- -

A Pragmatic analysis of emotion-triggering strategies in TED talks

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A Pragmatic analysis of emotion-triggering strategies in TED talks

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Mestre-Mestre, EM.; Pérez-Cabello De Alba, MB. (2022). A Pragmatic analysis of emotion-triggering strategies in TED talks. Circulo de Linguistica Aplicada a la Comunicacion. (92):257-271. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.77996

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/200927

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: A Pragmatic analysis of emotion-triggering strategies in TED talks
Autor: Mestre-Mestre, Eva M. Pérez-Cabello de Alba, María Beatriz
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Politécnica Superior de Gandia - Escola Politècnica Superior de Gandia
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
[EN] TED talks are a relatively new genre, in which experts in different fields share their knowledge, ideas and experiences to large audiences. The talks are broadcasted worldwide, thus reaching international and intercultural ...[+]
Palabras clave: Emotion , Humor , Intercultural context , TED talks
Derechos de uso: Reconocimiento (by)
Fuente:
Circulo de Linguistica Aplicada a la Comunicacion. (eissn: 1576-4737 )
DOI: 10.5209/clac.77996
Editorial:
Universidad Complutense de Madrid
Versión del editor: https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.77996
Tipo: Artículo

References

Abelin, Åsa and Allwood, Jens. 2000. Cross Linguistic Interpretation of Emotional Prosody. In Proceedings ISCA w/s Speech and Emotion. Newcastle, Northern Ireland, 110–113.

Alba-Juez, Laura and J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2019a. Emotion processes in discourse in J.L. Mackenzie and L. Alba-Juez (eds.) Emotion processes in discourse, 3-26. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.302.01alb

Alba-Juez, Laura and J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2019b. Emotion, lies, and “bullshit” in journalistic discourse: The case of fake news. Iberica 38: 17-50 [+]
Abelin, Åsa and Allwood, Jens. 2000. Cross Linguistic Interpretation of Emotional Prosody. In Proceedings ISCA w/s Speech and Emotion. Newcastle, Northern Ireland, 110–113.

Alba-Juez, Laura and J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2019a. Emotion processes in discourse in J.L. Mackenzie and L. Alba-Juez (eds.) Emotion processes in discourse, 3-26. John Benjamins Publishing Company. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.302.01alb

Alba-Juez, Laura and J. Lachlan Mackenzie. 2019b. Emotion, lies, and “bullshit” in journalistic discourse: The case of fake news. Iberica 38: 17-50

Albalat-Mascarell, Ana and Carrió-Pastor, María Luisa. 2019. Self-Representation in Political Campaign. Journal of Pragmatics, 147. 86-99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2019.05.011

Anthony, Laurence. 2017. AntConc (3.5.8) [MAC–OS]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software

Bellés– Fortuño, Begoña. 2008. Discourse Makers within the University Lecture Genre: a contrastive study between Spanish and North American Lectures (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Universitat Jaume I, Castellón.

Bhatia, Vijay Kumar. 2012. Critical reflections on genre analysis. Iberica, 24. 17–28.

Biber, Douglas. 2009. Corpus-Based and Corpus-driven Analyses of Language Variation and Use. In Heine, B. and H. Narrog. The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199544004.013.0008

Caliendo, Giuditta and Compagnone, Antonio. 2014. Expressing epistemic stance in University lectures and TED talks: a contrastive corpus–based analysis. Lingue Linguaggi. 11(11). 105–122. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1285/i22390359v11p105

Compagnone, Antonio. 2015. The reconceptualization of academic discourse as a professional practice in the digital age: A critical genre analysis of TED Talks. Hermes (Denmark), (54). 49–69. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7146/hjlcb.v27i54.22947

Compagnone, Antonio. 2017. The pragmatics of Spoken Academic discourse in the Framework of Ted Talks: A case Study. Utrecht studies in language and Communication. 29.

Culpeper, Jonathan. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/jlac.1.2.06sil

Derks, Daantje, Fischer, Agneta H. and Bos, Arjan E.R. 2008. The role of emotion in computer-mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 766–785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004

Drasovean, Anda and Tagg, Caroline. 2015. Evaluative language and its solidarity-bilding role on TED.com: An appraisal and corpus analysis. Language@Internet, 12, 1. urn:nbn:de:0009-7-42341

Dudley–Evans, Tony and St. John, Maggie J. 1998. Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi–disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Duwila, Shanty and Probowati, Yeni. 2021. Personal Metadiscourse Features on TED Talks by British Speakers. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020), 520–526. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.079

Dynel, Marta. 2009. Pragmatics and Discourse. A Resource Book for Students, 2nd Edition. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(5), 1074–1078. DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2008.12.011

Dynel, Marta. 2011. Pragmatics and linguistic research into humour, in M. Dynel (ed.) The Pragmatics of Humour across Discourse Domains. Pragmatics and Beyond New Series. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.210

Dynel, Marta. 2016. Comparing and combining covert and overt untruthfulness: on lying, deception, irony and metaphor. Pragmatics and Cognition. 23(1). 174–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pc.23.1.08dyn

Flowerdew, John and Miller, Lindsay. 1997. The teaching of academic listening comprehension and the question of authenticity. English for specific purposes. 16(1). 27–46. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(96)00030-0

Giménez–Moreno, Rosa. 2012. The interdependence of repetition and relevance in university lectures. Journal of Pragmatics, 44(6–7), 744–755. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2012.02.013

Goffman, Erving. 1981. Footing. In Goffman, E. (ed.), Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 124–159.

Holmes, Janet. 2000. Politeness, power and provocation: how humor functions in the workplace. Discourse Studies 2 (2). 159–185. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445600002002002

HUMAINE. 2008. Emotion Annotation and Representation Language. Emotion-research.net. Archived from the original.

Jenkins, Jennifer. 2000. The Phonology of English as an International Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jenkins, Jennifer. 2015. Repositioning English and multilingualism in English as a Lingua Franca. Englishes in Practice, 2 (3), 49-85. DOI:10.1515/eip-2015-0003

Kecskes, Istvan. 2004. Lexical merging, conceptual blending and cultural crossing. Intercultural Pragmatics. 1(1). 1–21. DOI:10.1515/iprg.2004.005

Kecskes, Istvan. 2010. The paradox of communication: A socio–cognitive approach. Pragmatics and Society 1(1). 50–73. DOI:10.1075/ps.1.1.04kec

Kecskes, Istvan. 2013. Intercultural Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kecskes, Istvan. 2016. “Can Intercultural Pragmatics Bring Some New Insight into Pragmatic Theories?”. In: Mey J. and A. Capone (eds.), Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society, Cham: Springer. 43–69. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12616-6_3

Kecskes, Istvan. 2015. Intercultural impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 86, 43–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2015.05.023

Khuwaileh, Abdullah. 1999. The role of chunks, phrases and body language in understanding co–ordinated academic lectures. System. 27(2). 249–260. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346–251X(99)00019–6

Langlotz, Andreas and Locher, Miriam A. 2013. The role of emotions in relational work. Journal of Pragmatics, 58, 87–107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.05.014

Lim, Nangyeon. 2016. Cultural differences in emotion: differences in emotional arousal level between the East and the West. Integrative Medicine Research, 5(2). 105–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2016.03.004

Liu, Chen Yu and Chen, Howard Hao Jan. 2019. Academic Spoken Vocabulary in TED Talks: Implications for Academic Listening. English Teaching and Learning, 43(4), 353–368. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-019-00033-2

Liu, Zhe, Xu, Anbang., Zhang, Mengdi, Mahmud, Jalal, and Sinha Vibha. 2017. Fostering User Engagement: Rhetorical Devices for Applause Generation Learnt from TED Talks. Proceedings of the Eleventh International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. Palo Alto, California: The AAAI Press.

Locher, Miriam A. and Langlotz, Andreas. 2008. “Relational work: At the intersection of cognition, interaction and emotion”. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée. 88. 165–191. DOI: 10.5451/unibas-ep8791

Ludewig, Julia. 2017. TED Talks as an Emergent Genre. CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture. 19 (1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7771/1481-4374.2946

Mestre-Mestre, Eva María. 2020. Showing emotion in academic discourse. A pragmatic analysis in ML Carrió-Pastor (Ed.) Corpus Analysis in Different Genres. Academic Discourse and Learner Corpora. New York, NY: Routledge.

Nesi, Hilary. 2001. A corpus– based analysis of academic lectures across disciplines. In Cotterill, J. and Ife, A. (eds.): Language across boundaries. London: Continuum.

Nesi, Hilary. 2012. Laughter in university lectures. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(2). 79–89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2011.12.003

Norrick, Neal. 1993. Conversational joking: humour in everyday talk. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. DOI: 10.1017/S004740450001808X

Norrick, N. 2003. Issues in conversational joking. Journal of Pragmatics. 35. 1333–1359. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00180-7

Norrick, Neal. 2004. Non–verbal humor and joke performance. Humor 17: 401–409. DOI:10.1515/humr.2004.17.4.401

Norrick, Neal. 2009. Humor in language. In Mey, J. L. (Ed.): Concise Encyclopedia of Pragmatics. 335–336.

Nurmukhamedov, Ulugbek. 2017. Lexical coverage of TED talks: implications for vocabulary instruction. TESOL Journal, 8(4), 768–790. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.323

Partington, Alan. 2006. The Linguistics of Laughter: A Corpus–assisted Study of Laughter–talk. Routledge, London.

Pell, Marc. D., Paulmann, Silke, Dara, Chinar, Alasseri, Areej, and Kotz, Sonja. A. 2009. Factors in the recognition of vocally expressed emotions: A comparison of four languages. Journal of Phonetics, 37(4), 417–435. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2009.07.005

Pinto, Alon. 2019. Variability in the formal and informal content instructors convey in lectures. Journal of Mathematical Behavior. 54. 100680. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2018.11.001

Poyatos, Fernando. 2002. Nonverbal Communication Across Disciplines. Volume II: Paralanguage, Kinesics, Silence, Personal and Environmental Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI:10.1075/gest.6.2.11fey

Seidlhofer, Barbara. 2011. Understanding English as a lingua franca. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1111/j.1473-4192.2011.00305.x

Sproull, Lee, and Kiesler, Sara. 1986. Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organization communication. Journal of Management Science, 32, 1492–1512. DOI:10.1287/mnsc.32.11.1492

Taguchi, Naoko. and Ishihara, Noriko. 2018. The pragmatics of English as a lingua franca: Research and pedagogy in the era of globalization. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 38. 80–101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190518000028

Tognini–Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6

Tsai, Timothy J. 2015. Are you TED talk material? comparing prosody in professors and TED speakers. Interspeech-15. 2534-2538. DOI: doi: 10.21437/Interspeech.2015-546

Uicheng, Kanokrat and Crabtree, Michael. 2018. Macro Discourse Markers in TED Talks: How Ideas are Signaled to Listeners. PASAA: Journal of Language Teaching and Learning in Thailand. (55). 1–31.

Valeiras-Jurado, Julia, Ruiz-Madrid, María Noelia and Jacobs, Geert. 2018. Revisiting persuasion in oral academic and professional genres: Towards a methodological framework for multimodal discourse analysis of research dissemination talks. Iberica. (35). 93–118.

Verschueren, Jef. 1999. Understanding Pragmatics. London: Edward Arnold / New York: Oxford University Press.

Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne. 2003. Truthfulness. In: Verschueren, J. Ӧstman, J.-O. Blommaert, J. and C. Bulcaen (eds.), Handbook of Pragmatics. John Benjamins, Amsterdam/Philadelphia. 1–48.

Vincent Marrelli, Jocelyne. 2004. Words in the Way of Truth. Truthfulness, Deception, Lying across Cultures and Disciplines. Napoli: Edizione Scientifiche Italiane.

Virtanen, Tuija and Halmari, Helena. 2005. “Persuasion across genres: Emerging perspectives” in H. Halmari and T. Virtanen (eds.): Persuasion across genres. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 2–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.130

Walther, Joseph B., Anderson, Jeffrey F. and Park, David . 1994. Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a meta-analysis of social and anti-social communication. Communication Research, 21,460–487. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365092019001003

Wanzer, Melissa Bekelja and Frymier, Ann Bainbridge. 1999. “The relationship between student perceptions of instructor humor and students’ reports of learning”. Communication Education. 48(1). 48-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634529909379152

Wanzer, Melissa Bekelja, Frymier, Ann Bainbridge, Wojtaszczyk, Ann M. and Smith, Tony. 2006. Appropriate and inappropriate uses of humor by teachers. Communication Education 55, 178––196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03634520600566132

Wingrove, Peter. 2017. How suitable are TED talks for academic listening? Journal of English for Academic Purposes 30. 79-95. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.10.010

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem