Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Sanchez-Ruiz, Lidia | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Marin-Garcia, Juan A. | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Blanco, Beatriz | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-01-09T07:58:03Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-01-09T07:58:03Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2018-12-27 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/114958 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Continuous improvement is a concept that has been widely studied from multiple perspectives during the last decades. However, new studies on the topic appear because it seems that there are still questions to be resolved. Therefore, the key question is what future research lines should be developed. As such, the possibility of carrying out a systematic review of literature was raised. However, given the high number of systematic reviews published in recent years, the final objective of this paper is to perform a meta-review of the concept of continuous improvement. Therefore, this study presents the research protocol followed to perform a meta-review of the concept of continuous improvement; being the main objective of the meta-review to know the state of this field of study and to find out where future research should be oriented. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | [ES] La mejora continua es un concepto que ha sido ampliamente estudiado desde múltiples perspectivas durante las últimas décadas. Sin embargo, siguen apareciendo estudios sobre el tema porque parece que aún hay preguntas por resolver. La cuestión es ¿qué líneas de investigación futura hay que desarrollar? Ante esta cuestión se planteó la posibilidad de realizar una revisión sistemática de literatura. No obstante, dado el elevado número de revisiones sistemáticas publicadas en los últimos años, el objetivo planteado fue realizar una meta-revisión del concepto de mejora continua. Por tanto, este estudio plantea el protocolo de investigación seguido para realizar una meta-revisión de literatura del concepto de mejora continua; siendo el objetivo principal de la meta-revisión conocer el estado de este campo de estudio y averiguar hacia dónde debe orientarse la investigación futura. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Universitat Politècnica de València | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Working Papers on Operations Management | |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento (by) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Mejora continua | es_ES |
dc.subject | Kaizen | es_ES |
dc.subject | Meta-revisión | es_ES |
dc.subject | Revisión literatura | es_ES |
dc.subject | Protocolo | es_ES |
dc.subject | Continuous improvement | es_ES |
dc.subject | Meta-review | es_ES |
dc.subject | Literature review | es_ES |
dc.subject | Protocol | es_ES |
dc.title | Protocol: A Meta-Review on continuous improvement to know the state of this research field | es_ES |
dc.title.alternative | Protocolo: Realización de una Meta-Revisión sobre mejora continua para conocer el estado del campo de investigación | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.date.updated | 2019-01-08T13:31:32Z | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10752 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers Industrials | es_ES |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Sanchez-Ruiz, L.; Marin-Garcia, JA.; Blanco, B. (2018). Protocol: A Meta-Review on continuous improvement to know the state of this research field. Working Papers on Operations Management. 9(2):88-111. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10752 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | SWORD | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10752 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 88 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 111 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 9 | |
dc.description.issue | 2 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1989-9068 | |
dc.description.references | Albliwi, S. A., Antony, J., & Arshed, N. (2014). Critical Literature Review on Maturity Models for Business Process Excellence. In 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM) (pp. 79-83). 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA: IEEE. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Álvarez-García, J., Durán-Sánchez, A., & del Río-Rama, M. C. (2018). Systematic bibliometric analysis on Kaizen in scientific journals. TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2017-0171 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Balzer, W. K., Francis, D. E., Krehbiel, T. C., & Shea, N. (2016). A review and perspective on Lean in higher education. QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 24(4), 442-462. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-03-2015-0011 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carnerud, D., Jaca, C., & Bäckström, I. (2018). Kaizen and continuous improvement - trends and patterns over 30 years. TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2018-0037 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Chiarini, A., Baccarani, C., & Mascherpa, V. (2018). Lean production, Toyota Production System and Kaizen philosophy: A conceptual analysis from the perspective of Zen Buddhism. TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2017-0178 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Cudney, E. A., Venuthurumilli, S. S. J., Materla, T., & Antony, J. (2018). Systematic review of Lean and Six Sigma approaches in higher education. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1422977 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Cullen, J., & Turnbull, S. (2005). A Meta-Review of the Management Development Literature. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 335-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278891 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | de Freitas, J. G., & Costa, H. G. (2017). Impacts of Lean Six Sigma over organizational sustainability: A systematic literature review on Scopus base. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-10-2015-0039 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Farrington, T., Antony, J., & O'Gorman, K. D. (2018). Continuous improvement methodologies and practices in hospitality andtourism. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 30(1), 581-600. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2017-0141 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gattoufi, S., Oral, M., Kumar, A., & Reisman, A. (2004). Content anal sis of data envelopment analysis literature and its comparison with that of other or/ms fields. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(9), 911-935. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4101929.pdf | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Glover, W. J., Farris, J. A., & Van Aken, E. M. (2014). Kaizen Events: Assessing the Existing Literature and Convergence ofPractices. ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 26(1), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2014.11432003 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gonzalez Aleu, Fernando; Van Aken, Eileen M.; Keathley-Herring, H. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of research design characteristics in continuous improvement projects in hospitals. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 2-8). | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gonzalez Aleu, F., & Van Aken, E. M. (2016). Systematic literature review of critical success factors for continuous improvement projects. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(3), 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-06-2015-0025 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Henrique, D. B., & Godinho Filho, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of empirical research in Lean and Six Sigma in healthcare. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1429259 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Hyland, P., Becker, K., Sloan, T., & Jorgensen, F. (2008). CI in the work place: does involving the HRM function make any difference? International Journal of Technology Management, 44(3/4), 427. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.021048 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Ingvaldsen, J. A., & Benders, J. (2016). Lost in translation? The role of supervisors in lean production. GERMAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT-ZEITSCHRIFT FURPERSONALFORSCHUNG, 30(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002215625893 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Jiang, K., & Messersmith, J. (2018). On the shoulders of giants: a meta-review of strategic human resource management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(1), 6-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1384930 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Jørgensen, F., Boer, H., & Gertsen, F. (2003). Jump‐starting continuous improvement through self‐assessment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(10), 1260-1278. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310496661 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Jurburg, D., Viles, E., Tanco, M., & Mateo, R. (2017). What motivates employees to participate in continuous improvementactivities? TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 28(13-14), 1469-1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1150170 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kovacevic, M., Jovicic, M., Djapan, M., & Zivanovic-Macuzic, I. (2016). LEAN THINKING IN HEALTHCARE: REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION RESULTS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 10(1), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.18421/IJQR10.01-12 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Lim, S. A. H., Antony, J., Arshed, N., & Albliwi, S. (2017). A systematic review of statistical process control implementation in thefood manufacturing industry. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 28(1-2), 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1050181 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Marin-Garcia, J. A., Betancour, E., & Girlado-O'Meara, M. (2018). Protocol: Literature review on the psychometric properties of the short versions of the scales of social desirability in the answers to competency self-assessment questionnaires. Working Papers on Operations Management, 9(1), 14-29. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | McLean, R., & Antony, J. (2014). Why continuous improvement initiatives fail in manufacturing environments? A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 370-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2013-0124 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Medina-López, C., Alfalla-Luque, R., & Marin-Garcia, J. (2011). Research in operations management teaching: Trends and challenges. Intangible Capital, 7(2), 507-548. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2011.v7n2.p507-548 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Medina Lopez, C., Marin Garcia, J. A., & Alfalla Luque, R. (2010). Una propuesta metodológica para la realización de búsquedas sistemáticas de bibliografía. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 1(2), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v1i2.786 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Paipa-Galeano, L., & Agudelo-Otalora, M. (2016). KAIZEN EVENTS: Concepts, current status and perspectives. Dyna, 91(1), 11-14. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Kaizen+events%3A+Concepts%2C+current+status+and+perspectives&btnG= | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Paranitharan, K. P., Babu, R. A., Pandi, P. A., & Jeyathilagar, D. (2017). An empirical validation of integrated manufacturing business excellencemodel. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 92(5-8), 2569-2591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0271-8 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Perdana, A., Robb, A., & Rohde, F. (2014). Experimental research and multivariate statistical analyses in business information systems research - a meta-review. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 16(3), 247. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2014.063767 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Perren, L. (2003). The role of e‐mentoring in entrepreneurial education and support: a meta‐review of academic literature. Education + Training, 45(8/9), 517-525. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910310508900 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | PRISMA. (2015). Prisma Flow Diagram. Retrieved July 17, 2018, from http://prisma-statement.org/prismastatement/flowdiagram.aspx | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Randhawa, J. S., & Ahuja, I. S. (2017). 5S implementation methodologies: Literature review and directions. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 20(1), 48-74. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2017.080692 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Reisman, A., Kumar, A., & Montwani, J. G. (2014). A meta review of game theory publications in the flagship us-based or/ms journals. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 16(3), 247-270. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2014.063767 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sabater, J. J. G., & Garcia, J. A. M. (2011). Can we still talk about continuous improvement? Rethinking enablers and inhibitors for successful implementation. International Journal of Technology Management, 55(1/2), 28. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2011.041678 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sanchez, L., & Blanco, B. (2014). Three decades of continuous improvement. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 25(9-10), 986-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.856547 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (n.d.). Meta-Review of Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital Literature: Citation Impact and Research Productivity Rankings. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.203 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Singh, J., & Singh, H. (2015). Continuous improvement philosophy - literature review and directions. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 22(1), 75-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2012-0038 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sreedharan, V. R., & Raju, R. (2016). A systematic literature review of Lean Six Sigma in different industries. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 7(4), 430-466. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-12-2015-0050 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tarwani, S., & Chug, A. (2016). Agile Methodologies in Software Maintenance: A Systematic Review. INFORMATICA-JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS, 40(4, SI), 415-426. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Tezel, A., Koskela, L., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (2016). Visual management in production management: a literature synthesis. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 27(6), 766-799. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2015-0071 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Vashishth, A., Chakraborty, A., & Antony, J. (2017). Lean Six Sigma in financial services industry: a systematic review and agenda for future research. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1308820 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wales, W. J. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation: A review and synthesis of promising research directions. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615613840 | es_ES |