Integrating Bioethics in Sciences’ curricula using values in science and socio-scientific issues

dc.contributor.authorSousa, C.es_ES
dc.date.accessioned2017-04-18T11:30:35Z
dc.date.available2017-04-18T11:30:35Z
dc.date.issued2017-04-10
dc.date.updated2017-04-18T10:45:38Z
dc.description.abstract[EN] The The main objective of the present work is selection of ethical issues that should be addressed with first year undergraduate and K-12 students.Since K-12 Sciences’ curriculum, in Portugal, does not include bioethics content in any discipline explicitly, teachers need to make an effort to include it. Some online materials are available to use in high school classes and will be discussed.My proposal combines inquiry learning-teaching methods with the aim of promoting the discussion of bioethics issues in accordance to UNESCO Bioethics Core Curriculum already adopted by twenty universities throughout the world (Darwish 2015). Some of the issues that are addressed are: ecology and environment ethics, infectious diseases and vaccination, water for all, intellectual property, genomes and patents, biotechnological advances (genetic modified organisms and synthesis of genomes), future generations, climate hanges and natural resources, biomedical advances and human rights, authorship and contributions in scientific publications, and biobanks.In conclusion, this study may constitute an example to facilitate the implementation, by K-12 teachers, of active inquiry strategies, using features of science such as values and socio-scientific issues, and focused on the discussion of concrete ethical issues facing humanity. It also constitutes a proposal of integrating Bioethics in undergraduate sciences’ curricula.en_EN
dc.description.accrualMethodSWORDes_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitationSousa, C. (2017). Integrating Bioethics in Sciences’ curricula using values in science and socio-scientific issues. Multidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences. 4(1):122-134. https://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2017.6481es_ES
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.referencesAllchin, D. (1999). Science & Education, 8(1), 1-12. doi:10.1023/a:1008600230536es_ES
dc.description.referencesChowning, J. T., Griswold, J. C., Kovarik, D. N., & Collins, L. J. (2012). Fostering Critical Thinking, Reasoning, and Argumentation Skills through Bioethics Education. PLoS ONE, 7(5), e36791. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036791es_ES
dc.description.referencesDarwish, B. (2015). Promoting the future of Bioethics. In Solinís (Ed.), Global Bioethics: What for? (p107-110). UNESCO.es_ES
dc.description.referencesGibson, D. G., Glass, J. I., Lartigue, C., Noskov, V. N., Chuang, R.-Y., Algire, M. A., … Venter, J. C. (2010). Creation of a Bacterial Cell Controlled by a Chemically Synthesized Genome. Science, 329(5987), 52-56. doi:10.1126/science.1190719es_ES
dc.description.referencesGutierez, S. B. (2015). Integrating Socio-Scientific Issues to Enhance the Bioethical Decision-Making Skills of High School Students. International Education Studies, 8, 1, 142-151.es_ES
dc.description.referencesHutchison, C. A., Chuang, R.-Y., Noskov, V. N., Assad-Garcia, N., Deerinck, T. J., Ellisman, M. H., … Venter, J. C. (2016). Design and synthesis of a minimal bacterial genome. Science, 351(6280), aad6253-aad6253. doi:10.1126/science.aad6253es_ES
dc.description.referencesIrrazábal, G. (2015). On the emergence and consolidation of bioethics as a discipline, as seen from a sociological perspective. História, Ciências, Saúde, 22, 4.es_ES
dc.description.referencesKeskin, M. O., Samanci, N. K. and Yaman, H. (2013). Argumentation based bioethics education: Sample implementation on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) and genetic screening tests. Educational Research and Reviewes, 8 (16), 1383-1391.es_ES
dc.description.referencesLoike, J. D., Rush, B. S., Schweber, A., & Fischbach, R. L. (2013). Lessons Learned from Undergraduate Students in Designing a Science-Based Course in Bioethics. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 701-710. doi:10.1187/cbe.13-01-0012es_ES
dc.description.referencesMatthews, M. R. (2011). Changing the Focus: From Nature of Science (NOS) to Features of Science (FOS). Advances in Nature of Science Research, 3-26. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-2457-0_1es_ES
dc.description.referencesNunes, R., Duarte, I., Santos, C., & Rego, G. (2015). Education for values and bioethics. SpringerPlus, 4(1). doi:10.1186/s40064-015-0815-zes_ES
dc.description.referencesO’Mathúna, D. P. (2007). Bioethics and biotechnology. Cytotechnology, 53(1-3), 113-119. doi:10.1007/s10616-007-9053-8es_ES
dc.description.referencesOsborne, J. (2010). Arguing to Learn in Science: The Role of Collaborative, Critical Discourse. Science, 328(5977), 463-466. doi:10.1126/science.1183944es_ES
dc.description.referencesSerageldin, I. (2011). The Values of Science. Science, 332(6034), 1127-1127. doi:10.1126/science.1208806es_ES
dc.description.referencesTurrens, J. F. (2005). Teaching Research Integrity and Bioethics to Science Undergraduates. Cell Biology Education, 4(4), 330-334. doi:10.1187/cbe.05-03-0068es_ES
dc.description.referencesUNESCO (2011). Bioethics Core Curriculum, Section 2: Study Materials. 92p.es_ES
dc.description.referencesRooy, W. V., & Pollard, I. (2002). Teaching and Learning about Bioscience Ethics with Undergraduates. Education for Health: Change in Learning & Practice, 15(3), 381-385. doi:10.1080/1357628021000012822es_ES
dc.description.referencesZimmermann, M. B., & Hurrell, R. F. (2002). Improving iron, zinc and vitamin A nutrition through plant biotechnology. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 13(2), 142-145. doi:10.1016/s0958-1669(02)00304-xes_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin134es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio122es_ES
dc.description.volume4
dc.identifier.doi10.4995/muse.2017.6481
dc.identifier.issn2341-2593
dc.identifier.urihttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/79734
dc.languageIngléses_ES
dc.publisherUniversitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartofMultidisciplinary Journal for Education, Social and Technological Sciences
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://doi.org/10.4995/muse.2017.6481es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1023/A:1008600230536es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1371/journal.pone.0036791es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1126/science.1190719es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1126/science.aad6253es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1187/cbe.13-01-0012es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/978-94-007-2457-0_1es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1186/s40064-015-0815-zes_ES
dc.relation.references10.1007/s10616-007-9053-8es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1126/science.1183944es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1126/science.1208806es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1187/cbe.05-03-0068es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1080/1357628021000012822es_ES
dc.relation.references10.1016/S0958-1669(02)00304-Xes_ES
dc.rightsReconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd)es_ES
dc.rights.accessRightsAbiertoes_ES
dc.subjectBioethicses_ES
dc.subjectSocio-scientific issueses_ES
dc.subjectValues in sciencees_ES
dc.subjectInquiryes_ES
dc.subjectK-12es_ES
dc.subjectUndergraduatees_ES
dc.titleIntegrating Bioethics in Sciences’ curricula using values in science and socio-scientific issueses_ES
dc.typeArtículoes_ES
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiones_ES
dspace.entity.typePublication
upv.uuidfbfbb8e2-d985-4a90-b998-6ef4e44b5310es_ES

Archivos

Bloque original

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
6481-26613-1-PB.pdf
Tamaño:
576.03 KB
Formato:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Bloque de licencias

Mostrando 1 - 1 de 1
Cargando...
Miniatura
Nombre:
license.txt
Tamaño:
359 B
Formato:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Descripción: