- -

Determinants of national patent ownership by public research organisations and universities

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Determinants of national patent ownership by public research organisations and universities

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Determinants of ...
Tamaño: 257.8Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: Joaquín M. Azagra-Caro ...
Tamaño: 578.0Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Azagra Caro, Joaquín María es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2017-07-20T08:47:18Z
dc.date.available 2017-07-20T08:47:18Z
dc.date.issued 2014-12
dc.identifier.issn 0892-9912
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/85522
dc.description.abstract [EN] This paper focuses on the question of whether the national production functions of patents owned by universities and public research organisations (PROs) differ. We use Eurostat patent and R&D data broken down by institutional sector for the European Union 27 and other countries in years 1982-2007, and we estimate dynamic panel models. The impact of R&D expenditure on patent ownership is higher for PROs than for universities. University patent ownership activity is dependent on business funding, while PRO patent ownership is not. We recommend a reversal of the current decline of PRO R&D expenditure and discuss whether PROs perform better at macroeconomic level vis a vis universities. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer Verlag (Germany) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Technology Transfer es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Academic patenting es_ES
dc.subject Technology transfer es_ES
dc.subject Scientific production es_ES
dc.subject.classification PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title Determinants of national patent ownership by public research organisations and universities es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10961-013-9322-y
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/256314/EU/ERAWATCH International Monitoring and Analysis/
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Azagra Caro, JM. (2014). Determinants of national patent ownership by public research organisations and universities. Journal of Technology Transfer. 39(6):898-914. doi:10.1007/s10961-013-9322-y es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-013-9322-y es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 898 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 914 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 39 es_ES
dc.description.issue 6 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 260587 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1573-7047
dc.description.references Acosta, D., Coronado, D., León, M. D., & Martínez, M. (2008). Production of university technological knowledge in European regions: Evidence from patent data. Regional Studies, 43(9), 1167–1181. es_ES
dc.description.references Acosta, D., Coronado, D., & Martínez, M. (2012). Spatial differences in the quality of university patenting: Do regions matter? Research Policy, 41(9), 692–703. es_ES
dc.description.references Ankrah, S. N., Burgess, T. F., Grimshaw, P., & Shaw, N. E. (2013). Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer: What single-group studies of motives omit. Technovation, 33, 50–65. es_ES
dc.description.references Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297. es_ES
dc.description.references Arvanitis, S., Kubli, U., & Woerter, M. (2008). University-industry knowledge and technology transfer in Switzerland: What university scientists think about co-operation with private enterprises. Research Policy, 37, 1865–1883. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra Caro, J. M., Fernández de Lucio, I., & Gutiérrez Gracia, A. (2003). University patents: Output and input indicators… of what? Research Evaluation, 12(1), 5–16. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., Archontakis, F., & Yegros–Yegros, A. (2007a). In which regions do universities patent and publish more? Scientometrics, 70(2), 251–266. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., Carayol, N., & Llerena, P. (2006a). Patent production at a European Research University: Exploratory evidence at the Laboratory Level. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(3), 257–268. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., Plaza-Gómez, L., & Romero-de-Pablos, A. (2007b). The origin of public research organisation patents: An economic approach. Research Evaluation, 16(4), 271–282. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., Yegros–Yegros, A., & Archontakis, F. (2006b). What do university patent routes indicate at regional level? Scientometrics, 66(1), 219–230. es_ES
dc.description.references Bach, L., & Llerena, P. (2007). Indicators of higher-education institutes and public-research organizations technology transfer activities: Insights from France. Science and Public Policy, 34(10), 709–721. es_ES
dc.description.references Baldini, N. (2006a). The Act on inventions at public research institutions: Danish universities’ patenting activity. Scientometrics, 69(2), 387–407. es_ES
dc.description.references Baldini, N. (2006b). University patenting and licensing activity: A review of the literature. Research Evaluation, 15(3), 197–207. es_ES
dc.description.references Baldini, N. (2009). Implementing Bayh-Dole-like laws: Faculty problems and their impact on University patenting activity. Research Policy, 38(8), 1217–1224. es_ES
dc.description.references Baldini, N. (2010). Do royalties really foster university patenting activity? An answer from Italy. Technovation, 30, 109–116. es_ES
dc.description.references Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35, 518–532. es_ES
dc.description.references Breschi, S., Lissoni, F., & Montobbio, F. (2008). University patenting and scientific productivity: A quantitative study of Italian academic inventors. European Management Review, 5, 91–109. es_ES
dc.description.references Buenstorf, G. (2009). Is commercialization good or bad for science? Individual-level evidence from the Max Planck Society. Research Policy, 38, 281–292. es_ES
dc.description.references Carayol, N. (2007). Academic incentives, research organization and patenting at a large French university. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 16(2), 119–138. es_ES
dc.description.references Cesaroni, F., & Piccaluga, A. (2005). Universities and intellectual property rights in Southern European Countries. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(4), 497–518. es_ES
dc.description.references Coupé, T. (2003). Science is golden: Academic R&D and University patents. Journal of Technology Transfer, 28, 31–46. es_ES
dc.description.references Crespi, G. A., Geuna, A., Nomaler, Ö., & Verspagen, B. (2010). University IPRs and knowledge transfer: Is university ownership more efficient? Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 19(7), 627–648. es_ES
dc.description.references Czarnitzki, D., Hussinger, K., & Schneider, C. (2012). The nexus between science and industry: Evidence from faculty inventions. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(5), 755–776. es_ES
dc.description.references D’Este, P., & Perkmann, M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316–339. es_ES
dc.description.references Dietz, J. S., & Bozeman, B. (2005). Academic careers, patents, and productivity: Industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 34(3), 349–367. es_ES
dc.description.references Dosi, G., Llerena, P., & Labini, M. S. (2006). Science–Technology–Industry links and the ‘European Paradox’: Some notes on the dynamics of scientific and technological research in Europe. In E. H. Lorenz & B.-Å. Lundvall (Eds.), How Europe’s economies learn: Coordinating competing models. Oxford: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references EC. (2007a). Commission communication ‘Improving knowledge transfer between research institutions and industry across Europe: Embracing open innovation’, COM(2007) 182. es_ES
dc.description.references EC. (2007b). Commission green paper ‘The European Research Area: New Perspectives’, COM(2007) 161. es_ES
dc.description.references Gaughan, M., & Corley, E. A. (2010). Science faculty at US research universities: The impacts of university research center-affiliation and gender on industrial activities. Technovation, 30, 215–222. es_ES
dc.description.references Geuna, A., Llerena, P., Matt, M., & Savona, M. (2004). Collaboration between a research university and firms and other institutions. In F. Cesaroni, A. Gambardella, & W. García-Fontes (Eds.), R&D, innovation, and competitiveness in the European chemical industry, Chap. 6. Boston: Kluwer. es_ES
dc.description.references Geuna, A., & Rossi, F. (2011). Changes to university IPR regulations in Europe and the impact on academic patenting. Research Policy, 40, 1068–1076. es_ES
dc.description.references Goel, R., & Rich, D. P. (2005). Organization of markets for science and technology. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 161, 1–17. es_ES
dc.description.references Grimpe, C., & Fier, H. (2010). Informal university technology transfer: A comparison between the United States and Germany. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 637–650. es_ES
dc.description.references Hall, B. H., Griliches, Z., & Hausman, J. A. (1986). Patents and R&D: Is there a lag? International Economic Review, 27(2), 265–283. es_ES
dc.description.references Krabel, S., & Mueller, P. (2009). What drives scientists to start their own company? An empirical investigation of Max Planck Society scientists. Research Policy, 38, 947–956. es_ES
dc.description.references Lissoni, F., Llerena, P., McKelvey, M., & Sanditov, B. (2008). Academic patenting in Europe: New evidence from the KEINS database. Research Evaluation, 17(2), 87–102. es_ES
dc.description.references Marinova, D. (2001). Eastern European patenting activities in the USA. Technovation, 21, 571–584. es_ES
dc.description.references Meyer, M. (2006). Are patenting scientists the better scholars? An exploratory comparison of inventor-authors with their non-inventing peers in nano-science and technology. Research Policy, 35(2006), 1646–1662. es_ES
dc.description.references Meyer, M., Du Pleiss, M., Tukeva, T., & Utecht, J. T. (2005). Inventive output of academic research: A comparison of two science systems. Scientometrics, 63(1), 145–161. es_ES
dc.description.references Moutinho, P. S. F., Fontes, M., & Godinho, M. M. (2007). Do individual factors matter? A survey of scientists’ patenting in Portuguese public research organizations. Scientometrics, 70(2), 355–377. es_ES
dc.description.references Nelson, R. R., & Rosenberg, N. (1993). Technical innovation and national systems. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), National innovation systems, Chap. 1. Oxford: Oxford University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Nilsson, A. S., Rickne, A., & Bengtsson, L. (2010). Transfer of academic research: Uncovering the grey zone. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(6), 617–636. es_ES
dc.description.references Núñez-Sánchez, R., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego-Rico, A. (2012). Performance of knowledge interactions between public research centres and industrial firms in Spain: A project-level analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 330–354. es_ES
dc.description.references OECD. (2001). Using patent counts for cross-country comparisons of technology output. STI Review 27. es_ES
dc.description.references Okamuro, H., & Nishimura, J. (2013). Impact of university intellectual property policy on the performance of university-industry research collaboration. Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(3), 273–301. es_ES
dc.description.references Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1995). Patterns of technological activity: Their measurement and interpretation. In P. Stoneman (Ed.), Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change, Chap. 2. UK: Blackwell. es_ES
dc.description.references Pavitt, K. (1998). Do patents reflect the useful research output of universities? Research evaluation, 7(2), 105–111. es_ES
dc.description.references Ponomariov, B. L. (2007). Effects of university characteristics on scientists’ interactions with the private sector: An exploratory assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(5), 485–503. es_ES
dc.description.references Potì, B., & Reale, E. (2005). The patenting regime in the Italian public research system. What motivates public inventors to patent. Ceris-Cnr, Working Paper No. 10/2005. es_ES
dc.description.references PREST. (2002). A comparative analysis of Public, Semi-Public and Recently Privatised Research Centres, mimeo: ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/indicators/docs/ind_report_prest1.pdf . Last access 20/02/2009. es_ES
dc.description.references Proton. (2007). The ProTon Europe 2005 Annual Survey report, mimeo: http://www.fptt-pftt.gc.ca/eng/resources/articles/2007/06/ProTonEurope2005.html . Last access 20/02/2009. es_ES
dc.description.references Van Looy, B., du Plessis, M., & Magerman, T. (2006). Data production methods for harmonized patent indicators: Assignee sector allocation. Luxembourg: Eurostat Working Paper and Studies. es_ES
dc.description.references Wong, P. K., & Singh, A. (2009). University patenting activities and their link to the quantity and quality of scientific publications. Scientometrics, 83, 271–294. es_ES
dc.description.references Yang, P. Y., & Chang, Y.-C. (2010). Academic research commercialization and knowledge production and diffusion: The moderating effects of entrepreneurial commitment. Scientometrics, 83, 403–421. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem