- -

Simultaneous Analysis of Global Decisions in Activity Travel Scheduling Process

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Simultaneous Analysis of Global Decisions in Activity Travel Scheduling Process

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

[Cerrado]
Nombre: Ruiz - SIMULTANEOUS ...
Tamaño: 220.0Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Garcia-Garces, P. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ruiz Sánchez, Tomás es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2015-02-24T08:39:15Z
dc.date.available 2015-02-24T08:39:15Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.issn 0361-1981
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/47417
dc.description.abstract This paper presents a global characterization of activity travel scheduling decisions that uses a new data set recently collected in Valencia, Spain. As an innovative approach, bivariate probit sample selection models are used to take into account potential self-selectivity bias in the decision process. Model 1 studies decisions to realize or not realize activity travel episodes by considering whether they have been included in the planned agenda. Model 2 analyzes decisions to perform activity travel episodes as they were planned or to modify one or more of their attributes before execution by considering whether their realization had been previously decided. Random parameters are used in both models to accommodate heterogeneity effects. Location, timing, and duration of activity travel episodes are important explanatory variables in the two scheduling processes studied. Few demographic and socioeconomic variables affect the decision processes. Significant correlations between decisions included in both models are found. Policy implications of the analysis results are highlighted. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher National Academy of Sciences es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Transportation Research Record es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA E INFRAESTRUCTURA DE LOS TRANSPORTES es_ES
dc.title Simultaneous Analysis of Global Decisions in Activity Travel Scheduling Process es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3141/2382-14
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería e Infraestructura de los Transportes - Departament d'Enginyeria i Infraestructura dels Transports es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Garcia-Garces, P.; Ruiz Sánchez, T. (2013). Simultaneous Analysis of Global Decisions in Activity Travel Scheduling Process. Transportation Research Record. (2382):121-131. doi:10.3141/2382-14 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.3141/2382-14 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 121 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 131 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.issue 2382 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 257486
dc.description.references Akar, G., Clifton, K. J., & Doherty, S. T. (2012). Redefining activity types: Who participates in which leisure activity? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(8), 1194-1204. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Mohammadian, A. (Kouros), & Doherty, S. T. (2005). Mixed Logit Model of Activity-Scheduling Time Horizon Incorporating Spatial–Temporal Flexibility Variables. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1926(1), 33-40. doi:10.1177/0361198105192600105 es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, M., & McNally, M. G. (2006). An empirical investigation on the dynamic processes of activity scheduling and trip chaining. Transportation, 33(6), 553-565. doi:10.1007/s11116-006-7728-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Mohammadian, A., & Doherty, S. T. (2006). Modeling activity scheduling time horizon: Duration of time between planning and execution of pre-planned activities. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(6), 475-490. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2005.08.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Clark, A. F., & Doherty, S. T. (2009). Activity Rescheduling Strategies and Decision Processes in Day-to-Day Life. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2134(1), 143-152. doi:10.3141/2134-17 es_ES
dc.description.references Akar, G., Clifton, K. J., & Doherty, S. T. (2009). How Travel Attributes Affect Planning Time Horizon of Activities. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2132(1), 33-41. doi:10.3141/2132-04 es_ES
dc.description.references Auld, J., & Mohammadian, A. (2012). Activity planning processes in the Agent-based Dynamic Activity Planning and Travel Scheduling (ADAPTS) model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(8), 1386-1403. doi:10.1016/j.tra.2012.05.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Joh, C.-H., Doherty, S., & Polak, J. (2005). Analysis of Factors Affecting the Frequency and Type of Activity Schedule Modification. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1926, 19-25. doi:10.3141/1926-03 es_ES
dc.description.references Ruiz, T., & Timmermans, H. (2006). Changing the timing of activities in resolving Scheduling Conflicts. Transportation, 33(5), 429-445. doi:10.1007/s11116-006-0010-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Ruiz, T., & Roorda, M. J. (2008). Analysis of Planning Decisions during the Activity-Scheduling Process. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2054(1), 46-55. doi:10.3141/2054-06 es_ES
dc.description.references Ruiz, T., & Roorda, M. J. (2011). Assessing planning decisions by activity type during the scheduling process. Transportmetrica, 7(6), 417-442. doi:10.1080/18128602.2010.520276 es_ES
dc.description.references Nurul Habib, K. M., & Miller, E. J. (2009). Modelling activity generation: a utility-based model for activity-agenda formation. Transportmetrica, 5(1), 3-23. doi:10.1080/18128600802591384 es_ES
dc.description.references Van Bladel, K., Bellemans, T., Janssens, D., & Wets, G. (2009). Activity Travel Planning and Rescheduling Behavior. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2134(1), 135-142. doi:10.3141/2134-16 es_ES
dc.description.references Auld, J., Rashidi, T. H., Javanmardi, M., & Mohammadian, A. (Kouros). (2011). Dynamic Activity Generation Model Using Competing Hazard Formulation. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2254(1), 28-35. doi:10.3141/2254-04 es_ES
dc.description.references Puhani, P. (2000). The Heckman Correction for Sample Selection and Its Critique. Journal of Economic Surveys, 14(1), 53-68. doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00104 es_ES
dc.description.references Kang, H., Scott, D. M., & Doherty, S. T. (2009). Investigation of Planning Priority of Joint Activities in Household Activity-Scheduling Process. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2134(1), 82-88. doi:10.3141/2134-10 es_ES
dc.description.references Lee, M. S., & McNally, M. G. (2003). On the structure of weekly activity/travel patterns. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37(10), 823-839. doi:10.1016/s0965-8564(03)00047-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Clark, A. F., & Doherty, S. T. (2008). Examining the Nature and Extent of the Activity-Travel Preplanning Decision Process. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2054(1), 83-92. doi:10.3141/2054-10 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem