- -

Assessing the Communication Quality of CSR Reports. A Case Study on Four Spanish Food Companies

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Assessing the Communication Quality of CSR Reports. A Case Study on Four Spanish Food Companies

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: -Baviera-Puig;Góm ...
Tamaño: 1008.Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión del Editor
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Baviera Puig, Maria Amparo es_ES
dc.contributor.author Gómez Navarro, Tomás es_ES
dc.contributor.author García Melón, Mónica es_ES
dc.contributor.author García Martínez, Gabriel es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-04-25T14:50:30Z
dc.date.available 2016-04-25T14:50:30Z
dc.date.issued 2015
dc.identifier.issn 2071-1050
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/62900
dc.description © 2016 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). es_ES
dc.description.abstract Sustainability reports are tools for disseminating information to stakeholders and the public, serving the organizations in the dual purpose of communicating CSR and being accountable. The production of these reports has recently become more prevalent in the food industry, despite the fact this practice has received heavy criticism on two fronts: The quality of the tool for communication, and the extent of accountability. In addition to these criticisms, organizations must overcome the additional challenge of publishing sustainability reports that successfully meet the demands of a multi-stakeholder audience. In light of the importance of this practice, this paper presents a method to assess the communication and accountability characteristics of Spanish food companies sustainability reports. This method is based on the method Analytic Network Process (ANP) and adopts a multi-stakeholder approach. This research, therefore, provides a reference model for improving sustainability reports, with the aim of successfully meeting their communication objectives and the demands of all stakeholders. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher MDPI AG es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Sustainability es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject CSR es_ES
dc.subject Sustainability reports es_ES
dc.subject Multi-stakeholder es_ES
dc.subject ANP es_ES
dc.subject MCDM es_ES
dc.subject GRI es_ES
dc.subject.classification PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.subject.classification ECONOMIA, SOCIOLOGIA Y POLITICA AGRARIA es_ES
dc.title Assessing the Communication Quality of CSR Reports. A Case Study on Four Spanish Food Companies es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.3390/su70811010
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Economía y Ciencias Sociales - Departament d'Economia i Ciències Socials es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Baviera Puig, MA.; Gómez Navarro, T.; García Melón, M.; García Martínez, G. (2015). Assessing the Communication Quality of CSR Reports. A Case Study on Four Spanish Food Companies. Sustainability. 7(8):11010-11031. doi:10.3390/su70811010 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su70811010 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 11010 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 11031 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 7 es_ES
dc.description.issue 8 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 292741 es_ES
dc.description.references Brønn, P. S., & Vrioni, A. B. (2001). Corporate social responsibility and cause-related marketing: an overview. International Journal of Advertising, 20(2), 207-222. doi:10.1080/02650487.2001.11104887 es_ES
dc.description.references Golob, U., & Bartlett, J. L. (2007). Communicating about corporate social responsibility: A comparative study of CSR reporting in Australia and Slovenia. Public Relations Review, 33(1), 1-9. doi:10.1016/j.pubrev.2006.11.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Kim, H., Hur, W.-M., & Yeo, J. (2015). Corporate Brand Trust as a Mediator in the Relationship between Consumer Perception of CSR, Corporate Hypocrisy, and Corporate Reputation. Sustainability, 7(4), 3683-3694. doi:10.3390/su7043683 es_ES
dc.description.references Merkelsen, H. (2011). The double‐edged sword of legitimacy in public relations. Journal of Communication Management, 15(2), 125-143. doi:10.1108/13632541111126355 es_ES
dc.description.references Elkington, J. (2006). Governance for Sustainability. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(6), 522-529. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8683.2006.00527.x es_ES
dc.description.references Jahdi, K. S., & Acikdilli, G. (2009). Marketing Communications and Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): Marriage of Convenience or Shotgun Wedding? Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 103-113. doi:10.1007/s10551-009-0113-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Walker, K., & Wan, F. (2011). The Harm of Symbolic Actions and Green-Washing: Corporate Actions and Communications on Environmental Performance and Their Financial Implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 109(2), 227-242. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-1122-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Ziek, P. (2009). Making sense of CSR communication. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 16(3), 137-145. doi:10.1002/csr.183 es_ES
dc.description.references Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing Business Returns to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR): The Role of CSR Communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8-19. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00276.x es_ES
dc.description.references Lock, I., & Seele, P. (2013). Analyzing Sector-Specific CSR Reporting: Social and Environmental Disclosure to Investors in the Chemicals and Banking and Insurance Industry. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 22(2), 113-128. doi:10.1002/csr.1338 es_ES
dc.description.references Basu, K., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Process Model of Sensemaking. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 122-136. doi:10.5465/amr.2008.27745504 es_ES
dc.description.references Sweeney, L., & Coughlan, J. (2008). Do different industries report Corporate Social Responsibility differently? An investigation through the lens of stakeholder theory. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 113-124. doi:10.1080/13527260701856657 es_ES
dc.description.references McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: a Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127. doi:10.5465/amr.2001.4011987 es_ES
dc.description.references Arendt, S., & Brettel, M. (2010). Understanding the influence of corporate social responsibility on corporate identity, image, and firm performance. Management Decision, 48(10), 1469-1492. doi:10.1108/00251741011090289 es_ES
dc.description.references Fernandez-Feijoo, B., Romero, S., & Ruiz, S. (2013). Effect of Stakeholders’ Pressure on Transparency of Sustainability Reports within the GRI Framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 53-63. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1748-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Vlachos, P. A. (2012). Corporate social performance and consumer‐retailer emotional attachment. European Journal of Marketing, 46(11/12), 1559-1580. doi:10.1108/03090561211259989 es_ES
dc.description.references Susnienė, D., & Purvinis, O. (2013). EMPIRICAL INSIGHTS ON UNDERSTANDING STAKEHOLDER INFLUENCE. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 16(4), 845-860. doi:10.3846/16111699.2013.785974 es_ES
dc.description.references Choi, Y., & Yu, Y. (2014). The Influence of Perceived Corporate Sustainability Practices on Employees and Organizational Performance. Sustainability, 6(1), 348-364. doi:10.3390/su6010348 es_ES
dc.description.references Lindgreen, A., Xu, Y., Maon, F., & Wilcock, J. (2012). Corporate social responsibility brand leadership: a multiple case study. European Journal of Marketing, 46(7/8), 965-993. doi:10.1108/03090561211230142 es_ES
dc.description.references Fassin, Y. (2008). SMEs and the fallacy of formalising CSR. Business Ethics: A European Review, 17(4), 364-378. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8608.2008.00540.x es_ES
dc.description.references Welford, R. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe, North America and Asia. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2005(17), 33-52. doi:10.9774/gleaf.4700.2005.sp.00007 es_ES
dc.description.references Perrini, F. (2006). The Practitioner’s Perspective on Non-Financial Reporting. California Management Review, 48(2), 73-103. doi:10.2307/41166339 es_ES
dc.description.references Coupland, C. (2006). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in web-based reports: Currency in the banking sector? Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 17(7), 865-881. doi:10.1016/j.cpa.2005.01.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Knox, S., Maklan, S., & French, P. (2005). Corporate Social Responsibility: Exploring Stakeholder Relationships and Programme Reporting across Leading FTSE Companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 7-28. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-0303-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Hah, K., & Freeman, S. (2013). Multinational Enterprise Subsidiaries and their CSR: A Conceptual Framework of the Management of CSR in Smaller Emerging Economies. Journal of Business Ethics, 122(1), 125-136. doi:10.1007/s10551-013-1753-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Shen, L., Govindan, K., & Shankar, M. (2015). Evaluation of Barriers of Corporate Social Responsibility Using an Analytical Hierarchy Process under a Fuzzy Environment—A Textile Case. Sustainability, 7(3), 3493-3514. doi:10.3390/su7033493 es_ES
dc.description.references Sanfey, A., & Hastie, R. (1998). Does Evidence Presentation Format Affect Judgment? An Experimental Evaluation of Displays of Data for Judgments. Psychological Science, 9(2), 99-103. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00018 es_ES
dc.description.references Lipkus, I. M., Samsa, G., & Rimer, B. K. (2001). General Performance on a Numeracy Scale among Highly Educated Samples. Medical Decision Making, 21(1), 37-44. doi:10.1177/0272989x0102100105 es_ES
dc.description.references Kim, P., Eng, T. R., Deering, M. J., & Maxfield, A. (1999). Published criteria for evaluating health related web sites: review. BMJ, 318(7184), 647-649. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7184.647 es_ES
dc.description.references Walsh, L. (2009). The Common Topoi of STEM Discourse: An Apologia and Methodological Proposal, With Pilot Survey. Written Communication, 27(1), 120-156. doi:10.1177/0741088309353501 es_ES
dc.description.references Widiarto Sutantoputra, A. (2009). Social disclosure rating system for assessing firms’ CSR reports. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 14(1), 34-48. doi:10.1108/13563280910931063 es_ES
dc.description.references SCHELLENS, P. J., & DEJONG, M. (1997). Revision of Public Information Brochures on the Basis of Reader Feedback. Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 11(4), 483-501. doi:10.1177/1050651997011004007 es_ES
dc.description.references Idowu, S. O., & Towler, B. A. (2004). A comparative study of the contents of corporate social responsibility reports of UK companies. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 15(4), 420-437. doi:10.1108/14777830410540153 es_ES
dc.description.references Cuganesan, S., Guthrie, J., & Ward, L. (2010). Examining CSR disclosure strategies within the Australian food and beverage industry. Accounting Forum, 34(3-4), 169-183. doi:10.1016/j.accfor.2010.07.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Montazar, A., Gheidari, O. N., & Snyder, R. L. (2013). A fuzzy analytical hierarchy methodology for the performance assessment of irrigation projects. Agricultural Water Management, 121, 113-123. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2013.01.011 es_ES
dc.description.references Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate Social Responsibility and Marketing: An Integrative Framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3-19. doi:10.1177/0092070303258971 es_ES
dc.description.references Felice, F. D., & Petrillo, A. (2014). Proposal of a structured methodology for the measure of intangible criteria and for decision making. International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling, 9(3), 157. doi:10.1504/ijspm.2014.064392 es_ES
dc.description.references Ishizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem