Can we improve academic performance and student satisfaction without additional time cost for teachers? Evidence from a blended methodology in Microeconomics

dc.contributor.authorErdmann, Anettes_ES
dc.contributor.authorTorres Marín, Alfonso Jesúses_ES
dc.date.accessioned2019-10-08T07:26:43Z
dc.date.available2019-10-08T07:26:43Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-03
dc.date.updated2019-10-08T07:03:20Z
dc.description.abstract[EN] Purpose: The main goal of this paper is to determine if the use of a blended methodology can improve performance and satisfaction of the students, with no additional time cost for teachers. As a second objective, the article attempts to explain observed differences across students in the effect of the methodology on study time based on the theory of optimal decision making. Finally, we sketch a simple cost benefit analysis for the digital learning platform (DLP) used.Design: The teachers combined the traditional classes methodology with the adoption of a DLP in two courses of Microeconomics at an undergraduate level at ESIC Business & Marketing School. Subsequently it is analyzed the impact of this methodology on student satisfaction and performance, as well as on student’s study time using different analytical tools.Findings: students’ grades, at the final exam, increased in a significative way as they spent more time with the DLP and/or when they do more digital assignments at home. Their satisfaction with the blended methodology, and the use of the DLP was quite high for most of students. Their feedback on working time relative to traditional methods showed two extremes, either studying much more or much less. We provide a theoretical explanation for this observation, based on Microeconomic theory. A cost-benefit analysis of the DLP tool at an institutional level suggests that its economic costs are more than justified by the economic benefits of the tool in terms of student’s satisfaction, brand reputation and teachers time saving.Contribution: This document provides a methodology to measure the benefits of an innovative learning methodology using relevant indicators and employing advanced statistical techniques as regression analysis. It also helps us to understand student’s behavior in the face of an educational innovation based on technology. The findings are in line with economic theory.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSWORDes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationErdmann, A.; Torres Marín, AJ. (2019). Can we improve academic performance and student satisfaction without additional time cost for teachers? Evidence from a blended methodology in Microeconomics. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences. 6(2):54-91. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2019.11869es_ES
dc.description.issue2
dc.description.referencesAguirre, A.C., Quintana H.P. & Miranda, R.T. (2015). Aplicación de las TIC en la educación superior como estrategia innovadora para el desarrollo de competencias digitales. Campus Virtuales, 3 (1), 88-101.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAhmed, N., Ballard, A., Ohkubo, S., & Limaye, R. (2017). Global Health eLearning: Examining the effects of blended learning models on knowledge application and retention.es_ES
dc.description.referencesAlonso, L. E., Fernández, C. J., & Nyssen, J. M. (2009). El debate sobre las competencias. Una investigación cualitativa en torno a la educación superior y el mercado de trabajo en España. Madrid: ANECA.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBeard, L. H. (2017). 'Incentivised reading'-Using an online VLE to measure engagement and attainment in student learning. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 5(11), 74-86.es_ES
dc.description.referenceshttps://doi.org/10.21125/edulearn.2017.0006es_ES
dc.description.referencesBecker, W. E., & Greene, W. H. (2001). Teaching statistics and econometrics to undergraduates. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(4), 169-182.es_ES
dc.description.referenceshttps://doi.org/10.1257/jep.15.4.169es_ES
dc.description.referencesBonk, C. J., & Graham, C. R. (2012). The handbook of blended learning: Global perspectives, local designs. John Wiley & Sons.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBravo, L. E. C., Guerrero, K. G., & López, H. J. F. (2011). Uso de las TIC y especialmente del blended learning en la enseñanza universitaria. Revista Educación y desarrollo social, 5(1), 151-160.es_ES
dc.description.referencesBrown, M. G. (2016). Blended instructional practice: A review of the empirical literature on instructors' adoption and use of online tools in face-to-face teaching. The Internet and Higher Education, 31, 1-10.es_ES
dc.description.referenceshttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesCastro-Rodriguez, M., De Castro Calvo, A., & Hernandez Rivero, V. M. (2017). Analysis of Spanish commercial digital educational platforms for Primary Education. Revista Latinoamericana de Tecnologia Educativa-RELATEC, 16(2), 49-62.es_ES
dc.description.referencesEfimchik, E. A., Ivaniushin, D. A., Kopylov, D. S., & Lyamin, A. V. (2017). A Technique for Applying RLCP-Compatible Labs on Open edX Platform. In E-Learning, E-Education, and Online Training (pp. 12-18). Springer, Cham.es_ES
dc.description.referenceshttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49625-2_2es_ES
dc.description.referencesEricsson, K. A. (2002). Attaining excellence through deliberate practice: Insights from the study of expert performance.es_ES
dc.description.referencesFernández March, A. (2005). Nuevas metodologías docentes. Valencia: Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGortner Lahmers, A., & Zulauf, C. R. (2000). Factors associated with academic time use and academic performance of college students: A recursive approach. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 544-556es_ES
dc.description.referencesHattinger, M., Engeström, Y., & Sannino, A. (2018). From contradictions to transformation: a study of joint Work-Integrated Elearning between Industry and University. Journal of Engineering Education.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHinerasky, C., Fahr, R., & Sliwka, D. (2017). Learning outcomes, feedback, and the performance effects of a training program. Universitätsbibliothek.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLisitsyna, L. S., Efimchik, E. A., & Izgareva, S. A. (2017, June). RLCP-compatible Virtual Laboratories with 3d-models and Demonstration Mode: Development and Application in e-learning. In International Conference on Smart Education and Smart E-Learning (pp. 75-81). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59451-4_8es_ES
dc.description.referencesLiu, Y., & Xie, T. (2019). Machine learning versus econometrics: prediction of box office. Applied Economics Letters, 26(2), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2018.1441499es_ES
dc.description.referencesMedina, J. M. C., Medina, I. I. S., & Rojas, F. R. (2016). Uso de objetos virtuales de aprendizaje ovas como estrategia de enseñanza-aprendizaje inclusivo y complementario a los cursos teóricos-prácticos. Revista educación en ingeniería, 11(22), 4-12.es_ES
dc.description.referencesMiríadax (2018, 3 de mayo). Nuestros números. Recuperado de https://miriadax.net/web/guest/nuestros-numeroses_ES
dc.description.referencesMoodle.org. (2018, 3 de mayo). Course and content. Recuperado de https://moodle.net/stats/es_ES
dc.description.referencesMosbeck, M., Markum, G., Platschek, A. & Jantsch, A. (2018). E-Learning System for Automatic Generation and Evaluation of Per-Student Customized Tasks for Hardware Modeling Courses, World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, International Jour. https://doi.org/10.1109/NORCHIP.2018.8573455es_ES
dc.description.referencesSangrá, L. M. (2016). La nueva brecha digital. El futuro de las nuevas tecnologías en Primaria desde la formación del profesorado. Revista electrónica interuniversitaria de formación del profesorado, 19(2), 301-313.es_ES
dc.description.referencesPérez, P., Urbano, J. & Onías, A. (2017). Los recursos didácticos digitales en la calidad del aprendizaje significativo en el área de matemáticas, (Bachelor's thesis, Universidad de Guayaquil).es_ES
dc.description.referencesPlant, E. A., Ericsson, K. A., Hill, L., & Asberg, K. (2005). Why study time does not predict grade point average across college students: Implications of deliberate practice for academic performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 30(1), 96-116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.06.001es_ES
dc.description.referencesRodríguez Miranda, F. D. P. (2009). Los coordinadores y coordinadoras de Centros TIC: su importancia como asesores internos para la calidad y el desarrollo del currículo en la Educación Primaria de Andalucía.es_ES
dc.description.referencesThe Core Team (2017). The Economy: Economics for a changing world. Oxford University Press. Recuperado de http://www.core-econ.org/the-economy/index.htmles_ES
dc.description.referencesTornero J.M. & Pi, M. (2013). La integración de las TIC y los libros digitales en la educación. España: Grupo Planeta.es_ES
dc.description.referencesTorres, A.T., Gonzalez E. y Bordonado, J. (2018, 2-4, July). Using a digital interactive labs educator tool to improve the scoring and learnig results of marketing students of econometric in ESIC Business & Marketing School. 10th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies. Palma Spain. ISBN: 978-84-09-02709-5. Doi: 10.21125.es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin91es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio54es_ES
dc.description.volume6
dc.identifier.doi10.4995/muse.2019.11869
dc.identifier.eissn2341-2593
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/127677
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartofMultidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2019.11869es_ES
dc.relation.references10.21125/edulearn.2017.0006es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1257/jep.15.4.169es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.05.001es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/978-3-319-49625-2_2es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/978-3-319-59451-4_8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/13504851.2018.1441499es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1109/NORCHIP.2018.8573455es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.06.001es_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectBlended Learninges_ES
dc.subjectTechnology-Enhanced Learninges_ES
dc.subjectVirtual labses_ES
dc.subjectEducational Innovationes_ES
dc.subjectComputer software on educationes_ES
dc.titleCan we improve academic performance and student satisfaction without additional time cost for teachers? Evidence from a blended methodology in Microeconomicses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuide514213b-20ad-46ef-80d5-3baed4a6c8dces_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
11869-49543-2-PB.pdf
Tamaño:
544.04 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
359 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: