The interaction of parsing rules and argument-predicate constructions: implications for the structure of the grammaticon in FunGramKB

dc.contributor.authorFumero Pérez, María del Carmenes_ES
dc.contributor.authorDíaz Galán, Anaes_ES
dc.contributor.funderMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad
dc.date.accessioned2017-07-27T08:56:03Z
dc.date.available2017-07-27T08:56:03Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-11
dc.date.updated2017-07-27T07:34:48Z
dc.description.abstract[EN] The Functional Grammar Knowledge Base (FunGramKB), (Periñán-Pascual and Arcas-Túnez 2010) is a multipurpose lexico-conceptual knowledge base designed to be used in different Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. It is complemented with the ARTEMIS (Automatically Representing Text Meaning via an Interlingua–based System) application, a parsing device linguistically grounded on Role and Reference Grammar (RRG) that transduces natural language fragments into their corresponding grammatical and semantic structures. This paper unveils the different phases involved in its parsing routine, paying special attention to the treatment of argumental constructions. As an illustrative case, we will follow all the steps necessary to effectively parse a For-Benefactive structure within ARTEMIS. This methodology will reveal the necessity to distinguish between Kernel constructs and L1-constructions, since the latter involve a modification of the lexical template of the verb. Our definition of L1-constructions leads to the reorganization of the catalogue of FunGramKB L1-constructions, formerly based on Levin’s (1993) alternations. Accordingly, a rearrangement of the internal configuration of the L1-Constructicon within the Grammaticon is proposed.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSWORDes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationFumero Pérez, MDC.; Díaz Galán, A. (2017). The interaction of parsing rules and argument-predicate constructions: implications for the structure of the grammaticon in FunGramKB. Revista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas. 12:33-44. https://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2017.5406es_ES
dc.description.referencesBoas, H. and Sag, I. (2012). Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford, Cal.: CSLI Publications.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFerrari, G. (2004). State of the art in Computational Linguistics. Linguistics Today – Facing a Greater Challenge, 163. doi:10.1075/z.126.09feres_ES
dc.description.referencesGoldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGoldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at Work: the Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLevin, B. (1993). English Verb Classes and Alternations. A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago / London: University of Chicago Press.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLuzondo-Oyón, A., & Ruiz de Mendoza-Ibáñez, F. J. (2015). Argument structure constructions in a Natural Language Processing environment. Language Sciences, 48, 70-89. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2015.01.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesMairal Usón, R., & Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2009). Levels of description and explanation in meaning construction. Deconstructing Constructions, 153-198. doi:10.1075/slcs.107.08leves_ES
dc.description.referencesPeri-án-Pascual, C. (2012). "En defensa del Procesamiento del Lenguaje Natural Fundamentado en la Lingüística Teórica". ONOMÁZEIN, 26/2: 13-48.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPeriñán-Pascual, C. (2013). Towards a model of constructional meaning for natural language understanding. Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics, 205-230. doi:10.1075/slcs.145.08peres_ES
dc.description.referencesPeri-án-Pascual, C. and Arcas-Túnez, F. (2010). The Architecture of FungramKB. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, 2667-2674. Malta: European Language Resources Association.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPeri-án-Pascual, C. and Arcas-Túnez, F. (2014). The implementation of the CLS constructor in ARTEMIS. In Nolan, B. and Peri-án-Pascual, C. (eds.) Language Processing and Grammars the role of functionally oriented computational models. Amsterdam / Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 164-196.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPeri-án-Pascual, C. and Mairal Usón, R. (2010). "La gramática de COREL: un lenguaje de representación conceptual The COREL grammar: a conceptual representation language". ONOMÁZEIN, 21/1: 11-45.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRuiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J. (2013). Meaning construction, meaning interpretation and formal expression in the Lexical Constructional Model. Linking Constructions into Functional Linguistics, 231-270. doi:10.1075/slcs.145.09ib225es_ES
dc.description.referencesRuiz de Mendoza Ibáñez, F. J., & Usón, R. M. (2008). Levels of description and constraining factors in meaning construction: an introduction to the Lexical Constructional Model. Folia Linguistica, 42(3-4). doi:10.1515/flin.2008.355es_ES
dc.description.referencesSag, I, Wasow, T. and Bender, E. (2003). Syntactic Theory: Formal Introduction. Stanford: CSLI Publications.es_ES
dc.description.referencesSteels, L. (2015). "Introducing Fluid Construction Grammar". In L. Steels (ed.) Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 3-30.es_ES
dc.description.referencesVan Valin, R. D. J. (2005). Exploring the Syntax–Semantics Interface. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511610578es_ES
dc.description.referencesVan Valin, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax. doi:10.1017/cbo9781139166799es_ES
dc.description.referencesWintner, S. (2009). What Science Underlies Natural Language Engineering? Computational Linguistics, 35(4), 641-644. doi:10.1162/coli.2009.35.4.35409es_ES
dc.description.sponsorshipEste trabajo ha sido desarrollado en el contexto del proyecto de investigación: “Desarrollo de un laboratorio virtual para el procesamiento computacional de la lengua desde un paradigma funcional”. (UNED) FF2014-53788-C3-1-P.
dc.description.upvformatpfin44es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio33es_ES
dc.description.volume12
dc.identifier.doi10.4995/rlyla.2017.5406
dc.identifier.eissn1886-6298
dc.identifier.issn1886-2438
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/85865
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherEditorial Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartofRevista de Lingüística y Lenguas Aplicadas
dc.relation.projectIDinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//FFI2014-53788-C3-1-P/ES/DESARROLLO DE UN LABORATORIO VIRTUAL PARA EL PROCESAMIENTO COMPUTACIONAL DEL LENGUAJE NATURAL DESDE UN PARADIGMA FUNCIONAL/
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4995/rlyla.2017.5406es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1075/z.126.09feres_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.langsci.2015.01.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1075/slcs.107.08leves_ES
dc.relation.references10.1075/slcs.145.08peres_ES
dc.relation.references10.1075/slcs.145.09ib225es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1515/flin.2008.355es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1017/cbo9780511610578es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1017/cbo9781139166799es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1162/coli.2009.35.4.35409es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectFunGramKBes_ES
dc.subjectNLPes_ES
dc.subjectParsinges_ES
dc.subjectARTEMISes_ES
dc.subjectArgumental Constructiones_ES
dc.subjectComputational implementation of RRGes_ES
dc.titleThe interaction of parsing rules and argument-predicate constructions: implications for the structure of the grammaticon in FunGramKBes_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuidc3fdd106-1a30-4c54-bd93-53e775f959eaes_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
5406-28777-1-PB.pdf
Tamaño:
428.97 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
359 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: