- -

Academic artists' engagement and commercialisation

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Academic artists' engagement and commercialisation

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Azagra-Caro, Joaquín M. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Benito Amat, Carlos es_ES
dc.contributor.author Planells-Aleixandre, Ester es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2023-08-28T18:00:26Z
dc.date.available 2023-08-28T18:00:26Z
dc.date.issued 2022-08 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0892-9912 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/195749
dc.description.abstract [EN] Academic artists are researchers who create artistic work. They form part of the cultural life of cities and contribute to welfare not only through research but also through art. They may commercialise their art or use it to engage in scientifc knowledge difusion. We seek to understand the relationship between art, academic commercialisation and engagement, and detect barriers to academic art. The resources needed to develop and difuse art in addition to conducting research may be incompatible with a career focused on science quality or an organisational logic based on teaching and pure basic research. We study the responses to a survey of some 7,000 Spanish academics and compare university research ers to other researchers. More than half of the researchers surveyed create artistic work; however, whereas engagement is the norm rather than the exception, commercialisation is rare. Working in a university and producing good quality science run counter to being an artist. The detrimental efect of science quality on being a commercial or engaged artist turns positive after a certain threshold, which suggests polarisation among academic art ists. Among commercial artists, this polarisation seems to apply specifcally to university researchers. We discuss the implications for the valorisation of art across knowledge trans fer channels and in research evaluations. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities funded this research through Project CSO2016-79045-C2-2-R of the Spanish National R&D&I Plan. We are grateful to Christopher S. Hayter and Einar Rasmussen for their constructive comments. Our special thanks go to the volunteers who pilot-tested the survey: David Barberá, Àngels Bernabeu, Joaquín Camps, Gérard Carat, María Ángeles Chavarría, Anabel Fernández, Ester Linde, Óscar Llopis, Francisco Rivas and Soberana Sáez. Thanks are due also to the survey respondents and, particularly, those who spontaneously provided supporting statements. Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof The Journal of Technology Transfer es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Knowledge transfer es_ES
dc.subject University-industry interaction es_ES
dc.subject Science quality es_ES
dc.subject Public understanding of science es_ES
dc.title Academic artists' engagement and commercialisation es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10961-022-09940-2 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MCIU//CSO2016-79045-C2-2-R/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Azagra-Caro, JM.; Benito Amat, C.; Planells-Aleixandre, E. (2022). Academic artists' engagement and commercialisation. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 47(4):1273-1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09940-2 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09940-2 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1273 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1296 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 47 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\465387 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades es_ES
dc.description.references Acosta, M., Coronado, D., León, M. D., & Moreno, P. J. (2019). The production of academic technological knowledge: An exploration at the research group level. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1–23. es_ES
dc.description.references Ayoub, M. R., Gottschalk, S., & Müller, B. (2017). Impact of public seed-funding on academic spin-offs. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(5), 1100–1124. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., Carat, G., & Pontikakis, D. (2010). Inclining the columns to make the temple look straight: A first glance at monetary indicators on university-industry cooperation. Research Evaluation, 19(2), 119–128. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., Fernández-Mesa, A., & Robinson-García, N. (2020a). ‘Getting out of the closet’: Scientific authorship of literary fiction and knowledge transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 56–85. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., González-Salmerón, L., & Marques, P. (2020b). Fiction lagging behind or non-fiction defending the indefensible? University–industry (et al.) interaction in science fiction. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46(6), 1889–1916. es_ES
dc.description.references Azagra-Caro, J. M., & Llopis, O. (2018). Who do you care about? Scientists’ personality traits and perceived impact on beneficiaries. R&D Management, 48(5), 566–579. es_ES
dc.description.references Azoulay, P., Ding, W., & Stuart, T. (2009). The impact of academic patenting on the rate, quality and direction of (public) research output. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 57(4), 637–676. es_ES
dc.description.references Becker, H. S. (1963). Outsiders: Studies in the sociology of deviance. Free Press Glencoe. es_ES
dc.description.references Bhandari, M., Guyatt, G. H., Kulkarni, A. V., Devereaux, P. J., Leece, P., Bajammal, S., Heels-Ansdell, D., & Busse, J. W. (2014). Perceptions of authors’ contributions are influenced by both byline order and designation of corresponding author. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 67(9), 1049–1054. es_ES
dc.description.references Bol, T., de Vaan, M., & van de Rijt, A. (2018). The Matthew effect in science funding. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(19), 4887–4890. es_ES
dc.description.references Bonaccorsi, A. (2017). Addressing the disenchantment: Universities and regional development in peripheral regions. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 20(4), 293–320. es_ES
dc.description.references Bozeman, B., & Gaughan, M. (2011). Job satisfaction among university faculty: Individual, work, and institutional determinants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(2), 154–186. es_ES
dc.description.references Buenstorf, G. (2009). Is commercialization good or bad for science? Individual-level evidence from the Max Planck Society. Research Policy, 38(2), 281–292. es_ES
dc.description.references Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50. es_ES
dc.description.references Edler, J., Fier, H., & Grimpe, C. (2011). International scientist mobility and the locus of knowledge and technology transfer. Research Policy, 40(6), 791–805. es_ES
dc.description.references Fischer, B. B., Schaeffer, P. R., Vonortas, N. S., & Queiroz, S. (2018). Quality comes first: University-industry collaboration as a source of academic entrepreneurship in a developing country. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(2), 263–284. es_ES
dc.description.references Florida, R. (2019). The rise of the creative class. Basic Books. es_ES
dc.description.references Fudickar, R., Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2018). What’s the price of academic consulting? Effects of public and private sector consulting on academic research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(4), 699–722. es_ES
dc.description.references Garcia, R., Araújo, V., Mascarini, S., Santos, E. G., & Costa, A. R. (2020). How long-term university-industry collaboration shapes the academic productivity of research groups. Innovation, 22(1), 56–70. es_ES
dc.description.references Gaughan, M., & Bozeman, B. (2016). Using the prisms of gender and rank to interpret research collaboration power dynamics. Social Studies of Science, 46(4), 536–558. es_ES
dc.description.references Giones, F., Laufs, D., & Schultz, C. (2020). Co-creating science commercialization opportunities for blue biotechnologies: The FucoSan Project. Sustainability, 12(14), 5578. es_ES
dc.description.references Gonzales, L. D., Martinez, E., & Ordu, C. (2014). Exploring faculty experiences in a striving university through the lens of academic capitalism. Studies in Higher Education, 39(7), 1097–1115. es_ES
dc.description.references Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950. es_ES
dc.description.references Haeussler, C., & Colyvas, J. A. (2011). Breaking the ivory tower: Academic entrepreneurship in the life sciences in UK and Germany. Research Policy, 40(1), 41–54. es_ES
dc.description.references Hayter, C. S., Rasmussen, E., & Rooksby, J. H. (2020). Beyond formal university technology transfer: Innovative pathways for knowledge exchange. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 1–8. es_ES
dc.description.references Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2017). Fishing for complementarities: Research grants and research productivity. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 51, 1–38. es_ES
dc.description.references Hottenrott, H., & Thorwarth, S. (2011). Industry funding of university research and scientific productivity. Kyklos, 64(4), 534–555. es_ES
dc.description.references Kwiek, M. (2019). Social stratification in Higher Education: What it means at the micro-level of the individual academic scientist. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(4), 419–444. es_ES
dc.description.references Lam, A. (2010). From ‘ivory tower traditionalists’ to ‘entrepreneurial scientists’? Academic scientists in fuzzy university—industry boundaries. Social Studies of Science, 40(2), 307–340. es_ES
dc.description.references Lam, A. (2018). Boundary-crossing careers and the ‘third space of hybridity’: Career actors as knowledge brokers between creative arts and academia. Environment and Planning a: Economy and Space, 50(8), 1716–1741. es_ES
dc.description.references Lam, A. (2020). Hybrids, identity and knowledge boundaries: Creative artists between academic and practitioner communities. Human Relations, 73(6), 837–863. es_ES
dc.description.references Laursen, K., & Salter, A. (2006). Open for innovation: The role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2), 131–150. es_ES
dc.description.references Martínez, C., Azagra-Caro, J. M., & Maraut, S. (2013). Academic inventors, scientific impact and the institutionalisation of Pasteur’s Quadrant in Spain. Industry and Innovation, 20(5), 438–455. es_ES
dc.description.references Mattsson, P., Sundberg, C. J., & Laget, P. (2011). Is correspondence reflected in the author position? A bibliometric study of the relation between corresponding author and byline position. Scientometrics, 87(1), 99–105. es_ES
dc.description.references Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science, 159(3810), 56–63. es_ES
dc.description.references Olmos-Peñuela, J., Castro-Martínez, E., & D’Este, P. (2014). Knowledge transfer activities in social sciences and humanities: Explaining the interactions of research groups with non-academic agents. Research Policy, 43(4), 696–706. es_ES
dc.description.references Perkmann, M., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Autio, E., Broström, A., D’Este, P., Fini, R., Geuna, A., Grimaldi, R., Hughes, A., Krabel, S., Kitson, M., Llerena, P., Lissoni, F., Salter, A., & Krabel, S. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialisation: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442. es_ES
dc.description.references Ranga, M., Perälampi, J., & Kansikas, J. (2016). The new face of university–business cooperation in Finland. Science and Public Policy, 43(5), 601–612. es_ES
dc.description.references Rooksby, J. H., & Hayter, C. S. (2019). Copyrights in higher education: Motivating a research agenda. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(1), 250–263. es_ES
dc.description.references Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2013). Sparks of genius: The 13 thinking tools of the world's most creative people. HMH. es_ES
dc.description.references Root-Bernstein, R., Allen, L., Beach, L., Bhadula, R., Fast, J., Hosey, C., Kremkow, B., Lapp, J., Lonc, K., Pawelec, K., Podufaly, A., Russ, C., Tennant, L., Vrtis, E., & Weinlander, S. (2008). Arts foster scientific success: Avocations of Nobel, national academy, royal society, and sigma xi members. Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology, 1(2), 51–63. es_ES
dc.description.references Root-Bernstein, R. S., Bernstein, M., & Garnier, H. (1995). Correlations between avocations, scientific style, work habits, and professional impact of scientists. Creativity Research Journal, 8(2), 115–137. es_ES
dc.description.references Root-Bernstein, R., & Root-Bernstein, M. (2004). Artistic scientists and scientific artists: The link between polymathy and creativity. In R. Sternberg, E. Grigorenko, & J. Singer (Eds.), Creativity: From potential to realization (pp. 127–151). American Psychological Association. es_ES
dc.description.references Scandura, A., & Iammarino, S. (2021). Academic engagement with industry: The role of research quality and experience. The Journal of Technology Transfer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-021-09867-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Schaeffer, V., Öcalan-Özel, S., & Pénin, J. (2020). The complementarities between formal and informal channels of university–Industry knowledge transfer: A longitudinal approach. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 45(1), 31–55. es_ES
dc.description.references Teirlinck, P., & Spithoven, A. (2012). Fostering industry-science cooperation through public funding: Differences between universities and public research centres. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(5), 676–695. es_ES
dc.description.references Toole, A. A., & Czarnitzki, D. (2010). Commercializing science: Is there a university “brain drain” from academic entrepreneurship? Management Science, 56(9), 1599–1614. es_ES
dc.description.references Van Looy, B., Ranga, M., Callaert, J., Debackere, K., & Zimmermann, E. (2004). Combining entrepreneurial and scientific performance in academia: Towards a compounded and reciprocal Matthew-effect? Research Policy, 33(3), 425–441. es_ES
dc.description.references Weiss, P. S. (2012). Who are corresponding authors? ACS Nano, 2(177), 2861–2861. es_ES
dc.description.references Wren, J. D., Grissom, J. E., & Conway, T. (2006). E-mail decay rates among corresponding authors in MEDLINE: The ability to communicate with and request materials from authors is being eroded by the expiration of e-mail addresses. EMBO Reports, 7(2), 122–127. es_ES
dc.description.references Zucker, L. G., & Darby, M. R. (1996). Star scientists and institutional transformation: Patterns of invention and innovation in the formation of the biotechnology industry. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93(23), 12709–12716. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem