- -

SQAS, social responsibility assessment or instrumentalisation?

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

SQAS, social responsibility assessment or instrumentalisation?

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: Torres-Rubira - ...
Tamaño: 864.3Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Torres-Rubira, Juan-Luis es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-07T07:45:22Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-07T07:45:22Z
dc.date.issued 2023-01-30
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/191675
dc.description.abstract [EN] Safety and Quality Assessment for Sustainability (SQAS) is evaluation promoted by an as-sociation of chemical companies called CEFIC. Its vocation is to serve as a tool for the as-sessment of safety, quality, security, health, environmental and corporate social responsi-bility (CSR) of the logistic suppliers, but the activity of the companies that promote it can generate doubts about its instrumentalization. On the other hand, ISO 26000 offers an agreed guidance framework on social responsibility (SR). Through a comparative analysis, using the core subjects of ISO 26000 as a basis, the suitability of the SQAS evaluation in its Transport Service modality, as SR measurement tool, is tested. The analysis detects im-portant shortcomings in the SR core subjects assessed, especially those referring to human rights, moral obligations with society or stakeholder commitment and its participation, but on the other hand, the assessment stands out for its exhaustiveness in specific transporta-tion safety issues. This work contributes to contextualize the SQAS assessment as a CSR tool and identify the aspects that should be incorporated for a more effective assess of CSR. It also shows the lack of rigor of the self-regulation tools of organizations. es_ES
dc.description.abstract [ES] Safety and Quality Assessment for Sustainability (SQAS) es una evaluación de la seguridad y la calidad para la sostenibilidad promovida por una asociación de empresas químicas denominada CEFIC. Su vocación es servir de evaluación para la sostenibilidad y la responsabilidad social corporativa (RSC), pero la actividad de las empresas que la promueven puede generar la aparición de dudas sobre su instrumentalización. Por otra parte, la ISO 26000 ofrece un marco consensuado sobre la responsabilidad social (RS) en forma de guía. Mediante un análisis comparativo, utilizando como base las materias fundamentales de la ISO 26000, se testa la idoneidad de la evaluación SQAS en su modalidad Transport Services como herramienta de medida de la responsabilidad social. El análisis detecta importantes carencias en los aspectos evaluados, especialmente en los referentes a obligaciones morales con la sociedad, compromiso con las partes interesadas y su participación en la RSC, pero por otra parte la evaluación destaca por su exhaustividad en cuestiones de seguridad específicas del transporte. Este trabajo contribuye a contextualizar la evaluación SQAS como herramienta de RSC y a determinar su relación con la ISO 26000. Además evidencia la falta de rigor de las herramientas de autoregulación de las organizaciones. es_ES
dc.language Español es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject SQAS es_ES
dc.subject ISO 26000 es_ES
dc.subject Sustainability es_ES
dc.subject Safety es_ES
dc.subject Transportation es_ES
dc.subject Dangerous goods es_ES
dc.subject Social responsibility es_ES
dc.subject Sostenibilidad
dc.subject Responsabilidad Social Corporativa
dc.subject Seguridad
dc.subject Transporte
dc.subject Mercancías peligrosas
dc.title SQAS, social responsibility assessment or instrumentalisation? es_ES
dc.title.alternative SQAS, ¿instrumentalización o evaluación de la responsabilidad social? es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/wpom.17938
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Torres-Rubira, J. (2023). SQAS, social responsibility assessment or instrumentalisation?. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management. 14(1):11-40. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.17938 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod OJS es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.17938 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 11 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 40 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 14 es_ES
dc.description.issue 1 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1989-9068
dc.relation.pasarela OJS\17938 es_ES
dc.description.references AENOR. (2012). AENOR. Guía de responsabilidad social UNE-ISO 26000. es_ES
dc.description.references Agreement Concerning the International Carriage of Dangerous Goods by Road 2021, 666 (2020). https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2021/04/13/pdfs/BOE-A-2021-5779.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Argandoña, A., & Isea, R. (2011). ISO 26000 Una guía para la Responsabilidad Social de las Organizaciones. Cuadernos de la Cátedra La Caixa de Responsabilidad Social de la Empresa y Gobierno Corporativo, 11, 33. http://www.iese.edu/es/files/catedralacaixa_vol11_Final_tcm5-66526.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Babiak, K. (2011). CSR and Environmental Responsibility: Motives and Pressures to Adopt Green Management Practices. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(March 2010), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.229 es_ES
dc.description.references Balzarova, M., & Castka, P. (2018). Social responsibility: Experts’ viewpoints on adoption of the ISO 26000 standard. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 819–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/CSR.1497 es_ES
dc.description.references Bastian Buck, G., Laura Espinach, G., Staffan Söderberg, I. 26000 P., (PPO), P. O., Organization, I. 26000 P. P., & (PPO). (2010). GRI G4 Guidelines and ISO 26000 : 2010 How to use the GRI G4 Guidelines and ISO 26000 in conjunction. Recuperado de http://www.iso.org/iso/iso-gri-26000_2014-01-28.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Berens, G., van Riel, C. B. M., & van Rekom, J. (2007). The CSR-Quality Trade-Off: When can Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Ability Compensate Each Other? Journal of Business Ethics, 74(3), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9232-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Boiral, O., Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., & Testa, F. (2017). SA8000 as CSR-Washing? The Role of Stakeholder Pressures. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 24(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1391 es_ES
dc.description.references Buhanita, I. (2015). Dimensions in CSR: an evaluation of current definitions. Romanian Journal of Journalism & Communication, X(4), 64–72. es_ES
dc.description.references Buysse, K., & Verbeke, A. (2003). Proactive environmental strategies: A stakeholder management perspective. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 453-470. https://doi.org/10.1002/SMJ.299 es_ES
dc.description.references Campisi, D., & Gastaldi, M. (1996). Environmental protection, economic efficiency and intermodal competition in freight transport. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 4(6), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-090X(96)00021-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Carroll, A. B. (1999). Corporate Social Responsibility. Evolution of a Definitional Construct. Business & Society, 38(3), 268-295. https://doi.org/10.1177/000765039903800303 es_ES
dc.description.references Castka, P., & Balzarova, M. A. (2008). ISO 26000 and supply chains-On the diffusion of the social responsibility standard. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 274-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.10.017 es_ES
dc.description.references CEFIC. (2018). SQAS / ESAD Guidelines February 2018. es_ES
dc.description.references CEFIC. (2019). SQAS 2019 Core Questionnaire and Guidelines (Spanish). es_ES
dc.description.references CEFIC. (2020). SQAS System User Guide (Issue September). es_ES
dc.description.references CEFIC. (2021a). SQAS / ESAD Guidelines August 2021 (Issue August). es_ES
dc.description.references CEFIC. (2021b). SQAS 2019 Core Questionnaire and Guidelines (Spanish) (p. 26). es_ES
dc.description.references CEFIC. (2021c). SQAS 2022 TS Questionnaire and Guidelines (Spanish) (p. 44). es_ES
dc.description.references CEFIC. (2022). Recuperado el 15 de julio de 2022. http://www.sqas.org es_ES
dc.description.references Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2017a). Developing the WH 2 framework for environmental sustainability in logistics service providers: A taxonomy of green initiatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 165, 1063-1077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.150 es_ES
dc.description.references Centobelli, P., Cerchione, R., & Esposito, E. (2017b). Environmental sustainability in the service industry of transportation and logistics service providers: Systematic literature review and research directions. Transportation Research Part D journal, 53, 454-470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.04.032 es_ES
dc.description.references Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2006). Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: Determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 863-878. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400231 es_ES
dc.description.references Comission, E. (2011). COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS A renewed EU strategy 2011-14 for Corporate Social Responsibility. es_ES
dc.description.references De Campos, R. S., Simon, A. T., & De Campos Martins, F. (2019). Assessing the impacts of road freight transport on sustainability: A case study in the sugar-energy sector. Journal of Cleaner Production, 220, 995-1004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.02.171 es_ES
dc.description.references Delchet-Cochet, K., & Vo, L.-C. (2013). Classification of CSR standards in the light of ISO 26000. Society and Business Review, 8(2), 134–144. https://doi.org/10.1108/SBR-11-2012-0046 es_ES
dc.description.references Dong, Q., Qian, D. L., Li, C. H., & Fan, H. B. (2013). Research on Safety Evaluation Indexes of the Road Transportation Enterprise of Dangerous Goods. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 409-410, 1330-1334. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.409-410.1330 es_ES
dc.description.references EFQM. (2004). The EFQM Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility. EFQM. https://doi.org/905236480X es_ES
dc.description.references EPA. (2002). CSR : Can the chemical industry lead the way ? Chemical Market Reporter, 262(10), S5. es_ES
dc.description.references Escrig-Tena, A. B., Garcia-Juan, B., & Segarra-Ciprés, M. (2019). Drivers and internalisation of the EFQM excellence model. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 36(3), 398–419. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJQRM-08-2017-0161 es_ES
dc.description.references European Comission. (2016). Horizon 2020 Work Programme 2016 - 2017: 11. Smart, green and integrated transport (Vol. 2017). Recuperado de https://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/smart-green-and-integrated-transport es_ES
dc.description.references Evangelista, P., Colicchia, C., & Creazza, A. (2017). Is environmental sustainability a strategic priority for logistics service providers? Journal of Environmental Management, 198, 353-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.096 es_ES
dc.description.references Evangelista, P., & Durst, S. (2015). Knowledge management in environmental sustainability practices of third-party logistics service providers. Very Informal Newsletter on Library Automation, 45(4), 509-529. https://doi.org/10.1108/VINE-02-2015-0012 es_ES
dc.description.references Flodén, J., & Woxenius, J. (2021). A stakeholder analysis of actors and networks for land transport of dangerous goods. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 100629. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RTBM.2021.100629 es_ES
dc.description.references Govindan, K., Khodaverdi, R., & Jafarian, A. (2013). A fuzzy multi criteria approach for measuring sustainability performance of a supplier based on triple bottom line approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 47, 345-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.04.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Hahn, R. (2012). Standardizing social responsibility new perspectives on guidance documents and management system standards for sustainable development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 59(4), 717–727. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2012.2183639 es_ES
dc.description.references Hazlett, S.-A., McAdam, R., & Murray, L. (2007). From quality management to socially responsible organisations: the case for CSR. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(7), 669–682. https://doi.org/10.1108/02656710710774665 es_ES
dc.description.references Heras-Saizarbitoria, I., Arana, G., & Boiral, O. (2016). Outcomes of Environmental Management Systems: the Role of Motivations and Firms’ Characteristics. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(8), 545–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1884 es_ES
dc.description.references Herciu, M. (2016). ISO 26000 – An Integrative Approach of Corporate Social Responsibility. Studies in Business and Economics, 11(1), 73–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/sbe-2016-0006 es_ES
dc.description.references Heyes, A., & Kapur, S. (2012). Community pressure for green behavior. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 64(3), 427-441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2012.04.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Hossain, M., Islam, M. T., Momin, M. A., Nahar, S., & Alam, M. S. (2019). Understanding Communication of Sustainability Reporting: Application of Symbolic Convergence Theory (SCT). Journal of Business Ethics, 160(2), 563-586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3874-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Hsu, B. X., Chen, Y. M., & Chen, L. A. (Leann). (2022). Corporate social responsibility and value added in the supply chain: Model and mechanism. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121302 es_ES
dc.description.references Hutchison, A. J., Johnston, L. H., & Breckon, J. D. (2009). Using QSR‐NVivo to facilitate the development of a grounded theory project: an account of a worked example. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13(4), 283–302. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570902996301 es_ES
dc.description.references Hyatt, D. G., & Berente, N. (2017). Substantive or Symbolic Environmental Strategies? Effects of External and Internal Normative Stakeholder Pressures. Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(8), 1212-1234. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1979 es_ES
dc.description.references Iatridis, K., & Kesidou, E. (2018). What Drives Substantive Versus Symbolic Implementation of ISO 14001 in a Time of Economic Crisis? Insights from Greek Manufacturing Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(4), 859–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3019-8 es_ES
dc.description.references IQNet. (2011). IQNet SR 10. sistemas de Gestión de la responsabilidad Social (Iqn. A.-T. I. C. Network, Ed.). IQNet Association - The International Certification Network. es_ES
dc.description.references Johnston, L. (2006). Software and Method: Reflections on Teaching and Using QSR NVivo in Doctoral Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(5), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645570600659433 es_ES
dc.description.references Konopásek, Z. (2008). Making Thinking Visible with Atlas.ti: Computer Assisted Qualitative Analysis as Textual Practices. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.17169/FQS-9.2.420 es_ES
dc.description.references Lazare, B., & Rongier, I. (2013). Quality and safety management systems. Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC, 12(May), 9277-9280. Recuperado de https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84904709255&partnerID=40&md5=e2c26ca0852a41ab07b90ac5863f9605 es_ES
dc.description.references Lieggio Junior, M., Granemann, S. R., de Souza, O. A., & Rocha, C. H. (2012). Transportation of dangerous goods by road: the Brazilian case for selection of carriers based on a risk management methodology. Transportation Planning and Technology, 35(7), 677-696. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060.2012.718155 es_ES
dc.description.references Martinsen, U., & Björklund, M. (2012). Matches and gaps in the green logistics market. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 42(6), 562-583. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031211250596 es_ES
dc.description.references Martinsen, U., & Huge-Brodin, M. (2014). Environmental practices as offerings and requirements on the logistics market. Logistics Research, 7(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12159-014-0115-y es_ES
dc.description.references McWilliams, A Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsiblity: a theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/259398 es_ES
dc.description.references Mendieta-Lopez, J. C., & Perdomo Calvo, J. A. (2008). Fundamentos De Economía Del Transporte: Teoría, Metodología Y Análisis De Política. En Ediciones Uniandes. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1592672 es_ES
dc.description.references Moratis, L. (2016a). Out of the ordinary? Appraising ISO 26000 ’ s CSR definition. International Journal of Law and Management, 58(1), 26-47. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLMA-12-2014-0064 es_ES
dc.description.references Moratis, L. (2016b). Signaling strategies for ISO 26000: a firm-level approach. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 36(5), 512–531. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-08-2014-0402 es_ES
dc.description.references Muha, R, & Sever, D. (2010). INFLUENCE OF SOCIETY CHANGES ON THE MODEL OF HAZARDOUS GOODS ROAD TRANSPORTATION. Promet-Traffic & Transportation, 22, 133-142. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v22i2.172 es_ES
dc.description.references Muha, Robert. (2009). Influence of Sustainable Development Guidelines on Dangerous Goods Haulers. PROMET - Traffic&Transportation, 21(6), 425-432. https://doi.org/10.7307/ptt.v21i6.259 es_ES
dc.description.references Muha, Robert. (2011). Increasing Market Opportunities Through Standarization and Responsible Care Program. Transport Problems, 7(2). es_ES
dc.description.references Quarshie, A. M., Salmi, A., & Leuschner, R. (2016). Sustainability and corporate social responsibility in supply chains: The state of research in supply chain management and business ethics journals. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 22(2), 82–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2015.11.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Ranängen, H., Zobel, T., & Bergström, A. (2014). The merits of ISO 26000 for CSR development in the mining industry: a case study in the Zambian Copperbelt. Social Responsibility Journal, 10(3), 500–515. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-05-2012-0110 es_ES
dc.description.references Salmones, M. del M. G. de los, Crespo, A. H., & Bosque, I. R. del. (2005). Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Loyalty and Valuation of Services. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(4), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5841-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Silver, C., & Lewins, A. (2017). Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide. In SAGE Publications Ltd (Ed.), Using Software in Qualitative Research: A Step-by-Step Guide (second). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781473906907 es_ES
dc.description.references Tarí, J. J. (2011). Research into Quality Management and Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 102(4), 623–638. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0833-x es_ES
dc.description.references Tarí, J. J., Molina-Azorín, J. F., López-Gamero, M. D., & Pereira-Moliner, J. (2021). The association between environmental sustainable development and internalization of a quality standard. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(5), 2587–2599. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2765 es_ES
dc.description.references Testa, F., Boiral, O., & Heras-Saizarbitoria, I. (2018). Improving CSR performance by hard and soft means: The role of organizational citizenship behaviours and the internalization of CSR standards. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(5), 853–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1502 es_ES
dc.description.references Toppinen, A., Virtanen, A., Mayer, A., & Tuppura, A. (2015). Standardizing Social Responsibility via ISO 26000: Empirical Insights from the Forest Industry. Sustainable Development, 23, 153–166. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1579 es_ES
dc.description.references Valmohammadi, C. (2011). Investigating corporate social responsibility practices in Iranian organizations: an ISO 26000 perspective. BUSINESS STRATEGY SERIES, 12(5), 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1108/17515631111166898 es_ES
dc.description.references Wang, D. D. (2019). Assessing road transport sustainability by combining environmental impacts and safety concerns. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 77(November), 212–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.10.022 es_ES
dc.description.references Wolf, C., & Seuring, S. (2010). Environmental impacts as buying criteria for third party logistical services. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 40(1/2), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1108/09600031011020377 es_ES
dc.description.references Wu, L., Subramanian, N., Abdulrahman, M. D., Liu, C., Lai, K. hung, & Pawar, K. S. (2015). The impact of integrated practices of lean, green, and social management systems on firm sustainability performance-evidence from Chinese fashion auto-parts suppliers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 7(4), 3838–3858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7043838 es_ES
dc.description.references Zhu, Q., & Lai, K. hung. (2019). Enhancing supply chain operations with extended corporate social responsibility practices by multinational enterprises: Social capital perspective from Chinese suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 213, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.02.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Zinenko, A., Rovira, M. R., & Montiel, I. (2015). The fit of the social responsibility standard ISO 26000 within other CSR instruments Redundant or complementary? Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 6(4), 498–526. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-05-2014-0032 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem