Analogical reasoning in uncovering the meaning of digital-technology terms: the case of backdoor

dc.contributor.authorSkrynnikova, Inna V.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-01T15:59:47Z
dc.date.available2020-06-01T15:59:47Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-26
dc.description.abstract[EN] The paper substantiates the critical role of analogical reasoning and figurative languge in resolving the ambiguity of cybersecurity terms in various expert communities. Dwelling on the divergent interpretations of a backdoor, it uncovers the potential of metaphor to serve both as an interpretative mechanism and as a framing tool in the ongoing digital technologies discourse. By combining methods of corpus research and frame semantics analysis the study examines the challenges of unpacking the meaning of the contested concept of the backdoor. The paper proposes a qualitatively new metaphor-facilitated mode of interpreting cybersecurity vulnerabilities based on MetaNet deep semantic metaphor analysis and outlines the merits of this hierarchically organized metaphor and frames ontology. The utility of the method is demonstrated through analyzing corpus data and top-down extracting of metaphors (linguistic metaphor – conceptual metaphor – entailed metaphor – inferences) with subsequent identifying of metaphor families dominating the cybersecurity discourse. The paper further claims that the predominant metaphors prompt certain decisions and solutions affecting information security policies. en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodOJSes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationSkrynnikova, IV. (2020). Analogical reasoning in uncovering the meaning of digital-technology terms: the case of backdoor. Journal of Computer-Assisted Linguistic Research. 4(1):23-46. https://doi.org/10.4995/jclr.2020.12921es_ES
dc.description.issue1es_ES
dc.description.referencesBetz, David and Stevens, Tim. 2013. "Analogical Reasoning and Cyber Security." Security Dialogue 44, No. 2: 147-164 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010613478323es_ES
dc.description.referencesDavid, Oana and Matlock, Teenie. 2018. "Cross-linguistic automated detection of metaphors for poverty and cancer." Language and Cognition 10 (2018), 467-493. UK Cognitive Linguistics Association. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2018.11es_ES
dc.description.referencesDavid, Oana. 2016. Metaphor in the grammar of argument realization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.es_ES
dc.description.referencesDavid, Oana, Lakoff, George, and Stickles, Elise. 2016. "Cascades in metaphor and grammar: A case study of metaphors in the gun debate." Constructions and Frames. 8. 10.1075/cf.8.2.04dav. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.2.04daves_ES
dc.description.referencesDavies, Mark. 2013. "Corpus of Global Web-Based English: 1.9 billion words from speakers in 20 countries." Available at: http://corpus.byu.edu/glowbe/es_ES
dc.description.referencesDavies, Mark. and Fuchs, Robert. 2015. "Expanding horizons in the study of World Englishes with the 1.9 billion word Global Web-based English Corpus (GloWbE)." English World-Wide 36(1), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1075/eww.36.1.01daves_ES
dc.description.referencesDeignan, Alice. 2005. Metaphor and corpus linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.6es_ES
dc.description.referencesDemjén, Zsófia, Semino, Elena, and Koller, Veronika. 2016. "Metaphors for 'good' and 'bad' deaths." Metaphor and the Social World 6(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1075/msw.6.1.01demes_ES
dc.description.referencesDodge, Ellen. K., Hong, Jisup, and Stickles, Elise. 2015. "MetaNet: deep semantic automatic metaphor analysis." Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, 40-49. Denver, Colorado, 5 June 2015. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3115/v1/W15-1405es_ES
dc.description.referencesDo Dinh, Erik-Lân and Gurevych, Iryna. 2016. "Token-level metaphor detection using neural networks." Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Metaphor in NLP (June), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W16-1104es_ES
dc.description.referencesDunn, Jonathan. 2013. "What metaphor identification systems can tell us about metaphor-inlanguage." Proceedings of the First Workshop on Metaphor in NLP, Atlanta Georgia, 13 June 2010, 1-10. Available at: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W13-0901es_ES
dc.description.referencesFillmore, Charles J. and Atkins, Beryl. T. 1992. "Toward a frame-based lexicon: the semantics of RISK and its neighbors." In Frames, fields, and contrasts: new essays in semantic and lexical organization, edited by A. Lehrer and E. F. Kittay, 75-102. New York/London: Routledge.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGedigian, M., Bryant, J., Narayanan, S., and Ciric, B. 2006. "Catching metaphors." Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Scalable Natural Language Understanding ScaNaLU 06 (June), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.3115/1621459.1621467es_ES
dc.description.referencesGill, Lex. 2018. "Law, Metaphor, and the Encrypted Machine." Osgoode Hall Law Journal 55.2: 440-477. Available at: https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/ohlj/vol55/iss2/3es_ES
dc.description.referencesGutiérrez, E. Dario, Shutova, Ekaterina, Marghetis, Tyler, and Bergen Benjamin. 2016. "Literal and metaphorical senses in compositional distributional semantic models." In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, August 7-12, 2016, 183-193. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P16-1018es_ES
dc.description.referencesHallam-Baker, Phillip. 2008. dotCrime Manifesto: How to Stop Internet Crime. Addison-Wesley.es_ES
dc.description.referencesJenner, Leontine. 2018. "Backdoor: how a metaphor turns into a weapon." Available at: https://www.hiig.de/en/backdoor-how-a-metaphor-turns-into-a-weapon/es_ES
dc.description.referencesKrishnakumaran, Saisuresh and Zhu, Xiaojin. 2007. "Hunting elusive metaphors using lexical resources." In Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Figurative Language, 13-20. Association for Computational Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.3115/1611528.1611531es_ES
dc.description.referencesKupers, Wendelin M. 2013. "Embodied transformative metaphors and narratives in organisational life‐worlds of change." Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 26 Issue: 3, 494-528. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534811311328551es_ES
dc.description.referencesLakoff, George. 1993. "The contemporary theory of metaphor". In Metaphor and thought, edited by A. Ortony, 202-251. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013es_ES
dc.description.referencesLakoff, George, and Johnson, Mark. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLandwehr, C., Bull, A. R., McDermott, J. P., and Choi, W. S. 1994. "A Taxonomy of Computer Program Security Flaws, with Examples." ACM Computing Surv., vol. 26, no. 3, 211-254. https://doi.org/10.1145/185403.185412es_ES
dc.description.referencesLederer, Jenny. (2013). "Assessing claims of metaphorical salience through corpus data." In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, editored by D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings and P. P. Maglio, 1255-1260. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLönneker, Birte. 2003. "Is there a way to represent metaphors in WordNets? Insights from the Hamburg Metaphor Database." Proceedings of the ACL 2003 Workshop on Lexicon and Figurative Language - Volume 14, 18-27. https://doi.org/10.3115/1118975.1118978es_ES
dc.description.referencesMartin, James H. 2006. "A corpus-based analysis of context effects on metaphor comprehension." In Corpus-based approaches to metaphor and metonymy edited by S. T. Gries and A. Stefanowitsch, 214-236. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMartin, James H. 1994. "MetaBank: a knowledge-base of metaphoric language conventions." Computational Intelligence 10(2), 134-149. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8640.1994.tb00161.xes_ES
dc.description.referencesMason, Z. J. 2004. "CorMet: a computational, corpus-based conventional metaphor extraction system." Computational Linguistics 30(1), 23-44.https://doi.org/10.1162/089120104773633376es_ES
dc.description.referencesPhilip, G. 2004. "Locating metaphor candidates in specialized corpora using raw frequency and keyword lists." In Metaphor in use: context, culture, and communication edited by F. MacArthur, J. L. Oncins-Martínez, M. Sánchez-García and A. M. Piquer-Píriz, 85-105.Amsterdam: John Benjamins.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPragglejaz Group. 2007. "MIP: a method for identifying metaphorically used words in discourse." Metaphor and Symbol 22(1), 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926480709336752es_ES
dc.description.referencesShutova, Ekaterina, Teufel, Simone, and Korhonen, Anna. 2012. "Statistical metaphor processing." Computational Linguistics 39(2), 301-353. https://doi.org/10.1162/COLI_a_00124es_ES
dc.description.referencesShutova, Ekaterina and Sun, Lin. 2013. "Unsupervised metaphor identification using hierarchical graph factorization clustering." In Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2013, Atlanta, Georgia, 9-14 June 2013, 978-988. Available at: http://www.aclweb.org/anthology/N13-1118es_ES
dc.description.referencesSkrynnikova, Inna, Astafurova, Tatiana, and Sytina, Nadezhda. 2017. "Power of metaphor: cultural narratives in political persuasion." Proceedings of the 7th International Scientific and Practical Conference "Current issues of linguistics and didactics: The interdisciplinary approach in humanities" (CILDIAH 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/cildiah-17.2017.50es_ES
dc.description.referencesSteen, Gerard J., Dorst, Aletta, Berenike, Herrmann J., Kaal, Anna A., Krennmayr, Tina, and Pasma, Trijntje. 2010. A method for linguistic metaphor identification: from MIP to MIPVU. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.14es_ES
dc.description.referencesSteen, Gerard, J. 1999. "From linguistic to conceptual metaphor in five steps." In Metaphor in cognitive linguistics, edited by R. W. Gibbs and G. J. Steen (Eds.), 57-77. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.175.05stees_ES
dc.description.referencesStefanowitsch, Anatol, and Gries, Stefan Th., eds. 2006. Corpus based approaches to metaphor and metonymy. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110199895es_ES
dc.description.referencesStickles, Elise, David, Oana, Dodge, Ellen K., and Hong, Jisup. 2016. "Formalizing contemporary conceptual metaphor theory." Constructions and Frames 8(2), 166-213. https://doi.org/10.1075/cf.8.2.03sties_ES
dc.description.referencesWolff, Josephine. 2014. "Cybersecurity as Metaphor: Policy and Defense Implications of Computer Security Metaphors." Paper presented at TPRC Conference, March 31, 2014. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2418638es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin46es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio23es_ES
dc.description.volume4es_ES
dc.identifier.doi10.4995/jclr.2020.12921
dc.identifier.eissn2530-9455
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/144775
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de Valènciaes_ES
dc.relation.ispartofJournal of Computer-Assisted Linguistic Researches_ES
dc.relation.pasarelaOJS\12921es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4995/jclr.2020.12921es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1177/0967010613478323es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1017/langcog.2018.11es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1075/cf.8.2.04daves_ES
dc.relation.references10.1075/eww.36.1.01daves_ES
dc.relation.references10.1075/celcr.6es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1075/msw.6.1.01demes_ES
dc.relation.references10.3115/v1/W15-1405es_ES
dc.relation.references10.18653/v1/W16-1104es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3115/1621459.1621467es_ES
dc.relation.references10.18653/v1/P16-1018es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3115/1611528.1611531es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1108/09534811311328551es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1017/CBO9781139173865.013es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1145/185403.185412es_ES
dc.relation.references10.3115/1118975.1118978es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1111/j.1467-8640.1994.tb00161.xes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1162/089120104773633376es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/10926480709336752es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1162/COLI_a_00124es_ES
dc.relation.references10.2991/cildiah-17.2017.50es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1075/celcr.14es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1075/cilt.175.05stees_ES
dc.relation.references10.1515/9783110199895es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1075/cf.8.2.03sties_ES
dc.relation.references10.2139/ssrn.2418638es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectAnalogical reasoninges_ES
dc.subjectFigurative languagees_ES
dc.subjectConceptual metaphores_ES
dc.subjectMetaphor corpuses_ES
dc.subjectContested conceptses_ES
dc.subjectCyber securityes_ES
dc.subjectBackdoores_ES
dc.titleAnalogical reasoning in uncovering the meaning of digital-technology terms: the case of backdoores_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuidbf7be1ae-9958-4e9b-a76d-d00da8d90a49es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
Skrynnikova - Analogical reasoning in uncovering the meaning of digital-technology terms: the cas....pdf
Tamaño:
1.37 MB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Descripción:
Versión editorial