Tensiones entre las funciones docente e investigadora del profesorado en la universidad

dc.contributor.authorTomàs-Folch, Marinaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCastro Ceacero, Diegoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorFeixas Condom, Mònicaes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-21T12:34:02Z
dc.date.available2020-04-21T12:34:02Z
dc.date.issued2012-04-24
dc.description.abstract[ES] El desempeño profesional del profesorado universitario transcurre a lo largo de tensiones entre sus diversas funciones, especialmente entre la docencia y la investigación. Es bien sabido que al menos desde las dos últimas décadas, la Universidad española incentiva y valora más, en los diversos sistemas de promoción, el curriculum fruto de la investigación que el de la docencia. Presentamos los resultados referidos a la dualidad docencia‐investigación de la investigación realizada cuyo objetivo principal es estudiar la cultura organizacional de las universidades catalanas. La metodología utilizada es de corte cuantitativo‐cualitativo para la cuál se confecciona adhoc un cuestionario y un guión de entrevista semiestructurada. Los resultados nos indican que se percibe una cultura universitaria docente que debe cambiar hacia perfiles de intervención entre profesorado y alumnado más interactivos, ampliando el uso de materiales didácticos con soporte TIC, con sistemas evaluativos más diversos y centrados en las competencias a adquirir y menos en los contenidos memorísticos. Respecto a la cultura universitaria investigadora se percibe la necesidad de la internalización de la investigación, mayor participación en convocatorias competitivas nacionales, europeas e internacionales y en la publicación de los resultados en revistas de contrastado prestigio internacional. Y en relación a la primacía de la investigación sobre la docencia la percepción es de descontento. En conclusión tanto desde la percepción del propio profesorado como de los expertos entrevistados como del análisis de los proyectos institucionales de las universidades se desprende la necesidad de un cambio en las competencias docente e investigadora del profesorado universitario.es_ES
dc.description.abstract[EN] The faculty's professional performance takes over tensions between its various functions, particularly between teaching and research. It is well known that at least since the last two decades, the Spanish University encourages and appreciates, in the various systems of promotion, more research than teaching. The article shows results related to the duality between teaching and research of a study whose main objective is to examine the organizational culture of the Catalan universities. The methodology used is quantitative and qualitative nature for which we build an adhoc questionnaire and a semistructured interview protocol. Results indicate that teachers perceive that the teaching culture needs to change towards approaches of greater focus on students‘ learning, enhancethe use of ICT , and use more diversified evaluation systems which are focused on desirable competences rather than on content. Regarding research culture, there is a perceived need for internacionalization of research, increase the participation in competitive national and international research projects and ist consequent publication in high impact international journals. In sum, teachers are displeased with the primacy of research over teaching. As a conclusion, the academics‘ self‐perception, that of interviewed experts and the analysis of university’s institutional documents clearly suggest the need for changes in the academics‘ teaching and research competences.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodOJSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationTomàs-Folch, M.; Castro Ceacero, D.; Feixas Condom, M. (2012). Tensiones entre las funciones docente e investigadora del profesorado en la universidad. REDU. Revista de Docencia Universitaria. 10(1):343-367. https://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2012.6135es_ES
dc.description.issue1es_ES
dc.description.referencesAustin, A. (1992). Faculty cultures. In Clark, b. & Neaves, g. (eds.), Encyclopedia of higher education. (pp.1614‐1623). Oxford: Pergamon.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBeare, H., Caldwell, B.J. & Millikan, R.H. (1992). Cómo conseguir centros de calidad. Madrid: La Muralla.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered: priorities in the professiorate. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBraxton, J.M. (1996). Contrasting perspectives on the relationship between teaching and research. New directions for institutional research, 90, 5‐15.es_ES
dc.description.referencesClark, B. (1987). The academic life: small world, different worlds. Princeton, NJ: The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.es_ES
dc.description.referencesClark, B. (1997). The modern integration of research activities with teaching and learning. Journal of higher education, 68 ,3, 241‐255.es_ES
dc.description.referencesCoates, K.; Barnett, R. & Williams, G. (2001). Relationship between teaching and research in higher education in England. Higher education quarterly, 55, 2, 158‐ 174.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDearing report (1997). National committee of inquiry into higher education. Http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ncihe (accessed 10/10/07).es_ES
dc.description.referencesDeem, R. & Lucas, L. (2006). Learning about research: exploring the learning and teaching/research relationship amongst educational practitioners studying in higher education. Teaching in higher education, 11, 1, 1‐18.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDe Miguel, J; Caïs, J; y Vaquera, E. (2001): Excelencia. Calidad de las universidades españolas. CIS, Madrid.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFairweather, J. (1996). Faculty work and public trust: restoring the value of teaching and public service in American life. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFeldman, K.A (1987). Research productivity and scholarly accomplishment of college teachers as related to their instructional effectiveness: a review and exploration. Research in higher education, 26, 227‐298.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGreenbank, P. (2006). The academic's role: the need for a re‐evaluation? Teaching in higher education, 11, 1, 107‐112.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHalse, C., Deane, E., Hobson, J., Jones, G. (2007). The research‐teaching nexus: what do national teaching awards tell us? Studies in higher education, 32, 6, 727‐746.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHannan, A. & Silver, H. (2000). Innovating in higher education: teaching, learning and institutional cultures. Buckingham: The Society for Research Into Higher Education & Open University Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHargreaves, A. & Dawe, R. (1990). Paths of professional development: contrived collegialitty, colaborative culture, and the case of peer coaching. Teaching and teacher education, 6.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHenkel, M. (1999). The modernization of research evaluation: the case of UK. Higher education, 38, 105‐122.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKarlsson, J. (2007). Service as collaboration: an integrated process in teaching and research. A response to Greenbank. Teaching in higher education, 12, 2, 281‐287.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLey Orgánica de Universidades (2001).es_ES
dc.description.referencesLlei d'Universitats de Catalunya (2003).es_ES
dc.description.referencesLucas, L. (2007). Research and teaching work within university education departments: fragmentation or integration? Journal of further and higher education, 31, 1, 17‐ 29.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiller, M.J. (2006). Conclusions‐towards a renewed humanistic paradigm for the European university. Higher education in Europe, 31, 4, 457‐469.es_ES
dc.description.referencesM.E.C. (2007). Borrador del Estatuto del Funcionario docente no universitario. Consultable en: http://www.infoescuela.com/infoescuela/pdf/BorradorEstatutoMayo07.pdfes_ES
dc.description.referencesMora, J‐G. (2001). The academic profession in Spain: between the civil service and the market. Higher education, 41, 131‐155.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMoss, G. & Kubacki, K. (2007). Researchers in higher education: a neglected focus of study? Journal of further and higher education, 31, 3, 297‐310.es_ES
dc.description.referencesNeumann, R. (1996). Researching the teaching‐research nexus: a critical review. Australian journal of education, 40, 1, 5‐18.es_ES
dc.description.referencesNewman, J.H. (2007). The idea of a university. Avaiable online www.newmanreader.org/works/idea/preface.html (accessed 11/10/07).es_ES
dc.description.referencesPalmer, A. & Collins, R. (2006). Perceptions of rewarding excellence in teaching: motivation and the scholarship of teaching. Journal of further and higher education, 30, 2, 193‐205.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPedró, F. & Sala, S. (2002). La profesión académica en los países de la unión europea: estado actual y tendencias de reforma. Informe final. Universitat Pompeu Fabra.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRowland, S. (1996). Relationships between teaching and research. Teaching in higher education, 1, 1, 7‐20.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRuiz, J. J. (2004): "La evaluación de la investigación universitaria: perspectivas actuales y futuras". En Cajide, J. (2004): Calidad universitaria y empleo. Dickinson, Madrid.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSancho, J.M. (2001). Docencia e investigación en la universidad: una profesión, dos mundos. Educar, 28, 41‐60.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSerow, R.C. et al. (2002). Cultures of undergraduate teaching at research universities. Innovative higher education, 27, 1 25‐37.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSimons, M. & Elen, J. (2007). The 'research‐teaching nexus' and 'education through research': an exploration of ambivalences. Studies in higher education, 32, 5, 617‐631.es_ES
dc.description.referencesTomàs, M.; Armengol, C. y Feixas, M. (1999). Estudio de los ámbitos del cambio de cultura en la docencia universitaria. III Congrés d'Innovació educativa. 25 al 27/11/1999. Santiago de Compostela.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVidal, J. & Quintanilla, M.A. (2000). The teaching and research relationship within institucional evaluation. Higher education, 40, 221‐229.es_ES
dc.description.referencesWright, T. (2003). Postgraduate research students: people in context? British journal of guidance and counseling, 31, 2, 209‐227.es_ES
dc.description.referencesYoung, P. (2006). Out of balance: lecturer's perceptions of differential status and rewards in relation to teaching and research. Teaching in higher education, 11, 2, 191‐202.es_ES
dc.description.referencesZamorski, B. (2002). Research‐led teaching and learning in higher education: a case. Teaching in higher education, 7, 4, 411‐427.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin367es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio343es_ES
dc.description.volume10es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.4995/redu.2012.6135
dc.identifier.eissn1887-4592
dc.identifier.issn1887-4592
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/141100
dc.languageEspañoles_ES
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de Valènciaes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofREDU. Revista de Docencia Universitariaes_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaOJS\6135es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4995/redu.2012.6135es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/ir.37019969003es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2307/2960040es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/1468-2273.00180es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/13562510500400040es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/BF00992241es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/13562510500400248es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/03075070701685155es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/0742-051X(90)90015-Wes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1023/A:1003799013939es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/13562510701194665es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/03098770601167849es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/03797720701304218es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1023/A:1026723014731es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/03098770701425006es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1177/000494419604000102es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/03098770600617729es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/1356251960010102es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1023/A:1020416306430es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/03075070701573781es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1023/A:1004083631288es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/0306988031000102379es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/13562510500527727es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/135625102760553919es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectTeachinges_ES
dc.subjectResearches_ES
dc.subjectCompetenceses_ES
dc.subjectTensionses_ES
dc.subjectAcademicses_ES
dc.subjectUniversityes_ES
dc.subjectFunción docentees_ES
dc.subjectFunción investigadoraes_ES
dc.subjectCompetenciases_ES
dc.subjectTensioneses_ES
dc.subjectProfesoradoes_ES
dc.subjectUniversidades_ES
dc.titleTensiones entre las funciones docente e investigadora del profesorado en la universidades_ES
dc.title.alternativeTensions between the academics teaching and research functionses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid5f5aab84-9c12-4dd0-b019-625b5ed79fe6es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Tomàs-Folch;Castro;Feixas - Tensiones entre las funciones docente e investigadora del profesorado....pdf
Tamaño:
428.68 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial