Influence of inoculum type (ileal, caecal and faecal) on the in vitro fermentation of different sources of carbohydrates in rabbits

dc.contributor.authorAbad-Guamán, Rodrigoes_ES
dc.contributor.authorLarrea-Dávalos, Jose Antonioes_ES
dc.contributor.authorCarabaño, Rosaes_ES
dc.contributor.authorGarcía, Javieres_ES
dc.contributor.authorCarro, Maria Doloreses_ES
dc.contributor.funderComunidad de Madrides_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovaciónes_ES
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-03T12:32:17Z
dc.date.available2019-01-03T12:32:17Z
dc.date.issued2018-09-28
dc.date.updated2019-01-03T11:41:54Z
dc.description.abstract[EN] Two in vitro experiments were performed to analyse the fermentative potential of ileal content, caecal content, soft faeces and hard faeces from adult rabbits. Experiment 1 evaluated 3 doses (0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 g fresh digesta/g substrate dry matter [DM]) of ileal and caecal digesta as inoculum in 28 h-incubations. Two ileal and 2 caecal inocula were obtained, each by pooling the ileal or caecal digesta of 2 adult rabbits. Pectin from sugar beet pulp (SBP) and the insoluble residue obtained after a 2-step in vitro pre-digestion of SBP and wheat straw were used as substrates. The 0.5 dose produced the lowest (P<0.05) amount of gas at 28 h, with no differences (P>0.05) between the 1.0 and 2.0 doses (44.9, 51.6 and 53.8 mL/g substrate DM, respectively; values averaged across inocula and substrates). Experiment 2 evaluated two doses of ileal inoculum (1 and 1.5 g fresh digesta/g substrate DM) and compared ileal digesta, caecal digesta, soft faeces and hard faeces as inoculum for determining in vitro gas production (144-h incubations) of the 3 substrates used in Experiment 1 and wheat starch. Three inocula of each type were obtained, each by pooling either digesta or faeces from 3 rabbits. There were no differences (P>0.05) between the 2 ileal doses tested in gas production parameters, and therefore the 1.0 dose was selected for further ileal fermentations. Starch and pectin showed similar (P>0.05) values of gas production rate and maximal gas production rate when they were fermented with caecal digesta (0.038 vs. 0.043%/h, and 13.7 vs. 15.2 mL/h, respectively), soft (0.022 vs. 0.031%/h, and 9.97 vs. 9.33 mL/h) and hard faeces (0.031 vs. 0.038%/h, and 13.6 vs. 10.8 mL/h), and values were higher than those for SBP and wheat straw; in contrast, values for starch and pectin differed with the ileal inoculum (0.046 vs. 0.024%/h, and 18.4 vs. 6.60 mL/h). Both ileal and caecal gas production parameters were well correlated with those for hard and soft faeces inocula, respectively (r≥0.77; P≤0.040). The ileal inoculum showed a relevant fermentative potential, but lower than that of caecal digesta and soft and hard faeces for all substrates except wheat starch.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSWORDes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationAbad-Guamán, R.; Larrea-Dávalos, JA.; Carabaño, R.; García, J.; Carro, MD. (2018). Influence of inoculum type (ileal, caecal and faecal) on the in vitro fermentation of different sources of carbohydrates in rabbits. World Rabbit Science. 26(3):227-240. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2018.9726es_ES
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.referencesAbad R., Ibañez M.A., Carabaño R., García J. 2013. Quantification of soluble fibre in feedstuffs for rabbits and evaluation of the interference between the determinations of soluble fibre and intestinal mucin. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 182: 61-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesAbad-Guamán R., Carabaño R., Gómez-Conde M.S., García J. 2015. Effect of type of fiber, site of fermentation, and method of analysis on digestibility of soluble and insoluble fiber in rabbits. J. Anim. Sci., 93: 2860-2871. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2014-8767es_ES
dc.description.referencesAssociation of Official Analytical Chemists International. 2000. Official Methods of Analysis 17th ed. AOAC International, Washington, DC.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBindelle J., Buldgen A., Lambotte D., Wavreille J., Leterme P. 2007. Effect of pig faecal donor and of pig diet composition on in vitro fermentation of sugar beet pulp. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 132: 212-226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.03.010es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoletín Oficial del Estado (BOE). 2013. Royal Decree 53/2013 of February 1st on the protection of animals used for experimentation or other scientific purposes. BOE nº 34, 11370-11421. https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2013/02/08/pdfs/BOE-A-2013-1337.pdf Accessed January 2017. In Spanish.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBovera F., Calabro S., Cutrignelli M.I., Infascelli F., Piccolo G., Nizza S., Tudisco R., Nizza A. 2008. Prediction of rabbit caecal fermentation characteristics from faeces by in vitro gas production technique: roughages. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 92: 260-271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2007.00748.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesBovera F., D'Urso S., Di Meo C., Piccolo G., Calabro S., Nizza A. 2006. Comparison of rabbit caecal content and rabbit hard faeces as source of inoculum for the in vitro gas production technique. Asian Austral. J. Anim. Sci., 19: 1649-1657. https://doi.org/10.5713/ajas.2006.1649es_ES
dc.description.referencesBovera F., D'Urso S., Meo C.D., Tudisco R., Nizza A. 2009. A model to assess the use of caecal and faecal inocula to study fermentability of nutrients in rabbit. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr., 93: 147-156. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0396.2007.00795.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesCalabrò S., Nizza A., Pinna W., Cutrignelli M., Piccolo V. 1999. Estimation of digestibility of compound diets for rabbits using the in vitro gas production technique. World Rabbit Sci., 7: 197-201. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.1999.401es_ES
dc.description.referencesCarabaño R., Fraga M.J., Santoma G., de Blas C. 1988. Effect of diet on composition of cecal contents and on excretion and composition of soft and hard feces of rabbits. J. Anim. Sci 66: 901-1000. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1988.664901xes_ES
dc.description.referencesCarabaño R., García J., de Blas J.C. 2001. Effect of fibre source on ileal apparent digestibility of non-starch polysaccharides in rabbits. Anim. Sci., 72: 343-350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1357729800055843es_ES
dc.description.referencesFalcão-e-Cunha L., Peres H., Freire J.P.B., Castro-Solla L. 2004. Effects of alfalfa, wheat bran or beet pulp, with or without sunflower oil, on caecal fermentation and on digestibility in the rabbit. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol., 117: 131-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.07.014es_ES
dc.description.referencesGarcía J., Carabaño R., de Blas J.C. 1999. Effect of fiber source on cell wall digestibility and rate of passage in rabbits. J. Anim. Sci., 77: 898-905. https://doi.org/10.2527/1999.774898xes_ES
dc.description.referencesGarcía J., Carabaño R., Pérez-Alba L., de Blas J.C. 2000. Effect of fiber source on cecal fermentation and nitrogen recycled through cecotrophy in rabbits. J. Anim. Sci., 78: 638-646. https://doi.org/10.2527/2000.783638xes_ES
dc.description.referencesGarcía J., Gidenne T., Falcão-e-Cunha L., de Blas C. 2002. Identification of the main factors that influence caecal fermentation traits in growing rabbits. Anim. Res. 51: 165-173. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2002011es_ES
dc.description.referencesGidenne T. 1992. Effect of fiber level, particle-size and adaptation period on digestibility and rate of passage as measured at the ileum and in the feces in the adult-rabbit. Brit. J. Nutr., 67: 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19920015es_ES
dc.description.referencesGidenne T. 1994. Effect of a reduction in fiber content on the rate of passage through the digestive-tract of the rabbit-comparison of models for the fecal kinetics of 2 markers. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 34: 295-307. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19940403es_ES
dc.description.referencesGoering H.K., Van Soest P.J. 1970. Forage Fiber Analysis (Apparatus, Reagents, Procedures, and Some Applications). USDA Agricultural Research Service, Handbook, Washington, DC.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGouet P., Fonty G. 1979. Changes in the digestive microflora of holoxenic rabbits from birth until adulthood. Ann. Biol Anim. Bioch., 19: 553-566. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19790501es_ES
dc.description.referencesLittell R.C., Henry P.R., Ammerman C.B. 1998. Statistical analysis of repeated measures data using SAS procedures. J. Anim. Sci., 76: 1216-1231. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.7641216xes_ES
dc.description.referencesMarounek M., Vovk S.J., Skrivanova V. 1995. Distribution of activity of hydrolytic enzymes in the digestive-tract of rabbits. Brit. J. Nutr., 73: 463-469. https://doi.org/10.1079/BJN19950048es_ES
dc.description.referencesMenke K.H., Raab L., Salewski A., Steingass H., Fritz D., Schneider W. 1979. The estimation of the digestibility and metabolizable energy of ruminant feedingstuff from the gas production when they are incubated with rumen liquor in vitro. J. Agr. Sci., 93: 217-222. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600086305es_ES
dc.description.referencesMertens D.R., Allen M., Carmany J., Clegg J., Davidowicz A., Drouches M., Frank K., Gambin D., Garkie M., Gildemeister B., Jeffress D., Jeon C.S., Jones D., Kaplan D., Kim G.N., Kobata S., Main D., Moua X., Paul B., Robertson J., Taysom D., Thiex N., Williams J., Wolf M. 2002. Gravimetric determination of amylase-treated neutral detergent fiber in feeds with refluxing in beakers or crucibles: Collaborative study. J. AOAC Int., 85:1217-1240.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMould F.L., Kliem K.E., Morgan R., Mauricio R.M. 2005. In vitro microbial inoculum: A review of its function and properties. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech., 123: 31-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.028es_ES
dc.description.referencesMurray S.M., Flickinger E.A., Patil A.R., Merchen N.R., Brent J.L., Fahey G.C. 2001. In vitro fermentation characteristics of native and processed cereal grains and potato starch using ileal chyme from dogs. J. Anim. Sci., 79: 435-444. https://doi.org/10.2527/2001.792435xes_ES
dc.description.referencesOmed H.M., Lovett D.K., Axford R.F.E. 2000. Faeces as a source of microbial enzymes for estimating digestibility, In: Givens D., Owen E., Axford R., Omed H. (Eds.), Forage Evaluation in Ruminant Nutrition, CAB International, UK, pp. 135-154. https://doi.org/10.1079/9780851993447.0135es_ES
dc.description.referencesPadilha M.T.S., Licois D., Gidenne T., Carre B., Fonty G. 1995. Relationships between microflora and caecal fermentation in rabbits before and after weaning. Reprod. Nutr. Dev., 35: 375-386. https://doi.org/10.1051/rnd:19950403es_ES
dc.description.referencesPascual J.J., Cervera C., Fernández-Carmona J. 2000. Comparison of different in vitro digestibility methods for nutritive evaluation of rabbit diets. World Rabbit Sci., 8: 93-97. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2000.425es_ES
dc.description.referencesPenney R.L., Folk G.E., Galask R.P., Petzold C.R. 1986. The microflora of the alimentary tract of rabbits in relation to pH, diet and cold. J. Appl. Rabbit Res., 9: 152-156.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPiattoni F., Demeyer D., Maertens L., 1997. Fasting effects on in vitro fermentation pattern of rabbit caecal contents. World Rabbit Sci., 5: 23-26. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.1997.314es_ES
dc.description.referencesRodríguez-Romero N., Abecia L., Fondevila M., Balcells J. 2011. Effects of levels of insoluble and soluble fibre in diets for growing rabbits on faecal digestibility, nitrogen recycling and in vitro fermentation. World Rabbit Sci., 19: 85-94. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2011.828es_ES
dc.description.referencesSAS Institute Inc. 2011. Base SAS® 9.3 Procedures Guide. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSchofield P., Pitt R.E., Pell A.N. 1994. Kinetics of fiber digestion from in-vitro gas-production. J. Anim. Sci., 72: 2980-2991. https://doi.org/10.2527/1994.72112980xes_ES
dc.description.referencesTagliapietra F., Williams B.A., Awati A., Bonsembiante M., Schiavon S., Verstegen M.W.A. 2003. In vitro degradation kinetics of four carbohydrates using ileal and faecal inocula from suckling piglets. Ital. J. Anim. Sci., 2: 195-197.es_ES
dc.description.referencesTrocino A., García J., Carabaño R., Xiccato, G. 2013. A meta-analysis on the role of soluble fibre in diets for growing rabbits. World Rabbit Sci., 21: 1-15. https://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2013.1285es_ES
dc.description.referencesVan Soest P.J., Robertson J.B., Lewis B.A. 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J. Dairy Sci., 74: 3583-3597. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2es_ES
dc.description.referencesWang D., Williams B.A., Ferruzzi M.G., D'Arcy B.R. 2013. Different concentrations of grape seed extract affect in vitro starch fermentation by porcine small and large intestinal inocula. J. Sci. Food Agr., 93: 276-283. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5753es_ES
dc.description.referencesWilliams B.A., Bhatia S.K., Boer H., Tamminga S. 1995. A preliminary study using the cumulative gas production technique to compare the kinetics of different fermentations by use of standard substrates. Ann. Zootech., 44: 35. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:19950505es_ES
dc.description.referencesWilliams B.A., Bosch M.W., Awati A., Konstantinov S.R., Smidt H., Akkermans A.D.L., Verstegen M.W.A., Tamminga S. 2005. In vitro assessment of gastrointestinal tract (GIT) fermentation in pigs: Fermentable substrates and microbial activity. Anim. Res., 54: 191-201. https://doi.org/10.1051/animres:2005011es_ES
dc.description.referencesWilliams B.A., Verstegen M.W., Tamminga S. 2001. Fermentation in the large intestine of single-stomached animals and its relationship to animal health. Nutr. Res. Rev., 14: 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1079/NRR200127es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Project AGL2011-22628) and the Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (CAM; Project MEDGAN ABI-2913) is gratefully acknowledged.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin240es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio227es_ES
dc.description.volume26
dc.identifier.doi10.4995/wrs.2018.9726
dc.identifier.eissn1989-8886
dc.identifier.issn1257-5011
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/114685
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartofWorld Rabbit Science
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MICINN//AGL2011-22628/ES/ESTUDIO DE LA MICROBIOTA EN SISTEMAS IN VITRO DE SIMULACION DE LA FERMENTACION RUMINAL (CULTIVOS NO RENOVADOS, FERMENTADORES RUSITEC Y FERMENTADORES DE FLUJO CONTINUO)/es_ES
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/CAM//S2013%2FABI-2913/es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4995/wrs.2018.9726es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2013.04.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2527/jas.2014-8767es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.03.010es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/j.1439-0396.2007.00748.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.5713/ajas.2006.1649es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/j.1439-0396.2007.00795.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.4995/wrs.1999.401es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2527/jas1988.664901xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1017/S1357729800055843es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2004.07.014es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2527/1999.774898xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.2527/2000.783638xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1051/animres:2002011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1079/BJN19920015es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1051/rnd:19940403es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1051/rnd:19790501es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2527/1998.7641216xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1079/BJN19950048es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1017/S0021859600086305es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.04.028es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2527/2001.792435xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1079/9780851993447.0135es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1051/rnd:19950403es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4995/wrs.2000.425es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4995/wrs.1997.314es_ES
dc.relation.references10.4995/wrs.2011.828es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2527/1994.72112980xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.4995/wrs.2013.1285es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78551-2es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1002/jsfa.5753es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1051/animres:19950505es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1051/animres:2005011es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1079/NRR200127es_ES
dc.rightsReserva de todos los derechoses_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectIn vitroes_ES
dc.subjectGas productiones_ES
dc.subjectSugar beet pulpes_ES
dc.subjectPectines_ES
dc.subjectWheat strawes_ES
dc.subjectStarches_ES
dc.subjectRabbites_ES
dc.titleInfluence of inoculum type (ileal, caecal and faecal) on the in vitro fermentation of different sources of carbohydrates in rabbitses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuid80f7085f-116f-4b15-8454-bd7d4e68ec56es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
9726-40449-1-PB.pdf
Tamaño:
1.17 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
359 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: