18(2), 246-257. doi:10.1177/0013916586182006 es_ES
dc.description.references Devlin, K., & Nasar, J. L. (1989). The beauty and the beast: Some preliminary comparisons of ‘high’ versus ‘popular’ residential architecture and public versus architect judgments of same. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 9(4), 333-344. doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(89)80013-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Stamps, A. E. (1991). Public Preferences for High Rise Buildings: Stylistic and Demographic Effects. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 72(3), 839-844. doi:10.2466/pms.1991.72.3.839 es_ES
dc.description.references Gifford, R., Hine, D. W., Muller-Clemm, W., Reynolds, D. J., & Shaw, K. T. (2000). Decoding Modern Architecture. Environment and Behavior, 32(2), 163-187. doi:10.1177/00139160021972487 es_ES
dc.description.references Akalin, A., Yildirim, K., Wilson, C., & Kilicoglu, O. (2009). Architecture and engineering students’ evaluations of house façades: Preference, complexity and impressiveness. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(1), 124-132. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Purcell, A. T. (1986). Environmental Perception and Affect. Environment and Behavior, 18(1), 3-30. doi:10.1177/0013916586181001 es_ES
dc.description.references Purcell, A. T. (1987). The relationship between buildings and behaviour. Building and Environment, 22(3), 215-232. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(87)90010-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Purcell, A. T., & Nasar, J. L. (1992). Experiencing other people’s houses: a model of similarities and differences in environmental experience. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(3), 199-211. doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80135-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Lewicki, P., Hill, T., & Bizot, E. (1988). Acquisition of procedural knowledge about a pattern of stimuli that cannot be articulated. Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), 24-37. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(88)90023-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Mulder, C. H. (1996). Housing choice: Assumptions and approaches. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 11(3), 209-232. doi:10.1007/bf02496589 es_ES
dc.description.references Ellen, I. G., & Turner, M. A. (1997). Does neighborhood matter? Assessing recent evidence. Housing Policy Debate, 8(4), 833-866. doi:10.1080/10511482.1997.9521280 es_ES
dc.description.references Nagamachi, M. (1995). Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15(1), 3-11. doi:10.1016/0169-8141(94)00052-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Jindo, T., Hirasago, K., & Nagamachi, M. (1995). Development of a design support system for office chairs using 3-D graphics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15(1), 49-62. doi:10.1016/0169-8141(94)00056-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Matsubara, Y., & Nagamachi, M. (1997). Hybrid Kansei engineering system and design support. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19(2), 81-92. doi:10.1016/s0169-8141(96)00005-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Llinares, C., & Page, A. (2007). Application of product differential semantics to quantify purchaser perceptions in housing assessment. Building and Environment, 42(7), 2488-2497. doi:10.1016/j.buildenv.2006.06.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Streiner, D. L. (2003). Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1), 99-103. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa8001_18 es_ES
dc.description.references Llinares, C., & Page, A. F. (2008). Differential semantics as a Kansei Engineering tool for analysing the emotional impressions which determine the choice of neighbourhood: The case of Valencia, Spain. Landscape and Urban Planning, 87(4), 247-257. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Herzog, T. R. (1992). A cognitive analysis of preference for urban spaces. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12(3), 237-248. doi:10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80138-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Nasar, J. L. (1990). The Evaluative Image of the City. Journal of the American Planning Association, 56(1), 41-53. doi:10.1080/01944369008975742 es_ES
dc.description.references Jindo, T., & Hirasago, K. (1997). Application studies to car interior of Kansei engineering. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19(2), 105-114. doi:10.1016/s0169-8141(96)00007-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Ishihara, S., Ishihara, K., Nagamachi, M., & Matsubara, Y. (1997). An analysis of Kansei structure on shoes using self-organizing neural networks. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19(2), 93-104. doi:10.1016/s0169-8141(96)00006-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Shimizu, Y., & Jindo, T. (1995). A fuzzy logic analysis method for evaluating human sensitivities. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15(1), 39-47. doi:10.1016/0169-8141(95)91249-a es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem