- -

Moscow International University Ranking: critical review and geopolitical effects

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Moscow International University Ranking: critical review and geopolitical effects

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Orduña-Malea, Enrique es_ES
dc.contributor.author Perez-Esparrells, Carmen es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2023-11-10T19:04:41Z
dc.date.available 2023-11-10T19:04:41Z
dc.date.issued 2021-04 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/199510
dc.description.abstract [EN] The Moscow International University Ranking (MosIUR) is a global university ranking launched in 2017 with the intention of evaluating universities by considering three essential dimensions (education, research, and knowledge transfer). This ranking was designed and developed by the Russian Union of Rectors following a direct request from President Vladimir Putin. The objective of this work is to perform a threefold analysis of this ranking. First, a methodological analysis is carried out, focused on describing the nature of the indicators and sources employed. Second, a geopolitical analysis aims to determine how countries are represented in this new global ranking. Third, a webometric analysis is done, focused on the online visibility of the ranking. The results reveal MosIUR to be a ranking with an outstanding number of webometric indicators and clearly oriented towards transference to society. However, some methodological concerns arise regarding a few metrics. The geopolitical position of developed countries is similar to that in other global rankings, but slight differences emerge, such as the stronger presence of Russian universities. The cybermetric analysis confirms that, despite being international, this ranking is strongly limited to Russia. It can be concluded that, except for the palpable predominance of the USA, each ranking tends to place universities from their own country in a better position. The creation of MosIUR by the Russian government can thus be perceived as a political strategy to improve the reputation of Russian universities, increase funding, and accelerate their transformation into world-class universities. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Ediciones Profesionales de la Informacion SL es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof El Profesional de la información (Online) es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject World-class universities es_ES
dc.subject University rankings es_ES
dc.subject Higher education es_ES
dc.subject University missions es_ES
dc.subject Informetrics es_ES
dc.subject Russian Federation es_ES
dc.subject Comparison es_ES
dc.subject Analysis es_ES
dc.subject Weaknesses and strengths es_ES
dc.subject MosIUR es_ES
dc.subject ARWU es_ES
dc.subject QS es_ES
dc.subject THE es_ES
dc.subject SCImago Institutions Rankings es_ES
dc.subject Leiden Ranking es_ES
dc.subject Webometrics Ranking (WR) es_ES
dc.subject.classification BIBLIOTECONOMIA Y DOCUMENTACION es_ES
dc.title Moscow International University Ranking: critical review and geopolitical effects es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3145/epi.2021.mar.09 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Facultad de Bellas Artes - Facultat de Belles Arts es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Orduña-Malea, E.; Perez-Esparrells, C. (2021). Moscow International University Ranking: critical review and geopolitical effects. El Profesional de la información (Online). 30(2):1-13. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.mar.09 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.mar.09 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 13 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 30 es_ES
dc.description.issue 2 es_ES
dc.identifier.eissn 1699-2407 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\430988 es_ES
dc.description.references Altbach, Philip G.; Hazelkorn, Ellen (2017). “Pursuing rankings in the age of massification: for most - forget about it”. International higher education, n. 89, pp. 8-10. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2017.89.9834 es_ES
dc.description.references ARM (2017). Moscow International University Ranking “The Three University Missions” (MosIUR): Pilot edition. Analytical materials. Association of Rating, Ranking, and Other Performance Evaluations Makers. https://mosiur.org/files/analytics/RU-Pilot_Ranking-2017-Analytics-General.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references ARM (2018a). Mosiur criteria features: outcome study. Criterion: “university’s impact on society”. Association of Rating, Ranking, and Other Performance Evaluations Makers. https://mosiur.org/files/analytics/EN-Wikipedia_Alumni_Analytics.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references ARM (2018b). Moscow International University Ranking “The Three University Missions”. The report on the study of the criterion “The number of online courses of the university, published on the largest online platforms”. Association of Rating, Ranking, and Other Performance Evaluations Makers. https://mosiur.org/files/analytics/EN-MosIUR_MOOC_Analytics.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references ARM (2018c). Moscow International University Ranking “The Three University Missions”. Association of Rating, Ranking, and Other Performance Evaluations Makers. https://mosiur.org/files/analytics/BUL_Analitika_Tri_missii_Eng.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references ARM (2019a). International study contests. A study based on materials of The Three University Missions Moscow International University Ranking 2018. Association of Rating, Ranking, and Other Performance Evaluations Makers. https://mosiur.org/files/analytics/EN_MosIUR_Contests_Study_-_2019.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references ARM (2019b). Moscow International University Ranking. The Three University Missions. Association of Rating, Ranking, and Other Performance Evaluations Makers. https://mosiur.org/files/analytics/EN_MosIUR_2019_Analytical_Commentary.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references ARM (2020). Moscow International University Ranking. The Three University Missions. Association of Rating, Ranking, and Other Performance Evaluations Makers. https://mosiur.org/files/analytics/EN_MosIUR_2020_Analytical_Commentary.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Docampo, Domingo (2008). “Rankings internacionales y calidad de los sistemas universitarios”. Revista de educación, v. 1, pp. 149-176. http://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/revista-de-educacion/numeros-revista-educacion/numeros-anteriores/2008/re2008/re2008-07.html es_ES
dc.description.references Hazelkorn, Ellen (2015). Rankings and the reshaping of higher education: The battle for world-class excellence. Hampshire (UK): Palgrave McMillan. ISBN: 978 1 137 44666 4 es_ES
dc.description.references Jöns, Heike; Hoyler, Michael (2013). “Global geographies of higher education: The perspective of world university rankings”. Geoforum, v. 46, pp. 45-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.12.014 es_ES
dc.description.references Landinez, Lina; Kliewe, Thorsten; Diriba, Habtamu (2019). “Entrepreneurial university indicators in global university rankings”. In: Kliewe, Thorsten; Kesting, Tobias; Plewa, Carolin; Baaken, Thomas. Developing engaged and entrepreneurial universities. Singapore: Springer, pp. 57-85. ISBN: 978 981 13 8129 4 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-8130-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, Jeongwoo (2013). “Creating world-class universities: implications for developing countries”. Prospects, v. 43, n. 2, pp. 233-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-013-9266-x es_ES
dc.description.references Marginson, Simon (2017). “Do rankings drive better performance?”. International higher education, n. 89, pp. 6-8. https://doi.org/10.6017/ihe.2017.89.9833 es_ES
dc.description.references Meho, Lokman I. (2020). “Highly prestigious international academic awards and their impact on university rankings”. Quantitative science studies, v. 1, n. 2, pp. 824-848. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00045 es_ES
dc.description.references Moed, Henk F. (2017). “A critical comparative analysis of five world university rankings”. Scientometrics, v. 110. n. 2, pp. 967-990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2212-y es_ES
dc.description.references Montesinos, Patricio; Carot, José-Miguel; Martínez, Juan-Miguel; Mora, Francisco (2008). “Third mission ranking for world class universities: Beyond teaching and research”. Higher education in Europe, v. 33, n. 2-3, pp. 259-271. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720802254072 es_ES
dc.description.references Pérez-Esparrells, Carmen (2020). “Una ensoñación al hilo del ranking de Shanghai”. Universidad: blog de Studia XXI. https://www.universidadsi.es/una-ensonacion-al-hilo-del-ranking-de-shanghai es_ES
dc.description.references Pérez-Esparrells, Carmen; Orduña-Malea, Enrique (2018). “Do the technical universities exhibit distinct behaviour in global university rankings? A Times Higher Education (THE) case study”. Journal of engineering and technology management, v. 48, pp. 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jengtecman.2018.04.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Safón, Vicente (2013). “What do global university rankings really measure? The search for the X factor and the X entity”. Scientometrics, v. 97, n. 2, pp. 223-244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-0986-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Safón, Vicente (2019). “Inter-ranking reputational effects: an analysis of the Academic Ranking of World Universities (ARWU) and the Times Higher Education World University Rankings (THE) reputational relationship”. Scientometrics, v. 121, n. 2, pp. 897-915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03214-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Safón, Vicente; Docampo, Domingo (2020). “Analyzing the impact of reputational bias on global university rankings based on objective research performance data: the case of the Shanghai Ranking (ARWU)”. Scientometrics, v. 125, pp. 2129-2227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03722-z es_ES
dc.description.references Saisana, Michaela; D’Hombres, Béatrice; Saltelli, Andrea (2011). “Rickety numbers: Volatility of university rankings and policy implications”. Research policy, v. 40, n. 1, pp. 165-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.09.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Sidorenko, Tatiana; Gorbatova, Tatiana (2015). “Efficiency of Russian education through the scale of world university rankings”. Procedia - Social and behavioral sciences, v. 166, pp. 464-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.555 es_ES
dc.description.references Siwinski, Waldemar (2016). “What direction next for university rankings?”. University world news, November 18. https://www.universityworldnews.com/post.php?story=20161114224439415 es_ES
dc.description.references Trigwell, Keith (2011). “Measuring teaching performance”. In: Shin Jung C.; Toutkoushian Robert K.; Teichler, Ulrich. University rankings. The changing academy - The changing academic profession in international comparative perspective. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 165-181. ISBN: 978 94 007 1115 0 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1116-7_9 es_ES
dc.description.references Van-Raan, Anthony F. J. (2005). “Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods”. Scientometrics, v. 62, n. 1, pp. 133-143. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Yudkevich, Maria; Altbach, Philip G.; Rumbley, Laura E. (2015). “Global university rankings: The ‘Olympic Games’ of higher education?”. Prospects, v. 45, n. 4, pp. 411-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-015-9365-y es_ES
dc.description.references Zadorozhnyuk, Ivan E.; Kalashnik, Viacheslav M.; Kireev, Sergey V. (2018). Moscow International University Ranking “The Three University Missions” in the Global Educational Space. Vysshee obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher education in Russia, v. 27, n. 6, pp. 31-41. es_ES
dc.subject.ods 04.- Garantizar una educación de calidad inclusiva y equitativa, y promover las oportunidades de aprendizaje permanente para todos es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem