- -

Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods

RiuNet: Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Politécnica de Valencia

Compartir/Enviar a

Citas

Estadísticas

  • Estadisticas de Uso

Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

Ficheros en el ítem

[Cerrado]
Nombre: Chulvi;Mulet;Chak ...
Tamaño: 816.3Kb
Formato: PDF
Descripción: Versión editorial
Solicitar una copia al autor
dc.contributor.author Chulvi Ramos, Vicente es_ES
dc.contributor.author Mulet Escrig, Elena es_ES
dc.contributor.author Chakrabarti, A. es_ES
dc.contributor.author López-Mesa, Belinda es_ES
dc.contributor.author González-Cruz, María-Carmen es_ES
dc.date.accessioned 2020-03-16T14:46:44Z
dc.date.available 2020-03-16T14:46:44Z
dc.date.issued 2012 es_ES
dc.identifier.issn 0954-4828 es_ES
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10251/138956
dc.description.abstract [EN] This work analyses the influence of several design methods on the degree of creativity of the design outcome. A design experiment has been carried out in which the participants were divided into four teams of three members, and each team was asked to work applying different design methods. The selected methods were Brainstorming, Functional Analysis, and SCAMPER method. The 'degree of creativity' of each design outcome is assessed by means of a questionnaire offered to a number of experts and by means of three different metrics: the metric of Moss, the metric of Sarkar and Chakrabarti, and the evaluation of innovative potential. The three metrics share the property of measuring the creativity as a combination of the degree of novelty and the degree of usefulness. The results show that Brainstorming provides more creative outcomes than when no method is applied, while this is not proved for SCAMPER and Functional Analysis. © 2012 Copyright Taylor and Francis Group, LLC. es_ES
dc.description.sponsorship The present research has been partially funded by the Fundacio Caixa Castello - Bancaixa (P1.1B2010-51). es_ES
dc.language Inglés es_ES
dc.publisher Taylor & Francis es_ES
dc.relation.ispartof Journal of Engineering Design es_ES
dc.rights Reserva de todos los derechos es_ES
dc.subject Creativity es_ES
dc.subject Design methods es_ES
dc.subject Novelty and usefulness es_ES
dc.subject Design method es_ES
dc.subject Work analysis es_ES
dc.subject Functional analysis es_ES
dc.subject Problem solving es_ES
dc.subject Design es_ES
dc.subject.classification PROYECTOS DE INGENIERIA es_ES
dc.title Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods es_ES
dc.type Artículo es_ES
dc.identifier.doi 10.1080/09544828.2011.624501 es_ES
dc.relation.projectID info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/UJI//P1·1B2010-51/ es_ES
dc.rights.accessRights Cerrado es_ES
dc.contributor.affiliation Universitat Politècnica de València. Departamento de Proyectos de Ingeniería - Departament de Projectes d'Enginyeria es_ES
dc.description.bibliographicCitation Chulvi Ramos, V.; Mulet Escrig, E.; Chakrabarti, A.; López-Mesa, B.; González-Cruz, M. (2012). Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods. Journal of Engineering Design. 23(4):241-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.624501 es_ES
dc.description.accrualMethod S es_ES
dc.relation.publisherversion https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2011.624501 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpinicio 241 es_ES
dc.description.upvformatpfin 269 es_ES
dc.type.version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion es_ES
dc.description.volume 23 es_ES
dc.description.issue 4 es_ES
dc.relation.pasarela S\230539 es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Fundació Caixa Castelló - Bancaixa es_ES
dc.contributor.funder Universitat Jaume I es_ES
dc.description.references Alves, J., Marques, M. J., Saur, I., & Marques, P. (2007). Creativity and Innovation through Multidisciplinary and Multisectoral Cooperation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16(1), 27-34. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00417.x es_ES
dc.description.references Chakrabarti , A. Towards a measure for assessing creative influences of a creativity technique . International conference on engineering design, ICED 03 , Edited by: Folkeson , A. , Gralen , K. , Norell , M. and Sellgren , U. pp. 157 – 158 . Stockholm , Sweden. Scotland : The Design Society . es_ES
dc.description.references CHAKRABARTI, A., SARKAR, P., LEELAVATHAMMA, B., & NATARAJU, B. S. (2005). A functional representation for aiding biomimetic and artificial inspiration of new ideas. AI EDAM, 19(02). doi:10.1017/s0890060405050109 es_ES
dc.description.references Groger, I., Sander, W., & Wirth, W.-D. (1990). Experimental phased array radar ELRA with extended flexibility. IEEE Aerospace and Electronic Systems Magazine, 5(11), 26-30. doi:10.1109/62.63160 es_ES
dc.description.references GONZÁLEZ CRUZ, M. C., AGUILAR ZAMBRANO, J. A., AGUILAR ZAMBRANO, J. J., & GARDONI, M. (2008). LA ESTRATEGIA DE CREATIVIDAD SISTEMÁTICA TRIZ CON EQUIPOS MULTIDISCIPLINARES DE DISEÑO DE PRODUCTO. DYNA INGENIERIA E INDUSTRIA, 83(1), 337-352. doi:10.6036/1937 es_ES
dc.description.references López-Mesa, B., Mulet, E., Vidal, R., & Thompson, G. (2009). Effects of additional stimuli on idea-finding in design teams. Journal of Engineering Design, 22(1), 31-54. doi:10.1080/09544820902911366 es_ES
dc.description.references Mulet , E. and Vidal , R. Classification and effectiveness of different creative methods in design problems . 13 International conference on engineering design ICED'01 . August 21–23 , Glasgow . Townbridge, Wiltshire , UK : The Crombell Press . es_ES
dc.description.references Peeters, M. A. G., van Tuijl, H. F. J. M., Reymen, I. M. M. J., & Rutte, C. G. (2007). The development of a design behaviour questionnaire for multidisciplinary teams. Design Studies, 28(6), 623-643. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2007.06.004 es_ES
dc.description.references Sarkar , P. and Chakrabarti , A. Development of a method for assessing design creativity . International conference on engineering design (ICED07) . Paris , France es_ES
dc.description.references Schütze, M., Sachse, P., & Römer, A. (2003). Support value of sketching in the design process. Research in Engineering Design, 14(2), 89-97. doi:10.1007/s00163-002-0028-7 es_ES
dc.description.references Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111-134. doi:10.1016/s0142-694x(02)00034-0 es_ES


Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem