Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Rojas, Juan-Carlos | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Contero, Manuel | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Bartomeu, Noemi | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Guixeres Provinciale, Jaime | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-21T08:37:54Z | |
dc.date.available | 2016-01-21T08:37:54Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-12 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 0894-3214 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/60093 | |
dc.description.abstract | Three-dimensional virtual representations of consumer products are expected to gain relevance in e-commerce applications as low cost virtual reality headsets arrive on the market in the next years. However, there are a limited number of studies related to the perceptual evaluation of virtual products and their packaging where virtual and real (photographic) representations are compared. As part of an extensive exploration toward understanding product perception in virtual stores, this work presents a study with 38 participants in which consumer perceptions of a photographic and a virtual representation of a beer bottle are examined. Perceptual evaluation is assessed using two metrics: first, an evaluation was performed by applying a bipolar semantic scale based on four axes: novelty, resolution, style and emotion. Second, eye-tracking metrics were employed to analyse participant gaze behaviour during the visualization of stimuli. Virtual bottles were modelled using a medium polygonal load (5K polygons per bottle), and render quality was also medium to intentionally recreate the computing limitations of smartphone-based virtual reality headsets. Results show that a medium render quality alters consumer perception and responses using semantic scales. Eye-tracking analysis confirms that the orientation of the bottle and how it is presented also affect consumer perception. While some orientations result in similar eye-tracking metrics, others show different results. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This work was partially funded by the research programme of 'Catedra Heineken Espana S.A.-UPV' at Universitat Politecnica de Valencia. | en_EN |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Wiley | es_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Packaging Technology and Science | es_ES |
dc.rights | Reserva de todos los derechos | es_ES |
dc.subject | Eye-tracking | es_ES |
dc.subject | Semantic scales | es_ES |
dc.subject | Time fixation | es_ES |
dc.subject | Packaging design | es_ES |
dc.subject | Virtuality | es_ES |
dc.subject.classification | EXPRESION GRAFICA EN LA INGENIERIA | es_ES |
dc.title | Using Combined Bipolar Semantic Scales and Eye-Tracking Metrics to Compare Consumer Perception of Real and Virtual Bottles | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1002/pts.2178 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Gráfica - Departament d'Enginyeria Gràfica | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Interuniversitario de Investigación en Bioingeniería y Tecnología Orientada al Ser Humano - Institut Interuniversitari d'Investigació en Bioenginyeria i Tecnologia Orientada a l'Ésser Humà | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Rojas, J.; Contero, M.; Bartomeu, N.; Guixeres Provinciale, J. (2015). Using Combined Bipolar Semantic Scales and Eye-Tracking Metrics to Compare Consumer Perception of Real and Virtual Bottles. Packaging Technology and Science. 28(12):1047-1056. doi:10.1002/pts.2178 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | S | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/pts.2178 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 1047 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 1056 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 28 | es_ES |
dc.description.issue | 12 | es_ES |
dc.relation.senia | 298033 | es_ES |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1099-1522 | |
dc.contributor.funder | Cátedra Heineken España, Universitat Politècnica de València | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Underwood, R. L., Klein, N. M., & Burke, R. R. (2001). Packaging communication: attentional effects of product imagery. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 10(7), 403-422. doi:10.1108/10610420110410531 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Reutskaja, E., Nagel, R., Camerer, C. F., & Rangel, A. (2011). Search Dynamics in Consumer Choice under Time Pressure: An Eye-Tracking Study. American Economic Review, 101(2), 900-926. doi:10.1257/aer.101.2.900 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Moskowitz, H. R., Reisner, M., Lawlor, J. B., & Deliza, R. (2009). Packaging Research in Food Product Design and Development. doi:10.1002/9781444319330 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Chatterjee, A. (2011). Neuroaesthetics: A Coming of Age Story. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 53-62. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21457 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Waterlander, W. E., Scarpa, M., Lentz, D., & Steenhuis, I. H. (2011). The virtual supermarket: An innovative research tool to study consumer food purchasing behaviour. BMC Public Health, 11(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-11-589 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pieters, R., & Warlop, L. (1999). Visual attention during brand choice: The impact of time pressure and task motivation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 16(1), 1-16. doi:10.1016/s0167-8116(98)00022-6 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Reimann, M., Zaichkowsky, J., Neuhaus, C., Bender, T., & Weber, B. (2010). Aesthetic package design: A behavioral, neural, and psychological investigation. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 431-441. doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2010.06.009 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hoffman, J. E., & Subramaniam, B. (1995). The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements. Perception & Psychophysics, 57(6), 787-795. doi:10.3758/bf03206794 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Piqueras-Fiszman, B., Velasco, C., Salgado-Montejo, A., & Spence, C. (2013). Using combined eye tracking and word association in order to assess novel packaging solutions: A case study involving jam jars. Food Quality and Preference, 28(1), 328-338. doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2012.10.006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Djamasbi, S., Siegel, M., & Tullis, T. (2010). Generation Y, web design, and eye tracking. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 68(5), 307-323. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2009.12.006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | TE Kessels, L., & AC Ruiter, R. (2012). Eye movement responses to health messages on cigarette packages. BMC Public Health, 12(1). doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-352 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Serrano, B., Botella, C., Baños, R. M., & Alcañiz, M. (2013). Using virtual reality and mood-induction procedures to test products with consumers of ceramic tiles. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 648-653. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.10.024 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Söderman, M. (2005). Virtual reality in product evaluations with potential customers: An exploratory study comparing virtual reality with conventional product representations. Journal of Engineering Design, 16(3), 311-328. doi:10.1080/09544820500128967 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Artacho-Ramírez, M. A., Diego-Mas, J. A., & Alcaide-Marzal, J. (2008). Influence of the mode of graphical representation on the perception of product aesthetic and emotional features: An exploratory study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(11-12), 942-952. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2008.02.020 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Park, H., Son, J.-S., & Lee, K.-H. (2008). Design evaluation of digital consumer products using virtual reality-based functional behaviour simulation. Journal of Engineering Design, 19(4), 359-375. doi:10.1080/09544820701474129 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ledoux, T., Nguyen, A. S., Bakos-Block, C., & Bordnick, P. (2013). Using virtual reality to study food cravings. Appetite, 71, 396-402. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2013.09.006 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gomes, T., Hurley, R. A., Duchowski, A., Darby, D., & Ouzts, A. (2014). The Effect of Full Body Versus Partial Body Graphic Labelling on Beverage Packaging. Packaging Technology and Science, 27(12), 933-943. doi:10.1002/pts.2070 | es_ES |