- -

Integrated methodological framework fos assesing the risk of failure in water supply incorporating drought forecast. Case study: Andean regulated river basin

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Integrated methodological framework fos assesing the risk of failure in water supply incorporating drought forecast. Case study: Andean regulated river basin

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Avilés-Añazco, Alex es_ES
dc.contributor.author Solera Solera, Abel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Paredes Arquiola, Javier es_ES
dc.contributor.author Pedro Monzonís, María es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2018-05-21T04:26:21Z
dc.date.available 2018-05-21T04:26:21Z
dc.date.issued 2018 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0920-4741 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/102323
dc.description.abstract [EN] Hydroclimatic drought conditions can affect the hydrological services offered by mountain river basins causing severe impacts on the population, becoming a challenge for water resource managers in Andean river basins. This study proposes an integrated methodological framework for assessing the risk of failure in water supply, incorporating probabilistic drought forecasts, which assists in making decisions regarding the satisfaction of consumptive, non-consumptive and environmental requirements under water scarcity conditions. Monte Carlo simulation was used to assess the risk of failure in multiple stochastic scenarios, which incorporate probabilistic forecasts of drought events based on a Markov chains (MC) model using a recently developed drought index (DI). This methodology was tested in the Machángara river basin located in the south of Ecuador. Results were grouped in integrated satisfaction indexes of the system (DSIG). They demonstrated that the incorporation of probabilistic drought forecasts could better target the projections of simulation scenarios, with a view of obtaining realistic situations instead of optimistic projections that would lead to riskier decisions. Moreover, they contribute to more effective results in order to propose multiple alternatives for prevention and/or mitigation under drought conditions. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This study was part of the doctoral thesis of Aviles A. at the Technical University of Valencia. This research was funded by the University of Cuenca through its Research Department (DIUC) and the Municipal public enterprise of telecommunications, drinking water, sewage and sanitation of Cuenca (ETAPA) through the projects: BIdentificacion de los procesos hidrometeorologicos que desencadenan inundaciones en la ciudad de Cuenca usando un radar de precipitacion" and "Ciclos meteorologicos y evapotranspiracion a lo largo de una gradiente altitudinal del Parque Nacional Cajas". The authors also thank INAMHI and the CBRM for providing the information for this study. The authors wish to thank the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness for its financial support through the ERAS project (CTM2016-77804-P). We thank Angel Vazquez, who helped in the programming of the multiple simulations. Also we thank to the TropiSeca project. en_EN
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Water Resources Management es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Risk assessment es_ES
dc.subject Probabilistic drought forecasting es_ES
dc.subject Simulation of stochastic scenarios es_ES
dc.subject Water resource systems management es_ES
dc.subject.classification INGENIERIA HIDRAULICA es_ES
dc.title Integrated methodological framework fos assesing the risk of failure in water supply incorporating drought forecast. Case study: Andean regulated river basin es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s11269-017-1863-7 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//CTM2016-77804-P/ES/ESTIMACION DEL RIESGO AMBIENTAL FRENTE A LAS SEQUIAS Y EL CAMBIO CLIMATICO/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.date.embargoEndDate 2019-03-31 es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto Universitario de Ingeniería del Agua y del Medio Ambiente - Institut Universitari d'Enginyeria de l'Aigua i Medi Ambient es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Ingeniería Hidráulica y Medio Ambiente - Departament d'Enginyeria Hidràulica i Medi Ambient es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Avilés-Añazco, A.; Solera Solera, A.; Paredes Arquiola, J.; Pedro Monzonís, M. (2018). Integrated methodological framework fos assesing the risk of failure in water supply incorporating drought forecast. Case study: Andean regulated river basin. Water Resources Management. 32(4):1209-1223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1863-7 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1863-7 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1209 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1223 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 32 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\347143 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES
dc.description.references Andreu J, Capilla J, Sanchís E (1996) AQUATOOL, a generalized decision-support system for water-resources planning and operational management. J Hydrol 177(3-4):269–291. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(95)02963-X es_ES
dc.description.references Andreu J, Solera A, Capilla J, Ferrer J (2007) Modelo SIMGES para simulación de cuencas. Manual de usuario v3. 00. Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Valencia es_ES
dc.description.references Andreu J, Ferrer J, Perez MA et al (2013) Drought planning and management in the Júcar River Basin, Spain. In: Schwabe K et al (eds) Drought in arid and semi-arid regions. Springer science, Dordrecht, pp 237–249. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6636-5_13 es_ES
dc.description.references Avilés A, Solera A (2013) Análisis de sistemas de recursos hídricos de la cuenca del rio Tomebamba en Ecuador, mediante modelos estocásticos y de gestión. In: Solera A, Paredes J, Andreu J (eds) Aplicaciones de sistemas soporte a la decisión en planificación y gestión integradas de cuencas hidrográficas. Marcombo, Barcelona, España pp 51–61 es_ES
dc.description.references Avilés A, Célleri R, Paredes J, Solera A (2015) Evaluation of Markov chain based drought forecasts in an Andean Regulated River basin using the skill scores RPS and GMSS. Water Resour Manag 29(6):1949–1963. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-0921-2 es_ES
dc.description.references Avilés A, Célleri R, Solera A, Paredes J (2016) Probabilistic forecasting of drought events using Markov chain-and Bayesian network-based models: a case study of an Andean Regulated River Basin. Water 8:1–16 es_ES
dc.description.references Barua S, Ng A, Perera B (2012) Drought assessment and forecasting: a case study on the Yarra River catchment in Victoria, Australia. Aust J Water Resour 15(2):95–108. https://doi.org/10.7158/W10-848.2012.15.2 es_ES
dc.description.references Bazaraa MS, Jarvis JJ, Sherali HD (2011) Linear programming and network flows, fourth Edi. John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey es_ES
dc.description.references Brown C, Baroang KM, Conrad E et al (2010) IRI technical report 10–15, managing climate risk in water supply systems. Palisades, NY es_ES
dc.description.references Cancelliere A, Di Mauro G, Bonaccorso B, Rossi G (2007) Drought forecasting using the standardized precipitation index. Water Resour Manag 21(5):801–819. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9062-y es_ES
dc.description.references Cancelliere A, Nicolosi V, Rossi G (2009) Assessment of drought risk in water supply systems in coping with drought risk in agriculture and water supply systems. Advances in natural and technological hazards research 26. In: Coping with drought risk in agriculture. Springer, pp 93–109. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9045-5_8 es_ES
dc.description.references Chen YD, Zhang Q, Xiao M, Singh VP, Zhang S (2016) Probabilistic forecasting of seasonal droughts in the Pearl River basin, China. Stoch Environ Res Risk Assess 30(7):2031–2040. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-015-1174-6 es_ES
dc.description.references Gong G, Wang L, Condon L, Shearman A, Lall U (2010) A simple framework for incorporating seasonal Streamflow forecasts into existing water resource management practices. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Assoc 46(3):574–585. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2010.00435.x es_ES
dc.description.references Haro D, Solera A, Paredes J, Andreu J (2014) Methodology for drought risk assessment in within-year regulated reservoir systems. Application to the Orbigo River system (Spain). Water Resour Manag 28(11):3801–3814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-014-0710-3 es_ES
dc.description.references Haro-Monteagudo D, Solera A, Andreu J (2017) Drought early warning based on optimal risk forecasts in regulated river systems: application to the Jucar River basin (Spain). J Hydrol 544:36–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.022 es_ES
dc.description.references Hashimoto T, Loucks DP, Stedinger JR (1982) Reliability, resiliency, and vulnerability criteria. Water Resour Res 18(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i001p00014 es_ES
dc.description.references Hwang Y, Carbone GJ (2009) Ensemble forecasts of drought indices using a conditional residual resampling technique. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48(7):1289–1301. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2071.1 es_ES
dc.description.references Kao S-C, Govindaraju RS (2010) A copula-based joint deficit index for droughts. J Hydrol 380(1-2):121–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.10.029 es_ES
dc.description.references Keyantash JA, Dracup JA (2004) An aggregate drought index: assessing drought severity based on fluctuations in the hydrologic cycle and surface water storage. Water Resour Res 40(9):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002610 es_ES
dc.description.references Khadr M (2016) Forecasting of meteorological drought using hidden Markov model (case study: the upper Blue Nile river basin, Ethiopia). Ain Shams Eng J 7(1):47–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2015.11.005 es_ES
dc.description.references Madadgar S, Moradkhani H (2013) A Bayesian framework for probabilistic seasonal drought forecasting. J Hydrometeorol 14(6):1685–1706. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-13-010.1 es_ES
dc.description.references Madadgar S, Moradkhani H (2014) Spatio-temporal drought forecasting within Bayesian networks. J Hydrol 512:134–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.02.039 es_ES
dc.description.references Mahmoudzadeh H, Mahmoudzadeh H, Afshar M, Yousefi S (2016) Applying first-order Markov chains and SPI drought index to monitor and forecast drought in West Azerbaijan Province of Iran. Int J Geo Sci Environ Plan 1:44–53. 10.22034/ijgsep.2016.40669 es_ES
dc.description.references Mishra AK, Singh VP (2010) Review paper a review of drought concepts. J Hydrol 391(1-2):202–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.07.012 es_ES
dc.description.references Nalbantis I, Tsakiris G (2009) Assessment of hydrological drought revisited. Water Resour Manag 23(5):881–897. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9305-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Ochola WO, Kerkides P (2003) A Markov chain simulation model for predicting critical wet and dry spells in Kenya: Analysing rainfall events in the kano plains. Irrig Drain 52(4):327–342. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.094 es_ES
dc.description.references Paulo AA, Pereira LS (2007) Prediction of SPI drought class transitions using Markov chains. Water Resour Manag 21(10):1813–1827. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-006-9129-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Phan TD, Smart JCR, Capon SJ, Hadwen WL, Sahin O (2016) Applications of Bayesian belief networks in water resource management: a systematic review. Environ Model Softw 85:98–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.08.006 es_ES
dc.description.references Pouget L, Roldán T, Gómez M et al (2015) Use of seasonal climate predictions in the water sector—preliminary results from the EUPORIAS project. In: Andreu J, Solera A, Paredes J et al (eds) Drought: research and science-policy interfacing. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK, p 247 es_ES
dc.description.references Rossi G, Cancelliere A (2013) Managing drought risk in water supply systems in Europe: a review. Int J Water Resour Dev 29(2):272–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2012.713848 es_ES
dc.description.references Rossi G, Caporali E, Garrote L (2012) Definition of risk indicators for reservoirs management optimization. Water Resour Manag 26(4):981–996. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9842-x es_ES
dc.description.references Sánchez S, Andreu J, Solera A (2001) Gestión de Recursos Hídricos con Decisiones Basadas en Estimación del Riesgo. Universidad Politécnica De Valencia, Valencia es_ES
dc.description.references Sandoval-Solis S, McKinney DC, Loucks M (2011) Sustainability index for water resources planning and management. J Water Resour Plan Manag 137(5):381–390. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000134 es_ES
dc.description.references Sankarasubramanian A, Lall U, Devineni N, Espinueva S (2009) The role of monthly updated climate forecasts in improving intraseasonal water allocation. J Appl Meteorol Climatol 48(7):1464–1482. https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JAMC2122.1 es_ES
dc.description.references Shukla S, Wood AW (2008) Use of a standardized runoff index for characterizing hydrologic drought. Geophys Res Lett 35(2):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL032487 es_ES
dc.description.references Staudinger M, Stahl K, Seibert J (2014) A drought index accounting for snow. Water Resour Res 50(10):7861–7872. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR015143 es_ES
dc.description.references Sveinsson O, Salas JD, Lane W, Frevert D (2007) Stochastic analysis, modeling, and simulation (SAMS) version 2007, user’s manual. Computing Hydrology Laboratory, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado es_ES
dc.description.references Svoboda M, Hayes M, Wilhite D, Tadesse T (2004) Recent advances in drought monitoring. Drought Mitig Cent Fac Publ 6:6 es_ES
dc.description.references Vogel RM (2017) Stochastic watershed models for hydrologic risk management. Water Secur 1:28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2017.06.001 es_ES
dc.description.references Wilks DS (2011) Statistical methods in the atmospheric sciences, third edit. Academic Press, USA es_ES
dc.description.references World Meteorological Organization (2012) Standardized precipitation index user Guide (M. Svoboda, M. Hayes and D. Wood). (WMO - No. 1090), Geneva  es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem