Bonavia, Tomas; Marin-Garcia, Juan A.(Universitat Politècnica de València, 2023-07-17)
[EN] This study aims to be one of the first to analyse the noise level in the peer review process of scientific articles. Noise is defined as the undesired variability in the judgements made by professionals on the same ...
Ferrer-Sapena, Antonia; Aleixandre-Benavent, Rafael; Peset Mancebo, María Fernanda; Sánchez Pérez, Enrique Alfonso(Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information, 2018)
[EN] This article shows an approach to the study of two fundamental aspects of the prepublication of scientific manuscripts in specialized repositories (arXiv). The first refers to the size of the interaction of ¿standard ...
Orduña Malea, Enrique; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio(Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL, 2018)
[EN] The overarching aim of this work is to provide a detailed description of the free version of Dimensions (new bibliographic database produced by Digital Science and launched in January 2018). To do this, the work is ...
Orduña Malea, Enrique; Martín-Martín, Alberto; Thelwall, M.; Delgado-López-Cózar, Emilio(Springer-Verlag, 2017-07)
[EN] The academic social network site ResearchGate (RG) has its own indicator, RG Score, for its members. The high profile nature of the site means that the RG Score may be used for recruitment, promotion and other tasks ...
Orduña Malea, Enrique; Bautista Puig, Núria(Universitat Politècnica de València, 2023-11-02)
This dataset includes the raw data used to carry out a study related to the analysis of the DORA Declaration on Twitter. The dataset includes the tweets collected from the Twitter Academic API (comprising three collections: ...
Orduña Malea, Enrique(Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL, 2022)
[EN] The purpose of this note is to describe the new citation context classification feature provided
by Web of Science, in which citations received by publications are classified into five categories (Background, Basis, ...
[EN] Impact indices used for joint evaluation of research items coming from different scientific fields must be comparable. Often a linear transformation -a normalization or another basic operation-is considered to be ...
[ES] ANECA ha puesto en marcha en diciembre de 2023 un cambio en el modelo de evaluación científica siguiendo los criterios de DORA y de COARA. La evaluación científica gira ahora alrededor de conceptos como el de evaluación ...
[EN] Journal rankings of specific research fields are often used for evaluation purposes, both of authors and institutions. These rankings can be defined by means of several methods, as expert assessment, scholarly-based ...
Orduña Malea, Enrique; Bautista-Puig, Núria; Pérez-Esparrells, Carmen(Agencia Canaria de Calidad Universitaria y Evaluación Educativa (ACCUEE), 2023)
This report designs and develops an architecture proposal (framework) for the evaluation of university teaching staff in the Spanish university system. The proposal aims to minimize the malpractices detected, adapt to the ...
MOLAS-GALLART, JORDI(SAGE Publications (UK and US), 2015-02)
Funding organisations are increasingly asking academics to show evidence of the economic and social value generated by their research. These requests have often been associated with the emergence of a so-called new social ...
[EN] hrough a comparative study of the United Kingdom and Spain, this article addresses the effect of different research governance structures on the functioning and uses of research evaluation. It distinguishes three main ...
[ES] La ANECA ha puesto en marcha en diciembre de 2023 un cambio en el modelo de evaluación científica siguiendo los criterios del DORA y la COARA. La evaluación científica gira ahora en torno a conceptos como la evaluación ...
Orduña Malea, Enrique(Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL, 2021-09-09)
[EN] This letter aims to highlight severe inconsistencies in the scientific evaluation of regionally publicly funded research projects, uncovering structural failures related to the public management of science that go ...
[EN] In many countries research evaluations confer high importance to mainstream journals, which are considered to publish excellent research. Accordingly, research evaluation policies discourage publications in other ...