Appropriate criteria set for personnel promotion across organizational levels using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)

dc.contributor.authorCastillo, Charles Novenes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDegamo, France Kevines_ES
dc.contributor.authorGitgano, Faith Theresees_ES
dc.contributor.authorLoo, Louie Alfredes_ES
dc.contributor.authorPacaanas, Shaira Maees_ES
dc.contributor.authorToroy, Nikaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorOcampo, Lanndones_ES
dc.contributor.authorOcampo, Christine Omelaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorSia, Leahlizbethes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-18T12:01:54Z
dc.date.available2017-04-18T12:01:54Z
dc.date.issued2017-01-31
dc.date.updated2017-04-18T11:50:01Z
dc.description.abstract[EN] Currently, there has been limited established specific set of criteria for personnel promotion to each level of the organization. This study is conducted in order to develop a personnel promotion strategy by identifying specific sets of criteria for each level of the organization. The complexity of identifying the criteria set along with the subjectivity of these criteria require the use of multi-criteria decision-making approach particularly the analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Results show different sets of criteria for each management level which are consistent with several frameworks in literature. These criteria sets would help avoid mismatch of employee skills and competencies and their job, and at the same time eliminate the issues in personnel promotion such as favouritism, glass ceiling, and gender and physical attractiveness preference. This work also shows that personality and traits, job satisfaction and experience and skills are more critical rather than social capital across different organizational levels. The contribution of this work is in identifying relevant criteria in developing a personnel promotion strategy across organizational levels.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSWORDes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationCastillo, CN.; Degamo, FK.; Gitgano, FT.; Loo, LA.; Pacaanas, SM.; Toroy, N.; Ocampo, L.... (2017). Appropriate criteria set for personnel promotion across organizational levels using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). International Journal of Production Management and Engineering. 5(1):11-22. https://doi.org/10.4995/ijpme.2017.5857es_ES
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.referencesAhrens, J.-P., Landmann, A., & Woywode, M. (2015). Gender preferences in the CEO successions of family firms: Family characteristics and human capital of the successor. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 6(2), 86-103. doi:10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.02.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesAnis, A., & Islam, R. (2015). The application of analytic hierarchy process in higher-learning institutions: a literature review. J. for International Business and Entrepreneurship Development, 8(2), 166. doi:10.1504/jibed.2015.070446es_ES
dc.description.referencesArasli, H., & Tumer, M. (2008). NEPOTISM, FAVORITISM AND CRONYISM: A STUDY OF THEIR EFFECTS ON JOB STRESS AND JOB SATISFACTION IN THE BANKING INDUSTRY OF NORTH CYPRUS. Social Behavior and Personality: an international journal, 36(9), 1237-1250. doi:10.2224/sbp.2008.36.9.1237es_ES
dc.description.referencesBaker, D. P. (2011). Forward and backward, horizontal and vertical: Transformation of occupational credentialing in the schooled society. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29(1), 5-29. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2011.01.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesBali, O., Dagdeviren, M., & Gumus, S. (2015). An integrated dynamic intuitionistic fuzzy MADM approach for personnel promotion problem. Kybernetes, 44(10), 1422-1436. doi:10.1108/k-07-2014-0142es_ES
dc.description.referencesBandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBarker, T. J., & Zabinsky, Z. B. (2011). A multicriteria decision making model for reverse logistics using analytical hierarchy process. Omega, 39(5), 558-573. doi:10.1016/j.omega.2010.12.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesBills, D. B. (2003). Credentials, Signals, and Screens: Explaining the Relationship Between Schooling and Job Assignment. Review of Educational Research, 73(4), 441-449. doi:10.3102/00346543073004441es_ES
dc.description.referencesBills, D. B., & Brown, D. K. (2011). New directions in educational credentialism. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 29(1), 1-4. doi:10.1016/j.rssm.2011.01.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesBrown, P., Hesketh, A., Williams, S. (2003). Employability in a knowledge-driven economy. Journal of Education and Work, 16(2), 107-126.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCastelo Branco, D. A., Rathmann, R., Borba, B. S. M. C., de Lucena, A. F. P., Szklo, A., & Schaeffer, R. (2012). A multicriteria approach for measuring the carbon-risk of oil companies. Energy Strategy Reviews, 1(2), 122-129. doi:10.1016/j.esr.2012.06.002es_ES
dc.description.referencesChandio, I. A., Matori, A. N. B., WanYusof, K. B., Talpur, M. A. H., Balogun, A.-L., & Lawal, D. U. (2012). GIS-based analytic hierarchy process as a multicriteria decision analysis instrument: a review. Arabian Journal of Geosciences, 6(8), 3059-3066. doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0568-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesChowdhury, S., Schulz, E., Milner, M., & Van De Voort, D. (2014). Core employee based human capital and revenue productivity in small firms: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, 67(11), 2473-2479. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.007es_ES
dc.description.referencesCohen, D. J. (2015). HR past, present and future: A call for consistent practices and a focus on competencies. Human Resource Management Review, 25(2), 205-215. doi:10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.006es_ES
dc.description.referencesDAHL, G. B., & MORETTI, E. (2008). The Demand for Sons. Review of Economic Studies, 75(4), 1085-1120. doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2008.00514.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesDelbari, S. A., Ng, S. I., Aziz, Y. A., & Ho, J. A. (2016). An investigation of key competitiveness indicators and drivers of full-service airlines using Delphi and AHP techniques. Journal of Air Transport Management, 52, 23-34. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.12.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesDion, K., Berscheid, E., & Walster, E. (1972). What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24(3), 285-290. doi:10.1037/h0033731es_ES
dc.description.referencesDirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611-628. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611es_ES
dc.description.referencesDolan, J. G., Isselhardt, B. J., & Cappuccio, J. D. (1989). The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Medical Decision Making. Medical Decision Making, 9(1), 40-50. doi:10.1177/0272989x8900900108es_ES
dc.description.referencesDumitrescu, M. (1995). Introduction to management and general management. Eurounion House, Oradea, 205.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFernandez, R. M., & Abraham, M. (2011). Glass Ceilings and Glass Doors? Internal and External Hiring in an Organizational Hierarchy. SSRN Electronic Journal. doi:10.2139/ssrn.1804896es_ES
dc.description.referencesFleishman, E. A., Mumford, M. D., Zaccaro, S. J., Levin, K. Y., Korotkin, A. L., & Hein, M. B. (1991). Taxonomic efforts in the description of leader behavior: A synthesis and functional interpretation. The Leadership Quarterly, 2(4), 245-287. doi:10.1016/1048-9843(91)90016-ues_ES
dc.description.referencesGarg, C. P. (2016). A robust hybrid decision model for evaluation and selection of the strategic alliance partner in the airline industry. Journal of Air Transport Management, 52, 55-66. doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.12.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesGodinho, P., Costa, J. P., Fialho, J., & Afonso, R. (2011). Some issues about the application of the analytic hierarchy process to R&D project selection. Global Business and Economics Review, 13(1), 26. doi:10.1504/gber.2011.039188es_ES
dc.description.referencesHackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1976). Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16(2), 250-279. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesHarter, J. K., Schmidt, F. L., & Hayes, T. L. (2002). Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(2), 268-279. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268es_ES
dc.description.referencesHerva, M., & Roca, E. (2013). Review of combined approaches and multi-criteria analysis for corporate environmental evaluation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 355-371. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.058es_ES
dc.description.referencesHo, W. (2008). Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications – A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 186(1), 211-228. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004es_ES
dc.description.referencesHumburg, M., & van der Velden, R. (2015). Skills and the graduate recruitment process: Evidence from two discrete choice experiments. Economics of Education Review, 49, 24-41. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.07.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesIshizaka, A., & Labib, A. (2011). Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process. Expert Systems with Applications. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143es_ES
dc.description.referencesIslam, R., Rasad, S.B.M. (2006). Employee performance evaluation by the AHP: A case study. Asia Pacific Management Review, 11(3), 163-176.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKim, Y., & Cannella, A. A. (2008). Social capital among corporate upper echelons and its impacts on executive promotion in Korea. Journal of World Business, 43(1), 85-96. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2007.10.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesKwon, I., & Meyersson Milgrom, E. M. (2014). The significance of firm and occupation specific human capital for hiring and promotions. Labour Economics, 31, 162-173. doi:10.1016/j.labeco.2014.07.003es_ES
dc.description.referencesLu, H., Barriball, K. L., Zhang, X., & While, A. E. (2012). Job satisfaction among hospital nurses revisited: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 49(8), 1017-1038. doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.11.009es_ES
dc.description.referencesMaleki, H., & Zahir, S. (2012). A Comprehensive Literature Review of the Rank Reversal Phenomenon in the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 20(3-4), 141-155. doi:10.1002/mcda.1479es_ES
dc.description.referencesMittal, K. C., Goel, A. K., & Mohindru, P. (2009). Performance Evaluation of Employees using Analytical Hierarchical Process: A Case Study of Indian IT Industry. Asia Pacific Business Review, 5(4), 119-127. doi:10.1177/097324700900500410es_ES
dc.description.referencesMumford, M. D. (1986). Leadership in the Organizational Context: A Conceptual Approach and its Applications1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16(6), 508-531. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01156.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesMumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Osburn, H. K. (s. f.). Planning in organizations: Performance as a multi-level phenomenon. The many faces of multi-level issues, 3-65. doi:10.1016/s1475-9144(02)01026-3es_ES
dc.description.referencesNichols, A. L., & Cottrell, C. A. (2014). What do people desire in their leaders? The role of leadership level on trait desirability. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 711-729. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesOcampo, L. A. (2015). A hierarchical framework for index computation in sustainable manufacturing. Advances in Production Engineering & Management, 40-50. doi:10.14743/apem2015.1.191es_ES
dc.description.referencesOcampo, L., & Clark, E. (2015). AN ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) APPROACH IN THE SELECTION OF SUSTAINABLE MANUFACTURING INITIATIVES: A CASE IN A SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING FIRM IN THE PHILIPPINES. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 7(1). doi:10.13033/ijahp.v7i1.223es_ES
dc.description.referencesOcampo, L. A., Clark, E. E., & Promentilla, M. A. B. (2016). Computing sustainable manufacturing index with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Sustainable Engineering, 1-10. doi:10.1080/19397038.2016.1144828es_ES
dc.description.referencesOcampo, L., Vergara, V. G., Impas, C., Tordillo, J. A., & Pastoril, J. (2015). Identifying Critical Indicators In Sustainable Manufacturing Using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Manufacturing and Industrial Engineering, 14(3-4). doi:10.12776/mie.v14i3-4.444es_ES
dc.description.referencesPromentilla, M. A. B., Furuichi, T., Ishii, K., & Tanikawa, N. (2006). Evaluation of remedial countermeasures using the analytic network process. Waste Management, 26(12), 1410-1421. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.020es_ES
dc.description.referencesRobbins, S.P., Judge, T.A. (2013). Organizational Behavior 15th ed. Prentice Hall: Pearson Education Inc.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSaaty, T. L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSaaty, T. L., & Ramanujam, V. (1983). An objective approach to faculty promotion and tenure by the analytic hierarchy process. Research in Higher Education, 18(3), 311-331. doi:10.1007/bf00979603es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchmidt, K., Aumann, I., Hollander, I., Damm, K., & von der Schulenburg, J.-M. G. (2015). Applying the Analytic Hierarchy Process in healthcare research: A systematic literature review and evaluation of reporting. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15(1). doi:10.1186/s12911-015-0234-7es_ES
dc.description.referencesSipahi, S., & Timor, M. (2010). The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications. Management Decision, 48(5), 775-808. doi:10.1108/00251741011043920es_ES
dc.description.referencesSubramanian, N., & Ramanathan, R. (2012). A review of applications of Analytic Hierarchy Process in operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(2), 215-241. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.036es_ES
dc.description.referencesTaylor, F. A., Ketcham, A. F., & Hoffman, D. (1998). Personnel evaluation with AHP. Management Decision, 36(10), 679-685. doi:10.1108/00251749810245336es_ES
dc.description.referencesTinkler, J. E., Bunker Whittington, K., Ku, M. C., & Davies, A. R. (2015). Gender and venture capital decision-making: The effects of technical background and social capital on entrepreneurial evaluations. Social Science Research, 51, 1-16. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.008es_ES
dc.description.referencesUmi Narimawati, S.E. (2007). The influence of work satisfaction, organizational commitment and turnover intention towards the performance of lecturers at West Java's private higher education institution. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3(7), 549-557.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVaidya, O. S., & Kumar, S. (2006). Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), 1-29. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028es_ES
dc.description.referencesYuen, K. K. F. (2014). The Primitive Cognitive Network Process in healthcare and medical decision making: Comparisons with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Applied Soft Computing, 14, 109-119. doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2013.06.028es_ES
dc.description.referencesZahedi, F. (1986). The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications. Interfaces, 16(4), 96-108. doi:10.1287/inte.16.4.96es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin22es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio11es_ES
dc.description.volume5
dc.identifier.doi10.4995/ijpme.2017.5857
dc.identifier.eissn2340-4876
dc.identifier.issn2340-5317
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/79744
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Production Management and Engineering
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4995/ijpme.2017.5857es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jfbs.2015.02.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1504/JIBED.2015.070446es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2224/sbp.2008.36.9.1237es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rssm.2011.01.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/K-07-2014-0142es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.omega.2010.12.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3102/00346543073004441es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.rssm.2011.01.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.esr.2012.06.002es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s12517-012-0568-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.03.007es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.01.006es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00514.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.12.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1037/h0033731es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1177/0272989X8900900108es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2139/ssrn.1804896es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/1048-9843(91)90016-Ues_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jairtraman.2015.12.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1504/GBER.2011.039188es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0030-5073(76)90016-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1037/0021-9010.87.2.268es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.058es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.004es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.07.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.143es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.jwb.2007.10.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.labeco.2014.07.003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2011.11.009es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/mcda.1479es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1177/097324700900500410es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb01156.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/s1475-9144(02)01026-3es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.14743/apem2015.1.191es_ES
dc.relation.references10.13033/ijahp.v7i1.223es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/19397038.2016.1144828es_ES
dc.relation.references10.12776/mie.v14i3-4.444es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.wasman.2005.11.020es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/BF00979603es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1186/s12911-015-0234-7es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/00251741011043920es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.036es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/00251749810245336es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ssresearch.2014.12.008es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.ejor.2004.04.028es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.asoc.2013.06.028es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1287/inte.16.4.96es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectPersonnel promotiones_ES
dc.subjectCriteriaes_ES
dc.subjectAHPes_ES
dc.subjectOrganizational levelses_ES
dc.subjectRetail industryes_ES
dc.subject.asignaturaGestión de la calidad y la sostenibilidad en la empresa 12183 / E - Grado en ingeniería electrónica industrial y automática 163es_ES
dc.titleAppropriate criteria set for personnel promotion across organizational levels using analytic hierarchy process (AHP)es_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid125e2f05-96ed-48e4-8a4a-2f5493638c83es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
5857-25209-1-PB.pdf
Tamaño:
569.49 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
359 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: