- -

Evaluating climate change mitigation potential of hydrochars: compounding insights from three different indicators

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Evaluating climate change mitigation potential of hydrochars: compounding insights from three different indicators

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Owsianiak, Mikolaj es_ES
dc.contributor.author Brooks, Jennifer es_ES
dc.contributor.author Renz, Michael es_ES
dc.contributor.author Laurent, Alexis es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2019-07-03T20:02:23Z
dc.date.available 2019-07-03T20:02:23Z
dc.date.issued 2018 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1757-1693 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/123139
dc.description.abstract [EN] We employed life cycle assessment to evaluate the use of hydrochars, prospective soil conditioners produced from biowaste using hydrothermal carbonization, as an approach to improving agriculture while using carbon present in the biowaste. We considered six different crops (barley, wheat, sugar beet, fava bean, onion, and lucerne) and two different countries (Spain and Germany), and used three different indicators of climate change: global warming potential (GWP), global temperature change potential (GTP), and climate tipping potential (CTP). We found that although climate change benefits (GWP) from just sequestration and temporary storage of carbon are sufficient to outweigh impacts stemming from hydrochar production and transportation to the field, even greater benefits stem from replacing climate-inefficient biowaste management treatment options, like composting in Spain. By contrast, hydrochar addition to soil is not a good approach to improving agriculture in countries where incineration with energy recovery is the dominant treatment option for biowaste, like in Germany. Relatively small, but statistically significant differences in impact scores (ISs) were found between crops. Although these conclusions remained the same in our study, potential benefits from replacing composting were smaller in the GTP approach, which due to its long-term perspective gives less weight to short-lived greenhouse gases (GHGs) like methane. Using CTP as indicator, we also found that there is a risk of contributing to crossing of a short-term climatic target, the tipping point corresponding to an atmospheric GHG concentration of 450 ppm CO2 equivalents, unless hydrochar stability in the soil is optimized. Our results highlight the need for considering complementary perspectives that different climate change indicators offer, and overall provide a foundation for assessing climate change mitigation potential of hydrochars used in agriculture. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship M.O. and M.R. acknowledge the financial support of the European Commission under the Climate-KIC program; CHARM. A.L. and M.O. acknowledge financial support of European Commission under the seventh framework program; SME-2013-2: NEWAPP, grant agreement 605178. es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd. es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof GCB Bioenergy es_ES
dc.rights Reconocimiento (by) es_ES
dc.subject Biowaste es_ES
dc.subject Climate tipping es_ES
dc.subject Global temperature change potential es_ES
dc.subject Hydrothermal carbonization es_ES
dc.subject Life cycle assessment es_ES
dc.subject Waste management es_ES
dc.subject.classification QUIMICA INORGANICA es_ES
dc.title Evaluating climate change mitigation potential of hydrochars: compounding insights from three different indicators es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1111/gcbb.12484 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/605178/EU/New technological applications for wet biomass waste stream products/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Abierto es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Owsianiak, M.; Brooks, J.; Renz, M.; Laurent, A. (2018). Evaluating climate change mitigation potential of hydrochars: compounding insights from three different indicators. GCB Bioenergy. 10(4):230-245. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12484 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion http://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12484 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 230 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 245 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 10 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\367068 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder European Commission es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem