Identificación de áreas quemadas mediante el análisis de series de tiempo en el ámbito de computación en la nube

dc.contributor.authorAnaya, J.A.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorSione, W.F.es_ES
dc.contributor.authorRodríguez-Montellano, A.M.es_ES
dc.contributor.funderUniversidad de Medellín
dc.contributor.funderUniversidad Autónoma de Entre Ríos
dc.coverage.spatialeast=-71.57239529999998; north=-1.4429123; name=Puerto Santander, Amazonas, Colòmbiaes_ES
dc.coverage.spatialeast=-63.58865300000002; north=-16.290154; name=Província d'Obispo Santistevan, Bolíviaes_ES
dc.coverage.spatialeast=-59.14467142779728; north=-26.964668024762478; name=General Donovan Department, Chaco Province, Argentinaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2018-07-09T09:53:22Z
dc.date.available2018-07-09T09:53:22Z
dc.date.issued2018-06-29
dc.date.updated2018-07-09T07:16:04Z
dc.description.abstract[EN] There are large omission errors in the estimation of burned area in map products that are generated at a global scale. This error is then inherited by other models, for instance, those used to report Greenhouse Gas Emissions using a “bottom up” approach. This study evaluates temporal methods to improve burned area detection using Landsat 5-TM and 8-OLI. In this process, the normalized burn ratio (NBR) was used to highlight burned areas and thresholds to classify burned and non-burned areas. In order to maximize the burned area detection two alternatives to the temporal dNBR method were evaluated: the relative form of the temporal difference RdNBR and the use of time series metrics. The processing, algorithm development and access to Landsat data was made on the Google Earth Engine GEE platform. Three regions of Latin America with large fire occurrence were selected: The Amazon Forest in Colombia, the transition from Chiquitano to Amazon Forest in Bolivia, and El Chaco Region in Argentina. The accuracy assessment of these new products was based on burned area protocols. The best model classified 85% of burned areas in the Chiquitano Forests of Bolivia, 63% of the burned areas of the Amazon Forests of Colombia and 69% of burned areas in El Chaco of Argentina.en_EN
dc.description.abstract[ES] Los productos globales de área quemada tienden a omitir una importante extensión de área afectada por el fuego, este error luego se traslada a otros modelos, por ejemplo, en las estimaciones nacionales de gases efecto invernadero utilizando el método conocido como “bottom up”. En este trabajo se evalúan métodos temporales para mejorar la identificación de áreas quemadas con datos de resolución espacial media (Landsat 5-TM y 8-OLI). En este proceso se utiliza el índice de proporción de quema normalizada (NBR) para resaltar las áreas quemadas y el método de selección de umbrales para separar las áreas quemadas de las no quemadas. Con el fin de maximizar la detección de área quemada se utilizaron dos métodos alternativos al método temporal dNBR: la forma relativa del método temporal, RdNBR, y el uso de métricas de series de tiempo. El procesamiento, el desarrollo del algoritmo y el acceso a los datos Landsat fue realizado en la plataforma de Google Earth Engine, GEE. Se evaluaron tres regiones con alta ocurrencia del fuego en Latino América: los bosques de la Amazonía colombiana, la transición de Bosque Chiquitano a Bosque Amazónico en Bolivia y El Chaco en Argentina. La evaluación de la calidad de los productos generados se basa en los protocolos de área quemada. Los resultados muestran que el mejor modelo identifica el 85% de las áreas quemadas en el Bosque Chiquitano de Bolivia, el 63% en los Bosques Amazónicos de Colombia y el 69% en El Chaco de Argentina.es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethodSWORDes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationAnaya, J.; Sione, W.; Rodríguez-Montellano, A. (2018). Identificación de áreas quemadas mediante el análisis de series de tiempo en el ámbito de computación en la nube. Revista de Teledetección. (51):61-73. https://doi.org/10.4995/raet.2018.8618es_ES
dc.description.issue51
dc.description.referencesAlonso-Canas, I., Chuvieco, E. 2015. Global burned area mapping from ENVISAT-MERIS and MODIS active fire data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 163, 140-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesAnaya, J. A., Chuvieco, E., 2010. Caracterización de la eficiencia del quemado a partir del análisis de series de tiempo del índice de vegetación EVI. Paper presented at the XVI Simposio internacional SELPER, Guanajuato, México.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAnaya, J. A., Chuvieco, E. 2012. Accuracy assessment of burned area products in the Orinoco basin. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 78(1), 53-60. https://doi.org/10.14358/PERS.78.1.53es_ES
dc.description.referencesArmenteras, D., Gibbes, C., Anaya, J. A., Dávalos, L. M. 2017. Integrating remotely sensed fires for predicting deforestation for REDD+. Ecological Applications, 27(4), 1294-1304. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.1522es_ES
dc.description.referencesBastarrika, A., Chuvieco, E., Martín, M. P. 2011. Mapping burned areas from Landsat TM/ETM+ data with a two-phase algorithm: Balancing omission and commission errors. Remote Sensing of Environment, 115(4), 1003-1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesCongalton, R. G., Green, K., 2009. Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesChander, G., Markham, B. L., Helder, D. L. 2009. Summary of current radiometric calibration coefficients for Landsat MSS, TM, ETM+, and EO-1 ALI sensors. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(5), 893-903. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesChen, B., Xiao, X., Li, X., Pan, L., Doughty, R., Ma, J., Dong, J., Qin, Y., Zhao, B., Wu, Z., Sun, R., Lan, G., Xie, G., Clinton, N., Giri, C. 2017. A mangrove forest map of China in 2015: Analysis of time series Landsat 7/8 and Sentinel-1A imagery in Google Earth Engine cloud computing platform. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 131(Supplement C), 104-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.07.011es_ES
dc.description.referencesChristensen, J. H., Hewitson, B., Busuioc, A., Chen, A., Gao, X., Held, I., Jones, R., Kolli, R. K., Kwon, W. T., Laprise, R., Magaña Rueda, V., Mearns, L., Menéndez, C. G., Räisänen, J., Rinke, A., Sarr, A., Whetton, P., 2007. Regional Climate Projections. In S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt, M. Tignor and H.L. Miller (Ed.), Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.es_ES
dc.description.referencesChuvieco, E., Martin, M. P., Palacios, A. 2002. Assessment of different spectral indices in the red-near-infrared spectral domain for burned land discrimination. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, 5103- 5110. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160210153129es_ES
dc.description.referencesChuvieco, E., Yue, C., Heil, A., Mouillot, F., AlonsoCanas, I., Padilla, M., Pereira, J. M., Oom, D., Tansey, K. 2016. A new global burned area product for climate assessment of fire impacts. Global Ecology and Biogeography, 25(5), 619-629. https://doi.org/10.1111/geb.12440es_ES
dc.description.referencesDevisscher, T., Malhi, Y., Rojas Landívar, D., Oliveras, I., 2015. Understanding ecological transitions under recurrent wildfire: A case study in the seasonally dry tropical forests of the Chiquitania, Bolivia. Forest Ecology and Management, 360, 273-286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.033es_ES
dc.description.referencesGiglio, L., Loboda, T., Roy, D. P., Quayle, B., Justice, C. O. 2009. An active-fire based burned area mapping algorithm for the MODIS sensor. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(2), 408-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.006es_ES
dc.description.referencesGorelick, N., Hancher, M., Dixon, M., Ilyushchenko, S., Thau, D., Moore, R. 2017. Google Earth Engine: Planetary-scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031es_ES
dc.description.referencesKey, C., Benson, N., 2006. Landscape Assessment (LA) Sampling and Analysis Method. In U. F. S. G. T. Rep. (Ed.), RMRS-GTR-164-CD (pp. 51).es_ES
dc.description.referencesKey, C. H., 2005. Remote sensing sensitivity to fire severity and fire recovery. Paper presented at the International workshop on Remote Sensing and GIS applications to forest fire management: fire effects assessment, Universidad de Zaragoza, Spain.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLibonati, R., DaCamara, C. C., Pereira, J. M. C., Peres, L. F. 2010. Retrieving middle-infrared reflectance for burned area mapping in tropical environments using MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 114(4), 831-843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.018es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiss, B., Howland, M. D., Levy, T. E. 2017. Testing Google Earth Engine for the automatic identification and vectorization of archaeological features: A case study from Faynan, Jordan. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 15, 299-304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.08.013es_ES
dc.description.referencesMelchiori, A. E., Candido, P. d. A., Libonati, R., Morelli, F., Setzer, A., de Jesús, S. C., GarciaFonseca, L. M., Korting, T. S., 2015. Spectral indices and multi-temporal change image detection algorithms for burned area extraction in the Brazilian Cerrado. Paper presented at the Anais XVII Simpsio Brasileiro de Sensoramiento Remoto, Joao Pessoa-PB, Brasil.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiller, J. D., Knapp, E. E., Key, C. H., Skinner, C. N., Isbell, C. J., Creasy, R. M., Sherlock, J. W. 2009. Calibration and validation of the relative differenced Normalized Burn Ratio (RdNBR) to three measures of fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Klamath Mountains, California, USA. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(3), 645-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.11.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiller, J. D., Thode, A. E. 2007. Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta Normalized Burn Ratio (dNBR). Remote Sensing of Environment, 109(1), 66-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2006.12.006es_ES
dc.description.referencesPadilla, M., Stehman, S. V., Chuvieco, E. 2014. Validation of the 2008 MODIS-MCD45 global burned area product using stratified random sampling. Remote Sensing of Environment, 144, 187-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.01.008es_ES
dc.description.referencesPadilla, M., Stehman, S. V., Ramo, R., Corti, D., Hantson, S., Oliva, P., Alonso-Canas, I., Bradley, A. V., Tansey, K., Mota, B., Pereira, J. M., Chuvieco, E. 2015. Comparing the accuracies of remote sensing global burned area products using stratified random sampling and estimation. Remote Sensing of Environment, 160, 114-121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.005es_ES
dc.description.referencesPereira, J. M. C. 2003. Remote sensing of burned areas in tropical savannas. International Journal of Wildland Fire, 12(4), 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF03028es_ES
dc.description.referencesPotter, C., Tan, P.-N., Steinbach, M., Klooster, S., Kumar, V., Myneni, R., Genovese, V. 2003. Major disturbance events in terrestrial ecosystems detected using global satellite data sets. Global Change Biology, 9(7), 1005-1021. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00648.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesRodríguez-Montellano, A., Libonatti, R., Melchiori, A. E. 2015, Sensibilidad en la detección de áreas quemadas en tres ecosistemas vegetales de Bolivia, utilizando tres productos regionales. Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoramiento Remoto, João Pessoa, Brasil, 25 a 29 de abril de 2015.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRoy, D., Boschetti, L., O'Neal, K. 2006. MODIS Collection 5 Burned Area Product MCD45 User's Guide. USGS, University of Maryland, 12.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRoy, D. P., Boschetti, L. 2009. Southern Africa Validation of the MODIS, L3JRC and GlobCarbon Burned-Area Products. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 47(4), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2008.2009000es_ES
dc.description.referencesRoy, D. P., Jin, Y., Lewis, P. E., Justice, C. O. 2005. Prototyping a global algorithm for systematic fireaffected area mapping using MODIS time series data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 97(2), 137- 162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2005.04.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchroeder, W., Oliva, P., Giglio, L., Csiszar, I. A. 2014. The New VIIRS 375 m active fire detection data product: Algorithm description and initial assessment. Remote Sensing of Environment, 143(0), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.008es_ES
dc.description.referencesSofía, M., Grau, H. R., Néstor Ignacio, G., Tobias, K., Matthias, B. 2017. Differences in production, carbon stocks and biodiversity outcomes of land tenure regimes in the Argentine Dry Chaco. Environmental Research Letters, 12(4), 045003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa625ces_ES
dc.description.referencesTansey, K., Grégoire, J.-M., Pereira, J. M. C., Defourny, P., Leigh, R., Pekel, J.-F., Barros, A., Silva, J. N. M., van Bogaert, E., Bartholomé, E., Bontemps, S., 2007, 11-14 September 2007. L3JRC - A global, multi-year (2000-2007) burnt area product (1 km resolution and daily time steps). Paper presented at the Remote Sensing and Photogrammetry Society Annual Conference 2007, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.es_ES
dc.description.referencesValencia, G. M., Anaya, J. A., Caro-Lopera, F. J. 2016. Implementation and evaluation of the landsat ecosystem disturbance adaptive processing systems (LEDAPS) model: A case study in the Colombian andes. Revista de Teledeteccion, 46, 83-101. https://doi.org/10.4995/raet.2016.3582es_ES
dc.description.referencesVermote, E. F., El Saleous, N. Z., Justice, C. O. 2002. Atmospheric correction of MODIS data in the visible to middle infrared: first results. Remote Sensing of Environment, 83(1-2), 97-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00089-5es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhu, Z., Woodcock, C. E. 2012. Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 118, 83-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028es_ES
dc.description.referencesZhu, Z., Woodcock, C. E. 2014. Automated cloud, cloud shadow, and snow detection in multitemporal Landsat data: An algorithm designed specifically for monitoring land cover change. Remote Sensing of Environment, 152, 217-234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2014.06.012es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipLos autores quieren agradecer el apoyo institucional de la Universidad de Medellín (UDEM) y de la Universidad Autónoma de Entre Ríos (UADER). El proyecto fue realizado en el contexto de REDLATIF y liderado por la línea de investigación de “Geomática aplicada a los recursos naturales” del grupo GEMA, con el apoyo de la Vicerrectoría de investigación de la UDEM. Convenio 294 código 789es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin73es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio61es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.4995/raet.2018.8618
dc.identifier.eissn1988-8740
dc.identifier.issn1133-0953
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/105584
dc.languageEspañoles_ES
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartofRevista de Teledetección
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UdeM//Convenio 294 código 789/
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4995/raet.2018.8618es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2015.03.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.14358/PERS.78.1.53es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/eap.1522es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1201/9781420055139es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2009.01.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.07.011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/01431160210153129es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/geb.12440es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.foreco.2015.10.033es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.006es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2009.11.018es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jasrep.2017.08.013es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2008.11.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2006.12.006es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2014.01.008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2015.01.005es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1071/WF03028es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00648.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/TGRS.2008.2009000es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2005.04.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2013.12.008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1088/1748-9326/aa625ces_ES
dc.relation.references10.1029/2007GL031567es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4995/raet.2016.3582es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0034-4257(02)00089-5es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2011.10.028es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rse.2014.06.012es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectÁrea quemadaes_ES
dc.subjectIncendioses_ES
dc.subjectNBRes_ES
dc.subjectGEEes_ES
dc.subjectComputación en la nubees_ES
dc.subjectBurned areaes_ES
dc.subjectFireses_ES
dc.subjectCloud computinges_ES
dc.titleIdentificación de áreas quemadas mediante el análisis de series de tiempo en el ámbito de computación en la nubees_ES
dc.title.alternativeBurned area detection based on time-series analysis in a cloud computing environmentes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid0a7bb8f3-4096-4261-9fb9-e1e13bfbb16fes_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
8618-38924-1-PB.pdf
Tamaño:
2.35 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
359 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: