- -

The suitability of risk reduction indicators to inform dam safety management

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

The suitability of risk reduction indicators to inform dam safety management

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Morales Torres, Adrián es_ES
dc.contributor.author Serrano Lombillo, Armando José es_ES
dc.contributor.author Escuder Bueno, Ignacio es_ES
dc.contributor.author Altarejos García, Luis es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2018-03-16T05:15:04Z
dc.date.available 2018-03-16T05:15:04Z
dc.date.issued 2016 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1573-2479 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/99449
dc.description.abstract [EN] Risk analysis can provide very suitable and useful information to manage the safety of critical civil infrastructures. Indeed, results of quantitative risk models can be used to inform prioritisation of safety investments on infrastructures' assets and portfolios. In order to inform this prioritisation, a series of risk reduction indicators can be used. This paper reviews existing indicators for dam safety, tracks how equity and efficiency principles are captured, propose additional indicators and provides insights into how tolerability guidelines and benefit-cost analysis can also play a role in decision-making. All reviewed, analysed and/or combined indicators are later applied in a case study, a portfolio of 27 dams where 93 structural and non-structural investments are prioritised. The case study shows that prioritisation sequences based on risk model results provide suitable and useful information, acknowledging that other concerns may be conditioning decision-making processes. With the results of the case study, a full comparison between all studied risk reduction indicators is made, and three indexes are calculated for all of them to measure how close they are to a theoretical best. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO) has supported the work described in this paper through the research project entitled IPRESARA (Incorporating man-made risk components into general dam risk management [BIA 2010-17852]) within the period 2011-2013 and the project INICIA (Methodology for assessing investments on water cycle infrastructures informed on risk and energy efficiency indicators [BIA 2013-48157-C2-1-R]) within the period 2014-2016. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Structure and Infrastructure Engineering es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Dam safety es_ES
dc.subject Decision-making es_ES
dc.subject Risk management es_ES
dc.subject Risk & probability analysis es_ES
dc.subject Quantitative analysis es_ES
dc.subject Risk reduction indicators es_ES
dc.subject Risk reduction principles es_ES
dc.subject Equity & efficiency es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA HIDRAULICA es_ES
dc.title The suitability of risk reduction indicators to inform dam safety management es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/15732479.2015.1136830 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//BIA2010-17852/ES/INCORPORACION DE LOS COMPONENTES DE RIESGO ANTROPICO A LOS SISTEMAS DE GESTION INTEGRAL DE SEGURIDAD DE PRESAS Y EMBALSES/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//BIA2013-48157-C2-1-R/ES/METODOLOGIA DE EVALUACION DE INVERSIONES EN INFRAESTRUCTURAS DEL CICLO INTEGRAL DEL AGUA BASADA EN INDICADORES DE RIESGO Y DE EFICIENCIA ENERGETICA/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente - Departament d'Enginyeria Hidràulica i Medi Ambient es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Universitario de Ingeniería del Agua y del Medio Ambiente - Institut Universitari d'Enginyeria de l'Aigua i Medi Ambient es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Morales Torres, A.; Serrano Lombillo, AJ.; Escuder Bueno, I.; Altarejos García, L. (2016). The suitability of risk reduction indicators to inform dam safety management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering. 12(11):1465-1476. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1136830 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2015.1136830 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1465 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1476 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 12 es_ES
dc.description.issue 11 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\332507 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación es_ES
dc.description.references Ayyub, B. M., McGill, W. L., & Kaminskiy, M. (2007). Critical Asset and Portfolio Risk Analysis: An All-Hazards Framework. Risk Analysis, 27(4), 789-801. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2007.00911.x es_ES
dc.description.references Baecher, G. B., Paté, M. E., & De Neufville, R. (1980). Risk of dam failure in benefit-cost analysis. Water Resources Research, 16(3), 449-456. doi:10.1029/wr016i003p00449 es_ES
dc.description.references Bohnenblust, H. (1998). Risk-Based Decision Making in the Transportation Sector. Quantified Societal Risk and Policy Making, 132-153. doi:10.1007/978-1-4757-2801-9_14 es_ES
dc.description.references Bottelberghs, P. . (2000). Risk analysis and safety policy developments in the Netherlands. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 71(1-3), 59-84. doi:10.1016/s0304-3894(99)00072-2 es_ES
dc.description.references De Blaeij, A., Florax, R. J. G. ., Rietveld, P., & Verhoef, E. (2003). The value of statistical life in road safety: a meta-analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35(6), 973-986. doi:10.1016/s0001-4575(02)00105-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Ellingwood, B. R. (2005). Risk-informed condition assessment of civil infrastructure: state of practice and research issues. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 1(1), 7-18. doi:10.1080/15732470412331289341 es_ES
dc.description.references Figueira, J., Greco, S., & Ehrogott, M. (2005). Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science. doi:10.1007/b100605 es_ES
dc.description.references Jonkman, S. N., Jongejan, R., & Maaskant, B. (2010). The Use of Individual and Societal Risk Criteria Within the Dutch Flood Safety Policy-Nationwide Estimates of Societal Risk and Policy Applications. Risk Analysis, 31(2), 282-300. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01502.x es_ES
dc.description.references Jonkman, S. N., van Gelder, P. H. A. J. M., & Vrijling, J. K. (2003). An overview of quantitative risk measures for loss of life and economic damage. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 99(1), 1-30. doi:10.1016/s0304-3894(02)00283-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Joshi, N. N., & Lambert, J. H. (2007). Equity Metrics With Risk, Performance, and Cost Objectives for the Prioritization of Transportation Projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(3), 539-547. doi:10.1109/tem.2007.900790 es_ES
dc.description.references Kabir, G., Sadiq, R., & Tesfamariam, S. (2013). A review of multi-criteria decision-making methods for infrastructure management. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 10(9), 1176-1210. doi:10.1080/15732479.2013.795978 es_ES
dc.description.references Kaplan, S. (1997). The Words of Risk Analysis. Risk Analysis, 17(4), 407-417. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00881.x es_ES
dc.description.references Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1993). Decisions with Multiple Objectives. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174084 es_ES
dc.description.references Khadam, I. M., & Kaluarachchi, J. J. (2003). Multi-criteria decision analysis with probabilistic risk assessment for the management of contaminated ground water. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 23(6), 683-721. doi:10.1016/s0195-9255(03)00117-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Lutter, R., Morrall, J. F., & Viscusi, W. K. (1999). THE COST-PER-LIFE-SAVED CUTOFF FOR SAFETY-ENHANCING REGULATIONS. Economic Inquiry, 37(4), 599-608. doi:10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01450.x es_ES
dc.description.references Ramsberg, J. A. L., & Sjoberg, L. (1997). The Cost-Effectiveness of Lifesaving Interventions in Sweden. Risk Analysis, 17(4), 467-478. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00887.x es_ES
dc.description.references Saaty, T. L. (1988). What is the Analytic Hierarchy Process? Mathematical Models for Decision Support, 109-121. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-83555-1_5 es_ES
dc.description.references Stewart, M. G., & Mueller, J. (2008). A risk and cost-benefit assessment of United States aviation security measures. Journal of Transportation Security, 1(3), 143-159. doi:10.1007/s12198-008-0013-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Viscusi, W. K., & Aldy, J. E. (2003). Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 27(1), 5-76. doi:10.1023/a:1025598106257 es_ES
dc.description.references Vrijling, J. (1995). A framework for risk evaluation. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 43(3), 245-261. doi:10.1016/0304-3894(95)91197-v es_ES
dc.description.references Yamano, N., & Ohkawara, T. (2000). The Regional Allocation of Public Investment: Efficiency or Equity? Journal of Regional Science, 40(2), 205-229. doi:10.1111/0022-4146.00172 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem