- -

Female entrepreneurial leadership factors

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Female entrepreneurial leadership factors

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: s11365-022-00798-2.pdf
Tamaño: 2.225Mb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Aparisi-Torrijo, Sofia es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ribes-Giner, Gabriela es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2023-02-15T19:00:12Z
dc.date.available 2023-02-15T19:00:12Z
dc.date.issued 2022-12 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1555-1938 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/191868
dc.description.abstract [EN] This article presents the foundations, current structure and trend of academic research into leadership factors in female entrepreneurship to provide scholars in the field with an overview of the followed research directions and to explore whether the same traditional patterns are reproduced in gender studies on entrepreneurship and leadership. For this purpose, a bibliometric analysis of the Web of Science database from 2000 to 2020 was used. With a performance analysis of variables (e.g. authors, publications, journals and countries), and thanks to scientific mapping, the links among these variables were studied. The results show that the trend of publications increased from 2015, but with little influence and output. The most influential and productive countries are the USA and Spain. 35% of the journals are based in the USA and 25% in England. The most influential ones deal with entrepreneurship, business, management and leadership. Although the foundational base is influenced by the author Ahl, known for calling for new research directions related to women entrepreneurs from a social construction perspective, the most influential articles continue to investigate gender with a dominant male bias. The network analysis reveals cooperation between different countries and authors with the USA dominating. The ambiguity of entrepreneurial leadership field due to the overlap of entrepreneurship and leadership disciplines reveals through the co-citation of journals different specialisation areas: business and entrepreneurship, management and psychology, organisational behaviour. This work provides researchers with an overview that encourages them to overcome the dominant male normative lens from new epistemological perspectives. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship Universitat Politecnica de Valencia es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Female Entrepreneurial Leadership es_ES
dc.subject Bibliometric analysis es_ES
dc.subject Gender es_ES
dc.subject Entrepreneurial leadership factors es_ES
dc.subject.classification ORGANIZACION DE EMPRESAS es_ES
dc.title Female entrepreneurial leadership factors es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11365-022-00798-2 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/GVA//GV00-013-7
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Facultad de Administración y Dirección de Empresas - Facultat d'Administració i Direcció d'Empreses es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyeria Informàtica es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Aparisi-Torrijo, S.; Ribes-Giner, G. (2022). Female entrepreneurial leadership factors. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. 18(4):1707-1737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00798-2 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-022-00798-2 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1707 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1737 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 18 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\470072 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Universitat Politècnica de València es_ES
dc.description.references Ahl, H. (2003). The Scientific Reproduction of Gender Inequality. A Discourse Analysis of Research Articles on Women’s Entrepreneurship.Qualitative Sociology Review es_ES
dc.description.references Ahl, H. (2004). The Scientific Reproduction of Gender Inequality. A Discourse Analysis of Research Texts on Women’s Entrepreneurship. In Copenhagen Business School Press. https://doi.org/10.1076/clin.17.3.402.18080 es_ES
dc.description.references Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595–621. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.x es_ES
dc.description.references Ahl, H., & Marlow, S. (2012). Exploring the dynamics of gender, feminism and entrepreneurship: Advancing debate to escape a dead end? Organization, 19(5), 543–562. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508412448695 es_ES
dc.description.references Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). h-Index: A review focused in its variants, computation and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3(4), 273–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2009.04.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Antunes, L. G. R., de Abreu, A. A., & Rodrigues, M. M. (2020). True heroines: unveiling the female management of startups’ entrepreneurs. Revista de Gestão e Secretariado, 11(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.7769/gesec.v11i2.1039 es_ES
dc.description.references Baier-Fuentes, H., Merigó, J. M., Amorós, J. E., & Gaviria-Marín, M. (2019). International entrepreneurship: a bibliometric overview. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 15(2), 385–429. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0487-y es_ES
dc.description.references Balachandra, L., Briggs, T., Eddleston, K., & Brush, C. (2019). Don’t Pitch Like a Girl!: How Gender Stereotypes Influence Investor Decisions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 43(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/1042258717728028 es_ES
dc.description.references Blanco-Mesa, F., Merigó, J. M., & Gil-Lafuente, A. M. (2017). Fuzzy decision making: A bibliometric-based review. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems, 32(3), 2033–2050. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-161640 es_ES
dc.description.references Bonilla, C. A., Merigó, J. M., & Torres-Abad, C. (2015). Economics in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105(2), 1239–1252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1747-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Börner, K., Chen, C., & Boyack, K. W. (2003). Visualizing knowledge domains. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 37, 179–255. https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.1440370106 es_ES
dc.description.references Boyack, K., & Klavans, R. (2010). Co-Citation Analysis, Bibliographic Coupling, and Direct Citation: Which Citation Approach Represents the Research Front Most Accurately? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 12(61), 2389–2404. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi es_ES
dc.description.references Braun, T., Glänzel, W., & Schubert, A. (2006). A Hirsch-type index for journals. Scientometrics, 69(1), 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-006-0147-4 es_ES
dc.description.references de Bruin, A., Brush, C. G., & Welter, F. (2006). Introduction to the Special Issue: Towards Building Cumulative Knowledge on Women’s Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 585–593. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00137.x es_ES
dc.description.references Buttner, E. H. (2001). Examining female entrepreneurs’ management style: An application of a relational frame. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(3), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026460615436 es_ES
dc.description.references Calás, M., & Smircich, L. (1996). From “The Woman’s” Point of View: Feminist Approaches to Organization Studies. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies (pp. 218–257). London: Sage es_ES
dc.description.references Calás, M. B., Smircich, L., & Bourne, K. A. (2009). Extending the boundaries: reframing “entrepreneurship as social change” through feminist perspectives. Academy of Management Review, 34(3), 552–569 es_ES
dc.description.references Callahan, J. L. (2010). Constructing a manuscript: Distinguishing integrative literature reviews and conceptual and theory articles. Human Resource Development Review, 9(3), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484310371492 es_ES
dc.description.references Cancino, C., Merigó, J. M., Coronado, F., Dessouky, Y., & Dessouky, M. (2017). Forty years of Computers & Industrial Engineering: A bibliometric analysis. Computers and Industrial Engineering, 113, 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2017.08.033 es_ES
dc.description.references Carter, S., Marlow, S., & Bennett, D. (2012). Gender and entrepreneurship. Enterprise and Small Business: Principles Practice and Policy, 218–231 es_ES
dc.description.references Carter, S., & Shaw, E. (2006). Women’s business ownership: recent research and policy development. In Report to the Small Business Service, London es_ES
dc.description.references Cogliser, C. C., & Brigham, K. H. (2004). The intersection of leadership and entrepreneurship: Mutual lessons to be learned. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 771–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Mukherjee, D., Pandey, N., & Lim, W. M. (2021). How to conduct a bibliometric analysis: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 133(April), 285–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.04.070 es_ES
dc.description.references Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2003). The female leadership advantage: An evaluation of the evidence. Leadership Quarterly, 14(6), 807–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z es_ES
dc.description.references Elliott, C., & Stead, V. (2008). Learning from leading women’s experience: Towards a sociological understanding. Leadership, 4(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715008089636 es_ES
dc.description.references Fernald, L. W. J., Solomon, G. T., & Tarabishy, A. (2005). A New Paradigm: Entrepreneurial Leadership. International Research Journal, 30(2), 257–276 es_ES
dc.description.references Galloway, L., Kapasi, I., & Sang, K. (2015). Entrepreneurship, Leadership, and the Value of Feminist Approaches to Understanding Them. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(3), 683–692. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12178 es_ES
dc.description.references Garfield, E. (1972). Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation. Science, 178, 417–479. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v20n02_05 es_ES
dc.description.references Gaviria-Marín, M. (2021). Bibliometrics and business. A challenge for researchers. Inquietud Empresarial, 21(1), I–III. Retrieved from https://revistas.uptc.edu.co/index.php/inquietud_empresarial/article/view/12931 es_ES
dc.description.references Gaviria-Marin, M., Merigó, J. M., & Baier-Fuentes, H. (2019). Knowledge management: A global examination based on bibliometric analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 140(July 2018), 194–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Gil-Gomez, H., Oltra-Badenes, R., Guerola-Navarro, V., & Zegarra Saldaña, P. (2021). Crowdfunding: a bibliometric analysis. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 0123456789, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-021-00784-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Guan, J., & Gao, X. (2008). Comparison and evaluation of Chinese research performance in the field of bioinformatics. Scientometrics, 75(2), 357–379. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1871-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Gundry, L. K., & Welsch, H. P. (2001). The ambitious entrepreneur: High growth strategies of women-owned enterprises. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 453–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00059-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Gupta, V., MacMillan, I. C., & Surie, G. (2004). Entrepreneurial leadership: Developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 241–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00040-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Harrison, C., & Burnard, K. (2016). Entrepreneurial leadership: A Systematic Literature Review. International Review of Entrepreneurship, 14(2), 235–264. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331589807 es_ES
dc.description.references Harrison, C., Burnard, K., & Paul, S. (2018). Entrepreneurial leadership in a developing economy: a skill-based analysis. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 25(3), 521–548. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-05-2017-0160 es_ES
dc.description.references Harrison, R., Leitch, C., & Mcadam, M. (2015). Breaking Glass: Toward a Gendered Analysis of Entrepreneurial Leadership. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(3), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12180 es_ES
dc.description.references Henry, C., Foss, L., & Ahl, H. (2015a). Gender and entrepreneurship research: A review of methodological approaches. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 34(3), 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242614549779 es_ES
dc.description.references Henry, C., Foss, L., Fayolle, A., Walker, E., & Duffy, S. (2015b). Entrepreneurial Leadership and Gender: Exploring Theory and Practice in Global Contexts. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(3), 581–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12174 es_ES
dc.description.references Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102 es_ES
dc.description.references Hjørland, B. (2013). Citation analysis: A social and dynamic approach to knowledge organization. Information Processing and Management, 49(6), 1313–1325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2013.07.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342 es_ES
dc.description.references Huff, A. S. (1999). Writing for scholarly publication. Sage es_ES
dc.description.references Karpinskaia, E., & Shirokova, G. (2019). Entrepreneurial leadership: approaches to concept definition and main research directions. Вестник Санкт-Петербургского Университета. Менеджмент, 18(2), 235–260 es_ES
dc.description.references Kempster, S., & Cope, J. (2010). Learning to lead in the entrepreneurial context. Team Performance Management, 16, 5–34 es_ES
dc.description.references Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, vol. 14, issue 1, 10–25 es_ES
dc.description.references Kuratko, D. F. (2007). Entrepreneurial Leadership in the 21st Century. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 13(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/10717919070130040201 es_ES
dc.description.references Leitch, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. (2018). The evolving field of entrepreneurial leadership: An overview. In Research Handbook on Entrepreneurship and Leadership. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781783473762.00006 es_ES
dc.description.references Leitch, C. M., Mcmullan, C., & Harrison, R. T. (2013). The Development of Entrepreneurial Leadership: The Role of Human, Social and Institutional Capital. British Journal of Management, 24(3), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00808.x es_ES
dc.description.references Liao, H., Tang, M., Luo, L., Li, C., Chiclana, F., & Zeng, X. J. (2018). A bibliometric analysis and visualization of medical big data research. Sustainability (Switzerland), 10(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10010166 es_ES
dc.description.references Lippitt, G. L. (1987). Entrepreneurial leadership: A performing art. Journal of Creative Behavior, 21, 264–270 es_ES
dc.description.references Luor, T., Lu, H. P., Yu, H., & Chang, K. (2014). Trends in and contributions to entrepreneurship research: A broad review of literature from 1996 to June 2012. Scientometrics, 99(2), 353–369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1203-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Marlow, S., & Patton, D. (2005). November). All credit to men? Entrepreneurship, finance, and gender.Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 29(6), 717+. https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A138313768/AONE?u=anon~d835599e&sid=googleScholar&xid=3a075dce es_ES
dc.description.references Martínez, M. A., Herrera, M., Contreras, E., Ruíz, A., & Herrera-Viedma, E. (2014). Characterizing highly cited papers in Social Work through H-Classics. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1713–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1460-y es_ES
dc.description.references Merigó, J. M., Cancino, C. A., Coronado, F., & Urbano, D. (2016). Academic research in innovation: a country analysis. Scientometrics, 108(2), 559–593. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1984-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Merigó, J. M., Gil-Lafuente, A. M., & Yager, R. R. (2015). An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 27, 420–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2014.10.035 es_ES
dc.description.references Merigó, J. M., Pedrycz, W., Weber, R., & de la Sotta, C. (2018). Fifty years of Information Sciences: A bibliometric overview. Information Sciences, 432, 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2017.11.054 es_ES
dc.description.references Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2017). Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Australian Accounting Review, 27(1), 71–100. https://doi.org/10.1111/auar.12109 es_ES
dc.description.references Nicholson, N. (1998). Personality and entrepreneurial leadership:: A study of the heads of the UK’s most successful independent companies. European Management Journal, 16(5), 529–539. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-2373(98)00030-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Patterson, N., Mavin, S., & Turner, J. (2012). Unsettling the gender binary: Experiences of gender in entrepreneurial leadership and implications for HRD. European Journal of Training and Development, 36(7), 687–711. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090591211255548 es_ES
dc.description.references Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of University and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, Vol. 34, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308319533 es_ES
dc.description.references Renko, M., Tarabishy, E., Carsrud, A., A. L., & Brännback, M. (2015). Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. Journal of Small Business Management, 53(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12086 es_ES
dc.description.references Roomi, M. A., & Harrison, P. (2011). Entrepreneurial Leadership: What Is It and How Should It Be Taught ? International Review of Entrepreneurship, 9(3), 1–43 es_ES
dc.description.references Schubert, A. (2007). Successive h-indices. Scientometrics, 70(1), 201–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0112-x es_ES
dc.description.references Simba, A., & Thai, M. T. T. (2019). Advancing Entrepreneurial Leadership as a Practice in MSME Management and Development. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(S2), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12481 es_ES
dc.description.references Thongpapanl, N. (2012). The changing landscape of technology and innovation management: An updated ranking of journals in the field. Technovation, 32(5), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2012.01.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Vecchio, R. P. (2002). Leadership and gender. International Encyclopedia of Education, 13, 797–802. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00455-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Vecchio, R. P. (2003). Entrepreneurship and leadership: Common trends and common threads. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00019-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Wallin, J. A. (2005). Bibliometric methods: Pitfalls and possibilities. Basic and Clinical Pharmacology and Toxicology, 97(5), 261–275. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2005.pto_139.x es_ES
dc.description.references Wang, J. (2013). Citation time window choice for research impact evaluation. Scientometrics, 94(3), 851–872. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0775-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Zupic, I., & Čater, T. (2015). Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, 18(3), 429–472. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114562629 es_ES
dc.description.references Cobo, M., López-Herrera, A., Herrera-Viedma, E. and Herrera, F. (2011), Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci., 62: 1382-1402. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21525 es_ES
dc.subject.ods 05.- Alcanzar la igualdad entre los géneros y empoderar a todas las mujeres y niñas es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem