- -

A quantitative flood risk analysis methodology for urban areas with integration of social research data

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A quantitative flood risk analysis methodology for urban areas with integration of social research data

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Escuder;Castillo; ...
Tamaño: 4.895Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Escuder Bueno, Ignacio es_ES
dc.contributor.author Castillo Rodríguez, Jesica Tamara es_ES
dc.contributor.author Zechner, S. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Jöbstl, C. es_ES
dc.contributor.author PERALES MOMPARLER, SARA es_ES
dc.contributor.author Petaccia, G. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2015-01-29T14:08:50Z
dc.date.available 2015-01-29T14:08:50Z
dc.date.issued 2012-09
dc.identifier.issn 1561-8633
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/46529
dc.description.abstract Risk analysis has become a top priority for authorities and stakeholders in many European countries, with the aim of reducing flooding risk, considering the population’s needs and improving risk awareness. Within this context, two methodological pieces have been developed in the period 2009–2011 within the SUFRI project (Sustainable Strategies of Urban Flood Risk Management with non-structural measures to cope with the residual risk, 2nd ERA-Net CRUE Funding Initiative). First, the “SUFRI Methodology for pluvial and river flooding risk assessment in urban areas to inform decision-making” provides a comprehensive and quantitative tool for flood risk analysis. Second, the “Methodology for investigation of risk awareness of the population concerned” presents the basis to estimate current risk from a social perspective and identify tendencies in the way floods are understood by citizens. Outcomes of both methods are integrated in this paper with the aim of informing decision making on non-structural protection measures. The results of two case studies are shown to illustrate practical applications of this developed approach. The main advantage of applying the methodology herein presented consists in providing a quantitative estimation of flooding risk before and after investing in non-structural risk mitigation measures. It can be of great interest for decision makers as it provides rational and solid information. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The work described in this paper was supported by the 2nd ERA-Net CRUE Funding Initiative, particularly funded by the Ministry of Science and Innovation of Spain and the Federal Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Environment and Water Management of Austria (Department 19B of the Government of Styria, Torrent and Avalanche control). en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher European Geosciences Union (EGU) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA HIDRAULICA es_ES
dc.title A quantitative flood risk analysis methodology for urban areas with integration of social research data es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.5194/nhess-12-2843-2012
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente - Departament d'Enginyeria Hidràulica i Medi Ambient es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Universitario de Ingeniería del Agua y del Medio Ambiente - Institut Universitari d'Enginyeria de l'Aigua i Medi Ambient es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Escuder Bueno, I.; Castillo Rodríguez, JT.; Zechner, S.; Jöbstl, C.; Perales Momparler, S.; Petaccia, G. (2012). A quantitative flood risk analysis methodology for urban areas with integration of social research data. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences. 12(9):2843-2863. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-2843-2012 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/nhess-12-2843-2012 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 2843 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 2863 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 12 es_ES
dc.description.issue 9 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 233417
dc.subject.asignatura Análisis de riesgos de inundación, incluyendo evaluación de seguridad de presas 32491 / W - Programa de doctorado en ingeniería del agua y medioambiental 2077 es_ES
dc.subject.asignatura Análisis de riesgos de inundación, incluyendo evaluación de seguridad de presas 32491 / W - Programa de doctorado en ingeniería del agua y medioambiental 2218 es_ES
dc.subject.asignatura Análisis de riesgos de inundación, incluyendo evaluación de seguridad de presas 32491 / X - Máster universitario en ingeniería hidráulica y medio ambiente 2152 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
dc.contributor.funder Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Austria
dc.description.references AEMS: Commonwealth of Australia, Flood Warning, Manual 21, Australian Emergency Manuals Series, ISBN 978-1-921152-17-7, 2009. es_ES
dc.description.references Australian National Committee on Large Dams (ANCOLD): Incorporated Guidelines on Risk Assessment, October 2003. es_ES
dc.description.references Ayyub, B. M.: Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risks, CRC Press, 2001. es_ES
dc.description.references Baana, P. J. and Klijna, F.: Flood risk perception and implications for flood risk management in the Netherlands, Int. J. River Basin Manage., 2, 113–122, 2004. es_ES
dc.description.references Bowles, D. S.: ALARP Evaluation-Using Cost Effectiveness and Disproportionality to Justify Risk Reduction, Australian National Commission on Large Dams (ANCOLD) – Bulletin, 127, 89–106, August 2004. es_ES
dc.description.references Conselleria d'Obres Públiques, Urbanisme i Territori (COPUT): Plan de Acción Territorial de Carácter Sectorial sobre Prevención de Riesgo de Inundación en la Comunidad Valenciana (PATRICOVA), 2002 (in Spanish). es_ES
dc.description.references CRUE Research Funding Initiative: Synthesis Report No I-2009, Addressing the key findings of research, Risk Assessment and Risk Management: Effectiveness and Efficiency of Non-structural Flood Risk Management Measures, Project Contract No: ERAC-CT-2004-515742, 2009. es_ES
dc.description.references Cunge, J. A., Holly, F. M., and Vervey, A.: Practical aspects of Computational River Hydraulics, Pitman Publ. Inc, London, 1990. es_ES
dc.description.references Dawson, W. R.: Generic depth-damage relationships for residential structures with basements, Economic Guidance Memorandum (EGM) 04-01, USACE, 2003. es_ES
dc.description.references DHS: Estimating Economic Consequences for Dam Failure Scenarios, Dams Sector, US Department of Homeland Security, September 2011, 2011a. es_ES
dc.description.references DHS: Estimating Loss of Life for Dam Failure Scenarios, Dams Sector, US Department of Homeland Security, September 2011, 2011b. es_ES
dc.description.references Douben, K. J.: Characteristics of river floods and flooding: a global overview, 1985–2003, Irrigation Drainage, 55, S9–S21, 2006. es_ES
dc.description.references EC: Directive 2007/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2007 on the assessment and management of flood risks, 2007. es_ES
dc.description.references EC: Directive 2008/114/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection, 2008. es_ES
dc.description.references Escuder-Bueno, I., Morales-Torres, A., and Perales-Momparler, S.: Urban Flood Risk Characterization as a tool for planning and managing. Workshop Alexandria, March 2010: Exploration of Tolerable Risk Guidelines for Levee Systems, Washington DC (USA), available at: www.ipresas.upv.es, www.sufri.tugraz.at, 2010. es_ES
dc.description.references Escuder-Bueno, I., Castillo-Rodríguez, J. T., Perales-Momparler, S., and Morales-Torres, A.: SUFRI methodology for pluvial and river flooding risk assessment in urban areas to inform decision-making, SUFRI project, WP3, final report, July 2011, available at: www.sufri.tugraz.at, 2011a. es_ES
dc.description.references Escuder-Bueno, I., Castillo-Rodríguez, J. T., Perales-Momparler, S., and Morales-Torres, A.: A complete and quantitative tool for flood risk analysis in urban areas: river and pluvial flooding, Proceedings UFRIM Conference, Graz (Austria), September 2011, 2011b. es_ES
dc.description.references Gómez, M. and Russo, B.: Criterios de riesgo asociados a escorrentía urbana, Jornadas de Ingeniería del Agua, 2009 (in Spanish). es_ES
dc.description.references Graham, W. J.: A procedure for estimating loss of life caused by dam failure, DSO-99-06, US Department of Interior, Bureau of Reclamation, 1999. es_ES
dc.description.references Grossmann, G. and Seiser, T.: Final Report – Survey about risk awareness – SUFRI project, 2011 (unpublished report). es_ES
dc.description.references IEC/FDIS 31010, ISO International Standard: Risk management – Risk assessment techniques, IEC/FDIS 31010:2009 (E), 2009. es_ES
dc.description.references International Commission on Large Dams (ICOLD): Risk Assessment in Dam Safety Management: A Reconnaissance of Benefits, Methods and Current Applications, Bulletin130, 2005. es_ES
dc.description.references Jöbstl, C., Zechner, S., Knoblauch, H., Pohl, R., Bornschein, A., Natale, L., Petaccia, G., Escuder-Bueno, I., Castillo-Rodríguez, J. T., Perales-Momparler, S., Morales-Torres, A., Bateman, A., Medina, V., Díaz, A., Grossmann, G., Kulmhofer, A., and Seiser, T.: SUFRI – Sustainable Strategies of Urban Flood Risk Management with non-structural measures to cope with the residual risk, Final Report, Graz 2011, available at: www.sufri.tugraz.at, 2011. es_ES
dc.description.references Jonkman, S. N.: Global Perspectives on Loss of Human Life Caused by Floods, Nat. Hazards, 34, 151–175, 2003. es_ES
dc.description.references Messner, F., Penning-Rowsell, E., Green, C., Meyer, V., Tunstall, S., and van der Veen, A.: FLOODSITE Evaluating flood damages: guidance and recommendations on principles and methods, Report T09-06-01, January 2007. es_ES
dc.description.references Munger, D. F., Bowles, D. S., Boyer, D. B., Davis, D. W., Margo, D. A., Moser, D. A., Regan, P. J., and Snorteland, N.: Interim tolerable risk guidelines for US Army Corps of Engineers dams. In USSD Workshop on the future of dam safety decision making: combining standards and risk, April 2009. es_ES
dc.description.references Nanía, L.: Métodos de transformación lluvía-escorrentía y de propagación de caudales, Hidrología superficial y subterránea, Universidad de Granada, 2002 (in Spanish). es_ES
dc.description.references Parker, D., Tunstall, S., and Wilson, T.: Socio-economic benefits of flood forecasting and warning, Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University, Queensway, Enfield, EN3 4SF, London, UK, 2005. es_ES
dc.description.references Penning-Rowsell, E., Floyd, D., Ramsbottom, P., and Surendran, S.: Estimating injury and loss of life in floods: A deterministic framework, Nat. Hazards, 36, 43–64, 2005. es_ES
dc.description.references Reiter, P.: RESCDAM – Loss of life caused by dam failure, the RESCDAM LOL method and its application to Kyrkosjarvi dam in Seinajoki, Water Consulting Ltd., 2001. es_ES
dc.description.references Roos, M.: Flood management practice in northern California, Irrigation Drainage, 55, 93–99, 2006. es_ES
dc.description.references Samuels, P., Klijn, F., and Dijkman J.: An analysis of the current practice of policies on river flood risk management in different countries, Irrigation Drainage, 55, 141–150, 2006. es_ES
dc.description.references Sayers, P. B., Hall, J. W., and Meadowcroft, I. C.: Towards risk-based flood hazard management in the UK, Proceedings of ICE-Civil Engineering 150 May 2002, 36–42, Paper 12803, 2002. es_ES
dc.description.references Scawthorn, C., Flores, P.; Blais, N., Seligson, H., Tate, E., Chang, S., Mifflin, E., Thomas, W., Murphy, J., Jones, C., and Lawrence, M.: HAZUS-MH flood loss estimation methodology, II: Damage and Loss Assessment, Nat. Hazards Rev., 7, 72–81, 2006. es_ES
dc.description.references Schanze, J., Hutter, G., Olfert, A., Penning-Rowsell, E.C., Parker, D., Harries, T., Werritty, A., Nachtnebel, H., Holzmann, H., Neuhold, C., Meyer, V., Kuhlicke, C., Schildt, A., Jessel, B., and Königer, P.: FLOOD-ERA Joint Report, CRUE Research Report No I-1: Systematisation, evaluation and context conditions of structural and non-structural measures for flood risk reduction, Project Contract No: ERAC-CT-2004-515742, 2008. es_ES
dc.description.references Serrano-Lombillo, A., Escuder-Bueno, I., de Membrillera-Ortuño, M. G., and Altarejos-García, L.: iPresas – Software for risk analysis, 23rd International Congress on Large Dams, Brasilia, 2009. es_ES
dc.description.references Simonovic, S. P.: Social criteria for evaluation of flood control measures – Winnipeg case study, Urban Water, 1, 167–175, 1999. es_ES
dc.description.references Témez, J. R.: Extended and Improved Rational method, Highways Administration of Spain, XXIV Congress Madrid Edition, 1991 (in Spanish). es_ES
dc.description.references US Bureau of Reclamation (USBR): Risk Based Profiling System, Technical Service Center, 2001. es_ES
dc.description.references Vrijling, J. K.: Probabilistic design of water defence systems in The Netherlands, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe., 74, 337–344, 2001. es_ES
dc.description.references Zechner, S., Jöbstl, C., and Knoblauch, H.: SUFRI Methodology for investigation of risk awareness of the population concerned, SUFRI project, WP4, final report, December 2011. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem