- -

A multivariate method for analyzing and improving the use of student evaluation of teaching questionnaires: a case study

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A multivariate method for analyzing and improving the use of student evaluation of teaching questionnaires: a case study

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem

Martínez Gómez, M.; Carot Sierra, JM.; Jabaloyes Vivas, JM.; Zarzo Castelló, M. (2011). A multivariate method for analyzing and improving the use of student evaluation of teaching questionnaires: a case study. Quality and Quantity. 45(6):1415-1427. doi:10.1007/s11135-010-9345-5

Por favor, use este identificador para citar o enlazar este ítem: http://hdl.handle.net/10251/39799

Ficheros en el ítem

Metadatos del ítem

Título: A multivariate method for analyzing and improving the use of student evaluation of teaching questionnaires: a case study
Autor: Martínez Gómez, Mónica Carot Sierra, José Miguel Jabaloyes Vivas, José Manuel Zarzo Castelló, Manuel
Entidad UPV: Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa Aplicadas y Calidad - Departament d'Estadística i Investigació Operativa Aplicades i Qualitat
Fecha difusión:
Resumen:
Student evaluation of teaching (SET) questionnaires are the most common methods of evaluation used by European universities to assess the quality of teaching delivered by their lecturers. A series of multivariate statistical ...[+]
Palabras clave: CHAID , Cluster analysis , Confirmatory factor analysis , Quality indicator , Student questionnaire for teaching assessment
Derechos de uso: Reserva de todos los derechos
Fuente:
Quality and Quantity. (issn: 0033-5177 )
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-010-9345-5
Editorial:
Springer Verlag (Germany)
Versión del editor: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs11135-010-9345-5
Descripción: The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9345-5
Tipo: Artículo

References

Batista, J.M., Coenders, G. (eds): Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales. Cuadernos de estadística, 6. La Muralla, Madrid (2000)

Batista J.M., Coenders G., Alonso J.: Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio. Su utilidad en validación de cuestionarios relacionados con la salud. Med. Clin. (Barc.) 122(1), 21–27 (2004)

Bentler P.M.: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107(2), 238–246 (1990) [+]
Batista, J.M., Coenders, G. (eds): Modelos de Ecuaciones Estructurales. Cuadernos de estadística, 6. La Muralla, Madrid (2000)

Batista J.M., Coenders G., Alonso J.: Análisis Factorial Confirmatorio. Su utilidad en validación de cuestionarios relacionados con la salud. Med. Clin. (Barc.) 122(1), 21–27 (2004)

Bentler P.M.: Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107(2), 238–246 (1990)

Bentler P.M., Bonett D.G.: Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88, 588–606 (1980)

Berk R.A.: Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. Int. J. Teach. Learn. High. Educ. 17, 48–62 (2005)

Bollen, K.A. (eds): Structural Equations with Latent Variables. Wiley, New York (1989)

Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (eds): Testing Structural Equation Models. Sage, Newbury Park (1993)

Brown M.W., Cudeck R.: Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In: Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models, pp. 136–162. Sage, Newbury Park (1993)

Cajide J.: Análisis factorial confirmatorio de las características de calidad docente universitaria (solución LISREL). Bordón 46(4), 389–405 (1994)

Campbell D.T., Fiske D.W.: Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait–multimethod matrix. Psychol. Bull. 56(2), 81–105 (1959)

Cashin W.E.: Concerns about using student ratings in community colleges. N. Dir. Community Coll. 11(1), 57–65 (1983)

Chiu, T., Fang, D., Chen, J., Wang, Y., Jeris, C.: A robust and scalable clustering algorithm for mixed type attributes in large database environment. In: Proceedings of Seventh ACM SIGKDD, International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Francisco, 2001

Feldman K.A.: The significance of circumstances for college student’s ratings of their teachers and courses. Res. High. Educ. 10, 149–172 (1979)

Göb R., McCollin C., Fernanda Ramalhoto M.: Ordinal methodology in the analysis of likert scales. Qual. Quant. 41, 601–626 (2007)

González Such, J.: Estudio de un Instrumento para la Evaluación del Profesorado Universitario. Thesis, Universitat de València, Valencia (1997)

Gursoy D., Umbreit W.T.: Exploring student’s evaluations of teaching effectiveness: what factors are important? J. Hosp. Tour. Res. 29(1), 91–109 (2005)

Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L., Black, W.C. (eds): Multivariate Data Analysis. Prentice Hall International, New York (1995)

Hu L., Bentler P.M.: Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance. Structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equ. Model. 6(1), 1–55 (1999)

Jackson D., Teal C.R., Raines J.S., Nansel T.R., Force R.C., Burdsal C.A.: The dimensions of students’ perceptions of teaching effectiveness. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 59(4), 580–596 (1999)

Jöreskog K.G.: Testing structural equation models. In: Bollen, K.A., Long, J.S. (eds) Testing Structural Equation Models, pp. 294–316. Sage, Newbury Park (1993)

Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D. (eds): LISREl V. Analysis of Linear Structural Relations by the Method of Maximum Likelihood. SPSS Publications, Chicago (1981)

Jöreskog, K.G., Sörbom, D. (eds): LISREL VI. Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variable, and Least Squares Methods. Scientific Software, Moresville (1986)

Kass G.V.: An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl. Stat. 29(2), 119–127 (1980)

Lalla M., Facchinetti G., Maestroleo G.: Ordinal scales and fuzzy set systems to measure agreement: an application to the evaluation of teaching activity. Qual. Quant. 38, 577–601 (2004)

Marsh H.W.: Validity of students’ evaluations of college teaching: a multitrait multimethod analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 74(2), 219–237 (1982)

Marsh H.W.: Students’ evaluations of university teaching: dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and utility. J. Educ. Psychol. 76(5), 707–754 (1984)

Marsh H.W.: Students’ evaluations of university teaching: research, findings, methodological issues and directions for future research. J. Educ. Res. 11(3), 253–388 (1987)

Marsh H.W.: Weighting for the right criteria in the Instructional Development and Effectiveness Assessment (IDEA) system: global and specific ratings of teaching effectiveness and their relation to course objectives. J. Educ. Psychol. 86, 631–648 (1994)

Marsh H.W., Hattie J.: The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness. J. High. Educ. 73, 603–641 (2002)

Mulaik S.A., James L.R., Van Alstine J., Bennett N., Lind S., Stilwell C.D.: Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychol. Bull. 105(3), 430–445 (1989)

Rodríguez Sabiote, C., Gutiérrez Pérez, J.: Debilidades de la evaluación de la calidad en la universidad española. Causas, consecuencias y propuestas de mejora. Revista Electron. de Investig. Educ. 5(1) (2003). http://redie.ens.uabc.mx/vol5no1/contenido-sabiote.html . Retrieved 20 April 2005

Ting K.F.: A multilevel perspective on student ratings of instruction: lessons from the Chinese experience. Res. High. Educ. 41, 637–661 (2000)

Toland M.D., De Ayala R.J.: A multilevel factor analysis of student’s evaluations of teaching. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 65(2), 272–296 (2005)

[-]

recommendations

 

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro completo del ítem