- -

A Multicriteria Decision Model for the Evaluation and Selection of Technologies in a R&D Centre

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

A Multicriteria Decision Model for the Evaluation and Selection of Technologies in a R&D Centre

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

Thumbnail
Nombre: 11458-46988-1-PB.pdf
Tamaño: 433.4Kb
Formato: PDF
Abrir
dc.contributor.author Lizarralde, R. es_ES
dc.contributor.author Ganzarain, J. es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2019-06-06T09:39:02Z
dc.date.available 2019-06-06T09:39:02Z
dc.date.issued 2019-06-05
dc.identifier.issn 2340-5317
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/121615
dc.description.abstract [EN] R&D Centres play a key role in the technology development process of industries, and therefore in their competitive strategies. They have responsibility in the identification, selection, acquisition, development and transfer of technology. Among these activities, the successful selection of new technologies is becoming a highly critical and complex challenge in the Technology Management Process. The problem of succeeding in the selection of new technologies is, from the methodological side, linked to heterogeneous key factors (technological, economic, human, and organisational). Many approaches deal with it by means of Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) techniques and tools. Nevertheless, most of the works are related to the selection of technologies in industrial cases and very few works have been found in the bibliography related to R&D Institutions and, in particular, Technological Centres. A model for the evaluation and decision about one or several technologies based on the MIVES (Modelo Integrado de Valor para Evaluaciones de Sostenibilidad) method is proposed. Introducing the motivations for using this method, after a review of the most used MCDM methods, and describing the structure of the model and the preliminary key parameters and relations among them. The proposed model is oriented to it’s application in the manufacturing sector, observing the particularities of the sector in the selection of the critical factors related to technology, R&D Centre and Industry. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.relation.ispartof International Journal of Production Management and Engineering
dc.rights Reconocimiento - No comercial - Sin obra derivada (by-nc-nd) es_ES
dc.subject Technology Selection es_ES
dc.subject R&D Centre es_ES
dc.subject MCDM es_ES
dc.subject MIVES es_ES
dc.subject Technology Management es_ES
dc.title A Multicriteria Decision Model for the Evaluation and Selection of Technologies in a R&D Centre es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.date.updated 2019-06-05T13:16:52Z
dc.identifier.doi 10.4995/ijpme.2019.11458
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Lizarralde, R.; Ganzarain, J. (2019). A Multicriteria Decision Model for the Evaluation and Selection of Technologies in a R&D Centre. International Journal of Production Management and Engineering. 7(Número Especial):101-106. https://doi.org/10.4995/ijpme.2019.11458 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod SWORD es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.4995/ijpme.2019.11458 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 101 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 106 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 7
dc.description.issue Número Especial
dc.identifier.eissn 2340-4876
dc.description.references Banuls, V.A., and Salmeron, J.L. (2006). A scenario-based assessment model - SBAM. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 74(6), 750-762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2006.05.015 es_ES
dc.description.references Brans, J.P., and Vincke, P. (1985). Note - A Preference Ranking Organisation Method. Management Science, 31(6), 647-656. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.31.6.647 es_ES
dc.description.references Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Lewin, A., Seiford, L.M. (1994). Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology and applications. Massachusetts: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0637-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Chen, S., Hwang, C., Beckmann, M., and Krelle, W. (1992). Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. New York: Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5 es_ES
dc.description.references Clausen, T.H., Korneliussen, T., and Madsen, E.L. (2013). Modes of innovation, resources and their influence on product innovation: Empirical evidence from R&D active firms in Norway. Technovation, 33(6-7), 225-233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2013.02.002 es_ES
dc.description.references Dalkey, N. C., and Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Management Science, 9(3), 458-467. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.9.3.458 es_ES
dc.description.references De la Concha, S. (2014). Horizonte2020, de la visión general a las oportunidades. XX y XXI Seminarios de Asesores de Proyectos de I+D de la Unión Europea. es_ES
dc.description.references Diffenbach, J. (1981). A compatibility approach to scenario evaluation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 19(2), 161-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(81)90013-5 es_ES
dc.description.references Dobbs, R., Manyika, J., and Roxburh, C. (2012). Manufacturing the future: The next era of global growth and innovation. McKinsey Global, (November). es_ES
dc.description.references Felipe, J., Aashish, M., and Changyong, R. (2014). Manufacturing Matters... but it's the Jobs that Count. Asian Development Bank Working Paper No. 420. es_ES
dc.description.references Gregory, M.J. (1995). Technology management - a process approach. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 209(5), 347-356. https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1995_209_094_02 es_ES
dc.description.references Grimaldi, M., Cricelli, L., Giovanni, M. Di, and Rogo, F. (2015). The patent portfolio value analysis: A new framework to leverage patent information for strategic technology planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 94, 286-302 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.10.013 es_ES
dc.description.references Guan, J.C., Yam, R.C.M., Tang, E.P.Y., Lau, A.K.W. (2009). Innovation strategy and performance during economic transition: Evidences in Beijing, China. Research Policy, 38(5), 802-812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.12.009 es_ES
dc.description.references Hartmann, M.H. (1999). Theory and practice of technological corporate assessment. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 17(4), 504-521. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.1999.002730 es_ES
dc.description.references Kaldor, N. (1967). Strategic Factors in Economic Development. Ithaca: New York State School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University. es_ES
dc.description.references McGrath, R.G., MacMillan, I.C. (2000). Assessing technology projects using real options reasoning. Research-Technology Management, 43(4), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2000.11671367 es_ES
dc.description.references Ordoobadi, S.M., Mulvaney, N.J. (2001). Development of a justification tool for advanced manufacturing technologies-value analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(2),157-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0923-4748(01)00033-9 es_ES
dc.description.references Phaal, R., Paterson, C.J., and Probert, D.R. (1998). Technology management in manufacturing business: process and practical assessment. Technovation, 18(8-9), 541-589. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4972(98)00026-1 es_ES
dc.description.references Phaal, R., Farrukh, C.J.P., and Probert, D.R. (2001). A framework for supporting the management of technological innovation. Engineering Department, University of Cambridge, 1-14. es_ES
dc.description.references Rohrbeck, R., Heuer, J., and Arnold, H. (2006). The Technology Radar - An instrument of technology intelligence and innovation strategy. ICMIT 2006 Proceedings - 2006 IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation and Technology, 2(September 2017), 978-983. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMIT.2006.262368 es_ES
dc.description.references Saaty, T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.21236/ADA214804 es_ES
dc.description.references Saaty, T.L. (1996). Decision Making with Dependence and Feedback, the Analytic Hierarchy Process, (RS Publications: Pittsburgh, PA). es_ES
dc.description.references Slowinski, G., Stanton, S.A., Tao, J.C., Miller, W., and McConnell, D.P. (2000). Acquiring external technologies, Res. Technol. Manag., 43(5), 29-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2000.11671378 es_ES
dc.description.references Tipping, J.W., Zeffren, E., Fusfeld, A.R. (1995). Assessing the value of your technology, Res. Technol. Manag., Vol. 38(5), 22-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.1995.11674292 es_ES
dc.description.references Viñolas, B., Cortés, F., Marques, A., Josa, A., and Aguado, A. (2009). MIVES: Modelo integrado de valor para evaluaciones de sostenibilidad. II Congrés Internacional de Mesura I Modelització de La Sostenibilitat, 1-24. es_ES
dc.description.references Willyard, C.H., McClees, C.W. (1987). Motorola's technology roadmap process, Res. Manag., 30(5), 13-19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00345334.1987.11757057 es_ES
dc.description.references Winebrake, J.J., Creswick, B.P. (2003). The future of hydrogen fueling systems for transportation: an application of perspective-based scenario analysis using the analytic hierarchy process, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(4), 359-384. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-1625(01)00189-5 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem