- -

Comparison of two different devices to assess intraocular lenses

RiuNet: Institutional repository of the Polithecnic University of Valencia

Share/Send to

Cited by

Statistics

Comparison of two different devices to assess intraocular lenses

Show simple item record

Files in this item

dc.contributor.author Furlan, Walter D. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Remón Martín, Laura es_ES
dc.contributor.author Llorens, Clara es_ES
dc.contributor.author Rodríguez-Vallejo, Manuel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Monsoriu Serra, Juan Antonio es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2019-01-10T21:03:30Z
dc.date.available 2019-01-10T21:03:30Z
dc.date.issued 2016 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0030-4026 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/115244
dc.description.abstract [EN] In this paper, we have compared the performance of two commercial systems, Kaleo-I and IOLA Plus, in the characterization of monofocal intraocular lenses (IOLs) according to the International Standard requirements (ISO 11979-2). The dioptric power (DP) and the Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) at 100.1p/mm and 3.0 mm aperture have been measured with both instruments in twenty commercial monofocal HEMA IOLs and their agreement was assessed by Bland Altman analysis. Compared with the designed power, IOLA Plus gave lower values in 85% of measures: Kaleo I errors are dependent on the power of the lens: measurements were higher than the designed power in the low-medium power range and lower than the labelled power in the high-power range. Differences in the MTF measurements between instruments were statistically significant, with an agreement of +/- 0.12 within the 95% confidence interval. IOLA Plus was very much reliable than Kaleo I in DP measurements. On the other hand, the reliability in the MTF measurements was similar for both instruments. (C) 2016 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship This study was supported by the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad and FEDER (Grant DP12015-71256-R), and by the Generalitat Valenciana (Grant PROMETEOII-2014-072), Spain. The authors acknowledge AJL S.A. for providing the IOLA Plus instrument and the set of lenses employed in this work.
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Elsevier es_ES
dc.relation MINECO/DPI2015-71256-R es_ES
dc.relation GV/PROMETEOII/2014/072 es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Monofocal intraocular lens es_ES
dc.subject Modulation transfer function es_ES
dc.subject Dioptric power es_ES
dc.subject International standard and reliability es_ES
dc.subject.classification FISICA APLICADA es_ES
dc.title Comparison of two different devices to assess intraocular lenses es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.08.005 es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Física Aplicada - Departament de Física Aplicada es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Furlan, WD.; Remón Martín, L.; Llorens, C.; Rodríguez-Vallejo, M.; Monsoriu Serra, JA. (2016). Comparison of two different devices to assess intraocular lenses. Optik - International Journal for Light and Electron Optics. 127(20):10108-10114. doi:10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.08.005 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijleo.2016.08.005 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 10108 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 10114 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 127 es_ES
dc.description.issue 20 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\316535 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Generalitat Valenciana es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad es_ES


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record