- -

Sintonía de controladores PID: un enfoque analítico basado en el moldeo de la función de sensibilidad

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Sintonía de controladores PID: un enfoque analítico basado en el moldeo de la función de sensibilidad

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Vilanova, R. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Alcántara, S. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Pedret, C. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2021-10-05T06:49:31Z
dc.date.available 2021-10-05T06:49:31Z
dc.date.issued 2021-09-30
dc.identifier.issn 1697-7912
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/173779
dc.description.abstract [EN] The PID controller is the most common option in the realm of control applications and is dominant in the process control industry. Among the related analytical methods, Internal Model Control (IMC) has gained remarkable industrial acceptance due to its robust nature and good set-point responses. However, the traditional application of IMC results in poor load disturbance rejection for lag-dominant and integrating plants. This work presents an IMC-like design method which avoids this common pitfall and is devised to work well for plants of modest complexity, for which analytical PID tuning is plausible. For simplicity, the design only focuses on the closed-loop sensitivity function. The approach provides model-based tuning of single-loop PID controllers in terms of the robustness/performance and servo/regulator trade-offs. Although the robustness/performance compromise is commonly considered, it is not so common to also take into account, for example, the conflict between input and output disturbances, referred also as the servo/regulator trade-off. As interested in providing a unified tuning approach, it is shown how the proposed methodology allows to deal with different process dynamics in a unified way. es_ES
dc.description.abstract [ES] El controlador PID es la opción más común en el ámbito de las aplicaciones de control, siendo la opción predominante en el control de procesos industriales. Entre los métodos analíticos más usuales utilizados para su diseño, el Control por Modelo Interno (IMC) ha ganado una notable aceptación industrial debido a su naturaleza robusta y buenas respuestas ante cambios de consigna. Sin embargo, la aplicación tradicional del IMC da como resultado un bajo rendimiento para el rechazo de perturbaciones en carga para plantas integradoras y/o con largas constantes de tiempo. Este trabajo presenta un método de diseño, basado en IMC, que evita esta deficiencia y está diseñado para funcionar bien en plantas de complejidad moderada para las cuales, por otro lado, el ajuste analítico de un controlador PID es plausible. Por simplicidad, el diseño solo se centra en la función de sensibilidad en lazo cerrado. El enfoque proporciona un ajuste basado en modelo en términos de los compromisos robustez/rendimiento y de servo/regulación. Aunque comúnmente se considera el compromiso robustez/rendimiento, no es tan común tener en cuenta también, por ejemplo, el conflicto entre las perturbaciones de entrada y salida, también conocido como el compromiso servo/regulación. Con el objetivo de proporcionar un enfoque de ajuste unificado, se muestra como la metodología propuesta permite tratar diferentes dinámicas de proceso de manera unificada. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship Los autores desean agradecer al Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad bajo las subvenciones DPI-2016-77271-R y PID2019-105434RB-C33 por la ayuda que han supuesto en la elaboración de los trabajos que han conducido a los desarrollos aquí presentados. es_ES
dc.language Español es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática industrial es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Compartir igual (by-nc-sa) es_ES
dc.subject PID es_ES
dc.subject Process Control es_ES
dc.subject Robustness Analysis es_ES
dc.subject Disturbance rejection es_ES
dc.subject Tracking es_ES
dc.subject Control de Procesos es_ES
dc.subject Análisis de Robustez es_ES
dc.subject Rechazo de perturbaciones es_ES
dc.subject Seguimiento es_ES
dc.title Sintonía de controladores PID: un enfoque analítico basado en el moldeo de la función de sensibilidad es_ES
dc.title.alternative PID Tuning: Analytical approach based on the weighted Sensitivity problem es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/riai.2021.15422
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2017-2020/PID2019-105434RB-C33/ES/RETOS DE ECONOMIA CIRCULAR PARA LA OPERACION Y EL CONTROL DEL SISTEMA INTEGRADO DE AGUAS/ es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI//DPI-2016-77271-R/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Vilanova, R.; Alcántara, S.; Pedret, C. (2021). Sintonía de controladores PID: un enfoque analítico basado en el moldeo de la función de sensibilidad. Revista Iberoamericana de Automática e Informática industrial. 18(4):313-326. https://doi.org/10.4995/riai.2021.15422 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/riai.2021.15422 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 313 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 326 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 18 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1697-7920
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\15422 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES
dc.description.references Alcántara, S., Vilanova, R., Pedret, C., 2013. PID control in terms of robustness/performance and servo/regulator trade-offs: A unifying approach to balanced autotuning. Journal of Process Control 23 (4), 527 - 542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.01.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Alcántara, S., Pedret, C., Vilanova, R., 2010. On the model matching approach to PID design: Analytical perspective for robust Servo/Regulator tradeoff tuning. Journal of Process Control 20 (5), 596 - 608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.02.011 es_ES
dc.description.references Alcántara, S., Pedret, C., Vilanova, R., Skogestad, S., 2011a. Generalized Internal Model Control for balancing input/output disturbance response. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 50 (19), 11170-11180. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie200717z es_ES
dc.description.references Alcántara, S., Vilanova, R., Pedret, C., 2020. PID Tuning: A Modern Approach via the Weighted Sensitivity Problem (1st ed.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429325335-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Alcántara, S., Vilanova, R., Pedret, C., Skogestad, S., 2012. A look into robustness/performance and servo/regulation issues in PI tuning. In: Proc. of the IFAC Conf. on Advances in PID Control PID'12. https://doi.org/10.3182/20120328-3-IT-3014.00031 es_ES
dc.description.references Alcántara, S., Zhang, W., Pedret, C., Vilanova, R., Skogestad, S., 2011b. IMC-like analytical H-inf design with S/SP mixed sensitivity consideration: Utility in PID tuning guidance. Journal of Process Control 21 (6), 976 - 985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.04.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Alfaro, V. M., Vilanova, R., 2013a. Performance and Robustness Considerations for Tuning of Proportional Integral/Proportional Integral Derivative Controllers with Two Input Filters. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 52, 18287-18302. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie4012694 es_ES
dc.description.references Alfaro, V. M., Vilanova, R., 2013b. Robust tuning of 2DoF five-parameters PID controllers for inverse response controlled processes. Journal of Process Control 23, 453-462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2013.01.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Alfaro, V. M., Vilanova, R., September 2013c. Simple robust tuning of 2DoF PID controllers from a performance/robustness trade-off analysis. Asian Journal of Control 15 (5), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/asjc.653 es_ES
dc.description.references Alfaro, V. M., Vilanova, R., 2016. Model-Reference Robust Tuning of PID Controllers. Springer International Publishing AG, Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland, ISBN 978-3-319-28213-8. es_ES
dc.description.references Alfaro, V. M., Vilanova, R., Méndez, R., Lafuente, J., 2010. Performance/Robustness Tradeoff Analysis of PI/PID Servo and Regulatory Control Systems. In: Proc. of the IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2010.5472662 es_ES
dc.description.references Arrieta, O., Vilanova, R., 2012. Simple servo/regulation proportional-integralderivative (pid) tuning rules for arbitrary ms-based robustness achievement. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 51 (6), 2666-2674. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie201655c es_ES
dc.description.references Arrieta, O., Vilanova, R., Rojas, J. D., Meneses, M., 2016. Improved pid controller tuning rules for performance degradation/robustness increase trade-off. Electrical Engineering 98 (3), 233-243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-016-0361-x es_ES
dc.description.references Arrieta, O., Visioli, A., Vilanova, R., 2010. PID autotuning for weighted servo/regulation control operation. Journal of Process Control 20 (4), 472 -480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.01.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Astrom, K., Hagglund, T., 2004. Revisiting the Ziegler-Nichols step response method for PID control. J. Process Control 14, 635-650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2004.01.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Astrom, K., Hagglund, T., 2005. Advanced PID control. ISA - The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society. es_ES
dc.description.references Chien, I. L., Fruehauf, P. S., 1990. Consider IMC tuning to improve controller performance. Chemical Engineering Progress 86 (10), 33 - 41. es_ES
dc.description.references Dehghani, A., Lanzon, A., Anderson, B., 2006. H1 design to generalize internalmodel control. Automatica 42 (11), 1959 - 1968. es_ES
dc.description.references Grimholt, C., Skogestad, S., 2012. Optimal PI Control and Verifcation of the SIMC Tuning Rule. In: Proc. of the IFAC Conf. on Advances in PID Control PID'12. https://doi.org/10.3182/20120328-3-IT-3014.00003 es_ES
dc.description.references Horn, I. G., Arulandu, J. R., Gombas, C. J., VanAntwerp, J. G., Braatz, R. D., 1996. Improved Filter Design in Internal Model Control. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 35 (10), 3437 - 3441. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie9602872 es_ES
dc.description.references Huba, M., 2012. Setpoint Versus Disturbance Responses of the IPDT Plant. In: Proc. of the IFAC Conf. on Advances in PID Control PID'12. https://doi.org/10.3182/20120328-3-IT-3014.00070 es_ES
dc.description.references J.Shi, W.S.Lee, 2004. Set Point Response and Disturbance Rejection Tradeoff for Second-Order Plus Dead Time Processes. In: Asian Control Conference. es_ES
dc.description.references Kristiansson, B., Lennartson, B., 1998. Optimal PID controllers for unstable and resonant plants. In: Proc. of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. pp. 4380-4381. es_ES
dc.description.references Kurokawa, R., Sato, T., Vilanova, R., Konishi, Y., 2019. Discrete-time firstorder plus dead-time model-reference trade-off pid control design. Applied Sciences 9 (16). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163220 es_ES
dc.description.references Kurokawa, R., Sato, T., Vilanova, R., Konishi, Y., 2020. Design of optimal pid control with a sensitivity function for resonance phenomenon-involved second-order plus dead-time system. Journal of the Franklin Institute 357 (7), 4187-4211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.03.015 es_ES
dc.description.references Leva, A., Maggio, M., 2012. Model-Based PI(D) Autotuning. In: PID Control in the Third Millennium. Lessons Learned and New Approaches. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2425-2_2 es_ES
dc.description.references Mercader, P., Astrom, K. J., Baños, A., Hagglund, T., 2017a. Robust pid design based on qft and convex?concave optimization. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology 25 (2), 441-452. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCST.2016.2562581 es_ES
dc.description.references Mercader, P., Baños, A., 2017. A pi tuning rule for integrating plus dead time processes with parametric uncertainty. ISA Transactions 67, 246-255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2017.01.025 es_ES
dc.description.references Mercader, P., Baños, A., Vilanova, R., 2017b. Robust proportional-integral-derivative design for processes with interval parametric uncertainty. IET Control Theory & Applications 11 (7), 016-1023. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2016.1239 es_ES
dc.description.references Mercader, P., Soltesz, K., Baños, A., 2017c. Robust pid design by chance-constrained optimization. Journal of the Franklin Institute 354 (18), 8217-8231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.10.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Meza, G. R., Ferragud, X. B., Saez, J. S., Dur, J. M. H., 2016. Controller Tuning with Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization: A Holistic Multiobjective Optimization Design Procedure, 1st Edition. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated. es_ES
dc.description.references Middleton, R. H., Graebe, S. F., 1999. Slow stable open-loop poles: to cancel or not to cancel. Automatica 35 (5), 877-886. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(98)00220-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Morari, M., Zafiriou, E., 1989. Robust Process Control. Prentice-Hall International. es_ES
dc.description.references Panagopoulos, H., Astrom, K. J., 2000. PID control design and H1 loop shaping. International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control 10 (15), 1249-1261. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1239(20001230)10:15<1249::AID-RNC514>3.0.CO;2-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Pedret, C., Vilanova, R., Moreno, R., Serra, I., 2002. A refinement procedure for PID controller tuning. Computers & Chemical Engineering 26 (6), 903- 908. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0098-1354(02)00011-X es_ES
dc.description.references Rivera, D. E., Morari, M., Skogestad, S., 1986. Internal model control: PID controller design. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development 25 (1), 252 - 265. https://doi.org/10.1021/i200032a041 es_ES
dc.description.references Rodriguez, C., September 2020. Revisiting the simplified imc tuning rules for low-order controllers: Novel 2dof feedback controller. IET Control Theory & Applications 14, 1700-1710(10). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cta.2019.0821 es_ES
dc.description.references Ruscio, D. D., 2010. On Tuning PI Controllers for Integrating Plus Time Delay Systems. Modeling, Identification and Control 31 (4), 145 - 164. https://doi.org/10.4173/mic.2010.4.3 es_ES
dc.description.references Samad, T., Feb 2017. A survey on industry impact and challenges thereof [technical activities]. CSM 37 (1), 17-18. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2016.2621438 es_ES
dc.description.references Sanchez, H. S., Padula, F., Visioli, A., Vilanova, R., 2017a. Tuning rules for robust fopid controllers based on multi-objective optimization with fopdt models. ISA Transactions 66, 344-361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2016.09.021 es_ES
dc.description.references Sanchez, H. S., Visioli, A., Vilanova, R., 2017b. Optimal nash tuning rules for robust pid controllers. Journal of the Franklin Institute 354 (10), 3945-3970.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2017.03.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Sato, T., Hayashi, I., Horibe, Y., Vilanova, R., Konishi, Y., 2019. Optimal robust pid control for first- and second-order plus dead-time processes. Applied Sciences 9 (9). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091934 es_ES
dc.description.references Sato, T., Tajika, H., Vilanova, R., Konishi, Y., 2018. Adaptive pid control system with assigned robust stability. IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering 13 (8), 1169-1181. https://doi.org/10.1002/tee.22680 es_ES
dc.description.references Shamsuzzoha, M., Lee, M., 2007. IMC-PID Controller Design for Improved Disturbance Rejection of Time-Delayed Processes. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 46 (7), 2077 - 2091. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie0612360 es_ES
dc.description.references Shamsuzzohaa, M., Skogestad, S., 2010. The setpoint overshoot method: A simple and fast closed-loop approach for PID tuning. Journal of Process Control 20 (10), 1220 - 1234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2010.08.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Skogestad, S., 2003. Simple analytic rules for model reduction and PID controller tuning. J. Process Control 13, 291-309. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-1524(02)00062-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Skogestad, S., Grimholt, C., 2012. PID Tuning for Smooth Control. In: PID Control in the Third Millennium. Lessons Learned and New Approaches. Springer. es_ES
dc.description.references Skogestad, S., Postlethwaite, I., 2005. Multivariable Feedback Control. Wiley. es_ES
dc.description.references Smuts, J. F., 2011. Process Control for Practitioners: How to Tune PID Controllers and Optimize Control Loops. OptiControls. es_ES
dc.description.references Vilanova, R., 2008. IMC based Robust PID design: Tuning guidelines and automàtic tuning. Journal of Process Control 18, 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprocont.2007.05.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Vilanova, R., Arrieta, O., 2007. PID design for improved disturbance attenuation: min max Sensitivity matching approach. IAENG International Journal of Applied Mathematics 37 (1). es_ES
dc.description.references Vilanova, R., Arrieta, O., Ponsa, P., 2018. Robust pi/pid controllers for load disturbance based on direct synthesis. ISA Transactions 81, 177-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isatra.2018.07.040 es_ES
dc.description.references Vilanova, R., Visioli, A., 2012. PID Control in the Third Millenium - Lessons Learned and New Approaches. Springer-Verlag London Limited. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-2425-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Visioli, A., 2001. Optimal tuning of PID controllers for integral and unstable processes. IEE Proceedings. Part D 148 (2), 180 - 184. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-cta:20010197 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhuang, M., Atherton, D. P., 1993. Automatic tuning of optimum PID controllers. IEE Proc. Part D 140 (3), 216-224. https://doi.org/10.1049/ip-d.1993.0030 es_ES
dc.description.references Ziegler, J. G., Nichols, N. B., 1942. Optimum settings for automatic controllers. Trans. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. 64, 759-768. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem