- -

Emotion and Sentiment Polarity in Parliamentary Debate: A Pragmatic Comparative Study

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Emotion and Sentiment Polarity in Parliamentary Debate: A Pragmatic Comparative Study

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Emotion and Sentiment ...
Tamaño: 321.6Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Autor.
Abrir
[Cerrado]
Nombre: Mestre-Mestre - ...
Tamaño: 630.3Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Mestre-Mestre, Eva M. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2022-11-03T10:38:07Z
dc.date.available 2022-11-03T10:38:07Z
dc.date.issued 2021-09 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/189069
dc.description.abstract [EN] An ever-increasing interest on the expression of emotions can be seen in the proliferation of studies from different perspectives; medical-psychological, sociological, linguistic, or computer based, to name but a few. From a pragmalinguistic standpoint, ethnopragmatics is interested in the cross-cultural study of emotion. The present confrontation in political discussion, aggravated by the pandemic sanitary crisis, invites an exploration of political debate. Traditionally, political discussion has been studied from a discourse analysis viewpoint. New investigations, able to compile abundant amount of data in order to provide different contexts of political language, can complement these views. The present paper shows a comparative study of a set of session diaries of the Valencian and the Scottish Parliaments during 2020. Its aim was to identify the basic emotion words used in the debate sessions, to investigate them from a cross-cultural perspective and to establish whether these emotion words are culturally transferable, in terms of meaning, use and polarity. The methodology used, corpus linguistics, permits quantitative and qualitative analyses of the corpus assembled. Results show that there exist significant differences in the use of terms in the two subcorpora, and that even when the same words are used in the two contexts, they don't necessarily infer the same emotions and sentiments-nor the same polarity. The comparison also elucidates the usefulness of existing emotion lexicons for this kind of research. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Corpus pragmatics (Online) es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Emotion words es_ES
dc.subject Lexicon es_ES
dc.subject Political discourse es_ES
dc.subject Corpus analysis es_ES
dc.subject Pragmatics es_ES
dc.subject.classification FILOLOGIA INGLESA es_ES
dc.title Emotion and Sentiment Polarity in Parliamentary Debate: A Pragmatic Comparative Study es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s41701-021-00103-6 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Lingüística Aplicada - Departament de Lingüística Aplicada es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Politécnica Superior de Gandia - Escola Politècnica Superior de Gandia es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Mestre-Mestre, EM. (2021). Emotion and Sentiment Polarity in Parliamentary Debate: A Pragmatic Comparative Study. Corpus pragmatics (Online). 5(3):359-377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00103-6 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s41701-021-00103-6 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 359 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 377 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 5 es_ES
dc.description.issue 3 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 2509-9515 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\438265 es_ES
dc.description.references Abbasi, A., Hsinchun, C., & Arab, S. (2008). Sentiment analysis in multiple languages: Feature selection for opinion classification in Web forums. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 26(3), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1145/1361684.1361685. es_ES
dc.description.references Albalat-Mascarell, A., & Carrió-Pastor, M. L. (2019). Self-representation in political campaign talk: A functional metadiscourse approach to self-mentions in televised presidential debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 147, 86–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.011. es_ES
dc.description.references Anthony, L. (2017). AntConc (3.5.8) [MAC-OS]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Retrieved from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software es_ES
dc.description.references Barbalet, J. (2002). Introduction: Why emotions are crucial. The Sociological Review, 50, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.2002.tb03588.x. es_ES
dc.description.references Bassols, M. (2007). El llenguatge dels polítics. Anàlisi del cas català. Eumo Editorial. es_ES
dc.description.references Bericat, E. (2015). The sociology of emotions: Four decades of progress. Current Sociology, 64(3), 491–513. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392115588355. es_ES
dc.description.references Blum-Kulka, S., House, J., & Kasper, G. (1989). Cross-cultural pragmatics: Requests and apologies. Ablex. es_ES
dc.description.references Botha, E., & Reyneke, M. (2013). To share or not to share: The role of content and emotion in viral marketing. Journal of Public Affairs, 13(2), 160–171. https://doi.org/10.1002/pa.1471. es_ES
dc.description.references Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Polity. es_ES
dc.description.references Brown, P., & Levinson, S. (1978). Universals in Language usage: Politeness phenomena. In E. Goody (Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction. (pp. 56–310). Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Chentsova-Dutton, Y., & Lyons, S. H. (2016). Different ways of measuring emotions cross-culturally. In H. L. Meiselman (Ed.), Emotion measurement. (pp. 601–628). Woodhead Publishing, Elsevier. es_ES
dc.description.references Chilton, P., & Schäffner, C. (1997). Discourse and politics. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction. (pp. 206–230). Sage. es_ES
dc.description.references Cislaru, G. (2012). Emotions as a rhetorical tool in political discourse. In M. Zaleska (Ed.), Rhetoric and politics. (pp. 107–126). Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2017). Sentiment analysis and social cognition engine (SEANCE): An automatic tool for sentiment, social cognition, and social-order analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 49(3), 803–821. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0743-z. es_ES
dc.description.references Cuenca, M. J., & Marín, M. J. (2006). Estratègies d’inici de torn en el debat electoral. Journal of Catalan Studies, 9, 20–47. es_ES
dc.description.references Druckman, J. N., Kifer, M. J., & Parkin, M. (2010). Timeless strategy meets new medium: Going negative on congressional campaign web sites, 2002–2006. Political Communication, 27(1), 88–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584600903502607. es_ES
dc.description.references Dunmire, P. (2012). Political discourse analysis: Exploring the language of politics and the politics of language. Language and Linguistics Compass, 6(11), 735–751. https://doi.org/10.1002/lnc3.365. es_ES
dc.description.references Escandell-Vidal, V. (1995). Cortesía, fórmulas convencionales y estrategias indirectas. Revista Española de Lingüística, 1, 31–66. es_ES
dc.description.references Escandell Vidal, M. V. (2005). La comunicación. Editorial Gredos. es_ES
dc.description.references Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis. Longman. es_ES
dc.description.references Ferrer García, D. (2016). Anàlisi crítica dels topoi en el discurs polític. Fòrum de Recerca, 21, 383–404. es_ES
dc.description.references Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self identity. Self and society in the late modern age. Polity Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Gladkova, A., & Romero-Trillo, J. (2014). Ain’t it beautiful? The conceptualization of beauty from an ethnopragmatic perspective. Journal of Pragmatics, 60, 140–159. es_ES
dc.description.references Goddard, C. (2014). Interjections and emotion with special reference to “Surprise” and “Disgust.” Emotion Review, 6, 53–63. es_ES
dc.description.references Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, 3: Speech acts. (pp. 41–58). Academic. es_ES
dc.description.references Hess-Lüttich, E. W. B. (2007). (Pseudo-)Argumentation in TV-debates. Journal of Pragmatics, 39(8), 1360–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2007.04.008. es_ES
dc.description.references Jungherr, A., Schoen, H., & Jürgens, P. (2016). The mediation of politics through Twitter: An analysis of messages posted during the campaign for the German federal election 2013. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(1), 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12143. es_ES
dc.description.references Kassam, K. S., Markey, A. R., Cherkassky, V. L., Loewenstein, G., & Just, M. A. (2013). Identifying emotions on the basis of neural activation. PLoS ONE, 8(6), e66032. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066032. es_ES
dc.description.references Kecskes, I., & Romero-Trillo, J. (Eds.). (2013). Research trends in intercultural pragmatics. de Gruyter. es_ES
dc.description.references Kreiss, D. (2016). Seizing the moment: The presidential campaigns’ use of Twitter during the 2012 electoral cycle. New Media and Society, 18(8), 1473–1490. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814562445. es_ES
dc.description.references Laborda, X. (1997). Discurs polític d’una celebritat i anàlisi crítica del discurs: Mediacions de l’exjutge i diputat Garzón. Revista de Llengua i Dret, 28, 7–44. es_ES
dc.description.references Laborda, X. (2012). Lágrimas de cocodrilo. Análisis del discurso político. UOC. es_ES
dc.description.references Marín, M. J. (2007). Political (Im)Politeness: Discourse power in electoral debates. Catalan Review, 21, 43–68. es_ES
dc.description.references Marín Jordá, M. J. (2006). Cortesia lingüística i debat electoral. In J. L. Blas Arroyo, Á. M. Casanova, & M. Velando Casanova (Eds.), Discurso y sociedad: Contribuciones al estudio de la lengua en contexto social. (pp. 677–686). Universitat Jaume I. es_ES
dc.description.references Mas Castells, J. À. (2019). El pluricentrisme de la llengua catalana en els principals correctors i traductors automàtics. Revista de Llengua i dret, 71, 208–222. es_ES
dc.description.references Merriam-Webster’s Learner Dictionary (online edition). Merriam-Webster. es_ES
dc.description.references Oatley, K. (1989). The language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field. Cognition and Emotion, 3(2), 81–123. es_ES
dc.description.references Orwell, G. (1969). Politics and the English language. In W. F. Bolton & D. Crystal (Eds.), The English Language Vol. 2: Essays by Linguists and Men of Letters, 1858–1964. Cambridge University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Patulny, R., Bellocchi, A., Olson, R. E, Khorana, S., McKenzie, J., & Peterie, M. (Eds.). (2019). Introduction. In Emotions in late modernity (pp. 1–7). Abingdon, Oxon, UK: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351133319. es_ES
dc.description.references Payrató, L. (1999). Llengua catalana III. Anàlisi del discurs. Universitat Oberta de Catalunya. es_ES
dc.description.references Payrató, L. (2003). Pragmàtica, discurs i llengua oral. Introducció a l’anàlisi funcional de textos. UOC. es_ES
dc.description.references Payrató, L. (2003). L’entorn pragmàtic: de corrents i perspectives. (pp. 1–7). Noves SL. es_ES
dc.description.references Pennebaker, J. W., Booth, R. J., & Francis, M. E. (2001). Linguistic inquiry and word count: LIWC. Austin, TX: LIWC.net. [Computer software]. es_ES
dc.description.references Portalés Llop, E. (2019). (Des) cortesia, agressivitat i emocions. La resposta dels lectors a la sentència de la Manada. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación: Revista de Estudios Culturales de la Universitat Jaume I, 20, 129–145. es_ES
dc.description.references Pozzi, F. A., Fersini, E., Messina, E., & Liu, B. (Eds.). (2016). Sentiment analysis in social networks. Elsevier. es_ES
dc.description.references Rheault, L., Beelen, K., Cochrane, C., & Hirst, G. (2016). Measuring emotion in parliamentary debates with automated textual analysis. PLoS ONE, 11, 12-e0168843. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0168843. es_ES
dc.description.references Ridao, S. (2009). Y es que usted cambia de criterio cada cuarto de hora: las estrategias de (des)cortesía en los debates electorales españoles de 2008. Linred, Lingüística en la Red, 7, 1–19. es_ES
dc.description.references Ridao Rodrigo, S. (2016). Between truth and lies. (Im)politeness strategies in trials. Revista de Llengua i Dret., 65, 59–75. https://doi.org/10.2436/20.8030.02.133. es_ES
dc.description.references Romero-Trillo, J., & Fuentes, V. (2017). What is pretty cannot be beautiful? A corpus-based analysis of the aesthetics of nature. In J. Blochowiak, C. Grisot, S. Durrleman-Tame, & C. Laenzlinger (Eds.), Formal models in the study of language. (pp. 415–430). Springer. es_ES
dc.description.references Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1995). Relevance. Blackwell. es_ES
dc.description.references Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H., & Strohmaier, M. (2018). Election campaigning on social media: Politicians, audiences, and the mediation of political communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication, 35(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2017.1334728. es_ES
dc.description.references Todolí, J., & Ribas, M. (2007). Mystifying through metaphors and lexical choice. Cultura, Lenguaje y Representación, 5, 165–176. es_ES
dc.description.references Uljarevic, M., & Hamilton, A. (2012). Recognition of emotions in Autism: A formal meta-analysis. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 43(7), 1517–1526. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-012-1695-5. es_ES
dc.description.references Van Dijk, T. (1993). El poder y los medios de comunicación. Periodística, 6, 11–38. es_ES
dc.description.references Van Dijk, T. (1997). What is political discourse analysis? Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 11(1), 11–52. es_ES
dc.description.references Van Dijk, T. (1998) "Había un problema y se ha solucionado": legitimación de la expulsión de inmigrantes "ilegales" en el discurso parlamentario español. Poder-decir: o el poder de los discursos, 169-234 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Dijk, T. (2003). Political discourse and ideology. Doxa, 1, 2017–2225. es_ES
dc.description.references Van Dijk, T. (2005). War rhetoric of a little ally: Political implicatures and Aznar’s legitimatization of the war in Iraq. Journal of language and politics, 4(1), 65–91. es_ES
dc.description.references Van Dijk, T. (2010). Political identities in parliamentary debates. In C. Ilie (Ed.), European Parliaments under Scrutiny. Discourse strategies and interaction practices. (pp. 29–56). John Benjamins. es_ES
dc.description.references Wierzbicka, A. (2003). Cross-cultural pragmatics: The semantics of human interaction. de Gruyter. es_ES
dc.description.references Wilson, D., & Sperber, D. (2002). Truthfulness and relevance. Mind, 111, 583–632. es_ES
dc.description.references Wilson, J. (1990). Politically Speaking. The Pragmatic Analysis of political language. Blackwell. es_ES
dc.description.references Wilson, J. (1991). The linguistic pragmatics of terrorist acts. Discourse and Society, 2(1), 29–45. es_ES
dc.description.references Yung, R., Khoo-Lattimore, C., & Potter, L. E. (2021). VR the world: Experimenting with emotion and presence for tourism marketing. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 46, 160–171. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem