- -

Patent Overlay Mapping: Visualizing Technological Distance

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Patent Overlay Mapping: Visualizing Technological Distance

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Kay L. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Newman, N. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Youtie, J. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Porter A.L. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Rafols García, Ismael es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2014-11-18T10:32:36Z
dc.date.available 2014-11-18T10:32:36Z
dc.date.issued 2014-05-07
dc.identifier.issn 1532-2882
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/44358
dc.description.abstract This paper presents a new global patent map that represents all technological categories and a method to locate patent data of individual organizations and technological fields on the global map. This overlay map technique may support competitive intelligence and policy decision making. The global patent map is based on similarities in citing-to-cited relationships between categories of the International Patent Classification (IPC) of European Patent Office (EPO) patents from 2000 to 2006. This patent data set, extracted from the PATSTAT database, includes 760,000 patent records in 466 IPC-based categories. We compare the global patent maps derived from this categorization to related efforts of other global patent maps. The paper overlays the nanotechnology-related patenting activities of two companies and two different nanotechnology subfields on the global patent map. The exercise shows the potential of patent overlay maps to visualize technological areas and potentially support decision making. Furthermore, this study shows that IPC categories that are similar to one another based on citing-to-cited patterns (and thus close in the global patent map) are not necessarily in the same hierarchical IPC branch, thereby revealing new relationships between technologies that are classified as pertaining to different (and sometimes distant) subject areas in the IPC scheme. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship We thank Kevin Boyack, Loet Leydesdorff, and Antoine Schoen for open and fruitful discussions about this paper. This research was undertaken largely at Georgia Tech drawing on support from the U.S. National Science Foundation (NSF) through the Center for Nanotechnology in Society (Arizona State University; Award No. 0531194); and NSF Award No. 1064146 ("Revealing Innovation Pathways: Hybrid Science Maps for Technology Assessment and Foresight"). Part of this research was also undertaken in collaboration with the Center for Nanotechnology in Society, University of California Santa Barbara (NSF Awards No. 0938099 and No. 0531184). The findings and observations contained in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the US National Science Foundation. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Association for Information Science and Technology (ASIS&T): JASIS&T es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Information mapping es_ES
dc.subject Innovation es_ES
dc.subject Patents es_ES
dc.title Patent Overlay Mapping: Visualizing Technological Distance es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1002/asi.23146
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSF//1064146/US/TLS: Revealing Innovation Pathways/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSF//0531184/US/NSEC: Center for Nanotechnology in Society at University of California, Santa Barbara/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSF//0938099/US/NSEC: Center for Nanotechnology in Society at University of California, Santa Barbara/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/NSF//0531194/US/NSEC: Center for Nanotechnology in Society at Arizona State University/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Kay L.; Newman, N.; Youtie, J.; Porter A.L.; Rafols García, I. (2014). Patent Overlay Mapping: Visualizing Technological Distance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 65(12):2432-2443. doi:10.1002/asi.23146 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/asi.23146 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 2432 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 2443 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 65 es_ES
dc.description.issue 12 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 260531
dc.contributor.funder National Science Foundation, EEUU es_ES
dc.description.references Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., Bettencourt, L., Chute, R., Rodriguez, M. A., & Balakireva, L. (2009). Clickstream Data Yields High-Resolution Maps of Science. PLoS ONE, 4(3), e4803. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004803 es_ES
dc.description.references Boyack, K. W., Börner, K., & Klavans, R. (2008). Mapping the structure and evolution of chemistry research. Scientometrics, 79(1), 45-60. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0403-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Boyack, K. W., & Klavans, R. (2008). Measuring science–technology interaction using rare inventor–author names. Journal of Informetrics, 2(3), 173-182. doi:10.1016/j.joi.2008.03.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Börner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351-374. doi:10.1007/s11192-005-0255-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Malerba, F. (2003). Knowledge-relatedness in firm technological diversification. Research Policy, 32(1), 69-87. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(02)00004-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Chen, C. (2003). Mapping Scientific Frontiers: The Quest for Knowledge Visualization. doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-0051-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and «Mode 2» to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123. doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(99)00055-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Franz , J.S. 2009 Constructing technological distances from US patent data es_ES
dc.description.references Hinze , S. Reiss , T. Schmoch , U. 1997 Statistical analysis on the distance between fields of technology http://www.isi.fraunhofer.de/isi-media/docs/isi-publ/1997/isi97b81/technology-fields-diastance.pdf?WSESSIONID=5712ff2ca5ffcf0d9590afc8ef7e1486 es_ES
dc.description.references Janssens, F., Zhang, L., Moor, B. D., & Glänzel, W. (2009). Hybrid clustering for validation and improvement of subject-classification schemes. Information Processing & Management, 45(6), 683-702. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2009.06.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Kauffman, S., Lobo, J., & Macready, W. G. (2000). Optimal search on a technology landscape. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 43(2), 141-166. doi:10.1016/s0167-2681(00)00114-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Klavans, R., & Boyack, K. W. (2009). Toward a consensus map of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(3), 455-476. doi:10.1002/asi.20991 es_ES
dc.description.references Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348-362. doi:10.1002/asi.20967 es_ES
dc.description.references Moya-Anegón, Sci. G. F. de, Vargas-Quesada, B., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., Munoz-Fernández, F. J., & Herrero-Solana, V. (2007). Visualizing the marrow of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(14), 2167-2179. doi:10.1002/asi.20683 es_ES
dc.description.references Moya-Anegón, F., Vargas-Quesada, B., Herrero-Solana, V., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Corera-Álvarez, E., & Munoz-Fernández, F. J. (2004). A new technique for building maps of large scientific domains based on the cocitation of classes and categories. Scientometrics, 61(1), 129-145. doi:10.1023/b:scie.0000037368.31217.34 es_ES
dc.description.references Porter, A. L., & Youtie, J. (2009). Where does nanotechnology belong in the map of science? Nature Nanotechnology, 4(9), 534-536. doi:10.1038/nnano.2009.207 es_ES
dc.description.references Rafols, I., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(9), 1823-1835. doi:10.1002/asi.21086 es_ES
dc.description.references Rafols, I., & Meyer, M. (2009). Diversity and network coherence as indicators of interdisciplinarity: case studies in bionanoscience. Scientometrics, 82(2), 263-287. doi:10.1007/s11192-009-0041-y es_ES
dc.description.references Rafols, I., Porter, A. L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2010). Science overlay maps: A new tool for research policy and library management. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(9), 1871-1887. doi:10.1002/asi.21368 es_ES
dc.description.references Rosvall, M., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2010). Mapping Change in Large Networks. PLoS ONE, 5(1), e8694. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0008694 es_ES
dc.description.references Schoen , A. Villard , L. Laurens , P. Cointet , J. Heimeriks , G. Alkemade , F. 2012 The network structure of technological developments: Technological distance as a walk on the technology map es_ES
dc.description.references Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269. doi:10.1002/asi.4630240406 es_ES
dc.description.references Van den Besselaar, P., & Leydesdorff, L. (1996). Mapping change in scientific specialties: A scientometric reconstruction of the development of artificial intelligence. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(6), 415-436. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(199606)47:6<415::aid-asi3>3.0.co;2-y es_ES
dc.description.references Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2012). A new methodology for constructing a publication-level classification system of science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(12), 2378-2392. doi:10.1002/asi.22748 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem