- -

The use of social technologies in Spanish young people: a global behaviour model in teenagers

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

The use of social technologies in Spanish young people: a global behaviour model in teenagers

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Gil Pechuán, Ignacio es_ES
dc.contributor.author Conesa García, María Pilar es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2014-12-05T11:33:57Z
dc.date.available 2014-12-05T11:33:57Z
dc.date.issued 2013-12
dc.identifier.issn 2194-0061
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/45221
dc.description.abstract The majority of all Spanish youths aged 12 17 use online social networking sites (internet and mobile technology), according to a new local survey of teenagers conducted by Valencia University, Fepad & the Universidad Polite¿cnica de Valencia. The survey also found that older teens, in particular girls, are more likely to use these sites. For girls, social networking sites are places to reinforce preexisting friendships, while for boys these networks provide opportunities for flirting and making new friends. In both cases, business relations in the future will be influenced by this new relationship method with new business relationships being taken on by digital natives as opposed to the current digital immigrants who have not taken on board this network technology as quickly. The objective of this study is to present our research on the relationship between web 2.0 technologies and the behaviour and personality of the teenagers who form the object of the study as well as the potential dependencies, and resulting personal, academic and family disorders that may stem from abuse of these technologies, especially via mobile phones. The main objective is to explore how web-based technologies lessen or generate different types of disorders in today s society, particularly amongst teenagers. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Global business perspectives es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Social technologies es_ES
dc.subject Behaviour model es_ES
dc.subject Participative social technologies es_ES
dc.subject Web 2.0 es_ES
dc.subject.classification ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS es_ES
dc.title The use of social technologies in Spanish young people: a global behaviour model in teenagers es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s40196-012-0006-z
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Gil Pechuán, I.; Conesa García, MP. (2013). The use of social technologies in Spanish young people: a global behaviour model in teenagers. Global business perspectives. 1(4):289-308. doi:10.1007/s40196-012-0006-z es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs40196-012-0006-z es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 289 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 308 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 1 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 262811
dc.description.references Becker, M. H. (1970). Sociometric location and innovativeness: Reformulation and extension of the diffusion Model. American Sociological Review, 35(2), 267–282. es_ES
dc.description.references Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27, 55–71. es_ES
dc.description.references Burt, R. S. (1978). Cohesion versus structural equivalence as a basis for network subgroups. Sociological Methods & Research, 7, 189–212. es_ES
dc.description.references Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1287–1335. es_ES
dc.description.references Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: An introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Chu, J. (1997). Navigating the media environment: How youth claim a place through zines. Social Justice, 24(3), 71–85. es_ES
dc.description.references Dagenne, A., & Forsé, M. (1999). Introducing social networks. London: Sage Publications. es_ES
dc.description.references Dinar, A., Karagiannis, G., & Tzouvelekas, V. (2007). Evaluating the impact of agricultural extension on farms’ performance in Crete: A nonneutral stochastic frontier approach. Agricultural Economics, 36, 135–146. es_ES
dc.description.references Erickson, B. H. (1988). The relational basis of attitudes. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach. New York: Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Feder, G., & Savastano, S. (2006). The role of opinion leaders in the diffusion of new knowledge: The case of integrated pest management. World Development, 34(7), 1287–1300. es_ES
dc.description.references Friedkin, N. E. (1984). Structural cohesion and equivalence explanations of social homogeneity. Sociological Methods and Research, 12, 234–261. es_ES
dc.description.references Friedkin, N. E. (1999). Social influence networks and opinion change. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 1–29. es_ES
dc.description.references Friedkin, N. E., & Johnssen, E. C. (1997). Social positions in influence networks. Social Networks, 19, 209–222. es_ES
dc.description.references Gamero, R. (2007). Servicios basados en redes sociales, la web 2.0. In Investigación y marketing, Vol. 97, pp. 16–20. es_ES
dc.description.references Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. es_ES
dc.description.references Granovetter, M. (1982). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. In P. V. Marsden & N. Lin (Eds.), Social structure and network analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. es_ES
dc.description.references Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111. es_ES
dc.description.references Krackhard, D. (1998). Simmelian ties: Super strong and sticky. In R. Kramer & M. Neale (Eds.), Power and influence in organizations. Thousand Oaks: California. es_ES
dc.description.references Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 183–210. es_ES
dc.description.references Krackhardt, D., & Kilduff, M. (2002). Structure, culture and Simmelian ties in entrepreneurial firms. Social Networks, 24, 279–290. es_ES
dc.description.references Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50, 1477–1490. es_ES
dc.description.references Liu, W. T., & Duff, R. W. (1972). The strength in weak ties. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 361–366. es_ES
dc.description.references Marsden, P. V. & Friedkin, N. E. (1994). Network studies of social influence. In: Wasserman, S. & Galaskiewicz, J. (Eds.), Advances in social network analysis: Research in the social and behavioural sciences. London: Sage. es_ES
dc.description.references McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001). Birds of a father: Homophily network. Annual of Sociology, 27, 415–444. es_ES
dc.description.references Michaelson, A., & Contractor, N. S. (1992). Structural position and perceived similarity. Social Psychology Quarterly, 55(3), 300–310. es_ES
dc.description.references Mizruchi, M. S. (1993). Cohesion, equivalence and similarity of behaviour: A theoretical and empirical assessment. Social Networks, 15, 275–307. es_ES
dc.description.references Monge, P. R. & Contractor, N. S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Nyblom, J., Borgatti, S., Roslakka, J., & Salo, M. A. (2003). Statistical analysis of network data: An application to diffusion of innovation. Social Networks, 25, 175–195. es_ES
dc.description.references Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the Tertius Iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50, 100–130. es_ES
dc.description.references Reagans, R., & McEvily, B. (2003). Network structure and knowledge transfer: The effects of cohesion and range. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 240–267. es_ES
dc.description.references Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Sieber, S., & Valor, J. (2005). Criterios de adopción de las tecnologías de información y comunicación, e-Business Center Pricewaterhouse Coopers & IESE, Working Paper. http://www.ebcenter.org . es_ES
dc.description.references Strang, D., & Soule, S. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265–290. es_ES
dc.description.references Tapscott, D. (1998). Growing up digital: The rise of the Net generation. New York: McGraw-Hill. es_ES
dc.description.references Valente, T. W. (1996). Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations. Social Networks, 18, 69–89. es_ES
dc.description.references Valente, T. W. (2005). Network models and methods for studying the diffusion of innovations. In: P. J Carrington, J. Scott & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Wejnert, B. (2002). Integrating models of diffusion of innovations: A conceptual framework. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 297–326. es_ES
dc.description.references Wilkening, E. A. (1956). Roles of communicating agents in technological change in agriculture. Social Forces, 34, 361–367. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem