- -

Allogamy-Autogamy Switch Enhance Assortative Mating in the Allotetraploid Centaurea seridis L. Coexisting with the Diploid Centaurea aspera L. and Triggers the Asymmetrical Formation of Triploid Hybrids

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Allogamy-Autogamy Switch Enhance Assortative Mating in the Allotetraploid Centaurea seridis L. Coexisting with the Diploid Centaurea aspera L. and Triggers the Asymmetrical Formation of Triploid Hybrids

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Ferriol Molina, María es_ES
dc.contributor.author Garmendia, Alfonso es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ana Gonzalez es_ES
dc.contributor.author Merle Farinós, Hugo Basilio es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-04-29T07:47:54Z
dc.date.available 2016-04-29T07:47:54Z
dc.date.issued 2015-10
dc.identifier.issn 1932-6203
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/63160
dc.description.abstract [EN] Hybridization between tetraploids and its related diploids is generally unsuccessful in Centaurea, hence natural formation of triploid hybrids is rare. In contrast, the diploid Centaurea aspera and the allotetraploid C. seridis coexist in several contact zones where a high frequency of triploid hybrids is found. We analyzed the floral biology of the three taxa to identify reproductive isolation mechanisms that allow their coexistence. Flowering phenology was recorded, and controlled pollinations within and between the three taxa were performed in the field. Ploidy level and germination of progeny were also assessed. There was a 50% flowering overlap which indicated a phenological shift. Diploids were strictly allogamous and did not display mentor effects, while tetraploids were found to be highly autogamous. This breakdown of self-incompatibility by polyploids is first described in Centaurea. The asymmetrical formation of the hybrid was also found: all the triploid intact cypselae came from the diploid mothers pollinated by the pollen of tetraploids. Pollen and eggs from triploids were totally sterile, acting as a strong triploid block. These prezygotic isolation mechanisms ensured higher assortative mating in tetraploids than in diploids, improving its persistence in the contact zones. However these mechanisms can also be the cause of the low genetic diversity and high genetic structure observed in C. seridis. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Public Library of Science es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof PLoS ONE es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Centaurea es_ES
dc.subject Hybridization es_ES
dc.subject Ploidy es_ES
dc.subject.classification BOTANICA es_ES
dc.title Allogamy-Autogamy Switch Enhance Assortative Mating in the Allotetraploid Centaurea seridis L. Coexisting with the Diploid Centaurea aspera L. and Triggers the Asymmetrical Formation of Triploid Hybrids es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1371/journal.pone.0140465
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ecosistemas Agroforestales - Departament d'Ecosistemes Agroforestals es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Ferriol Molina, M.; Garmendia, A.; Ana Gonzalez; Merle Farinós, HB. (2015). Allogamy-Autogamy Switch Enhance Assortative Mating in the Allotetraploid Centaurea seridis L. Coexisting with the Diploid Centaurea aspera L. and Triggers the Asymmetrical Formation of Triploid Hybrids. PLoS ONE. 10(10):1-13. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0140465 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0140465 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 13 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 10 es_ES
dc.description.issue 10 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 294321 es_ES
dc.identifier.pmid 26469271 en_EN
dc.identifier.pmcid PMC4607450
dc.description.references Jiao, Y., Wickett, N. J., Ayyampalayam, S., Chanderbali, A. S., Landherr, L., Ralph, P. E., … dePamphilis, C. W. (2011). Ancestral polyploidy in seed plants and angiosperms. Nature, 473(7345), 97-100. doi:10.1038/nature09916 es_ES
dc.description.references Wood, T. E., Takebayashi, N., Barker, M. S., Mayrose, I., Greenspoon, P. B., & Rieseberg, L. H. (2009). The frequency of polyploid speciation in vascular plants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(33), 13875-13879. doi:10.1073/pnas.0811575106 es_ES
dc.description.references ROMASCHENKO, K., ERTUǦRUL, K., SUSANNA, A., GARCIA-JACAS, N., UYSAL, T., & ARSLAN, E. (2004). New chromosome counts in the Centaurea Jacea group (Asteraceae, Cardueae) and some related taxa. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 145(3), 345-352. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2004.00292.x es_ES
dc.description.references Hardy, O. J., de Loose, M., Vekemans, X., & Meerts, P. (2001). Allozyme segregation and inter-cytotype reproductive barriers in the polyploid complex Centaurea jacea. Heredity, 87(2), 136-145. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2001.00862.x es_ES
dc.description.references KOUTECKÝ, P., BAĎUROVÁ, T., ŠTECH, M., KOŠNAR, J., & KARÁSEK, J. (2011). Hybridization between diploidCentaurea pseudophrygiaand tetraploidC. jacea(Asteraceae): the role of mixed pollination, unreduced gametes, and mentor effects. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 104(1), 93-106. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01707.x es_ES
dc.description.references Koutecký, P. (2012). A diploid drop in the tetraploid ocean: hybridization and long-term survival of a singular population of Centaurea weldeniana Rchb. (Asteraceae), a taxon new to Austria. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 298(7), 1349-1360. doi:10.1007/s00606-012-0641-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Mráz, P., Španiel, S., Keller, A., Bowmann, G., Farkas, A., Šingliarová, B., … Müller-Schärer, H. (2012). Anthropogenic disturbance as a driver of microspatial and microhabitat segregation of cytotypes of Centaurea stoebe and cytotype interactions in secondary contact zones. Annals of Botany, 110(3), 615-627. doi:10.1093/aob/mcs120 es_ES
dc.description.references Olšavská, K., & Löser, C. J. (2013). Mating System and Hybridization of the Cyanus triumfetti and C. montanus Groups (Asteraceae). Folia Geobotanica, 48(4), 537-554. doi:10.1007/s12224-013-9155-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Španiel, S., Marhold, K., Hodálová, I., & Lihová, J. (2008). Diploid and Tetraploid Cytotypes of Centaurea stoebe (Asteraceae) in Central Europe: Morphological Differentiation and Cytotype Distribution Patterns. Folia Geobotanica, 43(2), 131-158. doi:10.1007/s12224-008-9008-7 es_ES
dc.description.references HARDY, O. J., VANDERHOEVEN, S., DE LOOSE, M., & MEERTS, P. (2000). Ecological, morphological and allozymic differentiation between diploid and tetraploid knapweeds (Centaurea jacea) from a contact zone in the Belgian Ardennes. New Phytologist, 146(2), 281-290. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2000.00631.x es_ES
dc.description.references Ferriol, M., Garmendia, A., Ruiz, J. J., Merle, H., & Boira, H. (2012). Morphological and molecular analysis of natural hybrids between the diploidCentaurea asperaL. and the tetraploidC. seridisL. (Compositae). Plant Biosystems - An International Journal Dealing with all Aspects of Plant Biology, 146(sup1), 86-100. doi:10.1080/11263504.2012.727878 es_ES
dc.description.references Ferriol, M., Merle, H., & Garmendia, A. (2014). Microsatellite evidence for low genetic diversity and reproductive isolation in tetraploidCentaurea seridis(Asteraceae) coexisting with diploidCentaurea asperaand triploid hybrids in contact zones. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 176(1), 82-98. doi:10.1111/boj.12194 es_ES
dc.description.references Garmendia, A., Ferriol, M., Juarez, J., Zając, A., Kałużny, K., & Merle, H. (2015). A rare case of a natural contact zone in Morocco between an autopolyploid and an allopolyploid ofCentaurea asperawith sterile tetraploid hybrids. Plant Biology, 17(3), 746-757. doi:10.1111/plb.12284 es_ES
dc.description.references Petit, C., Bretagnolle, F., & Felber, F. (1999). Evolutionary consequences of diploid–polyploid hybrid zones in wild species. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 14(8), 306-311. doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01608-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Thorsson, A. T., Palsson, S., Sigurgeirsson, A., & Anamthawat-Jonsson, K. (2007). Morphological Variation among Betula nana (diploid), B. pubescens (tetraploid) and their Triploid Hybrids in Iceland. Annals of Botany, 99(6), 1183-1193. doi:10.1093/aob/mcm060 es_ES
dc.description.references Husband And, B. C., & Schemske, D. W. (2000). Ecological mechanisms of reproductive isolation between diploid and tetraploidChamerion angustifolium. Journal of Ecology, 88(4), 689-701. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00481.x es_ES
dc.description.references Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of Ranks in One-Criterion Variance Analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 47(260), 583-621. doi:10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441 es_ES
dc.description.references Dunn, O. J. (1961). Multiple Comparisons among Means. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56(293), 52-64. doi:10.1080/01621459.1961.10482090 es_ES
dc.description.references HARVILLE, D. A. (1974). Bayesian inference for variance components using only error contrasts. Biometrika, 61(2), 383-385. doi:10.1093/biomet/61.2.383 es_ES
dc.description.references McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989). Generalized Linear Models. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Lambert, D. (1992). Zero-Inflated Poisson Regression, with an Application to Defects in Manufacturing. Technometrics, 34(1), 1. doi:10.2307/1269547 es_ES
dc.description.references Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non-Nested Hypotheses. Econometrica, 57(2), 307. doi:10.2307/1912557 es_ES
dc.description.references Ferriol, M., Llorens, L., Gil, L., & Boira, H. (2008). Influence of phenological barriers and habitat differentiation on the population genetic structure of the balearic endemic Rhamnus ludovici-salvatoris Chodat and R. alaternus L. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 277(1-2), 105-116. doi:10.1007/s00606-008-0110-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Colas, B., Olivieri, I., & Riba, M. (2001). Spatio-temporal variation of reproductive success and conservation of the narrow-endemic Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). Biological Conservation, 99(3), 375-386. doi:10.1016/s0006-3207(00)00229-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Felber, F., & Bever, J. D. (1997). Effect of triploid fitness on the coexistence of diploids and tetraploids. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 60(1), 95-106. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.1997.tb01485.x es_ES
dc.description.references Peckert, T., & Chrtek, J. (2006). Mating interactions between coexisting dipoloid, triploid and tetraploid cytotypes ofHieracium Echioides (Asteraceae). Folia Geobotanica, 41(3), 323-334. doi:10.1007/bf02904945 es_ES
dc.description.references HUSBAND, B. C. (2004). The role of triploid hybrids in the evolutionary dynamics of mixed-ploidy populations. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 82(4), 537-546. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00339.x es_ES
dc.description.references Stebbins, G. L. (1950). Variation and Evolution in Plants. doi:10.7312/steb94536 es_ES
dc.description.references Barringer, B. C. (2007). Polyploidy and self-fertilization in flowering plants. American Journal of Botany, 94(9), 1527-1533. doi:10.3732/ajb.94.9.1527 es_ES
dc.description.references Borges, L. A., Souza, L. G. R., Guerra, M., Machado, I. C., Lewis, G. P., & Lopes, A. V. (2012). Reproductive isolation between diploid and tetraploid cytotypes of Libidibia ferrea (= Caesalpinia ferrea) (Leguminosae): ecological and taxonomic implications. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 298(7), 1371-1381. doi:10.1007/s00606-012-0643-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Greiner, R., & Oberprieler, C. (2012). The role of inter-ploidy block for reproductive isolation of the diploid Leucanthemum pluriflorum Pau (Compositae, Anthemideae) and its tetra- and hexaploid relatives. Flora - Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants, 207(9), 629-635. doi:10.1016/j.flora.2012.07.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Ferrer, M. M., & Good-Avila, S. V. (2006). Macrophylogenetic analyses of the gain and loss of self-incompatibility in the Asteraceae. New Phytologist, 173(2), 401-414. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2006.01905.x es_ES
dc.description.references Sun, M., & Ritland, K. (1998). Mating system of yellow starthistle (Centaurea solstitialis), a successful colonizer in North America. Heredity, 80(2), 225-232. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00290.x es_ES
dc.description.references Husband, B. C., & Sabara, H. A. (2003). Reproductive isolation between autotetraploids and their diploid progenitors in fireweed, Chamerion angustifolium (Onagraceae). New Phytologist, 161(3), 703-713. doi:10.1046/j.1469-8137.2004.00998.x es_ES
dc.description.references Awadalla, P., & Ritland, K. (1997). Microsatellite variation and evolution in the Mimulus guttatus species complex with contrasting mating systems. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 14(10), 1023-1034. doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025708 es_ES
dc.description.references Reinartz, J. A., & Les, D. H. (1994). Bottleneck-Induced Dissolution of Self-Incompatibility and Breeding System Consequences in Aster furcatus (Asteraceae). American Journal of Botany, 81(4), 446. doi:10.2307/2445494 es_ES
dc.description.references Hiscock, S. J. (2000). Genetic control of self-incompatibility in Senecio squalidus L. (Asteraceae): a successful colonizing species. Heredity, 85(1), 10-19. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00692.x es_ES
dc.description.references NIELSEN, L. R., SIEGISMUND, H. R., & PHILIPP, M. (2003). Partial self-incompatibility in the polyploid endemic species Scalesia affinis (Asteraceae) from the Galápagos: remnants of a self-incompatibility system? Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 142(1), 93-101. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.00168.x es_ES
dc.description.references Sonnleitner, M., Weis, B., Flatscher, R., García, P. E., Suda, J., Krejčíková, J., … Hülber, K. (2013). Parental Ploidy Strongly Affects Offspring Fitness in Heteroploid Crosses among Three Cytotypes of Autopolyploid Jacobaea carniolica (Asteraceae). PLoS ONE, 8(11), e78959. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0078959 es_ES
dc.description.references Cui, C., Ge, X., Gautam, M., Kang, L., & Li, Z. (2012). Cytoplasmic and Genomic Effects on Meiotic Pairing inBrassicaHybrids and Allotetraploids from Pair Crosses of Three Cultivated Diploids. Genetics, 191(3), 725-738. doi:10.1534/genetics.112.140780 es_ES
dc.description.references Comai, L. (2005). The advantages and disadvantages of being polyploid. Nature Reviews Genetics, 6(11), 836-846. doi:10.1038/nrg1711 es_ES
dc.description.references Mráz, P. (2003). Mentor effects in the genusHieracium S.STR. (Compositae, Lactuceae). Folia Geobotanica, 38(3), 345-350. doi:10.1007/bf02803204 es_ES
dc.description.references Husband, B. C., Schemske, D. W., Burton, T. L., & Goodwillie, C. (2002). Pollen competition as a unilateral reproductive barrier between sympatric diploid and tetraploid Chamerion angustifolium. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 269(1509), 2565-2571. doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2196 es_ES
dc.description.references Baldwin, S. J., & Husband, B. C. (2010). Genome duplication and the evolution of conspecific pollen precedence. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 278(1714), 2011-2017. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2208 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem