Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Previtali, Mattia | es_ES |
dc.contributor.author | Valente, Riccardo | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-02-06T08:08:01Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-02-06T08:08:01Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-01-28 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/116456 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] The open data paradigm is changing the research approach in many fields such as remote sensing and the social sciences. This is supported by governmental decisions and policies that are boosting the open data wave, and in this context archaeology is also affected by this new trend. In many countries, archaeological data are still protected or only limited access is allowed. However, the strong political and economic support for the publication of government data as open data will change the accessibility and disciplinary expertise in the archaeological field too. In order to maximize the impact of data, their technical openness is of primary importance. Indeed, since a spreadsheet is more usable than a PDF of a table, the availability of digital archaeological data, which is structured using standardised approaches, is of primary importance for the real usability of published data. In this context, the main aim of this paper is to present a workflow for archaeological data sharing as open data with a large level of technical usability and interoperability. Primary data is mainly acquired through the use of digital techniques (e.g. digital cameras and terrestrial laser scanning). The processing of this raw data is performed with commercial software for scan registration and image processing, allowing for a simple and semi-automated workflow. Outputs obtained from this step are then processed in modelling and drawing environments to generate digital models, both 2D and 3D. These crude geometrical data are then enriched with further information to generate a Geographic Information System (GIS) which is finally published as open data using Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) standards to maximise interoperability.Highlights:Open data will change the accessibility and disciplinary expertise in the archaeological field.The main aim of this paper is to present a workflow for archaeological data sharing as open data with a large level of interoperability.Digital acquisition techniques are used to document archaeological excavations and a Geographic Information System (GIS) is generated that is published as open data. | es_ES |
dc.description.abstract | [ES] El paradigma de los datos abiertos está cambiando el enfoque de investigación en muchos campos de estudio como son la teledetección y las ciencias sociales. Está respaldado por decisiones gubernamentales y políticas que están impulsando la ola de los datos abiertos y en este contexto también la arqueología se ve afectada por esta nueva tendencia. En muchos países, los datos arqueológicos todavía están protegidos o se permite un acceso limitado. Sin embargo, el fuerte apoyo político y económico hacia la publicación de datos gubernamentales como datos abiertos también cambiará el panorama en el campo arqueológico. Para maximizar el efecto de los datos, su apertura técnica es de primordial importancia. De hecho, dado que una hoja de cálculo es más útil que la digitalización PDF de una tabla, de manera similar, la disponibilidad de los datos arqueológicos digitales y su estructuración mediante enfoques estandarizados es de importancia primordial para una utilización real de los datos publicados. En este contexto, el objetivo principal de este documento es presentar un flujo de trabajo para compartir datos arqueológicos como datos abiertos con un gran nivel de usabilidad técnica e interoperabilidad. La adquisición de datos primarios se realiza principalmente mediante el uso de técnicas de adquisición digital (por ejemplo, cámaras digitales y escaneado láser terrestre). El procesamiento de los datos crudos se realiza con software comercial para el registro de los escaneados y el procesamiento de imágenes que permite un procesamiento simple y semiautomático. Los resultados del área arqueológica obtenidos de este paso se procesan en modelos y entornos de dibujo que permiten generar modelos digitales, 2D y 3D. Esos datos geométricos crudos se enriquecen luego con información adicional para generar un Sistema de Información Geográfica (SIG) que finalmente se publica con datos abiertos usando los estándares del Consorcio Geoespacial Abierto (OGC) que maximizan la interoperabilidad. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | The authors want to thank Prof. Philippe Pergola, who had the scientific direction of the archaeological fieldworks in Albenga, and dott. Stefano Roascio and dott.ssa Elena Dellù, who managed the on-field operations; dott. Giovanni Svevo for the help with on-field survey. Thanks to Fondazione Lamboglia and Fondazione De Mari which funded fieldworks. A special thanks to Fondazione Fratelli Confalonieri which funded the research. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Universitat Politècnica de València | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Virtual Archaeology Review | |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Arqueología virtual | es_ES |
dc.subject | Reconstrucción 3D | es_ES |
dc.subject | Información abierta | es_ES |
dc.subject | Sistema de Información Geográfica (SIG) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Virtual archaeology | es_ES |
dc.subject | 3D reconstruction | es_ES |
dc.subject | Open data | es_ES |
dc.subject | Geographic Information System (GIS) | es_ES |
dc.title | Archaeological documentation and data sharing: digital surveying and open data approach applied to archaeological fieldworks | es_ES |
dc.title.alternative | Documentación arqueológica e intercambio de datos: topografía digital y procedimiento con datos abiertos aplicado a trabajos de campo arqueológico | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.date.updated | 2019-02-05T13:51:40Z | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4995/var.2019.10377 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Previtali, M.; Valente, R. (2019). Archaeological documentation and data sharing: digital surveying and open data approach applied to archaeological fieldworks. Virtual Archaeology Review. 10(20):17-27. https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2019.10377 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | SWORD | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2019.10377 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 17 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 27 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 10 | |
dc.description.issue | 20 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1989-9947 | |
dc.contributor.funder | Fondazione Nino Lamboglia | |
dc.contributor.funder | Fondazione De Mari di Savona | |
dc.contributor.funder | Fondazione Fratelli Confalonieri | |
dc.description.references | Anichini, F., & Gattiglia, G. (2015). Verso la rivoluzione. Dall'Open Access all'Open Data: la pubblicazione aperta in archeologia. Post-classical archaeologies, 5, 298-326. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Beaulieu, A., & Wouters, P. (2009). E-research as intervention. In N. Jankowski (Ed.), E-research: transformation in Scholarly Practice, (pp. 54 - 69). New York, NY: Routledge. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Bizer, C., Heath, T. & Berners-Lee, T. (2009). Linked data-the story so far. International journal on semantic web and information systems, 5(3), 1-22. http://doi:10.4018/jswis.2009081901. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Boulton, G., Campbell, P., Collins, B., Elias, P., Hall, W., Laurie, G., & Walport, M. (2012). Science as an open enterprise. London, England: Royal Society. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Burkel, V. (2016). Environmental Health Tracking Rides the Open Data Wave. Journal of Environmental Health, 78(7), 36-38. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Campana, S., Scopigno, R., Carpentiero, G. & Cirillo, M. (Eds.) (2016). CAA2015. Keep The Revolution Going: Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress Archaeology. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carrion, D., Migliaccio, F., Minini, G., & Zambrano, C. (2015). Open Web Services: new tools for Medievalist Historians to manage and share their research work. Geomatics Workbooks, 12, 55-66. Retrieved from https://re.public.polimi.it/retrieve/handle/11311/980787/39679/FOSS4G-eu15_submission_119.pdf | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Creative Commons, (2018a). Homepage, Retrieved April 10, 2018 from https://creativecommons.org/. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Creative Commons, (2018b). About the licences, Retrieved April 10, 2018 from https://creativecommons.org/licenses/?lang=en. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Costa, S., Beck, A., Bevan, A., & Ogden, J. (2012). Defining and advocating open data in archaeology. In G.Earl, T. Sly, A. Chrysanthi, P. Murrieta-Flores, C. Papadopoulos, I. Romanowska & D. Wheatley (Eds.), Archaeology in the Digital Era: Proceedings of the 40th Annual Conference of Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) University of Southampton on 26-30 March 2012, I, (pp. 449-456) Amsterdam University Press: Amsterdam. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Dawes, S. S., Vidiasova, L., & Parkhimovich, O. (2016). Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 15-27. http://doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.01.003. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | De Reu, J., Plets, G., Verhoeven, G., De Smedt, P., Bats, M., Cherretté, B., & Van Meirvenne, M. (2013). Towards a three-dimensional cost-effective registration of the archaeological heritage. Journal of archaeological science, 40(2), 1108-1121. http://doi: 10.1016/j.jas.2012.08.040. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Gattiglia, G. (2009). Open Digital Archives in archeologia. Good practice. Archeologia e Calcolatori supplemento 2, 49-63. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Egger-Peitler I. & Polzer T. (2014). Open Data: European Ambitions and Local Efforts. Experiences from Austria. In M. Gascó-Hernández (Ed), Open Government. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 4. Springer, New York, NY. http://doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-9563-5_9. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Harris, E. (1989). Principles of archaeological stratigraphy. London. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kersten, T. P., & Lindstaedt, M. (2012, October). Image-based low-cost systems for automatic 3D recording and modelling of archaeological finds and objects. In M. Ioannides, D. Fritsch, J. Leissner, R. Davies, F. Remondino, & R. Caffo (Eds), Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation. EuroMed 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7616 (pp. 1-10). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. http://doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-34234-9_1. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Kitchin, R. (2014). The data revolution: Big data, open data, data infrastructures and their consequences. London: Sage. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Olson, B. R., Gordon, J. M., Runnels, C., & Chomyszak, S. (2014). Experimental three-dimensional printing of a lower Palaeolithic handaxe: an assessment of the technology and analytical value. Lithic Technology, 39(3), 162-172. http://doi: 10.1179/2051618514Y.0000000004. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Pergola, P., Spadea, G., Roascio, S., Dellù, E., Castiglia, G., Svevo, G., & Valente, R. (2014). Il complesso di San Calocero ad Albenga alla luce dei nuovi dati (campagna di scavo in concessione al Pontificio Istituto di Archeologia Cristiana del 2014). Rivista di Archeologia Cristiana, 90, 365-421. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Portalés, C., Alonso-Monasterio, P., & Viñals, M. J. (2017). 3D virtual reconstruction and visualisation of the archaeological site Castellet de Bernabé (Llíria, Spain). Virtual Archaeology Review (Vol. 8, No. 16, pp. 72-85). Universitat Politècnica de València. doi:https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2017.5890 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Richards, J. D., & Winters, J. (2015). Digging into Data: Open Access and Open Data. European Journal of Post-Classical Archaeologies, 5, 285-298. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Russo, M., Remondino, F., & Guidi, G. (2011). Principali tecniche e strumenti per il rilievo tridimensionale in ambito archeologico. Archeologia e calcolatori, 22, 169-198. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Samuelson, P. A. (1954). The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 36(4), 387-389. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Scopigno, R., Callieri, M., Dellepiane, M., Ponchio, F., & Potenziani, M. (2017). Delivering and using 3D models on the web: are we ready?. Virtual Archaeology Review (Vol. 8, No. 17, pp. 1-9). Universitat Politècnica de València. doi:https://doi.org/10.4995/var.2017.6405. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Spadea Noviero, G., Pergola, P., & Roascio, S. (2010). Albenga. Un antico spazio cristiano. Chiesa e monastero di San Calocero al Monte. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Trabucco, M. (2009). Pubblico ma non pubblico: prospettive normative sulla proprietà intellettuale dei dati archeologici. Archeologia e Calcolatori supplemento 2, 65-70. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Valente, R., Brumana, R., Oreni, D., Banfi, F., Barazzetti, L., & Previtali, M. (2017). Object-Oriented Approach for 3d Archaeological Documentation. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spatial Inf. Sci., XLII-2/W5,707-712. http://doi: 10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-707-2017. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wessels, B., Finn, R. L., Linde, P., Mazzetti, P., Nativi, S., Riley, S., Smallwood, R., Taylor, M. J., Tsoukala, V., Wadhwa, K. & Wyatt, S. (2014). Issues in the development of open access to research data. Prometheus: Critical Studies in Innovation, 32(1), 49-66. http://doi: 10.1080/08109028.2014.956505. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Wiley, D. (2014). The Access Compromise and the 5th R. Iterating toward openness. Retrieved December 13, 2015 from http://opencontent.org/blog/archives/3221. | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Zuiderwijk, A., & Janssen, M. (2014). Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison. Government Information Quarterly, 31(1), 17-29. http://doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003. | es_ES |