- -

Individual Well-Being, Geographical Heterogeneity and Social Capital

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Individual Well-Being, Geographical Heterogeneity and Social Capital

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

dc.contributor.author Neira-Gómez, Isabel es_ES
dc.contributor.author Bruna, Fernando es_ES
dc.contributor.author Portela, Marta es_ES
dc.contributor.author García Aracil, Adela es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-03-12T06:51:42Z
dc.date.available 2020-03-12T06:51:42Z
dc.date.issued 2018-04 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 1389-4978 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/138738
dc.description.abstract [EN] This paper argues the relevance of analysing the origins of contextual effects to explain subjective well-being (SWB). Using the 2012 European Social Survey, the study applies social capital indicators to distinguish between-context and between-individual heterogeneity in three multilevel models of happiness and life satisfaction. Five indicators of social capital at individual and regional level are used to measure the trust, networks and norms dimensions of social capital. Random intercept and random slope hierarchical models are used to control for unexplained regional variability. The possibility of aggregated subjective perceptions conditioning, or interacting with, the effects of individual perceptions is also examined. The results show that the regional means of the social capital indicators are useful in explaining not only average levels of SWB (between-context heterogeneity) but also differences in the importance individuals attribute to their social capital (between-individual heterogeneity). The paper also proposes a research agenda to expand the frontier on contextual effects in the new science of well-being. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship We are grateful to the participants of the Workshop of Socioeconomics and Economic Sociology (A Coruna 2016) and to anonymous referees for their helpful comments. The research for this paper was conducted as part of the research project ref. EDU-2013-45177-R 'Education, Employability and Empowerment of the Youth' (3E4Youth), funded by the National R&D Programme of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness. The views expressed in this paper are not necessarily the views of that organization es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Springer-Verlag es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Happiness Studies es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Happiness es_ES
dc.subject Life satisfaction es_ES
dc.subject Multilevel models es_ES
dc.subject Between-context es_ES
dc.subject Between individual es_ES
dc.subject European regions es_ES
dc.title Individual Well-Being, Geographical Heterogeneity and Social Capital es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1007/s10902-016-9840-z es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/MINECO//EDU2013-45177-R/ES/EDUCACION, EMPLEABILIDAD Y EMPODERAMIENTO DE LOS JOVENES/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Instituto de Gestión de la Innovación y del Conocimiento - Institut de Gestió de la Innovació i del Coneixement es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Neira-Gómez, I.; Bruna, F.; Portela, M.; García Aracil, A. (2018). Individual Well-Being, Geographical Heterogeneity and Social Capital. Journal of Happiness Studies. 19(4):1067-1090. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9840-z es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-016-9840-z es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 1067 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 1090 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 19 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\398920 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad es_ES
dc.description.references Andriani, L., & Christoforou, A. (2016). Social capital: A roadmap of theoretical and empirical contributions and limitations. Journal of Economic Issues, 50(1), 4–22. es_ES
dc.description.references Aslam, A., & Corrado, L. (2012). The geography of well-being. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(3), 627–649. es_ES
dc.description.references Ballas, D., & Tranmer, M. (2012). Happy people or happy places? A multilevel modelling approach to the analysis of happiness and well-being. International Regional Science Review, 35(1), 70–102. es_ES
dc.description.references Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B. M., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1), 1–48. es_ES
dc.description.references Bell, A., & Jones, K. (2015). Explaining fixed effects: Random effects modelling of time-series cross-sectional and panel data. Political Science Research and Methods, 3(1), 133–153. es_ES
dc.description.references Bjørnskov, C., & Sønderskov, K. M. (2013). Is social capital a good concept? Social Indicators Research, 114(3), 1225–1242. es_ES
dc.description.references Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (2004). Well-being over time in Britain and the USA. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7–8), 1359–1386. es_ES
dc.description.references Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research in the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Clark, A. E., & Oswald, A. J. (1994). Unhappiness and unemployment. Economic Journal, 104(424), 648–659. es_ES
dc.description.references Coleman, J. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Corrado, L., & Fingleton, B. (2012). Where is the economics in spatial econometrics? Journal of Regional Science, 52(2), 210–239. es_ES
dc.description.references Diener, E. (2016). Subjective well-being: Frequently answered questions. Web page: http://internal.psychology.illinois.edu/~ediener/faq.html . es_ES
dc.description.references Dolan, P., Peasgood, T., & White, M. (2008). Do we really know what makes us happy? A review of the literature on the factors associated with subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Psychology, 29(1), 94–122. es_ES
dc.description.references Dong, G., & Harris, R. (2015). Spatial autoregressive models for geographically hierarchical data structures. Geographical Analysis, 47(2), 173–191. es_ES
dc.description.references Dong, G., Harris, R. & Mimis, A. (2016). HSAR: An R Package for Integrated Spatial Econometric and Multilevel Modelling. GIS Research UK 2016 (GISRUK2016). University of Greenwich. Web page: https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/HSAR/ . es_ES
dc.description.references Duncan, C., Jones, K., & Moon, G. (1998). Context, composition and heterogeneity: Using multilevel models in health research. Social Science and Medicine, 46(1), 97–117. es_ES
dc.description.references Easterlin, R. A. (1974). Does economic growth improve the human lot? Some empirical evidence. In P. A. David, & M. W. Reder (Eds.), Nations and households in economic growth. Essays in honor of Moses Abramovitz (pp. 89–125). New York: Academic Press, Inc. es_ES
dc.description.references Easterlin, R. A. (2001). Income and happiness: Towards a unified theory. The Economic Journal, 11(473), 465–484. es_ES
dc.description.references ESS, European Social Survey (2012). ESS Round 6 Source Questionnaire. Northampton: Centre for Comparative Social Surveys, City University London. Web page: http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org . es_ES
dc.description.references Fazio, G., & Lavecchia, L. (2013). Social capital formation across space proximity and trust in European regions. International Regional Science Review, 36(3), 296–321. es_ES
dc.description.references Ferrer-i-Carbonell, A., & Frijters, P. (2004). How important is methodology for the estimates of the determinants of happiness? The Economic Journal, 114(497), 641–659. es_ES
dc.description.references Fine, B. (2010). Theories of social capital: Researchers behaving badly. New York: Pluto Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Frey, B. S., & Stutzer, A. (2002). Happiness and economics. Oxford: Princeton University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Gasper, D. (2004). Human well-being: Concepts and conceptualization. Helsinki: United Nations University, World Institute for Development Economics Research. es_ES
dc.description.references Goldstein, H., Browne, W., & Rasbash, J. (2002). Partitioning variation in multilevel models. Understanding Statistics, 1(4), 223–231. es_ES
dc.description.references Han, S. (2015). Social capital and subjective happiness: Which contexts matter. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(1), 241–255. es_ES
dc.description.references Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2008). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques. New York: Routledge. es_ES
dc.description.references Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1522 . es_ES
dc.description.references Hudson, J. (2006). Institutional trust and subjective well-being across the EU. Kyklos, 59(1), 43–62. es_ES
dc.description.references Inaba, Y. (2013). What’s wrong with social capital? Critiques from social science. In I. Kawachi, S. Takao, & S. Subramanian (Eds.), Global perspectives on social capital and health (pp. 323–342). New York: Springer. es_ES
dc.description.references Inglehart, R., Foa, R., Peterson, C., & Welzel, C. (2008). Development, freedom, and rising happiness. A global perspective (1981-2007). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(4), 264–285. es_ES
dc.description.references Layard, R. (2005). Happiness: Lessons from a new science. London: Penguin Books. es_ES
dc.description.references Maleckia, E. J. (2012). Regional social capital: Why it matters. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1023–1039. es_ES
dc.description.references Manski, C. F. (1993). Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies, 60(3), 531–542. es_ES
dc.description.references McMillan, D. W., & Chavis, D. M. (1986). Sense of community: A definition and theory. Journal of Community Psychology, 14(1), 6–23. es_ES
dc.description.references Mundlak, Y. (1978). Pooling of time-series and cross-section data. Econometrica, 46(1), 69–85. es_ES
dc.description.references OECD (2016). Better life initiative: Measuring well-being and progress. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Web page: http://www.oecd.org/statistics/measuring-well-being-and-progress.htm . es_ES
dc.description.references Paxton, P. (1999). Is social capital declining in the United States? A multiple indicator assessment. American Journal of Sociology, 105(1), 88–127. es_ES
dc.description.references Pierewan, A. C., & Tampubolon, G. (2014). Spatial dependence multilevel model of well-being across regions. Applied Geography, 47, 168–176. es_ES
dc.description.references Pittau, M. G., Zelli, R., & Gelman, A. (2010). Economic disparities and life satisfaction in European regions. Social Indicators Research, 96(2), 339–361. es_ES
dc.description.references Pooley, J. A., Cohen, L., & Pike, L. T. (2005). Can sense of community inform social capital? The Social Science Journal, 42(1), 71–79. es_ES
dc.description.references Portela, M., Neira, I., & Salinas-Jiménez, M. (2013). Social capital and subjective well-being in Europe: A new approach on social capital. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 493–511. es_ES
dc.description.references Puntscher, S., Hauser, C., Walde, J., & Tappeiner, G. (2015). The impact of social capital on subjective well-being: A regional perspective. Journal of Happiness Studies, 16(5), 1231–1246. es_ES
dc.description.references Putnam, R. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. es_ES
dc.description.references Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster. es_ES
dc.description.references Rampichini, C., & d’Andrea, S. (1997). A hierarchical ordinal probit model for the analysis of life satisfaction in Italy. Social Indicators Research, 44(1), 41–69. es_ES
dc.description.references Rodríguez-Pose, A., & von Berlepsch, V. (2014). Social capital and individual happiness in Europe. Journal of Happiness Studies, 15(2), 357–386. es_ES
dc.description.references Sabatini, F. (2008). Social capital and the quality of economic development. KYKLOS, 61(3), 466–499. es_ES
dc.description.references Schyns, P. (2002). Wealth of nations, individual income and life satisfaction in 42 countries: A multilevel approach. Social Indicators Research, 60(1/3), 5–40. es_ES
dc.description.references Scrivens, K., & Smith, C. (2013). Four interpretations of social capital: An agenda for measurement. OECD Statistics Working Papers, 2013/06. Paris: OECD Publishing. es_ES
dc.description.references Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (2012). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publishers. es_ES
dc.description.references Stanca, L. (2010). The geography of economics and happiness: Spatial patterns in the effects of economic conditions on well-being. Social Indicators Research, 99(1), 115–133. es_ES
dc.description.references Veenhoven, R. (2000). The four qualities of life: Ordering concepts and measures of the good life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 1(1), 1–39. es_ES
dc.description.references Veenhoven, R. (2009). Well-being in nations and well-being of nations: Is there a conflict between individual and society? Social Indicators Research, 91(1), 5–21. es_ES
dc.description.references Westlund, H., Rutten, R., & Boekema, F. (2010). Social capital, distance, borders and levels of space: Conclusions and further issues. European Planning Studies, 18(6), 965–970. es_ES
dc.description.references Yuan, H. (2016). Structural social capital, household income and life satisfaction: The evidence from Beijing, Shanghai and Guangdong-Province. China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 17(2), 569–586. es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem