- -

Spatio-temporal patterns and interactions with honeydew-producing hemiptera of ants in a Mediterranean citrus orchard

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Spatio-temporal patterns and interactions with honeydew-producing hemiptera of ants in a Mediterranean citrus orchard

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

[Cerrado]
Nombre: PEKAS;Tena;Aguilar ...
Tamaño: 651.1Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Pekas, Apostolos es_ES
dc.contributor.author Tena Barreda, Alejandro es_ES
dc.contributor.author Aguilar Martí, Mª Amparo es_ES
dc.contributor.author García Mari, Ferran es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2013-11-18T13:47:19Z
dc.date.issued 2011
dc.identifier.issn 1461-9555
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/33688
dc.description.abstract 1 The role of ants in the citrus agro-ecosystem is controversial and understanding their ecology may help to clarify their function. The present study determined the daily and seasonal foraging patterns, the spatial distribution, the feeding sources and the associations with honeydew-producing Hemiptera of three ant species that forage in citrus canopies. 2 The dominant ants Pheidole pallidula (Nylander) (Myrmicinae) and Lasius grandis Forel (Formicinae) foraged in mutually exclusive territories within the ¿eld, although they both shared their territory with the subordinate Plagiolepis schmitzii Forel (Formicinae), a distribution pattern known as `ant mosaic¿. 3 The observed mean overlap for the spatial distribution was signi¿cantly lower than the generated by null models, providing strong evidence of spatial interspeci¿c competition, especially between the two dominants. 4 Ants ascended to the canopies from April until November. Colony nutritional requirements and temperature probably shape their seasonal foraging patterns. The daily activity pattern of P. schmitzii was strictly diurnal, whereas L. grandis and P. pallidula were active during the entire day. 5 The ants¿ diet in the canopies consisted principally of hemipteran honeydew, whereas citrus nectar and predation/scavenging did not represent important food sources. More than 60% of the total honeydew sources and 100% of the citrus mealybug Planococcus citri colonies were tended by ants during spring and summer. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship We are very grateful to N. J. Gotelli for providing statistical help and to Xim Cerda for his critical review and helpful comments. This work was supported by the project AGL2005-07155-C03-03 from the Ministerio de Educacion y Ciencia of Spain. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Wiley-Blackwell es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Agricultural and Forest Entomology es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Ant mosaic es_ES
dc.subject Honeydew es_ES
dc.subject Nectar es_ES
dc.subject Null models es_ES
dc.subject Lasius grandis es_ES
dc.subject Pheidole pallidula es_ES
dc.subject Plagiolepis schmitzii es_ES
dc.subject.classification PRODUCCION VEGETAL es_ES
dc.title Spatio-temporal patterns and interactions with honeydew-producing hemiptera of ants in a Mediterranean citrus orchard es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.embargo.lift 10000-01-01
dc.embargo.terms forever es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00501.x
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MEC//AGL2005-07155-C03-03/ES/CONTROL BIOLOGICO Y UMBRALES DE TRATAMIENTO DEL PIOJO ROJO DE CALIFORNIA AONIDIELLA AURANTII (HOMOPTERA: DIASPIDIDAE) EN CITRICOS/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Agroforestal Mediterráneo - Institut Agroforestal Mediterrani es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ecosistemas Agroforestales - Departament d'Ecosistemes Agroforestals es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Pekas, A.; Tena Barreda, A.; Aguilar Martí, MA.; García Mari, F. (2011). Spatio-temporal patterns and interactions with honeydew-producing hemiptera of ants in a Mediterranean citrus orchard. Agricultural and Forest Entomology. (13):89-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00501.x es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1461-9563.2010.00501.x/pdf es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 89 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 97 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.issue 13 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 39530
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia es_ES
dc.description.references Abril, S., Oliveras, J., & Gómez, C. (2007). Foraging Activity and Dietary Spectrum of the Argentine Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in Invaded Natural Areas of the Northeast Iberian Peninsula. Environmental Entomology, 36(5), 1166-1173. doi:10.1603/0046-225x(2007)36[1166:faadso]2.0.co;2 es_ES
dc.description.references Albrecht, M., & Gotelli, N. J. (2001). Spatial and temporal niche partitioning in grassland ants. Oecologia, 126(1), 134-141. doi:10.1007/s004420000494 es_ES
dc.description.references Bartlett, B. R. (1961). The Influence of Ants Upon Parasites, Predators, and Scale Insects1. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 54(4), 543-551. doi:10.1093/aesa/54.4.543 es_ES
dc.description.references BLÜTHGEN, N., & STORK, N. E. (2007). Ant mosaics in a tropical rainforest in Australia and elsewhere: A critical review. Austral Ecology, 32(1), 93-104. doi:10.1111/j.1442-9993.2007.01744.x es_ES
dc.description.references Blüthgen, N., E. Stork, N., & Fiedler, K. (2004). Bottom-up control and co-occurrence in complex communities: honeydew and nectar determine a rainforest ant mosaic. Oikos, 106(2), 344-358. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299.2004.12687.x es_ES
dc.description.references Blüthgen, N., Verhaagh, M., Goitía, W., Jaffé, K., Morawetz, W., & Barthlott, W. (2000). How plants shape the ant community in the Amazonian rainforest canopy: the key role of extrafloral nectaries and homopteran honeydew. Oecologia, 125(2), 229-240. doi:10.1007/s004420000449 es_ES
dc.description.references Buckley, R. C. (1987). Interactions Involving Plants, Homoptera, and Ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18(1), 111-135. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.18.110187.000551 es_ES
dc.description.references Cannon, C. A., & Fell, R. D. (2002). Patterns of Macronutrient Collection in the Black Carpenter Ant,Camponotus pennsylvanicus(De Geer) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Environmental Entomology, 31(6), 977-981. doi:10.1603/0046-225x-31.6.977 es_ES
dc.description.references Carroll, C. R., & Janzen, D. H. (1973). Ecology of Foraging by Ants. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 231-257. doi:10.1146/annurev.es.04.110173.001311 es_ES
dc.description.references Cerda, X., Retana, J., & Cros, S. (1997). Thermal Disruption of Transitive Hierarchies in Mediterranean Ant Communities. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 66(3), 363. doi:10.2307/5982 es_ES
dc.description.references Cerdá, X., Retana, J., & Manzaneda, A. (1998). The role of competition by dominants and temperature in the foraging of subordinate species in Mediterranean ant communities. Oecologia, 117(3), 404-412. doi:10.1007/s004420050674 es_ES
dc.description.references Cerdá, X., Palacios, R., & Retana, J. (2009). Ant Community Structure in Citrus Orchards in the Mediterranean Basin: Impoverishment as a Consequence of Habitat Homogeneity. Environmental Entomology, 38(2), 317-324. doi:10.1603/022.038.0203 es_ES
dc.description.references Cros, S., Cerdá, X., & Retana, J. (1997). Spatial and temporal variations in the activity patterns of Mediterranean ant communities. Écoscience, 4(3), 269-278. doi:10.1080/11956860.1997.11682405 es_ES
dc.description.references DAANE, K. M., SIME, K. R., FALLON, J., & COOPER, M. L. (2007). Impacts of Argentine ants on mealybugs and their natural enemies in California’s coastal vineyards. Ecological Entomology, 32(6), 583-596. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00910.x es_ES
dc.description.references DEGEN, A. A., & GERSANI, M. (1989). Environmental effects on activity and honeydew collection by the weaver antPolyrhachis simplex(Hymenoptera: Formicidae) when attending the mealybugTrabutinasp. (Homoptera: Pseudococcidae). Journal of Zoology, 218(3), 421-432. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7998.1989.tb02554.x es_ES
dc.description.references Detrain, C. (1990). Field study on foraging by the polymorphic ant species,Pheidole pallidula. Insectes Sociaux, 37(4), 315-332. doi:10.1007/bf02225995 es_ES
dc.description.references Flanders, S. E. (1945). Coincident Infestations of Aonidiella citrina and Coccus hesperidum, a Result of Ant Activity. Journal of Economic Entomology, 38(6), 711-712. doi:10.1093/jee/38.6.711 es_ES
dc.description.references Fellers, J. H. (1989). Daily and seasonal activity in woodland ants. Oecologia, 78(1), 69-76. doi:10.1007/bf00377199 es_ES
dc.description.references Ghazoul, J. (2001). Can floral repellents pre-empt potential ant-plant conflicts? Ecology Letters, 4(4), 295-299. doi:10.1046/j.1461-0248.2001.00229.x es_ES
dc.description.references Haney, P. B., Luck, R. F., & Moreno, D. S. (1987). Increases in densities of the citrus red mite,Panonychus citri [Acarina: Tetranychidae], in association with the Argentine ant,Iridomyrmex humilis [Hymenoptera: Formicidae], in southern California citrus. Entomophaga, 32(1), 49-57. doi:10.1007/bf02390931 es_ES
dc.description.references Heimpel, G. E., Rosenheim, J. A., & Mangel, M. (1997). Predation on adult Aphytis parasitoids in the field. Oecologia, 110(3), 346-352. doi:10.1007/s004420050168 es_ES
dc.description.references Heimpel, G., Lee, J., Wu, Z., Weiser, L., Wäckers, F., & Jervis, M. (2004). Gut sugar analysis in field-caught parasitoids: Adapting methods originally developed for biting flies. International Journal of Pest Management, 50(3), 193-198. doi:10.1080/09670870410001731925 es_ES
dc.description.references Hölldobler, B., & Wilson, E. O. (1990). The Ants. doi:10.1007/978-3-662-10306-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Itioka, T., & Inoue, T. (1996). Density-dependent ant attendance and its effects on the parasitism of a honeydew-producing scale insect, Ceroplastes rubens. Oecologia, 106(4), 448-454. doi:10.1007/bf00329700 es_ES
dc.description.references James, D. G., Stevens, M. M., O’Malley, K. J., & Faulder, R. J. (1999). Ant Foraging Reduces the Abundance of Beneficial and Incidental Arthropods in Citrus Canopies. Biological Control, 14(2), 121-126. doi:10.1006/bcon.1998.0678 es_ES
dc.description.references Mailleux, A.-C., Deneubourg, J.-L., & Detrain, C. (2003). Regulation of ants’ foraging to resource productivity. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270(1524), 1609-1616. doi:10.1098/rspb.2003.2398 es_ES
dc.description.references Majer, J. D. (1972). The ant mosaic in Ghana cocoa farms. Bulletin of Entomological Research, 62(2), 151-160. doi:10.1017/s0007485300047593 es_ES
dc.description.references Markin, G. P. (1970). Foraging Behavior of the Argentine Ant in a California Citrus Grove1. Journal of Economic Entomology, 63(3), 740-744. doi:10.1093/jee/63.3.740 es_ES
dc.description.references Markin, G. P. (1970). The Seasonal Life Cycle of the Argentine Ant, Iridomyrmex humilis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), in Southern California. Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 63(5), 1238-1242. doi:10.1093/aesa/63.5.1238 es_ES
dc.description.references Moreno, D. S., Haney, P. B., & Luck, R. F. (1987). Chlorpyrifos and Diazinon as Barriers to Argentine Ant (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Foraging on Citrus Trees1. Journal of Economic Entomology, 80(1), 208-214. doi:10.1093/jee/80.1.208 es_ES
dc.description.references Paris, C. I., & Espadaler, X. (2009). Honeydew collection by the invasive garden ant Lasius neglectus versus the native ant L. grandis. Arthropod-Plant Interactions, 3(2), 75-85. doi:10.1007/s11829-009-9057-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Retana, J., & Cerdá, X. (2000). Patterns of diversity and composition of Mediterranean ground ant communities tracking spatial and temporal variability in the thermal environment. Oecologia, 123(3), 436-444. doi:10.1007/s004420051031 es_ES
dc.description.references Retana, J., Cerda Xim, & Espadaler Xavier. (1992). Coexistence of two Sympatric Ant Species, Pheidole pallidula and Tetramorium semilaeve (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Entomologia Generalis, 17(1), 29-40. doi:10.1127/entom.gen/17/1992/29 es_ES
dc.description.references Ribas, C. R., & Schoereder, J. H. (2002). Are all ant mosaics caused by competition? Oecologia, 131(4), 606-611. doi:10.1007/s00442-002-0912-x es_ES
dc.description.references Sanders, C. J. (1972). SEASONAL AND DAILY ACTIVITY PATTERNS OF CARPENTER ANTS (CAMPONOTUS SPP.) IN NORTHWESTERN ONTARIO (HYMENOPTERA: FORMICIDAE). The Canadian Entomologist, 104(11), 1681-1687. doi:10.4039/ent1041681-11 es_ES
dc.description.references SANTINI, G., TUCCI, L., OTTONETTI, L., & FRIZZI, F. (2007). Competition trade-offs in the organisation of a Mediterranean ant assemblage. Ecological Entomology, 32(3), 319-326. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.2007.00882.x es_ES
dc.description.references Skinner, G. J., & Whittaker, J. B. (1981). An Experimental Investigation of Inter-Relationships Between the Wood-Ant (Formica rufa) and Some Tree-Canopy Herbivores. The Journal of Animal Ecology, 50(1), 313. doi:10.2307/4047 es_ES
dc.description.references Stadler, B., & Dixon, A. F. G. (2005). Ecology and Evolution of Aphid-Ant Interactions. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 36(1), 345-372. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.091704.175531 es_ES
dc.description.references STEPPUHN, A., & WACKERS, F. L. (2004). HPLC sugar analysis reveals the nutritional state and the feeding history of parasitoids. Functional Ecology, 18(6), 812-819. doi:10.1111/j.0269-8463.2004.00920.x es_ES
dc.description.references Styrsky, J. D., & Eubanks, M. D. (2006). Ecological consequences of interactions between ants and honeydew-producing insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 274(1607), 151-164. doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3701 es_ES
dc.description.references SUDD, J. H., & SUDD, M. E. (1985). Seasonal changes in the response of wood-ants (Formica lugubris) to sucrose baits. Ecological Entomology, 10(1), 89-97. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2311.1985.tb00538.x es_ES
dc.description.references Urbaneja, A., Marí, F. G., Tortosa, D., Navarro, C., Vanaclocha, P., Bargues, L., & Castañera, P. (2006). Influence of Ground Predators on the Survival of the Mediterranean Fruit Fly Pupae, Ceratitis capitata, in Spanish Citrus Orchards. Biocontrol, 51(5), 611-626. doi:10.1007/s10526-005-2938-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Völkl, W., Woodring, J., Fischer, M., Lorenz, M. W., & Hoffmann, K. H. (1999). Ant-aphid mutualisms: the impact of honeydew production and honeydew sugar composition on ant preferences. Oecologia, 118(4), 483-491. doi:10.1007/s004420050751 es_ES
dc.description.references Wäckers, F. L. (2005). Suitability of (extra-)floral nectar, pollen, and honeydew as insect food sources. Plant-Provided Food for Carnivorous Insects, 17-74. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511542220.003 es_ES
dc.description.references Wäckers, F. L., van Rijn, P. C. J., & Heimpel, G. E. (2008). Honeydew as a food source for natural enemies: Making the best of a bad meal? Biological Control, 45(2), 176-184. doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2008.01.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Way, M. J. (1963). Mutualism Between Ants and Honeydew-Producing Homoptera. Annual Review of Entomology, 8(1), 307-344. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.08.010163.001515 es_ES
dc.description.references Way, M. J., & Khoo, K. C. (1992). Role of Ants in Pest Management. Annual Review of Entomology, 37(1), 479-503. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.37.010192.002403 es_ES
dc.description.references Way, M. J., Cammell, M. E., Paiva, M. R., & Collingwood, C. A. (1997). Distribution and dynamics of the Argentine ant Linepithema (Iridomyrmex) humile (Mayr) in relation to vegetation, soil conditions, topography and native competitor ants in Portugal. Insectes Sociaux, 44(4), 415-433. doi:10.1007/s000400050062 es_ES
dc.description.references Yanoviak, S. P., & Kaspari, M. (2000). Community structure and the habitat templet: ants in the tropical forest canopy and litter. Oikos, 89(2), 259-266. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.890206.x es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem