- -

Protocol: A Meta-Review on continuous improvement to know the state of this research field

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Protocol: A Meta-Review on continuous improvement to know the state of this research field

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: 10752-41144-1-PB.PDF
Tamaño: 639.7Kb
Formato: PDF
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Sanchez-Ruiz, Lidia es_ES
dc.contributor.author Marin-Garcia, Juan A. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Blanco, Beatriz es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2019-01-09T07:58:03Z
dc.date.available 2019-01-09T07:58:03Z
dc.date.issued 2018-12-27
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/114958
dc.description.abstract [EN] Continuous improvement is a concept that has been widely studied from multiple perspectives during the last decades. However, new studies on the topic appear because it seems that there are still questions to be resolved. Therefore, the key question is what future research lines should be developed. As such, the possibility of carrying out a systematic review of literature was raised. However, given the high number of systematic reviews published in recent years, the final objective of this paper is to perform a meta-review of the concept of continuous improvement. Therefore, this study presents the research protocol followed to perform a meta-review of the concept of continuous improvement; being the main objective of the meta-review to know the state of this field of study and to find out where future research should be oriented. es_ES
dc.description.abstract [ES] La mejora continua es un concepto que ha sido ampliamente estudiado desde múltiples perspectivas durante las últimas décadas. Sin embargo, siguen apareciendo estudios sobre el tema porque parece que aún hay preguntas por resolver. La cuestión es ¿qué líneas de investigación futura hay que desarrollar? Ante esta cuestión se planteó la posibilidad de realizar una revisión sistemática de literatura. No obstante, dado el elevado número de revisiones sistemáticas publicadas en los últimos años, el objetivo planteado fue realizar una meta-revisión del concepto de mejora continua. Por tanto, este estudio plantea el protocolo de investigación seguido para realizar una meta-revisión de literatura del concepto de mejora continua; siendo el objetivo principal de la meta-revisión conocer el estado de este campo de estudio y averiguar hacia dónde debe orientarse la investigación futura. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof Working Papers on Operations Management
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Mejora continua es_ES
dc.subject Kaizen es_ES
dc.subject Meta-revisión es_ES
dc.subject Revisión literatura es_ES
dc.subject Protocolo es_ES
dc.subject Continuous improvement es_ES
dc.subject Meta-review es_ES
dc.subject Literature review es_ES
dc.subject Protocol es_ES
dc.title Protocol: A Meta-Review on continuous improvement to know the state of this research field es_ES
dc.title.alternative Protocolo: Realización de una Meta-Revisión sobre mejora continua para conocer el estado del campo de investigación es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2019-01-08T13:31:32Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10752
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenieros Industriales - Escola Tècnica Superior d'Enginyers Industrials es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Organización de Empresas - Departament d'Organització d'Empreses es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Sanchez-Ruiz, L.; Marin-Garcia, JA.; Blanco, B. (2018). Protocol: A Meta-Review on continuous improvement to know the state of this research field. Working Papers on Operations Management. 9(2):88-111. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10752 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v9i2.10752 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 88 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 111 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 9
dc.description.issue 2
dc.identifier.eissn 1989-9068
dc.description.references Albliwi, S. A., Antony, J., & Arshed, N. (2014). Critical Literature Review on Maturity Models for Business Process Excellence. In 2014 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM) (pp. 79-83). 345 E 47TH ST, NEW YORK, NY 10017 USA: IEEE. es_ES
dc.description.references Álvarez-García, J., Durán-Sánchez, A., & del Río-Rama, M. C. (2018). Systematic bibliometric analysis on Kaizen in scientific journals. TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2017-0171 es_ES
dc.description.references Balzer, W. K., Francis, D. E., Krehbiel, T. C., & Shea, N. (2016). A review and perspective on Lean in higher education. QUALITY ASSURANCE IN EDUCATION, 24(4), 442-462. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-03-2015-0011 es_ES
dc.description.references Carnerud, D., Jaca, C., & Bäckström, I. (2018). Kaizen and continuous improvement - trends and patterns over 30 years. TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-03-2018-0037 es_ES
dc.description.references Chiarini, A., Baccarani, C., & Mascherpa, V. (2018). Lean production, Toyota Production System and Kaizen philosophy: A conceptual analysis from the perspective of Zen Buddhism. TQM Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/TQM-12-2017-0178 es_ES
dc.description.references Cudney, E. A., Venuthurumilli, S. S. J., Materla, T., & Antony, J. (2018). Systematic review of Lean and Six Sigma approaches in higher education. Total Quality Management and Business Excellence, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1422977 es_ES
dc.description.references Cullen, J., & Turnbull, S. (2005). A Meta-Review of the Management Development Literature. Human Resource Development Review, 4(3), 335-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484305278891 es_ES
dc.description.references de Freitas, J. G., & Costa, H. G. (2017). Impacts of Lean Six Sigma over organizational sustainability: A systematic literature review on Scopus base. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 8(1), 89-108. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-10-2015-0039 es_ES
dc.description.references Farrington, T., Antony, J., & O'Gorman, K. D. (2018). Continuous improvement methodologies and practices in hospitality andtourism. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 30(1), 581-600. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-03-2017-0141 es_ES
dc.description.references Gattoufi, S., Oral, M., Kumar, A., & Reisman, A. (2004). Content anal sis of data envelopment analysis literature and its comparison with that of other or/ms fields. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(9), 911-935. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4101929.pdf es_ES
dc.description.references Glover, W. J., Farris, J. A., & Van Aken, E. M. (2014). Kaizen Events: Assessing the Existing Literature and Convergence ofPractices. ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 26(1), 39-61. https://doi.org/10.1080/10429247.2014.11432003 es_ES
dc.description.references Gonzalez Aleu, Fernando; Van Aken, Eileen M.; Keathley-Herring, H. (2017). Bibliometric analysis of research design characteristics in continuous improvement projects in hospitals. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 2-8). es_ES
dc.description.references Gonzalez Aleu, F., & Van Aken, E. M. (2016). Systematic literature review of critical success factors for continuous improvement projects. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(3), 214-232. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-06-2015-0025 es_ES
dc.description.references Henrique, D. B., & Godinho Filho, M. (2018). A systematic literature review of empirical research in Lean and Six Sigma in healthcare. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2018.1429259 es_ES
dc.description.references Hyland, P., Becker, K., Sloan, T., & Jorgensen, F. (2008). CI in the work place: does involving the HRM function make any difference? International Journal of Technology Management, 44(3/4), 427. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2008.021048 es_ES
dc.description.references Ingvaldsen, J. A., & Benders, J. (2016). Lost in translation? The role of supervisors in lean production. GERMAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT-ZEITSCHRIFT FURPERSONALFORSCHUNG, 30(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.1177/2397002215625893 es_ES
dc.description.references Jiang, K., & Messersmith, J. (2018). On the shoulders of giants: a meta-review of strategic human resource management. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 29(1), 6-33. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1384930 es_ES
dc.description.references Jørgensen, F., Boer, H., & Gertsen, F. (2003). Jump‐starting continuous improvement through self‐assessment. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 23(10), 1260-1278. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570310496661 es_ES
dc.description.references Jurburg, D., Viles, E., Tanco, M., & Mateo, R. (2017). What motivates employees to participate in continuous improvementactivities? TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 28(13-14), 1469-1488. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1150170 es_ES
dc.description.references Kovacevic, M., Jovicic, M., Djapan, M., & Zivanovic-Macuzic, I. (2016). LEAN THINKING IN HEALTHCARE: REVIEW OF IMPLEMENTATION RESULTS. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY RESEARCH, 10(1), 219-229. https://doi.org/10.18421/IJQR10.01-12 es_ES
dc.description.references Lim, S. A. H., Antony, J., Arshed, N., & Albliwi, S. (2017). A systematic review of statistical process control implementation in thefood manufacturing industry. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 28(1-2), 176-189. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2015.1050181 es_ES
dc.description.references Marin-Garcia, J. A., Betancour, E., & Girlado-O'Meara, M. (2018). Protocol: Literature review on the psychometric properties of the short versions of the scales of social desirability in the answers to competency self-assessment questionnaires. Working Papers on Operations Management, 9(1), 14-29. es_ES
dc.description.references McLean, R., & Antony, J. (2014). Why continuous improvement initiatives fail in manufacturing environments? A systematic review of the evidence. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 63(3), 370-376. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2013-0124 es_ES
dc.description.references Medina-López, C., Alfalla-Luque, R., & Marin-Garcia, J. (2011). Research in operations management teaching: Trends and challenges. Intangible Capital, 7(2), 507-548. https://doi.org/10.3926/ic.2011.v7n2.p507-548 es_ES
dc.description.references Medina Lopez, C., Marin Garcia, J. A., & Alfalla Luque, R. (2010). Una propuesta metodológica para la realización de búsquedas sistemáticas de bibliografía. WPOM-Working Papers on Operations Management, 1(2), 13-30. https://doi.org/10.4995/wpom.v1i2.786 es_ES
dc.description.references Paipa-Galeano, L., & Agudelo-Otalora, M. (2016). KAIZEN EVENTS: Concepts, current status and perspectives. Dyna, 91(1), 11-14. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.es/scholar?hl=es&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Kaizen+events%3A+Concepts%2C+current+status+and+perspectives&btnG= es_ES
dc.description.references Paranitharan, K. P., Babu, R. A., Pandi, P. A., & Jeyathilagar, D. (2017). An empirical validation of integrated manufacturing business excellencemodel. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 92(5-8), 2569-2591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0271-8 es_ES
dc.description.references Perdana, A., Robb, A., & Rohde, F. (2014). Experimental research and multivariate statistical analyses in business information systems research - a meta-review. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 16(3), 247. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2014.063767 es_ES
dc.description.references Perren, L. (2003). The role of e‐mentoring in entrepreneurial education and support: a meta‐review of academic literature. Education + Training, 45(8/9), 517-525. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910310508900 es_ES
dc.description.references PRISMA. (2015). Prisma Flow Diagram. Retrieved July 17, 2018, from http://prisma-statement.org/prismastatement/flowdiagram.aspx es_ES
dc.description.references Randhawa, J. S., & Ahuja, I. S. (2017). 5S implementation methodologies: Literature review and directions. International Journal of Productivity and Quality Management, 20(1), 48-74. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJPQM.2017.080692 es_ES
dc.description.references Reisman, A., Kumar, A., & Montwani, J. G. (2014). A meta review of game theory publications in the flagship us-based or/ms journals. International Journal of Business Information Systems, 16(3), 247-270. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBIS.2014.063767 es_ES
dc.description.references Sabater, J. J. G., & Garcia, J. A. M. (2011). Can we still talk about continuous improvement? Rethinking enablers and inhibitors for successful implementation. International Journal of Technology Management, 55(1/2), 28. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2011.041678 es_ES
dc.description.references Sanchez, L., & Blanco, B. (2014). Three decades of continuous improvement. TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS EXCELLENCE, 25(9-10), 986-1001. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2013.856547 es_ES
dc.description.references Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (n.d.). Meta-Review of Knowledge Management and Intellectual Capital Literature: Citation Impact and Research Productivity Rankings. https://doi.org/10.1002/kpm.203 es_ES
dc.description.references Singh, J., & Singh, H. (2015). Continuous improvement philosophy - literature review and directions. BENCHMARKING-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 22(1), 75-119. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-06-2012-0038 es_ES
dc.description.references Sreedharan, V. R., & Raju, R. (2016). A systematic literature review of Lean Six Sigma in different industries. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LEAN SIX SIGMA, 7(4), 430-466. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLSS-12-2015-0050 es_ES
dc.description.references Tarwani, S., & Chug, A. (2016). Agile Methodologies in Software Maintenance: A Systematic Review. INFORMATICA-JOURNAL OF COMPUTING AND INFORMATICS, 40(4, SI), 415-426. es_ES
dc.description.references Tezel, A., Koskela, L., & Tzortzopoulos, P. (2016). Visual management in production management: a literature synthesis. JOURNAL OF MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 27(6), 766-799. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-08-2015-0071 es_ES
dc.description.references Vashishth, A., Chakraborty, A., & Antony, J. (2017). Lean Six Sigma in financial services industry: a systematic review and agenda for future research. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2017.1308820 es_ES
dc.description.references Wales, W. J. (2016). Entrepreneurial orientation: A review and synthesis of promising research directions. International Small Business Journal, 34(1), 3-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615613840 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem