Impact and reactions to a blended MA course on Language Education and Technology

dc.contributor.authorYpsilandis, Georgees_ES
dc.coverage.spatialeast=22.9592224; north=40.6308283; name=Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Salònica 546 36, Grèciaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-20T09:07:20Z
dc.date.available2020-05-20T09:07:20Z
dc.date.issued2019-09-30
dc.description.abstract[EN] The subject of computers in language learning was not covered at a postgraduate level in Greece independently but as an add-on module in more broad programmes, such as applied linguistics or TEFL. In such programmes, this module was merely scratching the surface of the subject, leaving students with the impression that there was no more to it than learning to run a software programme or an application. The MA programme on Language Education and Technology (LET) was the first in the country that aimed to offer a specialised course with all its modules directly related to the area. Furthermore, the programme attempted to incorporate a number of novelties in the personnel involved (experts from six different countries), methods of teaching (blended, through face-to-face, and synchronous web teleconferencing), transparency (as to the use and allocation of the fees and student selection), systems of examination, modes of collaboration, and modules and seminars offered, all directly linked to its title.The study described here aimed to shed light and estimate the impact of the course on the professional life of its participants through several open and closed questions included in a questionnaire, constructed to register student status before and after the programme, and their opinions on several other programme features. Students scored very positively a) module development, b) the instructors that were involved, c) the modules offered, and d) the knowledge they gained. Some of the students presented their final papers at international conferences, four were accepted in PhD studies in Spain, the UK and Austria, with scholarships from the host institution, while others increased their salaries, or found a new better paid job.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodOJSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationYpsilandis, G. (2019). Impact and reactions to a blended MA course on Language Education and Technology. The EuroCALL Review. 27(2):53-74. https://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2019.11149es_ES
dc.description.issue2es_ES
dc.description.referencesBadawi, M. F. (2009). Using blended learning for enhanced EFL prospective teachers' pedagogical knowledge and performance. Proceedings of the Learning & Language Conference - The Spirit of the Age. Cairo: Ain Shams University.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBonk, C.J. & Graham, C.R. (2006). The handbook of blended learning environments: Global perspectives, local designs. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.es_ES
dc.description.referencesChan, C. T. & Koh, Y.Y. (2008). Different Degrees of blending benefit students differently: A Pilot Study. Proceedings of the EDU-COM 2008 InternationalConference, 19-21 November 2008. Retrieved from http://ro.ecu.edu.au/ceducom/7.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDelialioglu, O. & Yilklirim, Z. (2007). Student's Perceptions on Effective Dimensions of Interactive Learning in a Blended Learning Environment. Educational Technology & Society, 10(2), 133-146.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDriscoll, M. (2002). Blended learning: Let's get beyond the hype. E-learning, 1(4), 1-4.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGarnham, C. & Kaleta, R. (2002) Introduction to hybrid courses. Teaching with Technology Today, 8(6), 1-2.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGarrison, D.R. & Kanuka, H. (2004). Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(2), pp. 95-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesGulbahar, Y. & Madran, O. (2009). Communication and collaboration, satisfaction, equity, and autonomy in blended learning environments: A case from Turkey. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(2), 1-22.es_ES
dc.description.referencesIslam, K. (2002). Is e-learning floundering: Identifying shortcomings and preparing for success. E-Learning Magazine, pp. 22-26es_ES
dc.description.referencesKambakis-Vougiouklis, P., Vougiouklis, T. (2008). Bar instead of scale. Ratio Sociologica , 3, 49-56.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKambakis-Vougiouklis, P., Nikolaidou, P. & Vougiouklis, T. (2017). Questionnaires in Linguistics Using the Bar and the H v-Structures. In Maturo, A., Hoskova-Mayerova, S., Soitu, D.T. & Kacprzyk, J. (Eds). Recent Trends in Social Systems: Quantitative Theories and Quantitative Models. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 66. Springer International Publishing AG Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40585-8_23es_ES
dc.description.referencesLi K. & Zhao J. (2004). The Theory and Applied Model of Blended Learning. E-Education Research, 7, 1-6.es_ES
dc.description.referencesNaaj, M., Nachouki, M. & Ankit, A. (2012). Evaluating student satisfaction with blended learning in a gender-segregated environment. Journal of InformationTechnology Education: Research, 11(1), 185-200. https://doi.org/10.28945/1692es_ES
dc.description.referencesOliver, M. & K. Trigwell (2005). Can 'Blended Learning' Be Redeemed? E-Learning, 2, 17-26. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17es_ES
dc.description.referencesOsguthorpe, R. & C.R. Graham (2003) . Blended Learning Environments, Definitions and Directions. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), pp. 227-233.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPicciano, A.G. (2006). Blended learning: Implications for growth and access. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 10(3), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v10i3.1758es_ES
dc.description.referencesSingh, H., & Reed, C. (2001). A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. Centra software, 1, 1-11.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSo, H. J. & Brush, T.A. (2008). Student perceptions of collaborative learning, social presence and satisfaction in a blended learning environment: Relationships and critical factors. Computers & Education, 51(1), 318-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesThorne, K. (2003). Blended learning: How to integrate online and traditional learning. London: Kogan Page.es_ES
dc.description.referencesYpsilandis, G.S. (2005). Language Teaching, Language Learning: Current Trends and Practices. Keynote published with the proceedings of the 1st ESP Conference on Teaching English For Specific Purposes: A Trend or A Demand? Ziti Publications, pp. 31-40.es_ES
dc.description.referencesYpsilandis, G.S. (2006). On feedback provision strategies in CALL software. Keynote published in the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Motivation in Learning Language for Specific and Academic Purposes. Thessaloniki: University of Macedonia Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesYpsilandis, G.S. (2018). The MA program on Language Education and Technology: A Global Endeavour. Proceedings of the International Conference on Innovation in Language Learning. Pixel Publications. Available from https://conference.pixel-online.net/ICT4LL.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin74es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio53es_ES
dc.description.volume27es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.4995/eurocall.2019.11149
dc.identifier.issn1695-2618
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/143833
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de Valènciaes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofThe EuroCALL Reviewes_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaOJS\11149es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4995/eurocall.2019.11149es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.iheduc.2004.02.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/978-3-319-40585-8_23es_ES
dc.relation.references10.28945/1692es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17es_ES
dc.relation.references10.24059/olj.v10i3.1758es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.009es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectComputer-assisted language learninges_ES
dc.subjectMaster’s degreees_ES
dc.subjectTeaching methodses_ES
dc.titleImpact and reactions to a blended MA course on Language Education and Technologyes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid0ffe5052-2441-49d0-a94b-948043ace4e8es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Ypsilandis - Impact and reactions to a blended MA course on Language Education and Technology.pdf
Tamaño:
684.66 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial