Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem
dc.contributor.author | Carman, John | es_ES |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-06-18T11:57:53Z | |
dc.date.available | 2019-06-18T11:57:53Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-06-18 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10251/122425 | |
dc.description.abstract | [EN] Increasingly across the globe, heritage agencies have taken on board the critique of heritage management enshrined in Smith’s (2006) argument about the dominance of an ‘authorised heritage discourse’ and the way this has been developed by other writers in the field. To this end, they are increasingly engaged in extending their work towards working with communities. This is highly commendable and contributes towards the sustainability of heritage as a category.What gets lost in the debates about community engagement and involvement, however, is any consideration of the nature or role of the heritage agency as a type of institution; and yet an understanding of the role of these institutions in the process is essential if we are truly to break away from limited, top-down, highly managerial conceptions of what heritage is for. It is not just a matter of organisations doing what they do in a more inclusive manner; it is more than them moving from positions of authority to acting as facilitators. There needs to be a clear understanding by all involved in the heritage process – including those who work for institutions – of how institutions function in relation to the object of their attention and others who have an interest in that object. | es_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | This paper is an amalgam of contributions to the Theoretical Archaeology Group conference in Cardiff in December 2017 and to the Heritage 2018 conference in Granada in June 2018 and I thank the organisers of the sessions at these for indulging my presence. I am very grateful to all those who listened patiently to the papers and responded positively. I am especially grateful to the anonymous referees for Heritage 2018 for their generous comments. Finally, thanks go to several of my PhD students – Sarah Howard, Gosia Trelka, and Hannah Clancy – who indirectly contributed to its content by their support for my style of thinking, and last but not least to my partner Patricia for unfailing support and invaluable critique. | es_ES |
dc.language | Inglés | es_ES |
dc.publisher | Universitat Politècnica de València | |
dc.relation.ispartof | VITRUVIO - International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability | |
dc.rights | Reconocimiento - No comercial (by-nc) | es_ES |
dc.subject | Heritage | es_ES |
dc.subject | Sustainability | es_ES |
dc.subject | Bureaucracy | es_ES |
dc.subject | Value | es_ES |
dc.title | What sustaining heritage really does | es_ES |
dc.type | Artículo | es_ES |
dc.date.updated | 2019-06-18T11:40:23Z | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2019.11772 | |
dc.rights.accessRights | Abierto | es_ES |
dc.description.bibliographicCitation | Carman, J. (2019). What sustaining heritage really does. VITRUVIO - International Journal of Architectural Technology and Sustainability. 4(1):1-10. https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2019.11772 | es_ES |
dc.description.accrualMethod | SWORD | es_ES |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://doi.org/10.4995/vitruvio-ijats.2019.11772 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpinicio | 1 | es_ES |
dc.description.upvformatpfin | 10 | es_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | es_ES |
dc.description.volume | 4 | |
dc.description.issue | 1 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 2444-9091 | |
dc.description.references | Adams, W M. (1990) Green Development: environment and sustainability in the Third World Routledge, London | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Berger, P. (1973) The Homeless Mind: modernisation and consciousness. Penguin, Harmondsworth | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carman, J. (1996) Valuing Ancient Things: archaeology and law. Leicester University Press, London | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carman, J. (2002) Archaeology and Heritage: an introduction. Continuum, New York and London | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carman, J. (2005) Against Cultural; Property: archaeology, heritage and ownership. Duckworth, London | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Carman, J, (2016) Archaeological; Resource Management: an international perspective. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139020473 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Darvill, T, (1987) Ancient Monuments in the Countryside: an archaeological management review. English Heritage Archaeological Report 5. English Heritage, London | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Douglas, M. (1986) How Institutions Think. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Dreyfus, H. & Rabinow, P. (1983) Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Högberg, A., Holtorf, C., May, S. & Wollentz, G. (2018) No future in archaeological heritage management? World Archaeology. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2017.1406398 [Accessed 31st January 2018] | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Holtorf, C. (1998) The past as a renewable resource. Arkeologen 5-6, 4-12 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | MacFarlane, R. (2000) Managing whole landscapes in the postproductive rural environment. In J F Benson and M H Roe (Eds) Landscape and sustainability. SPON Press, London | es_ES |
dc.description.references | McGimsey, C. R. (1972) Public Archaeology. Seminar Press, New York | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Rannikko, P. (1999) Combining social and ecological sustainability in the Nordic forest periphery. Sociologia Ruralis 39.3, 394-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00115 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Schwarz, M. & Thompson, M. (1990) Divided We Stand: redefining politics, technology and social choice., Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Selman, P. (2008) What do we mean by 'sustainable landscape'? Sustainability: Science, Practice and Policy 4.2: 23-28. http//:ejournal.nbii.org/archives/vol4iss2/communityessay.selman.html [Accessed 3 July 2009]. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2008.11908019 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Smith, L. (2006) Uses of Heritage. Routledge, London. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263 | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Smith, L. & Waterton, E. 2010. Heritage, Communities and Archaeology. Duckworth, London | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Startin, B. (1997) Assessment of field remains. In Hunter, J. & Ralston, I. (eds) Archaeological Resource Management in the UK: an introduction. 1st ed. Sutton, Stroud | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Sustainable Communities Task Force. (1993) Strategic Directions for Community Sustainability, a discussion paper for the citizens of British Columbia. British Columbia Round Table on the Environment and the Economy: Victoria BC | es_ES |
dc.description.references | Thomas, R. M. 2004. Archaeology and authority in England. In Merriman, N. (ed.) Public Archaeology. Routledge, London | es_ES |