- -

Some theory for conservation of contemporary art

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Some theory for conservation of contemporary art

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Llamas-Pacheco, Rosario es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-09-11T03:30:57Z
dc.date.available 2021-09-11T03:30:57Z
dc.date.issued 2020-11-16 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0039-3630 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/172134
dc.description.abstract [EN] This article analyzes different ontological categories and how they relate to the conservation of contemporary art. Faced with the necessity of apprehending the work of art from an ontological point of view, a theoretical approach is made on the concepts that most affect the conservation of contemporary art: quiddity, truth-authenticity, identity, quality, consistency, and interpretation. These are analyzed from an empirical perspective, based on the experience of conservation and restoration. Since conserving and restoring require making decisions that will affect the material and conceptual plane of the works, several possible paradigms that must be introduced into the deontological code of the profession are analyzed. In addition, the study of a new paradigm is provided, that of the death of the work of art. This paradigm can serve as a frame of reference, given the impossibility of bringing the `Truth¿ of the artwork into the world of the sensitive. This may occur due to different conditioning factors and limitations of a material, technical, or intentional type, which affect issues that were once established as essential to the entity. On the other hand, different types of time that are related to the conservation of contemporary art are studied: biological time, the eternal present of the work, time as a constructor agent, and destructive time as a facilitator of the appearance of ruin or ruin-relic in the work of art. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Maney Publishing es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Studies in Conservation es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Theory es_ES
dc.subject Conservation-restoration es_ES
dc.subject Contemporary art es_ES
dc.subject Quiddity es_ES
dc.subject Authenticity es_ES
dc.subject Paradigm of death es_ES
dc.subject Ontological categories es_ES
dc.subject Identity es_ES
dc.subject.classification PINTURA es_ES
dc.title Some theory for conservation of contemporary art es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/00393630.2020.1733790 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Conservación y Restauración de Bienes Culturales - Departament de Conservació i Restauració de Béns Culturals es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Llamas-Pacheco, R. (2020). Some theory for conservation of contemporary art. Studies in Conservation. 65(8):487-498. https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2020.1733790 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1080/00393630.2020.1733790 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 487 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 498 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 65 es_ES
dc.description.issue 8 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\425037 es_ES
dc.description.references Bal, M. 2002. “Conceptos viajeros en las humanidades” En Travelling Concepts in the Humanities. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 30–31. es_ES
dc.description.references Brandi, C. 2011. Teoría de la restauración. Madrid: Alianza Forma, 24–29. es_ES
dc.description.references Breuil, M. H. 2014. Personal Communication in an Interview Conducted in Marseille on 7 February 2014, Published in Llamas, R. (2015). “Obsolescence, Materials and Authenticity. The Opinion of Cécile Dazord and Marie-Hélène Breuil”, Arché, n° 8, 9 y 10: 11–16. es_ES
dc.description.references Dykstra, S. W. (1996). The Artist’s Intentions and the Intentional Fallacy in Fine Arts Conservation. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation, 35(3), 197-218. doi:10.1179/019713696806113676 es_ES
dc.description.references Kapelouzou, I. 2010. “Contemplating Integration: Modern Art and the Conservation System.” In Art and Science Volume VIII. Proceedings of a Special Focus Symposium in Art and Science, 22nd International Conference on System Research, Informatics and Cybernetics, 2–6 August 2010, Baden Baden, Lasker, G.E., Schinzel, H., and Boullart, K. (eds). 39–44. Tecumseh: IIAS (The International Institute for Advanced Studies in Systemic Research and Cybernetics). es_ES
dc.description.references Laurenson, P. 2006. “Authenticity, Change and Loss in the Conservation of Time-Based Media Installations”. Tate Papers. Accesible en: https://www.tate.org.uk/research/publications/tate-papers/06/authenticity-change-and-loss-conservation-of-time-based-media-installations, acceso 30 de octubre de 2019. es_ES
dc.description.references Llamas Pacheco, R. 2014. Arte contemporáneo y restauración. O cómo investigar entre lo material, lo esencial y lo simbólico. Madrid, Tecnos, 36–73. es_ES
dc.description.references Martore, P. 2009. “The Contemporary Artwork Between Meaning and Cultural Identity.” CeROArt [Online], 4 | 2009, Online since 14 October 2009, connection on 10 October 2019. URL: http://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/1287. doi:10.4000/ceroart.1287. es_ES
dc.description.references Schinzel, H. 2003. “La intención artística y las posibilidades de la restauración”, en Restauración de pintura contemporánea. Tendencias, Materiales, Técnicas, Madrid, Akal, 45–64. es_ES
dc.description.references Szmelter, I. 2013. “New Values of Cultural Heritage and the Need for a New Paradigm Regarding its Care.” CeROArt [Online], HS | 2013, Online since 30 October 2013, Connection on 10 October 2019. http://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/3647. doi:10.4000/ceroart.3647. es_ES
dc.description.references Van de Vall   , R. (2017). Documentando dilemas. Sobre la relevancia de los casos éticamente ambiguos. Sin Objeto, (00), 83. doi:10.18239/sinobj_2017.00.05 es_ES
dc.description.references Verbeeck, M. 2019a. “Brandi y la restauración del arte contemporáneo. De un lado y del otro de la teoría”, en: Conversaciones con Cesare Brandi y Giulio Carlo Argán, México, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, ICCROM, n° 7, 194–209. es_ES
dc.description.references Verbeeck, M. 2019b. “De l’intention de l’artiste à l’effet de l’œuvre. Changer l’approche en conservation ?” CeROArt [Online], HS | 2018, Online since 15 January 2019, connection on 10 October 2019. http://journals.openedition.org/ceroart/6020. doi:10.4000/ceroart.602. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem