- -

Compost versus vermicompost as substrate constituents for rooting shrub cuttings

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Compost versus vermicompost as substrate constituents for rooting shrub cuttings

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Fornes Sebastiá, Fernando es_ES
dc.contributor.author Mendoza-Hernandez, D. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Belda Navarro, Rosa María es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2016-11-11T09:01:38Z
dc.date.available 2016-11-11T09:01:38Z
dc.date.issued 2013
dc.identifier.issn 1695-971X
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/73832
dc.description.abstract [EN] The feasibility of composted (C), composted plus vermicomposted (V1) and straight vermicomposted (V2) tomato crop waste as component of rooting media for Euonymus japonicus ‘Microphylla’ and Lavandula angustifolia vegetative propagation was studied. Mixes of C, V1 and V2 with coir fibre (CF) at the proportions 100:0, 75:25, 50:50, 25:75, 0:100 (v:v) were assayed. Physical, physico-chemical and nutritional characteristics of all materials and mixes were determined and correlated with cutting rooting and growth performances. The compost and the two vermicomposts were markedly different from CF. They had higher bulk density and lower total porosity than CF. Compost had lower water-holding capacity and shrinkage in response to drying than vermicomposts and CF. Compost and vermicomposts were alkaline materials whilst CF was almost neutral. Electrical conductivity (EC) was low in CF and vermicomposts, and high in compost due to the high mineral contents, mainly of K+, SO4 2– and Na+ in this material. EC and the ions contributing to it (K+, SO4 2–, Na+) showed highly significative inverse correlations with rooting percentage for the two species and with root and shoot growth but only for E. japonicus. Due to its high EC, compost C (average rooting = 22.5%) performed worse than vermicomposts V1 (av. rooting = 97%) and V2 (av. rooting = 98%) whilst the latter performed similarly to CF control (av. rooting = 100%). Thus vermicomposts appeared to be more appropriate than compost as rooting media constituent. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship Authors are deeply grateful to Dr. Maria Jose Lopez and Dr. Raquel Melgar for supervising the composting and vermicomposting procedures. This study was funded by the Institut Nacional de Investigacion y Tecnologia Agraria (INIA) of the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (Project Reference RTA2006-00008-C02-02). en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Instituto Nacional de Investigación y Tecnología Agraria y Alimentaria (INIA) es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Composting es_ES
dc.subject Crop waste reclamation es_ES
dc.subject Rooting media es_ES
dc.subject Vegetative plant propagation es_ES
dc.subject Vermicomposting es_ES
dc.subject.classification BIOLOGIA VEGETAL es_ES
dc.subject.classification FISIOLOGIA VEGETAL es_ES
dc.title Compost versus vermicompost as substrate constituents for rooting shrub cuttings es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.5424/sjar/2013112-3304
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MEC//RTA2006-00008-C02-02/ES/Caracterización y evaluación de vermicomposts de residuos de cultivos hortícolas como sustratos para la producción de plantas ornamentales en maceta/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y del Medio Natural - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyeria Agronòmica i del Medi Natural es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Fornes Sebastiá, F.; Mendoza-Hernandez, D.; Belda Navarro, RM. (2013). Compost versus vermicompost as substrate constituents for rooting shrub cuttings. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research. 11(2):518-528. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013112-3304 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://dx.doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2013112-3304 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 518 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 528 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 11 es_ES
dc.description.issue 2 es_ES
dc.relation.senia 254980 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia es_ES
dc.description.references Abad M, Fornes F, Carrión C, Noguera V, Noguera P, Maquieira A, Puchades R, 2005. Physical properties of various coconut coir dusts compared to peat. HortScience 40: 2138-2144. es_ES
dc.description.references Arancon, N. Q., Edwards, C. A., Babenko, A., Cannon, J., Galvis, P., & Metzger, J. D. (2008). Influences of vermicomposts, produced by earthworms and microorganisms from cattle manure, food waste and paper waste, on the germination, growth and flowering of petunias in the greenhouse. Applied Soil Ecology, 39(1), 91-99. doi:10.1016/j.apsoil.2007.11.010 es_ES
dc.description.references Atiyeh, R. M., Domínguez, J., Subler, S., & Edwards, C. A. (2000). Changes in biochemical properties of cow manure during processing by earthworms (Eisenia andrei, Bouché) and the effects on seedling growth. Pedobiologia, 44(6), 709-724. doi:10.1078/s0031-4056(04)70084-0 es_ES
dc.description.references Bachman, G. R., & Metzger, J. D. (2008). Growth of bedding plants in commercial potting substrate amended with vermicompost. Bioresource Technology, 99(8), 3155-3161. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.069 es_ES
dc.description.references Bunt, A. C. (1988). Media and Mixes for Container-Grown Plants. doi:10.1007/978-94-011-7904-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Carmona E, Abad M, 2007. Aplicación del compost en viveros y semilleros. In: Compostaje (Moreno J, Moral R, eds). Ed Mundi-Prensa, Madrid. pp. 397-424. es_ES
dc.description.references Carrión C, García-de-la-Fuente R, Fornes F, Puchades R, Abad M, 2008. Acidifying compost from vegetable crop wastes to prepare growing media for containerized crops. Compost Sci Utiliza 16: 20-29. es_ES
dc.description.references Domínguez, J. (2004). State-of-the-Art and New Perspectives on Vermicomposting Research. Earthworm Ecology, 401-424. doi:10.1201/9781420039719.ch20 es_ES
dc.description.references Fornes, F., Belda, R. M., Carrión, C., Noguera, V., García-Agustín, P., & Abad, M. (2007). Pre-conditioning ornamental plants to drought by means of saline water irrigation as related to salinity tolerance. Scientia Horticulturae, 113(1), 52-59. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2007.01.008 es_ES
dc.description.references Fornes, F., Carrión, C., García-de-la-Fuente, R., Puchades, R., & Abad, M. (2010). Leaching composted lignocellulosic wastes to prepare container media: Feasibility and environmental concerns. Journal of Environmental Management, 91(8), 1747-1755. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.03.017 es_ES
dc.description.references Fornes, F., Mendoza-Hernández, D., García-de-la-Fuente, R., Abad, M., & Belda, R. M. (2012). Composting versus vermicomposting: A comparative study of organic matter evolution through straight and combined processes. Bioresource Technology, 118, 296-305. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.05.028 es_ES
dc.description.references González, M., Gomez, E., Comese, R., Quesada, M., & Conti, M. (2010). Influence of organic amendments on soil quality potential indicators in an urban horticultural system. Bioresource Technology, 101(22), 8897-8901. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.095 es_ES
dc.description.references Guérin, V., Lemaire, F., Marfà, O., Caceres, R., & Giuffrida, F. (2001). Growth of Viburnum tinus in peat-based and peat-substitute growing media. Scientia Horticulturae, 89(2), 129-142. doi:10.1016/s0304-4238(00)00228-4 es_ES
dc.description.references Hartmann HT, Kester DE, Davies Jr FT, Geneve RL (ed), 2010. Plant propagation: principles and practices. 8th ed. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, USA. pp. 363-365. es_ES
dc.description.references Iglesias-Díaz, M. I., Lamosa, S., Rodil, C., & Díaz-Rodríguez, F. (2009). Root development of Thuja plicata in peat-substitute rooting media. Scientia Horticulturae, 122(1), 102-108. doi:10.1016/j.scienta.2009.04.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Kulcu, R. (2004). Determination of aeration rate and kinetics of composting some agricultural wastes. Bioresource Technology, 93(1), 49-57. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2003.10.007 es_ES
dc.description.references Lazcano, C., Gómez-Brandón, M., & Domínguez, J. (2008). Comparison of the effectiveness of composting and vermicomposting for the biological stabilization of cattle manure. Chemosphere, 72(7), 1013-1019. doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.04.016 es_ES
dc.description.references Li Q, Chen J, Russell D, Caldwell D, Deng M, 2009. Cowpeat as a substitute for peat in container substrates for foliage plant propagation. HortTechnology 19: 340-345. es_ES
dc.description.references MAGRAMA, 2010. Anuario de estadística agroalimentaria. Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente, Madrid. [In Spanish]. es_ES
dc.description.references Maronek DM, Studebaker D, Oberly B, 1985. Improving media aeration in liner and container production. Comb Proc Int Plant Prop Soc 35: 591-597. es_ES
dc.description.references Masaguer A, Benito M, 2007. Evaluación de la calidad del compost. In: Compostaje (Moreno J, Moral R, eds). Ed. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid. pp. 285-304. es_ES
dc.description.references Matysiak B, Nowak J, 2008. Coir substrates for rooting of ornamental ericaceous plants. Propagation Ornamental Plants 8: 76-80. es_ES
dc.description.references Mazuela, P., Salas, M. del C., & Urrestarazu, M. (2005). Vegetable Waste Compost as Substrate for Melon. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 36(11-12), 1557-1572. doi:10.1081/css-200059054 es_ES
dc.description.references Mills HA, Jones Jr JB, 1996. Plant analysis handbook II. A practical sampling, preparation, analysis, and interpretation guide. MicroMacro Publishing, Athens, USA. es_ES
dc.description.references Ndegwa, P. ., & Thompson, S. . (2001). Integrating composting and vermicomposting in the treatment and bioconversion of biosolids. Bioresource Technology, 76(2), 107-112. doi:10.1016/s0960-8524(00)00104-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Nogales R, Domínguez J, Mato S, 2007. Vermicompostaje. In: Compostaje (Moreno J, Moral R, eds). Ed. Mundi-Prensa, Madrid. pp: 187-207. es_ES
dc.description.references Noguera P, Abad M, Puchades R, Noguera V, Ma¬quieira A, Martinez J, 1997. Physical and chemi¬cal properties of coir waste and their relation to plant growth. Acta Hortic 450: 365-369. es_ES
dc.description.references Puchades R, Maquieira A, Rubio JL, Primo-Yúfera E, 1985. Evolución del nitrógeno nítrico y amoniacal en un suelo de cítricos fertilizado con urea recubierta de azufre. Relación con el nitrógeno foliar. Agrochimica XXIX: 30-39. es_ES
dc.description.references Stoven J, Kooima H, 1999. Coconut-coir based media versus peat-based media for propagation of woody ornamentals. Comb Pro In Plant Prop Soc 49: 373-374. es_ES
dc.description.references Tognetti FL, Mazzarino MJ, Hernández MT, 2005. Composting vs. vermicomposting: a comparison of end product quality. Compost Sci Utiliza 13: 6-13. es_ES
dc.description.references Verdonck O, De Vleeschauwer D, Penninck R, 1983. Cocofibre dust a new growing medium for plants in the tropics. Acta Hortic 133: 215-220. es_ES
dc.description.references Ansorena J, 1994. Sustratos: propiedades y caracterización. Ed Mundi¬¬-Prensa, Madrid. pp: 105-135. es_ES
dc.description.references EN 13037, 2011. Determination of pH. Soil improvers and growing media. European Standards. CEN, Brussels. es_ES
dc.description.references EN 13038, 2011. Determination of electrical conductivity. Soil improvers and growing media. European Standards. CEN, Brussels. es_ES
dc.description.references EN 13039, 2011. Determination of organic matter content and ash. Soil improvers and growing media. European Standards. CEN, Brussels. es_ES
dc.description.references EN 13040, 2008. Sample preparation for chemical and physical tests, determination of dry matter content, moisture content and laboratory compacted bulk density. Soil improvers and growing media. European Standards. CEN, Brussels. es_ES
dc.description.references EN 13041, 2011. Determination of physical properties. dry bulk density, air volume, water volume, shrinkage value and total pore space. Soil improvers and growing media. European Standards. CEN, Brussels. es_ES
dc.description.references EN 13652, 2001. Extraction of water soluble nutrients and elements. Soil improvers and growing media. European Standards. CEN, Brussels. es_ES
dc.description.references FEPEX, 2011. Federación Espa-ola de Asociaciones de Productores y Exportadores de Frutas, Hortalizas, Flores y Plantas Vivas. Available in http://www.fepex.es/archivos/publico/ESTADISTICAS/ADUANAS/FLORES/EXPORT/FP_EPRODPAIEUROS.xls. [July 2012]. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem