Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Mendoza, Juan D. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Mula, Josefa | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Campuzano Bolarín, Francisco | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-09T10:56:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-07-09T10:56:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0144-3577 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/52879 | |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore different aggregate production planning (APP) strategies (inventory levelling, validation of the workforce and flexible production alternatives: overtime and/or outsourcing) by using a system dynamics model in a two-level, multi-product, multi-period manpower intensive supply chain (SC). Therefore, the appropriateness of using systems dynamics as a research method, by focusing on managerial applications, to analyse APP policies is proven. From the combination of systems dynamics and APP, recommendations and action strategies are considered for each scenario to understand how the system performs and to improve decision making on APP in the SC context. Design/methodology/approach - The research design analyses a typical factory setting with representative parameter settings for five different conventional APP policies - inventory levelling, workforce variation, overtime, outsourcing and a combination of overtime and outsourcing - through deterministic systems dynamics-based simulation. In order to validate the simulation model, the results from published APP models were replicated. Then, optimisation is conducted for this deterministic setting to determine the performance of all these typical policies with optimal parameter settings. Next, a Monte Carlo stochastic simulation is used to assess the robustness of such performances in a variety of demand settings. Different aggregate plans are tested and the effect that events like demand variability and production times have on the SC performance results is analysed. Findings - The results support the assertion that the greater the demand variability, the higher the flexibility costs (overtime, outsourcing, inventory levelling, and contracts and firings). As greater inter-month oscillations appear, which must be covered with additional alternatives, the optimum number of employees must be determined by analysing the interchanges and marginal costs between capacity oversizing costs (wages, idle time, storage) and the costs to undersize it (penalties for lowering safety stocks, delayed demand, greater use of overtime and outsourcing). Accordingly, controlling the times to avoid increased costs and penalties incurred by delayed demand becomes an essential important task, but one that also depends on the characteristics of this variability. Practical implications - This paper has developed a modelling approach for APP in a manpower intensive SC by applying system dynamics. It includes a simulation model, the analysis of several scenarios, the impact on performance caused by variability events in the parameters, and some recommendations and action strategies to be subsequently applied. The modelling methodology proposed can be employed to design-specific models for each SC. Originality/value - This paper proposes an APP system dynamics approach in a two-level, multi-product, multi-period manpower intensive SC for the first time. This model bridges the gap in the literature relating to simulation, specifically system dynamics and its application for APP. The paper also provides a qualitative description of the various pros and cons of each analysed policy and how they can be combined. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Emerald | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | International Journal of Operations and Production Management | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | Supply chain management | es_ES |
dc.subject | System dynamics | es_ES |
dc.subject | Simulation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Operations planning | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS | es_ES |
dc.title | Using systems dynamics to evaluate the tradeoff among supply chain aggregate production planning policies | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1108/IJOPM-06-2012-0238 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Cerrado | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Centro de Investigación de Gestión e Ingeniería de la Producción - Centre d'Investigació de Gestió i Enginyeria de la Producció | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Mendoza, JD.; Mula, J.; Campuzano Bolarín, F. (2014). Using systems dynamics to evaluate the tradeoff among supply chain aggregate production planning policies. International Journal of Operations and Production Management. 34(8):1055-1079. doi:10.1108/IJOPM-06-2012-0238 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-06-2012-0238 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 1055 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 1079 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 34 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 8 | es_ES |
dc.relation.senia | 287246 | |
dc.description.references | Aliev, R.A. , Fazlollahi, B. , Guirimov, B.G. and Aliev, R.R. (2007), “Fuzzy-genetic approach to aggregate production-distribution planning in supply chain management”, J. Inf. Sci., An Int. J., Vol. 177 No. 20, pp. 4241-4255. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Appelqvist, P., & Lehtonen, J. (2005). Combining optimisation and simulation for steel production scheduling. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 16(2), 197-210. doi:10.1108/17410380510576831 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bertolini, M., & Rizzi, A. (2002). A simulation approach to manage finished goods inventory replenishment economically in a mixed push/pull environment. Logistics Information Management, 15(4), 281-293. doi:10.1108/09576050210436129 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Buxey, G. (2003). Strategy not tactics drives aggregate planning. International Journal of Production Economics, 85(3), 331-346. doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(03)00120-8 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Byrne, M. ., & Bakir, M. . (1999). Production planning using a hybrid simulation – analytical approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 59(1-3), 305-311. doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(98)00104-2 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Campuzano, F., Mula, J., & Peidro, D. (2010). Fuzzy estimations and system dynamics for improving supply chains. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 161(11), 1530-1542. doi:10.1016/j.fss.2009.12.002 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Das, B. ., Rickard, J. ., Shah, N., & Macchietto, S. (2000). An investigation on integration of aggregate production planning, master production scheduling and short-term production scheudling of batch process operations through a common data model. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 24(2-7), 1625-1631. doi:10.1016/s0098-1354(00)80014-9 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Dejonckheere, J., Disney, S. M., Lambrecht, M., & Towill, D. R. (2003). The dynamics of aggregate planning. Production Planning & Control, 14(6), 497-516. doi:10.1080/09537280310001621967 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | De Toni, A., Nassimbeni, G., & Tonchia, S. (1996). An artificial, intelligence‐based production scheduler. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, 7(3), 17-25. doi:10.1108/09576069610116896 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Dewhurst, F., Barber, K., & Rogers, J. J. B. (2001). Towards integrated manufacturing planning with common tool and information sets. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(11), 1460-1482. doi:10.1108/eum0000000006225 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Disney, S. M., Naim, M. M., & Potter, A. (2004). Assessing the impact of e-business on supply chain dynamics. International Journal of Production Economics, 89(2), 109-118. doi:10.1016/s0925-5273(02)00464-4 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gomes da Silva, C., Figueira, J., Lisboa, J., & Barman, S. (2006). An interactive decision support system for an aggregate production planning model based on multiple criteria mixed integer linear programming. Omega, 34(2), 167-177. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2004.08.007 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Greasley, A. (2005). Using system dynamics in a discrete‐event simulation study of a manufacturing plant. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 25(6), 534-548. doi:10.1108/01443570510599700 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hernández, J. E., Mula, J., & Ferriols, F. J. (2008). A reference model for conceptual modelling of production planning processes. Production Planning & Control, 19(8), 725-734. doi:10.1080/09537280802476128 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hernández, J. E., Mula, J., Ferriols, F. J., & Poler, R. (2008). A conceptual model for the production and transport planning process: An application to the automobile sector. Computers in Industry, 59(8), 842-852. doi:10.1016/j.compind.2008.06.004 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Huq, F., Cutright, K., Jones, V., & Hensler, D. A. (2006). Simulation study of a two‐level warehouse inventory replenishment system. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 36(1), 51-65. doi:10.1108/09600030610642931 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ismail, M. A., & ElMaraghy, H. (2009). Progressive modeling—An enabler of dynamic changes in production planning. CIRP Annals, 58(1), 407-412. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2009.03.094 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Jalmania, A. and Feili, A. (2011), “A simulation testing and analysis of aggregate production planning strategies”, Prod. Plan. Control, Vol. 24 No. 6, pp. 423-448. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Jamalnia, A., & Soukhakian, M. A. (2009). A hybrid fuzzy goal programming approach with different goal priorities to aggregate production planning. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(4), 1474-1486. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2008.09.010 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kamath, N. B., & Roy, R. (2007). Capacity augmentation of a supply chain for a short lifecycle product: A system dynamics framework. European Journal of Operational Research, 179(2), 334-351. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2006.03.045 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lambert, D. M., & Cooper, M. C. (2000). Issues in Supply Chain Management. Industrial Marketing Management, 29(1), 65-83. doi:10.1016/s0019-8501(99)00113-3 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lee, Y. H., & Kim, S. H. (2002). Production–distribution planning in supply chain considering capacity constraints. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 43(1-2), 169-190. doi:10.1016/s0360-8352(02)00063-3 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Leung, S. C. H., & Chan, S. S. W. (2009). A goal programming model for aggregate production planning with resource utilization constraint. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 56(3), 1053-1064. doi:10.1016/j.cie.2008.09.017 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lisboa, J., & Yasin, M. (1999). The impact of workforce level restriction on the performance of the linear decision rule: an exploratory production planning study. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 99(4), 156-164. doi:10.1108/02635579910274479 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Minegishi, S., & Thiel, D. (2000). System dynamics modeling and simulation of a particular food supply chain. Simulation Practice and Theory, 8(5), 321-339. doi:10.1016/s0928-4869(00)00026-4 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mula, J., Peidro, D., Díaz-Madroñero, M., & Vicens, E. (2010). Mathematical programming models for supply chain production and transport planning. European Journal of Operational Research, 204(3), 377-390. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2009.09.008 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Mula, J., Poler, R., García-Sabater, J. P., & Lario, F. C. (2006). Models for production planning under uncertainty: A review. International Journal of Production Economics, 103(1), 271-285. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.09.001 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Nam, S., & Logendran, R. (1992). Aggregate production planning — A survey of models and methodologies. European Journal of Operational Research, 61(3), 255-272. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(92)90356-e | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Özbayrak, M., Papadopoulou, T. C., & Akgun, M. (2007). Systems dynamics modelling of a manufacturing supply chain system. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 15(10), 1338-1355. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2007.09.007 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pan, L. and Kleiner, B.H. (1995), “Aggregate planning today”, J. Work Study – MCB univ. press, Vol. 44 No. 3, pp. 4-7. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pastor, R., Altimiras, J., & Mateo, M. (2009). Planning production using mathematical programming: The case of a woodturning company. Computers & Operations Research, 36(7), 2173-2178. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2008.08.005 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sharif, A. M. (2005). Can systems dynamics be effective in modelling dynamic business systems? Business Process Management Journal, 11(5), 612-615. doi:10.1108/14637150510619911 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Singhvi, A., Madhavan, K. P., & Shenoy, U. V. (2004). Pinch analysis for aggregate production planning in supply chains. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 28(6-7), 993-999. doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2003.09.006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Suryani, E., Chou, S.-Y., Hartono, R., & Chen, C.-H. (2010). Demand scenario analysis and planned capacity expansion: A system dynamics framework. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 18(6), 732-751. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2010.01.013 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wang, R.-C., & Fang, H.-H. (2001). Aggregate production planning with multiple objectives in a fuzzy environment. European Journal of Operational Research, 133(3), 521-536. doi:10.1016/s0377-2217(00)00196-x | es_ES |