- -

Improving the benefits of multicast prioritization algorithms

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Improving the benefits of multicast prioritization algorithms

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Miedes De Elías, Emili Pau es_ES
dc.contributor.author Muñoz Escoí, Francisco Daniel es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2015-05-15T14:54:02Z
dc.date.available 2015-05-15T14:54:02Z
dc.date.issued 2014-06
dc.identifier.issn 0920-8542
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/50305
dc.description The final publication is available at Springer via http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11227-014-1087-z es_ES
dc.description.abstract Prioritized atomic multicast consists in delivering messages in total order while ensuring that the priorities of the messages are considered; i.e., messages with higher priorities are delivered first. That service can be used in multiple applications. An example is the usage of prioritization algorithms for reducing the transaction abort rates in applications that use a replicated database system. To this end, transaction messages get priorities according to their probability of violating the existing integrity constraints. This paper evaluates how that abort reduction may be improved varying the message sending rate and the bounds set on the length of the priority reordering queue being used by those multicast algorithms. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This work has been partially supported by EU FEDER and Spanish MICINN under research Grants TIN2009-14460-C03-01 and TIN2010-17193. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer Verlag (Germany) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Supercomputing es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Total-order multicast es_ES
dc.subject Database replication es_ES
dc.subject Integrity constraints es_ES
dc.subject Abort rate es_ES
dc.subject Prioritized message delivery es_ES
dc.subject.classification LENGUAJES Y SISTEMAS INFORMATICOS es_ES
dc.title Improving the benefits of multicast prioritization algorithms es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11227-014-1087-z
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//TIN2009-14460-C03-01/ES/Sistemas Distribuidos Fiables, Dinamicos Y Adaptables (Upv)/ / es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//TIN2010-17193/ES/MEJORAS EN LA INTEGRIDAD, DINAMICIDAD, ESCALABILIDAD Y ADAPTABILIDAD DE LOS SISTEMAS DISTRIBUIDOS/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación - Departament de Sistemes Informàtics i Computació es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Universitario Mixto Tecnológico de Informática - Institut Universitari Mixt Tecnològic d'Informàtica es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Miedes De Elías, EP.; Muñoz Escoí, FD. (2014). Improving the benefits of multicast prioritization algorithms. Journal of Supercomputing. 68(3):1280-1301. doi:10.1007/s11227-014-1087-z es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11227-014-1087-z es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1280 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1301 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 68 es_ES
dc.description.issue 3 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 279681
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación es_ES
dc.description.references Amir Y, Danilov C, Stanton JR (2000) A low latency, loss tolerant architecture and protocol for wide area group communication. In: International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN), IEEE-CS, Washington, DC, USA, pp 327–336 es_ES
dc.description.references Chockler G, Keidar I, Vitenberg R (2001) Group communication specifications: a comprehensive study. ACM Comput Surv 33(4):427–469 es_ES
dc.description.references CiA (2001) About CAN in Automation (CiA). http://www.can-cia.org/index.php?id=aboutcia es_ES
dc.description.references Défago X, Schiper A, Urbán P (2004) Total order broadcast and multicast algorithms: taxonomy and survey. ACM Comput Surv 36(4):372–421 es_ES
dc.description.references Dolev D, Dwork C, Stockmeyer L (1987) On the minimal synchronism needed for distributed consensus. J ACM 34(1):77–97 es_ES
dc.description.references International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (1993) Road vehicles—interchange of digital information—controller area network (CAN) for high-speed communication. Revised by ISO 11898-1:2003 es_ES
dc.description.references JBoss (2011) The Netty project 3.2 user guide. http://docs.jboss.org/netty/3.2/guide/html/ es_ES
dc.description.references Kaashoek MF, Tanenbaum AS (1996) An evaluation of the Amoeba group communication system. In: International conference on distributed computing system (ICDCS), IEEE-CS, Washington, DC, USA, pp 436–448 es_ES
dc.description.references Miedes E, Muñoz-Escoí FD (2008) Managing priorities in atomic multicast protocols. In: International conference on availability, reliability and security (ARES), Barcelona, Spain, pp 514–519 es_ES
dc.description.references Miedes E, Muñoz-Escoí FD (2010) Dynamic switching of total-order broadcast protocols. In: International conference on parallel and distributed processing techniques and applications (PDPTA), CSREA Press, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, pp 457–463 es_ES
dc.description.references Miedes E, Muñoz-Escoí FD, Decker H (2008) Reducing transaction abort rates with prioritized atomic multicast protocols. In: International European conference on parallel and distributed computing (Euro-Par), Springer, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain, Lecture notes in computer science, vol 5168, pp 394–403 es_ES
dc.description.references Mocito J, Rodrigues L (2006) Run-time switching between total order algorithms. In: International European conference on parallel and distributed computing (Euro-Par), Springer, Dresden, Germany, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4128, pp 582–591 es_ES
dc.description.references Moser LE, Melliar-Smith PM, Agarwal DA, Budhia R, Lingley-Papadopoulos C (1996) Totem: a fault-tolerant multicast group communication system. Commun ACM 39(4):54–63 es_ES
dc.description.references Nakamura A, Takizawa M (1992) Priority-based total and semi-total ordering broadcast protocols. In: International conference on distributed computing systems (ICDCS), Yokohama, Japan, pp 178–185 es_ES
dc.description.references Nakamura A, Takizawa M (1993) Starvation-prevented priority based total ordering broadcast protocol on high-speed single channel network. In: 2nd International symposium on high performance distributed computing (HPDC), pp 281–288 es_ES
dc.description.references Rodrigues L, Veríssimo P, Casimiro A (1995) Priority-based totally ordered multicast. In: Workshop on algorithms and architectures for real-time control (AARTC), Ostend, Belgium es_ES
dc.description.references Rütti O, Wojciechowski P, Schiper A (2006) Structural and algorithmic issues of dynamic protocol update. In: 20th International parallel and distributed processing symposium (IPDPS), IEEE-CS Press, Rhodes Island, Greece es_ES
dc.description.references Tindell K, Clark J (1994) Holistic schedulability analysis for distributed hard real-time systems. Microprocess Microprogr 40(2–3):117–134 es_ES
dc.description.references Tully A, Shrivastava SK (1990) Preventing state divergence in replicated distributed programs. In: International symposium on reliable distributed systems (SRDS), Huntsville, Alabama, USA, pp 104–113 es_ES
dc.description.references Wiesmann M, Schiper A (2005) Comparison of database replication techniques based on total order broadcast. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 17(4):551–566 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem