- -

The role of sex differences in detecting deception in computer-mediated communication in English

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

The role of sex differences in detecting deception in computer-mediated communication in English

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: 10521-39331-3-PB.pdf
Tamaño: 193.0Kb
Formato: PDF
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Kuzio, Anna es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2018-09-03T12:35:22Z
dc.date.available 2018-09-03T12:35:22Z
dc.date.issued 2018-07-12
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/106477
dc.description.abstract [EN] While deception seems to be a common approach in interpersonal communication, most examination on interpersonal deception sees the sex of the interlocutor as unconnected with the capability to notice deceptive messages. This research studies the truth and deception detection capability of both male and female receivers when replying to both true and deceptive messages from both male and female speakers. The outcomes indicate that sex may be a significant variable in comprehending the interpersonal detection probabilities of truth and of lies. An interaction of variables including the speakers’ sex, receivers’ sex, and whether the message appears to be truthful or deceptive is created to relate to detection capability. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Computer-Assisted Linguistic Research
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Computer-mediated communication es_ES
dc.subject Interpersonal communication es_ES
dc.subject Deception es_ES
dc.title The role of sex differences in detecting deception in computer-mediated communication in English es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2018-09-03T12:16:54Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/jclr.2018.10521
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Kuzio, A. (2018). The role of sex differences in detecting deception in computer-mediated communication in English. Journal of Computer-Assisted Linguistic Research. 2(1):39-53. https://doi.org/10.4995/jclr.2018.10521 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/jclr.2018.10521 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 39 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 53 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 2
dc.description.issue 1
dc.identifier.eissn 2530-9455
dc.description.references Aamodt, M. G., & Custer, H. (2006). Who can best catch a liar? A meta-analysis of individual differences in detecting deception. The Forensic Examiner, 15(1), 6-11. es_ES
dc.description.references Blalock, H. M. (1972). Social Statistics. New York: McGraw Hill. es_ES
dc.description.references Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. M. (2006). Accuracy of deception judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(3), 214-234. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_2 es_ES
dc.description.references Boush, D. M., Friestad, M., & Wright, P. (2009). Deception in the marketplace : The psychology of deceptive persuasion and consumer self-protection. New York: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Camden, C., Motley, M. T., & Wilson, A. (1984). White lies in interpersonal communication: A taxonomy and preliminary investigation of social motivations. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 48(4), 309-325. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570318409374167 es_ES
dc.description.references Carlson, J., George, J., Burgoon, J., Adkins, M., & White, C. (2004). Deception in computer mediated communication. Group Decision and Negotiation, 13, 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:GRUP.0000011942.31158.d8 es_ES
dc.description.references Daft, R.L. & Lengel, R.H. (1986). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organizational design. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B.M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior 6 (pp. 191-233). Homewood, IL: JAI Press. es_ES
dc.description.references DePaulo, B. M., Epstein, J. A., & Wyer, M. M. (1993). Sex differences in lying: How women and men deal with the dilemma of deceit. In M. Lewis, & C. Saarni (Eds.), Lying and deception in everyday life (pp. 126-147). New York: Guilford Press. es_ES
dc.description.references DePaulo, B. M., Kashy, D. A., Kirkendol, S. E., Wyer, M. M., & Epstein, J. A. (1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(5), 979- 995. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.5.979 es_ES
dc.description.references DePaulo, B. M., Kirkendol, S. E., Tang, J., & O'Brien, T. P. (1988). The motivational impairment effect in the communication of deception: Replications and extensions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 12(3), 177-202. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987487 es_ES
dc.description.references DePaulo, B. M., Lassiter, G. D., & Stone, J. L. (1982). Attention all determinants of success at detecting deception and truth. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8(2), 273-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167282082014 es_ES
dc.description.references DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Telling lies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1713-1722. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1713 es_ES
dc.description.references Dreber, A., & Johannesson, M. (2008). Gender differences in deception. Economics Letters, 99(1), 197-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2007.06.027 es_ES
dc.description.references Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar? American Psychologist, 46(9), 913-920. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.46.9.913 es_ES
dc.description.references Ekman, P., O'Sullivan, M., & Frank, M. G. (1999). A few can catch a liar. Psychological Science, 10(3), 263-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00147 es_ES
dc.description.references Feldman, R. S., Forrest, J. A., & Happ, B. R. (2002). Self-presentation and verbal deception: Do self-presenters lie more? Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 24(2), 163-170. https://doi.org/10.1207/153248302753674848 es_ES
dc.description.references George, J. F., & Robb, A. (2008). Deception and computer-mediated communication in daily life. Communication Reports, 21(2), 92-103. https://doi.org/10.1080/08934210802298108 es_ES
dc.description.references Hample, D. (1980). Purposes and effects of lying. Southern Speech Communication Journal, 46(1), 33-47. https://doi.org/10.1080/10417948009372474 es_ES
dc.description.references Hancock, J., Thom-Santelli, J., & Ritchie, T. (2004). Deception and design: The impact of communication technology on lying behavior. In E. Dykstra-Erickson, & M. Tscheligi (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2004 conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 129-134). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.https://doi.org/10.1145/985692.985709 es_ES
dc.description.references Haselton, M. G., Buss, D. M., Oubaid, V., & Angleitner, A. (2005). Sex, lies, and strategic interference: The psychology of deception between the sexes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(1), 3-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271303 es_ES
dc.description.references Inglehart, R., Basa-ez, M., & Moreno, A. (1998). Human values and beliefs: A crosscultural sourcebook. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14858 es_ES
dc.description.references Knapp, L. M., Hart, R. P., & Dennis, H. S. (1974). An exploration of deception as a communication construct. Human Communication Research, 1(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1974.tb00250.x es_ES
dc.description.references Kraut, R. E. (1980). Behavioral roots of person perception: The deception judgments of customs inspectors and laymen. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(5), 784-798. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.784 es_ES
dc.description.references Kuzio, A. (2018). Cross-cultural Deception in Polish and American English in Computer-Mediated Communication. New Castle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references Levine, T. R., & Kim, R. K. (2010). Some considerations for a new theory of deceptive communication. In M. S. McGlone, & M. L. Knapp (Eds.), The interplay of truth and deception: New agendas in theory and research (pp. 16-34). New York: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Levine, T. R., Park, H. S., & McCornack, S. A. (2006). Accuracy in detecting truths and lies: Documenting the "Veracity Effect". Communication Monographs, 66(2), 125- 144. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637759909376468 es_ES
dc.description.references Manstead, A., Wagner, H. L., & McDonald, C. J. (1986). Deceptive and non-deceptive communications: Sending experience, modality, and individual abilities. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 10(3), 147-167. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00987612 es_ES
dc.description.references McCornack, S. A., & Parks, M. R. (1990). What women know that men don't: Sex differences in determining the truth behind deceptive messages. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 7(1), 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407590071006 es_ES
dc.description.references Park, H. S., Levine, T. R., McCornack, S. A., Morrison, K., & Ferrara, M. (2002). How people really detect lies. Communication Monographs, 69(2), 144-157. https://doi.org/10.1080/714041710 es_ES
dc.description.references Prater, T., & Kiser, S. B. (2002). Lies, lies, and more lies. SAM Advanced Management Journal,67(2), 9-36. es_ES
dc.description.references Sanchez-Pages, S., & Vorsatz, M. (2008). Enjoy the silence: An experiment on truthtelling. Experimental Economics, 12(2), 220-241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-008-9211-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Seiter, J. S., Bruschke, J., & Bai, C. (2002). The acceptability of deception as a function of perceivers' culture, deceiver's intention, and deceiver-deceived relationship. Western Journal of Communication, 66(2), 158-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10570310209374731 es_ES
dc.description.references Serota, K. B., Levine, T. R., & Boster, F. J. (2010). The prevalence of lying in America: Three studies of self-reported lies. Human Communication Research, 36(1), 2-25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2009.01366.x es_ES
dc.description.references Turner, R. E., Edgley, C., & Olmstead, G. (1975). Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy. Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11(1), 69-89. es_ES
dc.description.references https://doi.org/10.17161/STR.1808.6098 es_ES
dc.description.references Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (volume 11, pp. 1-59). New York: Academic Press. es_ES
dc.description.references https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60369-X es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem