- -

Evaluando las condiciones de racionalidad y plausibilidad en la valoración de conservar la biodiversidad de un país megabiodiverso. El caso del Manu en Perú

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Evaluando las condiciones de racionalidad y plausibilidad en la valoración de conservar la biodiversidad de un país megabiodiverso. El caso del Manu en Perú

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Dávila, J.; Vásquez-Lavín, F.; Orihuela, CE.; Ponce Oliva, RD.; Lavado-Solis, K.; Paredes-Vilca, O.; Mogollón Ñañez, R.... (2023). Evaluando las condiciones de racionalidad y plausibilidad en la valoración de conservar la biodiversidad de un país megabiodiverso. El caso del Manu en Perú. Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales - Agricultural and Resource Economics. 23(1):35-54. https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2023.01.02

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/194821

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: Evaluando las condiciones de racionalidad y plausibilidad en la valoración de conservar la biodiversidad de un país megabiodiverso. El caso del Manu en Perú
Otro titulo: Assessing the conditions of Rationality and Plausibility in the valuation of biodiversity conservation in a mega-biodiverse country. The case of Manu in Perú
Autor: Dávila, José Vásquez-Lavín, Felipe Orihuela, Carlos Enrique Ponce Oliva, Roberto D. Lavado-Solis, Karol Paredes-Vilca, Oscar Mogollón Ñañez, Raymundo Díaz, Sabrina
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN]  According to NOAA, the results of an economic valuation are applicable as public policy if they fulfill two conditions: rationality and plausibility. In this study, we carried out the valuation of biodiversity ...[+]


[ES] Según la NOAA, los resultados de una valoración económica son aplicables como política pública si cumplen dos condiciones: racionalidad y plausibilidad. En el presente estudio, se realiza la valoración económica de ...[+]
Palabras clave: Biodiversity conservation , Choice experiment , Functionality , Sensitivity to scope , Plausibility , Funcionalidad , Sensibilidad al alcance , Conservación de biodiversidad , Experimento de elección , Plausibilidad
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)
Fuente:
Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales - Agricultural and Resource Economics. (issn: 1578-0732 ) (eissn: 2174-7350 )
DOI: 10.7201/earn.2023.01.02
Editorial:
Universitat Politècnica de València
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2023.01.02
Tipo: Artículo

Localización


 

References

Adams, C., Seroa Da Motta, R., Ortiz, R.A., Reid, J., Ebersbach Aznar, C. & de Almeida Sinisgalli, P. A. (2008). "The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil)". Ecological Economics, 66(2-3), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.008

Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R. & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation, January 11, 1993. Obtenido de: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4473366/mod_folder/intro/Arow_WTP.pdf

Bakhtiari, F., Jacobsen, J.B., Thorsen, B.J., Lundhede, T.H., Strange, N. & Boman, M. (2018). "Disentangling Distance and Country Effects on the Value of Conservation across National Borders". Ecological Economics, 147, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.019 [+]
Adams, C., Seroa Da Motta, R., Ortiz, R.A., Reid, J., Ebersbach Aznar, C. & de Almeida Sinisgalli, P. A. (2008). "The use of contingent valuation for evaluating protected areas in the developing world: Economic valuation of Morro do Diabo State Park, Atlantic Rainforest, São Paulo State (Brazil)". Ecological Economics, 66(2-3), 359-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.008

Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P., Leamer, E., Radner, R. & Schuman, H. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation, January 11, 1993. Obtenido de: https://edisciplinas.usp.br/pluginfile.php/4473366/mod_folder/intro/Arow_WTP.pdf

Bakhtiari, F., Jacobsen, J.B., Thorsen, B.J., Lundhede, T.H., Strange, N. & Boman, M. (2018). "Disentangling Distance and Country Effects on the Value of Conservation across National Borders". Ecological Economics, 147, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.12.019

Bakhtiari, F., Lundhede, T.H., Gibbons, J., Strange, N. & Jacobsen, J.B. (2014). "Testing embedding or reversed embedding effects in valuation of forest biodiversity". Comunicación presentada al 5th World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economists, Estambul.

Bartkowski, B., Lienhoop, N. & Hansjürgens, B. (2015). "Capturing the complexity of biodiversity: A critical review of economic valuation studies of biological diversity". Ecological Economics, 113, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.023

Bartkowski, B. (2019). Economic Valuation of Biodiversity: An Interdisciplinary Conceptual Perspective. London and New York: Routledge.

Beaudet, C., Tardieu, L. & David, M. (2022). "Are citizens willing to accept changes in public lighting for biodiversity conservation?" Ecological Economics, 200, 107527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107527

Becker, G.S. & Murphy, K.M. (1993). "A Simple Theory of Advertising as a Good or Bad". The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(4), 941-964. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118455

Bhat, M.Y., Bhatt, M.S. & Sofi, A.A. (2020). "Valuing biodiversity attributes: A choice experiment design". Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 192, 499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-020-08420-0

Borzykowski, N., Baranzini, A. & Maradan, D. (2018). "Scope Effects in Contingent Valuation: Does the Assumed Statistical Distribution of WTP Matter?" Ecological Economics, 144, 319-329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.09.005

Boyle, K.J., Bishop, R.C., Welsh, M.P. & Ahearn, M.C. (1998). Test of Scope in Contingent-Valuation Studies: Are the Numbers for the Birds. Obtenido de: https://www.academia.edu/22396027/Test_of_Scope_in_Contingent_Valuation_Studies_Are_the_Numbers_for_the_Birds

Boyle, K.J., Desvousges, W.H., Johnson, F., Dunford, R.W. & Hudson, S.P. (1994). "An Investigation of Part-Whole Biases in Contingent-Valuation Studies". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 27(1), 64-83. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1994.1026

Burrows, J., Newman, R., Genser, J. & Plewes, J. (2017). "Do contingent valuation estimates of willingness to pay for non-use environmental goods pass the scope test with adequacy? A review of the evidence from empirical studies in the literature". En: McFadden, D. & Train, K. (ed.), Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods (pp. 82-152). Cheltenham, Reino Unido: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781786434692.00011

Carson, R.T. & Mitchell, R.C. (1995). "Sequencing and Nesting in Contingent Valuation Surveys". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(2), 155-173. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1011

CBD (2016). Like-minded mega-diverse countries carta to achieve Aichi Biodiversity Target 11. Obtenido de: Convention on Biological Diversity: https://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/cop/cop-13/information/cop-13-inf-45-en.pdf

Constanza, R., D'Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B, Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton, P. & Van Den Belt, M. (1997). "The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital". Nature Search Journal, 387, 253-260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0

Cummings, R. & Taylor, L. (1999). "Unbiased value estimates for environmental goods: A cheap talk design for the contingent valuation method". American Economic Review, 89(3), 649-665. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.649

Czajkowski, M. & Hanley, N. (2009). "Using Labels to Investigate Scope Effects in Stated Preference Methods". Environmental and Resource Economics, 44, 521-535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-009-9299-z

Granado-Díaz, R., Villanueva, A.J., Gómez-Limón, J.A. & Rodríguez-Entrena, M. (2018). "Análisis de la heterogeneidad de la demanda de bienes públicos procedentes del olivar de montaña en Andalucía". ITEA. Información Técnica Económica Agraria, 114(2): 158-182. https://doi.org/10.12706/itea.2018.011

Granado-Díaz, R., Gómez-Limón, J.A., Villanueva, A.J. & Rodríguez-Entrena, M. (2020). "Spatial analysis of demand for sparsely-located ecosystem services using alternative index approaches". European Review of Agricultural Economics, 47(2), 752-784. https://doi.org/10.1093/erae/jbz036

Ferrini, S. & Turner, K. (2018). "McFadden, Daniel and Train, Kenneth: Contingent valuation of environmental goods-a comprehensive critique". Journal of Economics, 125, 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-018-0606-4

Hanemann, W.M. (2001). "The Economic Theory of WTP and WTA". En Bateman, I. J & Willis, K. G. (Eds.) Valuing Environmental Preferences: Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries (pp. 42-96). New York, USA: Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/0199248915.003.0003

Hausman, J. & McFadden, D. (1984). "Specification Tests for the Multinomial Logit". Econometrica, 52(5), 1219-1240. https://doi.org/10.2307/1910997

Holmes, T.P. & Adamowicz, W.L. (2003). "Attribute-based methods". En Champ, P.A., Boyle, K.J. & Brown, T.C. (eds.): A Primer on Nonmarket Valuation (pp.171-219) New York, USA: Springer Science+Business Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0826-6_6

Hynes, S., Chen, W., Vondolia, K., Armstrong, C. & O'Connor, E. (2021). "Valuing the ecosystem service benefits from kelp forest restoration: A choice experiment from Norway". Ecological Economics, 179, 106833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106833

Jacobsen, J.B., Boiesen, H., Thorsen, B.J., & Strange, N. (2008). "What's in a name? The use of quantitative measures versus' Iconised' species when valuing biodiversity". Environmental and Resource Economics, 39, 247-263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9107-6

Jacobsen, J.B., Hedemark, T., Martinsen, L., Hasler, B. & Thorsen, B.J. (2011). "Embedding effects in choice experiment valuations of environmental preservation projects". Ecological Economics, 70(6), 1170-1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.01.013

Jordano, P. (2016). "Chasing Ecological Interactions". PLOS Biology. 14(9). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002559

Jorgensen, B.S., Wilson, M.A. & Heberlein, T.A. (2001). "Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: Attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope". Ecological Economics,36(1), 133-148. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00210-X

Kahneman, D. & Knetsch, J. (1992). "Valuing Public Goods: The Purchase of Moral Satisfaction". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22(1), 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/0095-0696(92)90019-S

Kasting, J.F.& Schultz, P.A. (1996). "Benefit-Cost Analysis in Environmental, Health, and Safety Regulation a Statement of Principles". Science, 272 (5268), 1571-1572. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.272.5268.1571.c

Lancaster, K.J. (1966). "A new approach to consumer theory". Journal of Political Economy, 74(2), 132-157. https://doi.org/10.1086/259131

Lew, D.K., Layton, D.F. & Rowe, R.D. (2010). "Valuing Enhancements to Endangered Species Protection under Alternative Baseline Futures: The Case of the Steller Sea Lion University of California". Marine Resource Economics, 25(2), 133-154. https://doi.org/10.5950/0738-1360-25.2.133

Lew, D.K. & Wallmo, K. (2011). "External Tests of Scope and Embedding in Stated Preference Choice Experiments: An Application to Endangered Species Valuation". Environmental and Resource Economics, 48, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-010-9394-1

Loomis, J., Lockwood, M. & DeLacy, T. (1993). "Some Empirical Evidence on Embedding Effects in Contingent Valuation of Forest Protection". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 25(1), 45-55. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1993.1025

Louviere, J., Hensher, D.A., & Swait, J. (2000). Stated Choice Methods Analysis and Applications. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511753831

Martin-Ortega, J., Mesa-Jurado, M. & Berbel, J. (2015). "Revisiting the impact of order effects on sensitivity to scope: A contingent valuation of a common-pool resource". Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66(3) 705-726. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12105

McFadden, D. (1974). "Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour". En Zarembka, P. (ed.): Economic Theory and Mathematical Economics (pp. 105-142). New York, EEUU: Academic Press.

Morrison, G. (2000). Embedding and substitution in willingness to pay. Obtenido de: University of Nottingham: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/economics/documents/discussion-papers/00-10.pdf

Morse-Jones, S., Bateman, I. J., Kontoleon, A., Ferrini, S., Burgess, N.D. & Turner, R.K. (2012). "Stated preferences for tropical wildlife conservation amongst distant beneficiaries: Charisma, endemism, scope and substitution effects". Ecological Economics, 78, 9-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.11.002

Musgrave, R.A. (1959). The theory of public finance. New York, USA: McGraw-Hill.

Mwebaze, P., Marris, G. C., Brown, M., MacLeod, A., Jones, G. & Budge, G. E. (2018). "Measuring public perception and preferences for ecosystem services: A case study of bee pollination in the UK". Land Use Policy, 71, 355-362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.11.045

Nijkamp, P., Vindigni, G. & Nunes, P. (2008). "Economic valuation of biodiversity: A comparative study". Ecological Economics, 67(2), 217-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.03.003

Nunes, P.A.L.D. & van den Bergh, J.C.J.M. (2001). "Economic valuation of biodiversity: Sense or nonsense?" Ecological Economics, 39(2), 203-222. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00233-6

Ojea, E. & Loureiro, M.L. (2009). "Valuation of Wildlife: Revising some additional considerations for scope tests". Contemporary Economic Policy, 27(2), 236-250. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7287.2008.00129.x

Olar, M., Adamowicz, W., Boxall, P., West, G.E., Lessard, F. & Cantin, G. (2007). Estimation of the Economic Benefits of Marine Mammal Recovery in the St. Lawrence Estuary. Obtenido de: Canada. Department of Fisheries and Oceans. Quebec Region. Policy and Economics Branch: https://publications.gc.ca/collections/collection_2010/mpo-dfo/Fs124-2-2008-eng.pdf

Orihuela, C.E., Minaya, C.A., Mercado, W., Jiménez, L.A., Estrada, M. & Gómez, H.J. (2020). "Efecto distancia en la disposición a pagar por la conservación de la biodiversidad: el caso de un área protegida megadiversa". Economía Agraria y Recursos Naturales - Agricultural and Resource Economics, 20(1), 167-188. https://doi.org/10.7201/earn.2020.01.08

Patterson, B., Stotz, D. & Solari, S. (2006). "Mammals and Birds of the Manu Biosphere Reserve, Peru". Fieldiana Zoology, 110, 1. https://doi.org/10.3158/0015-0754(2006)110[1:MABOTM]2.0.CO;2

Pouta, E. (2005). "Sensitivity to scope of environmental regulation in contingent valuation of forest cutting practices in Finland". Forest Policy and Economics, 7(4), 539-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2003.09.002

Remoundou, K., Diaz-Simal, P., Koundouri, P. & Rulleau, B. (2015). "Valuing climate change mitigation: A choice experiment on a coastal and marine ecosystem". Ecosystem Services, 11, 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.11.003

Ressurreição, A., Gibbons, J., Dentinho, T., Kaiser, M., Santos, R. & Edwards-Jones, G. (2011). "Economic valuation of species loss in the open sea". Ecological Economics, 70(4), 729-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.11.009

Ring, I., Hansjürgens, B., Elmqvist, T., Wittmer, H. & Sukhdev, P. (2010). "Challenges in framing the economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: The TEEB initiative". Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(1-2), 15-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.03.005

Rolfe, J. & Windle, J. (2012). "Distance Decay Functions for Iconic Assets: Assessing National Values to Protect the Health of the Great Barrier Reef in Australia". Environmental and Resource Economics, 53, 347-365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-012-9565-3

Rollins, K. & Lyke, A. (1998). "The Case for Diminishing Marginal Existence Values". Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(3), 324-344. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1998.1045

Rudd, M.A. (2009). "National values for regional aquatic species at risk in Canada". Inter-Research Science Publisher, 6(3), 239-249. https://doi.org/10.3354/esr00160

Samuelson, P.A. (1954). "The pure theory of public expenditure". The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925895

Samuelson, P.A. (1955). "Diagrammatic exposition of a theory of public expenditure". The Review of Economics and Statistics, 37(4), 350-356. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925849

SERNANP, (2014). Plan Maestro del Parque Nacional del Manu. Diagnóstico 2013-2018. Obtenido de: Servicio Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas: https://global.wcs.org/DesktopModules/Bring2mind/DMX/API/Entries/Download?EntryId=27461&PortalId=94&DownloadMethod=attachment

Spencer-Cotton, A., Kragt, M.E. & Burton, M. (2018). "Spatial and Scope Effects: Valuations of Coastal Management Practices". Journal of Agricultural Economics, 69(3), 833-851. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-9552.12301

Szabó, Z. (2011). "Reducing protest responses by deliberative monetary valuation: Improving the validity of biodiversity valuation". Ecological Economics, 72, 37-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.025

Talebi, Y., Najafi, H., Esmaili, R., Asadi, M., Mosavi, S. & Vakilpoor, M. (2022). "Estimation of the monetary value of biodiversity in the Central Alborz Protected Area". Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(13), 19553-19562. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17147-5

Train, K. (2009). Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation. Cambridge, Reino Unido: Cambridge University Press.

Vedogbeton, H. & Johnston, R. (2020). "Commodity Consistent Meta-Analysis of Wetland Values: An Illustration for Coastal Marsh Habitat". Environmental and Resource Economics, 75, 835-865. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-020-00409-0

Villanueva, A.J., Granado-Díaz, R. & Gómez-Limón, J.A. (2018). La producción de bienes públicos por parte de los sistemas agrarios. Córdoba, España: UCOpress, Editorial Universidad de Córdoba.

Wallmo, K. & Lew, D.K. (2016). "A comparison of regional and national values for recovering threatened and endangered marine species in the United States". Journal of Environmental Management, 179, 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.04.053

Wheeler, S. & Damania, R. (2001). "Valuing New Zealand recreational fishing and an assessment of the validity of the contingent valuation estimates". Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 45(4), 599-621. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8489.00159

Whitehead, J.C. (2016). "Plausible responsiveness to scope in contingent valuation". Ecological Economics, 128, 17-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.011

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem